Title: Evaluation Results of the Prepaid Mental Health Demonstration: Year 7 Areas 1 and 6 Briefing for the
1Evaluation Results of the Prepaid Mental Health
Demonstration Year 7 - Areas 1 and 6Briefing
for the Substance Abuse and Mental Health
CorporationAugust 4, 2004
- David L. Shern, Ph.D.
- and the Evaluation Team
- Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute
2Framing Evaluation Questions
- What are the implementation issues related to
systems redesign and expansion? - What is the impact of managed care on Medicaid
enrollees - Access to care?
- Health and mental health status?
- Costs of care?
3Financial Risk Arrangements
4Integrated Sub-Studies
- Implementation Analysis
- Review of Contracts
- Surveys of Key Informants and Stakeholders
- Administrative Data
- Medicaid Enrollment and FFS Claims
- Managed Care Encounter Data
- Pharmacy Claims Data
- Global Functioning Measures for Service Users
- Adults with SMI Intensive Interview Study
- Mental Health Status and Satisfaction Data
- Social Cost Analysis
- Medicaid General Population Mail Survey
5Description of the Provider Networks
- Area 6
- HMOs primarily use the 5 main Community Mental
Health Centers in the area - All Fee-For-Service in the beginning
- Shifted to capitation over time, but some
- Fee-For-Service still present
- PMHP uses the same 5 Community Mental Health
Centers - stable structure over time - Use risk adjusted capitation to Community Mental
Health Centers
6 Area 6 Funding Streams as of 4/04
Agency for Health Care Administration
SA, SIPP, FACT, BHOS, STFC, Comprehens.
Assessment
FHP/VO
AmG
HE
STAY
UHC
MG
MHC
WBH
UBH
Northside
Medicaid enrollees not eligible for managed care
PR
WH
AssociateProv.
Community Mental Health Centers
Providers
Other Providers
Solid line Capitation Dotted line Fee for
service
7Provider Networks
- Area 1
- The PMHP and HMO have different provider networks
- Fee-For-Service for HMO Relationships
- Capitation for PMHP
8 Area 1 Funding Streams as of 6/04
Agency for Health Care Administration
SA, SIPP, FACT, BHOS, STFC, Comprehens.
Assessment
ABH LVC
HE
WCBH
BW
Medicaid enrollees not eligible for managed care
COPE
Providers (excluding LV)
Associate Providers
Providers
Solid line Capitation Dotted line
Fee-for-service
9What Have We Learned?
10The HMO Business Arrangements Have been
Accompanied by Greater Instability and Complexity
in Organizational Arrangements
11Organizational Structure Funding Streams as of
1/00
Agency for Health Care Administration
St.A.
FL 1st
PHP
HE
STAY
PCA
UHC
ALP
FHP
MG
Value Options
MHC
MAG
WEL
APS
Horizon
UBH
CBC
Northside
MHC (CMHC)
BHM
PR
MHC (CMHC)
WH
AssociateProv.
Community Mental Health Centers Other Providers
12 Area 6 Funding Streams as of 3/02
Agency for Health Care Administration
FHP/VO
ST.A
FL 1st
PHP
HE
STAY
UHC
MG
MHC
UBH
CBC
HZ
Northside
PR
CMHC
WH
AssociateProv.
Community Mental Health Centers
Other Providers
Black FFS Blue Outpatient capped only
Red Outpatient Inpatient capped Dotted line
Risk Sharing
13 Figure 6. Area 6 Funding Streams as of 4/04
Agency for Health Care Administration
SA, SIPP, FACT, BHOS, STFC, Comprehens.
Assessment
FHP/VO
AmG
HE
STAY
UHC
MG
MHC
WBH
UBH
Northside
Medicaid enrollees not eligible for managed care
PR
WH
AssociateProv.
Community Mental Health Centers
Providers
Other Providers
Solid line Capitation Dotted line Fee for
service
14Implementation of Managed Care Has Not Resulted
in Improved Access to Services
15Average 6-Month Penetration for Carve-Out
Services Areas 1, 2, and 4
Case Mix Adjusted
16Average Annual Penetration for Carve-Out Services
Only Areas 6, 4 and 7
Case Mix Adjusted
17People with Schizophrenia enrolled in HMOs,
which are at risk for pharmaceutical expenses,
are less likely to receive atypical antipsychotic
medications
18Atypical Penetration Areas 4 6 Adult
Schizophrenia Diagnosis Only
19 - Enrollees are Receiving Fewer Services or Less
Intensive Services in the Managed Care Conditions - HMO Enrollees Receive Fewer Services than Persons
in the PMHP
20PMPM Standard Costs by Category Areas 1, 2 4
(Case Mix Adjusted)
21PMPM Standard Costs by Category Areas 6, 4 and
7 (Case Mix Adjusted)
22Reduced Intensity of Services has Generally Not
Been Associated with Poorer Outcomes for Managed
Care EnrolleesYouth in Area 1 Require Further
Study to Explain Poor Outcomes
23Change in Predicted GAF Score Over Time For Ages
21-64 in Areas 1, 2, and 4 (n5,278)
Financing Conditions differ p lt.001 Time p lt
.001 Interaction - NS
24Based on Our Social Cost Analysis, Reduced
Intensity of Services for Medicaid-Funded
Services May be Offset by Higher Expenditures by
Other Payers
25Case-Mix Adjusted Annualized Costs for Adults
with Severe Mental Illnesses
Medicaid costs include health care and
transportation. Other public costs include off
budget health care cost, housing subsidies, legal
service, and volunteer cost. Private costs
include informal service provided by
families/friends, earned income, and out of
pocket fee if earned income equal to zero.
26Service and Organizational Recommendations
27Service Recommendations
- Set Access Targets for Carve-Out Services at
Pre-Implementation Levels at a Minimum in All
Areas - Assure that the Service Network is Adequate to
Provide Services to Persons with More Severe
Illnesses
28Service Recommendations
- Assure Provision of Evidence Based Care for both
Treatment and Rehabilitation - Fidelity Measurement
- Benchmarked Outcome Data
- Explore Methods to Appropriately Expand Consumer
Knowledge about and Direction of Care - Particularly for Persons with More Chronic Care
Needs
29Organizational Recommendations
- Implement Strategies to Independently Assure
Adequacy of Data for System Monitoring - Anticipate the Loss of Outcome Data for Networks
Like those Used in Area 1 HMO - Investigate Methods for Independently Collecting
Encounter Data Including Sources of Care from
Other Public and Private Payers
30Organizational Recommendations
- Assure Readiness to Provide Comprehensive Mental
Health Benefits - Demonstrated Capacity in MIS
- Demonstrated Management Capacity for
Authorization and Payment - Adequate Transition Strategies and Ramp-up Time
31Organizational Recommendations
- AHCA Should Develop, Test and Implement a Method
to Assure Compliance with the 80 Rule - Incomplete Encounter Data Frustrates Adequate
Monitoring - Consider Expanding Range of Carve-Out Services to
Limit Cost Shifting within Medicaid Budgets - Carefully Monitor Access to Specialized Services
for Managed Care Enrollees - Exclude Pharmacy Benefit and Explore other
Methods to Control Pharmacy Costs - Include Substance Abuse Services with Adequate
Capitation Rate
32Organizational Recommendations
- Coordinate Efforts with DCF and Other Relevant
Providers (Child Welfare, JJ, etc.) to - Reduce Cost Shifting Among Public Payers
- Assure Most Effective and Efficient Delivery
Strategies
33Framing Evaluation Questions
- What are the implementation issues related to
systems redesign and expansion - What is the impact of managed care on Medicaid
enrollees - Access to care
- Health and mental health status
- Costs of care
34Table 9. Annualized Formal Costs for Health
Services On and Off Budget (Adjusted)
Health services include general medical, vision
and dental care excluding transportation.
Significant at the 5 percent level.
Significant at the 1 percent level.
35Managed Care Arrangements, Particularly in the
HMO Condition, have been Accompanied by
Consistent and Significant Problems with
Encounter Data - Frustrating Accountability
36If Managed Care is to Accomplish its Goal of
Giving More to the State through Greater
Efficiency and Effectiveness of Management, We
Must Get More from Managed Care
37Service and Organizational Recommendations
38Service Recommendations
- Set Access Targets for Carve-Out Services at
Pre-Implementation Levels at a Minimum in All
Areas - Assure that the Service Network is Adequate to
Provide Services to Persons with More Severe
Illnesses
39Service Recommendations
- Assure Provision of Evidence Based Care for both
Treatment and Rehabilitation - Fidelity Measurement
- Benchmarked Outcome Data
- Explore Methods to Appropriately Expand Consumer
Knowledge about and Direction of Care - Particularly for Persons with More Chronic Care
Needs
40Organizational Recommendations
- Implement Strategies to Independently Assure
Adequacy of Data for System Monitoring - Anticipate the Loss of Outcome Data for Networks
Like those Used in Area 1 HMO - Investigate Methods for Independently Collecting
Encounter Data Including Sources of Care from
Other Public and Private Payers
41Organizational Recommendations
- Assure Readiness to Provide Comprehensive Mental
Health Benefits - Demonstrated Capacity in MIS
- Demonstrated Management Capacity for
Authorization and Payment - Adequate Transition Strategies and Ramp-up Time
42Organizational Recommendations
- AHCA Should Develop, Test and Implement a Method
to Assure Compliance with the 80 Rule - Incomplete Encounter Data Frustrates Adequate
Monitoring - Consider Expanding Range of Carve-Out Services to
Limit Cost Shifting within Medicaid Budgets - Carefully Monitor Access to Specialized Services
for Managed Care Enrollees - Exclude Pharmacy Benefit and Explore other
Methods to Control Pharmacy Costs - Include Substance Abuse Services with Adequate
Capitation Rate
43Organizational Recommendations
- Coordinate Efforts with DCF and Other Relevant
Providers (Child Welfare, JJ, etc.) to - Reduce Cost Shifting Among Public Payers
- Assure Most Effective and Efficient Delivery
Strategies