DOE-UltraScience Net ( - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

DOE-UltraScience Net (

Description:

OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ... OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY. In Summary. Only at layer-1 do you get: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: willi314
Learn more at: http://www.internet2.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: DOE-UltraScience Net (


1
DOE-UltraScience Net ( network infrastructure)
Update
  • JointTechs Meeting
  • February 15, 2005
  • W. R. Wing

2
Motivation - DOE Needs Extreme Networking
  • 160-200 Gbs throughput by 2008
  • Probably only achievable by circuit bonding
  • 0.1 packet re-order and jitter control
  • Probably only achievable at SONET layer
  • Line rate, provably-secure, connections
  • Only available at SONET or optical layer

3
The Well Known Bandwidth Problem
  • DOE needs 160 - 200 Gbs by 2008
  • Typical multi-stream throughput limited to 25/-
    Gbs, and programming multi-steam is hard - hero
    efforts yield 30 Gbs
  • Typical single-steam throughput to a single
    application 1Gbs, even on a tuned network - hero
    effort yields 5-6 Gbs
  • Networks will soon offer 40 Gbs channels
  • Firewalls throw it away anyway

4
Even Without Firewalls -We Have a Technology
Problem
DOE needs 160-200 Gbs by 2008 This is
on the blue line This isnt a problem
routers are going to fix - bonded IP
channels ONLY work with VERY large
numbers of streams (as Teragrid has
discovered) Bonding at layer-2 (Ethernet)
is just as bad Solution is circuit
switching and Layer-1 bonding
5
Jitter Control
  • Needed to deconstruct data sets, needed for
    remote vis, and for remote instrument control or
    steering
  • Routers and switch-routers are path
    deterministic, but not time-deterministic
  • Only at layer-1 (or SONET) do you get
    time-determinism

6
Security
  • Security requirements will get more and more
    onerous
  • Solutions involving IPSec, VPNs, and encryption
    have more and more trouble running at line speed
  • Alternate solution is to use optical/SONET
    circuits with provable, known end-points and
    inherent immunity to injected traffic
  • Again - only available at layer-1

7
In Summary
  • Only at layer-1 do you get
  • Zero packet re-ordering
  • Zero jitter
  • Zero drops due to Congestion
  • Known (by definition) paths and end points
  • SONET (or below) can do this
  • Ethernet switches and switch/routers cant
  • MPLS cant
  • Layer-1 circuits can
  • Bypass firewalls
  • Carry non-IP frames (e.g., Fiber-Channel over
    SONET)
  • Easily (transparently) support parallel, bonded
    circuits

8
MPLS Jitter - ORNL / Atlanta
9
How do we get there from here?
  • It requires a research network we control at
    least down to the SONET layer
  • It requires a research network with significant
    span
  • It requires a research network with at least two
    lambdas

10
UltraScience Net Research Testbed
  • Building an extended-regional lambda-switching
    testbed
  • Connect to NLR in Atlanta and Chicago
  • Use asset-trading to extend reach (Sunnyvale and
    East Coast)
  • Provide an evolving matrix of switching
    capabilities
  • Separately fund research projects (e.g.,
    high-performance protocols, control,
    visualization) that will exercise the network and
    directly support applications at the host
    institutions

11
In More Detail -
12
Connections to National Nets
ORNL
ORNL-TVA
13
Research Projects
  • A progression of switching approaches
  • Study/compare SONET, MPLS(GMPLS), and all optical
  • New all-optical technologies coming (e.g., laser
    tuning)
  • Fast Local Storage
  • Storage Depots
  • Transport-optimized storage
  • Progression of experimental point-to-point
    transport technologies
  • Fiber channel
  • Infiniband
  • LAN-PHY Ethernet initial transport
  • Circuit-Switched backbone, Frame-Switched edge

14
Digression LAN-PHY vs. WAN-PHY
  • Conventional Wisdom LAN-PHY will win
  • Cheaper, faster, etc. (based on POS experience)
  • False cost model (extra processing)
  • Ignore SONET advantages
  • New Transponders are transparent
  • Software selectable OC192 (WANPHY) or LANPHY
  • Costs now equal
  • Advantage now WAN-PHY
  • DCC and OAM non-trivial considerations

15
PoS vs. Ethernet
16
Status and Schedule
  • All contracts signed
  • Fiber, Co-Lo space and power, equipment and
    installation, smart-hands
  • Equipment shipping, built-out started
  • Chicago-Sunnyvale paced by NLR cross-connects in
    Chicago (Level(3) to Starlight)
  • NLR supplying 10Gig-E (LAN-PHY) initially
  • PNNL fiber schedule will pace their connection
  • First Chicago-Sunnyvale traffic this month
  • Details on following VuGraphs -

17
Phase-1 (February)
18
Phase-2 (February-March)
19
Phase-3 (March - April)
20
Phase-4 (April - May)
21
Thank You
http//www.csm.ornl.gov/ultranet
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com