Title: Steve Bollens1,2, Jeffrey Cordell3, Sean Avent1, and Rian Hooff1
1 Zooplankton Invasions Occurrences, Causes and
Consequences Two Case Studies from the Northeast
Pacific
- Steve Bollens1,2, Jeffrey Cordell3, Sean Avent1,
and Rian Hooff1 - 1Romberg Tiburon Center for Environmental Studies
and Department of Biology, San Francisco State
University - 2Moss Landing Marine Laboratories, California
State University - 3Fisheries Research Institute, School of Aquatic
and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington
2Acknowledgements
- Field and Lab Darren Gewant (SFSU), Anne
Slaughter (SFSU), Dave Purkerson (SFSU), Harmon
Brown (SFSU), and Alison Sanders (SFSU), Mikelle
Rasmussen (UW), Olga Kalata (UW), Bill Couch
(UW), Crew and Scientists of the RV Polaris
(USGS) -
- Discussions and Advice Bruce Frost (UW), Wim
Kimmerer (SFSU) , Gretchen Rollwagen Bollens (UC
Berkeley) and Jim Cloern (USGS) -
- WA State Sea Grant, LMER, CALFED, EPA, NSF,
ONR
3Outline
- Review the current state of research on biology
of non- indigenous/invasive zooplankton - Present overview of two on-going research
projects as case studies - Pseudiodiaptomus inopinus in Pacific
Northwest estuaries - Tortanus dextrilobatus in San Francisco Bay
- III. Recommendations for Future Research
4Terminology
Figure1. The eight colonizer types shown as the
result of the proposed classification scheme.
According to this scheme, Types 1,2 5, and 6 can
be considered successional colonizers, Types 3
and 7 can be considered novel, non-invasive
colonizers and Types 4 and 8 can be considered
novel, invasive Colonizers. It is recommended
that the word invader be used for colonizer Types
4 and 8. From M.A. Davis and K. Thompson (2000).
5Non-Indigenous Zooplankton ASFA/OA Literature
Review (taxa/publications)
6Non-Indigenous Zooplankton ASFA/OA Literature
Review (taxa/publications)
7Non-Indigenous Zooplankton ASFA/OA Literature
Review (taxa/publications)
8Non-Indigenous Zooplankton ASFA/OA Literature
Review (taxa/publications)
9Non-Indigenous Zooplankton ASFA/OA Literature
Review (taxa/publications)
10Non-Indigenous Zooplankton ASFA/OA Literature
Review (taxa/publications)
11Non-Indigenous Zooplankton ASFA/OA Literature
Review (taxa/publications)
12Non-Indigenous Zooplankton ASFA/OA Literature
Review (taxa/publications)
13Non-Indigenous Zooplankton ASFA/OA Literature
Review (taxa/publications)
14Non-Indigenous Zooplankton ASFA/OA Literature
Review (taxa/publications)
15Pseudodiaptomus Picture
Pseudodiaptomus inopinus
16(No Transcript)
17(No Transcript)
18Abundance of Pseudodiaptomus inopinus in relation
to salinity in seven Pacific northwest estuaries
1000
750
P. inopinus (no. m-3)
500
250
0
0
5
10
15
Salinity (psu)
19Chehalis River Prey Selection Experiments
20Diet of Invertebrate Predators, Chehalis River,
7/98 11/99
Neomysis n 243 predators n 562 prey
Crangon juveniles n 667 predators n 1,272 prey
21Pseudodiaptomus inopinus Vertical
Distribution Chehalis River at 6 PSU Bottom
Salinity
Surface (1)
Mid (2)
Weighted Mean Depth
Bottom (3)
0600
1200
0600
0600
1200
1200
1800
1800
1800
0000
0000
Time
22Percent Contribution (by weight) of Neomysis in
Fish Diets, Chehalis River, 7/98 11/99
23Percent Contribution (by weight) of Neomysis in
Fish Diets, Chehalis River, 7/98 11/99
24Percent numerical composition of copepods across
salinity gradient in fourteen west coast
estuaries without Pseudodiaptomus inopinus
gt 10 psu
0 psu
Paracalanus sp.
E. americana
Cyclopidae
Corycaeus sp.
P. inopinus
Acartiura spp.
Acartia tonsa
E. affinis
Oithona similis
Other Copepods
25Percent numerical composition of copepods across
salinity gradient in fourteen west coast
estuaries without Pseudodiaptomus inopinus
Percent numerical composition of copepods across
salinity gradient in seven west coast estuaries
with Pseudodiaptomus inopinus
gt 10 psu
0 psu
Paracalanus sp.
E. americana
Cyclopidae
Corycaeus sp.
P. inopinus
Acartiura spp.
Acartia tonsa
E. affinis
Oithona similis
Other Copepods
26Percent numerical composition of copepods across
salinity gradient in seven west coast estuaries
with Pseudodiaptomus inopinus
gt 10 psu
0 psu
Paracalanus sp.
E. americana
Cyclopidae
Corycaeus sp.
P. inopinus
Acartiura spp.
Acartia tonsa
E. affinis
Oithona similis
Other Copepods
27Tortanus dextrilobatus
28(No Transcript)
29(No Transcript)
30(No Transcript)
31Prey Selectivity of Tortanus dextrilobatus
Four replicates per treatment (_at_ rep 2
predators and 10 of each prey in 1 L jar)
32Change in Zooplankton Community Composition, 1980
v. 1997
33San Francisco Bay Zooplankton (gt500 µ) Composition
1997
1998
1999
34Summary of Case Studies
- Pseudodiaptomus inopinus
- First observed in the Northeast Pacific in 1990
- Broadly distributed in Washington and Oregon
coastal river estuaries - Abundant (lt 800 m-3) in the low salinity zone
(2-6 psu) - Predators show neutral selection between this and
native copepods in experiments - Vertical distribution is closely associated with
the bottom during the day - Important prey item of the bentho-pelagic
invertebrates, but not pelagic fishes, in the
Chehalis River - Suggestive of ecosystem change from pelagic to
bentho-pelagic production? -
35Summary of Case Studies
-
- Tortanus dextrilobatus
-
- First observed in San Francisco Bay in 1992
- Broadly distributed in San Francisco Bay
- Abundant (lt 104 m-3) in both North and South Bays
- Selects larger, native copepods over smaller, NIS
copepods in experiments - Is one of several other NIS copepods that has
resulted in a dramatic change in community - composition in SF Bay in last 20 yrs.
- Implications for higher trophic levels and
ecosystem productivity currently unknown
36Recommendations for Future Research
Occurrences We need to keep looking (e.g., Evadne
spinifera in Port Hueneme, CA) Causes Wide
variety of vectors and mechanisms of dispersal
under study. Larger role for molecular
genetics. Consequences Impacts at the community
and ecosystem levels are particularly
understudied (or simply absent?) Modeling
and experimental manipulation (e.g., enclosures)
could be fruitful
37Ongoing Projects
Thin Layers
ONR