Title: Mapping Poverty for the Millennium Development Goals and related initiatives
1Mapping Poverty for the Millennium Development
Goals (and related initiatives)
- Deborah Balk
- Columbia University
- 28 April 2003
2What have we learned in 10 years?
- Basic Question Where do people live?
- Ten years ago, the answer was nationally
delineated - Now it is delineated by over 250,000 smaller
areas - Characteristics of the population
- Urban vs. rural
- Indicators of population well-being
- Mortality
- Underweight
- Poverty
- How much more will we know, in a regional or
globally consistent fashion, in another 10 years?
3Gridded Population of the World
- First developed in c. 1996, revised in 2000, and
currently under revision - Substantial improvements in inputs each revision
- Additional years of population estimation
- Best-available collection of spatially
disaggregated population estimates - Distributes administrative population across a
raster surface (or grid) - 2.5 arc-minutes (4.5 km) resolution
- Allows aggregation of population by any other
spatial phenomenon (land cover, ecosystems, etc.)
Columbia Universityin the City of New York
4GPW Version 1 19,000 units globally 2,200 in
Africa
Population Density
Persons per sq. km
0
0.1 - 5
5.1 - 25
25.1 - 250
250.1 - 500
500.1 - 43,086.8
5GPW Version 2 127,000 units globally 6,000 units
in Africa
Population Density
Persons per sq. km
0
0.1 - 5
5.1 - 25
25.1 - 250
250.1 - 500
500.1 - 43,086.8
6GPW Version 3 250,000 units globally 102,000
units in Africa (81,000 in South Africa)
Population Density
Persons per sq. km
0
0.1 - 5
5.1 - 25
25.1 - 250
250.1 - 500
500.1 - 87,157.6
7Use in health applications in Africa
- Estimates of malaria mortality and morbidity
(Snow et al.) - Estimate 1 million deaths in 1995 estimated due
to malaria and 200 million clinical events - Combined GPW with endemicity (and other) data
- Project human and tsetse fly population
distribution to 2040 (Reid et al.) - Human population growth causes loss of fly
habitat - Pop growth affects subspecies differently
- Model human-fly interactions based on
species-specific behavior - Estimate that by 2040 the fly population will
decline throughout Africa but an area as large as
Europe will remain infested - Combine GPW with fly pop data
- Analysis of malaria and economic growth (Gallup
and Sachs) - Used GPW to estimate population density within
100 km a coastline--to proxy for access to
transportation - Despite the strong correlation between poverty
and malaria, and the strong impacts of malaria on
the economy, the causal mechanism are unclear
8Who lives where urban and rural areas
- Combine
- GPW administrative units
- Urban areas from
- Lights at night satellite data (DMSP derived
time-stable lights) - Digital Chart of the World, pilotage charts for
parts of Africa - Population estimates for places (points) from
census sources - NB UN Demographic Yearbook collects these only
to places of 100K or more - Results in resolution about 4x higher than GPW
- 30 arc-seconds
- Three data products
- Points
- Urban-rural mask
- Population Surface (grid)
9Rationale
- GPW is a good start, but there remains an unmet
need for better data indicating the spatial
distribution of human population - Especially indicating urban areas or localized
settlements - Population and extent thereof
- Prior data sets do not indicate urban extent to
this accuracy - Approach does not need to adopt a what is urban
definition, although users could ultimately apply
one - For use in analysis of
- economic development
- demographic change (including urbanization)
- hazards
- global change
- agriculture
10Basic Steps
- Find places with their
- Population size
- Geographic co-ordinates
- Estimate
- Population to the target years (1990, 1995 and
2000) - Urban boundaries
- Aggregate
- Population data to urban agglomerates
- Derive population grid reallocated to urban areas
- Validate with administrative pop data
11Input sources
- Population data
- National statistical offices for censuses, in
most cases - Other authoritative sources
- Coordinate data
- NIMA, in most cases
- National survey agencies or geospatial units of
stats offices - Other atlases (usually for validation, only)
- Extent data
- NOAAs Night-time lights (OLS) satellite data, in
most cases - DCW, TPC or other polygons
- Administrative boundary data
- National statistical or mapping agencies or
regional partners - E.g, CIAT
12Points
Step 1 Estimate pop of places for target years
13 Night-time lights
Step 2 Derive polygons of urban extent (no
threshold applied)
14 Create circles where lights are absent
- The night-time lights disfavor economically
poorer regions of the world - Thus, reliance on the lights only in Africa, for
example, will yield far fewer urban extents than
is necessary - We, therefore, use a regression analysis to
predict the geographic size of an area based on
the population size of that area - Continental-specific regressions
- Pulls data-poor and data-rich countries alike
- Create a circle for the urban area
- Predict the circles radius
15The results Population Density, 1995
- Compare GPW with the urban rural output for a
part of W. Africa
GPW
Urban-Rural
16Urban Rural Points
Populated Places
3,830 places (36 1 million )
38 - 1,000,000
1,000,001 - 7,645,936
17Lights from DMSP (this is what youd get if you
used only the night time lights)
Lights with population
18Urban Areas (includes areas for which we
predicted areas)
Population Density
Persons per sq. km
0 - 1,000
1,001 - 10,000
19(No Transcript)
20(No Transcript)
21Urban Rural Surface
Population Density
Persons per sq. km
0
0.1 - 5
5.1 - 25
25.1 - 250
250.1 - 500
500.1 - 87,157.6
22Improvement from GPW
- Starting resolution is pretty good
- Level 2, although that varies
- But the number of polygons increase considerably
- The lower the starting resolution the greater the
room for improvement - Up to 5x (in the number of polygons) for Cameroon
23Quantifying the improvement
- Thinner curve represents GPW thicker curve
represents U-R - 40 percent of the population lives on only 6
percent of the land area rather than occupying
closer to 15 percent of the land area - The inset histogram shows a multimodal
distribution of population density, with roughly
a third of Ecuadors population living at
densities below 100 persons per square kilometer,
another third living between 100 to 1000 persons
per square kilometer, and the remaining third
above 1000 persons per square kilometer. Ecuador
has a relatively small proportion of the
population living at densities considered highly
urban by international standards (i.e., 10,000
persons per square kilometers).
Lorenz curves with the distributions of
cumulative population and land areas, in Ecuador
24Are the places in the correct location? Use roads
overlay with urban areas
- Greyish blobs are urban areas from our database
- Irregular/rougher shapes are derived from
night-time lights - Circles are estimated from a regression
- Green lines are roads
- Use VMAP to overlay the roads
- Good match for places found
- Unknown for places not found
25Estimates of coastal populations
GPW shown with coastal buffers of 50 and 100 km
26Improved estimates of coastal population
Urban-rural shown with coastal buffers of 50 and
100 km
27Estimates of coastal populations
- At 50 km there are some substantial differences
in the population estimates - This will increase with coarser admin data
- Urban-rural does much better here (regardless of
the difference)
28Does estimating the coastal population matter?
- At risk of certain hazards
- Better access to ports and markets
- Coastal dwellers tend to be less poor
- Coastal areas grow differently (face more
constraints) - Are urban dwellers disproportionately coastal
dwellers? - Well be able to answer that soon.
29Mapping Development Indicators
- First two MDG indicators selected
- Infant mortality
- Underweight (Hunger)
- Integrate data from surveys
- Demographic Health Surveys (DHS)
- UNICEFs Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys
(MICS) - African Nutrition Database Initiative (ANDI)
- UNDP Human Development Reports
- Construct geographies to match the surveys
- Although these surveys have been around for a
while, use in a GIS is (more or less) new - Between the several survey types coverage is
becoming increasing complete, spatially and
temporally
30(No Transcript)
31(No Transcript)
32What do these all have in common?
- Underlying spatial data infrastructure that makes
the transformation of census or survey data
possible - Significant Institutional collaborations (among
others!) - GPW
- UC Santa Barbara/NCGIA
- UN Environmental Program
- World Resources Institute IFPRI
- US Census Bureau
- Urban Rural
- International Food Policy Research Institute
(IFPRI) - Center for International Agriculture of the
Tropics (CIAT) - WCMC Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA)
- Poverty Maps
- World Bank
- World Resources Institute
- UNEP-GRID
- CG centers (IFPRI, CIAT, ILRI)
- Macro International
33Whats next
- Poverty maps
- Health infrastructure maps
- These will allow for analysis of mortality or
malnutrition outcomes with health service
provision, access to services, and underlying
poverty
34Poverty maps
- Supplement the small-area estimation approach
based on income which require extensive income
and expenditure survey data - Construct asset indicators
- First at the same geographic-level as the IMR and
Hunger maps shown - Compare these with income indicators
- In data rich and data poor countries
- Determine replicability with a variety of
assets since surveys vary in measurements of
assets - Determine whether scale of output is useful as it
will be coarser than the small-area estimate
approach
35Recent Poverty Mapping Workshop
- Agreement that a confluence of approaches will
help us to better - scrutinize poverty profiles (geographic,
occupational, demographic) to identify
characteristics of the poor that are common
across countries - evaluation of definitions of poverty transient
vs. chronic, absolute versus relative - Fitness-of-use guidelines
- Determine which approaches work where and which
are appropriate for what types of analysis and
policy inferences
36In less than ten years
- We went from a map of global population
distribution at the national level (with about
250 units) to one with 1000 times as many - Many institutional partners and data sharing
model - Many uses in health and environmental studies and
policy - Thus, with the same model and commitment, poverty
mappingalthough more complexwill look much
different 10 years from now. - For more info, contact dbalk_at_ciesin.columbia.edu