Title: Measuring%20the%20Impact%20of%20Networked%20Electronic%20Services:%20Developing%20Assessment%20Infrastructure%20for%20Libraries,%20State,%20and%20Other%20Types%20of%20Consortia
1Measuring the Impact of Networked Electronic
Services Developing Assessment Infrastructure
for Libraries, State, and Other Types of Consortia
- Presented By
- Terry Plum, Simmons GSLISBrinley Franklin,
University of ConnecticutMartha Kyrillidou, ARL
Gary Roebuck, ARL - Raynna Bowlby, ARL Consultant Simmons
GSLISMaShana Davis, ARL Kristina Justh, ARL
Library Assessment Conference 2008 University of
Washington Seattle, WA
2ARL New Measures Toolkit StatsQUAL
3What is MINES?
- Action Research
- Historically rooted in indirect cost studies
- Set of recommendations for research design
- Set of recommendations for web survey
presentation - Set of recommendations for information
architecture in libraries - Plan for continual assessment of networked
electronic resources - An opportunity to benchmark across libraries
4What is MINES? (contd)
- Measuring the Impact of Networked Electronic
Services (MINES) - MINES is a research methodology that measures the
usage of networked electronic resources of a
library or consortium by a specific category of
the patron population. - MINES is a Web-based survey form consisting of 5
questions that is administered at the time of
transaction. - MINES measures
- User status and discipline/affiliation (who)
- Physical location (where)
- Primary purpose and reason of use (why)
- MINES a part of Association of Research
Libraries New Measures Assessment Initiatives
(since 2003). - MINES is different from other electronic resource
usage measures that quantify total usage (e.g.,
Project COUNTER, E-Metrics) or measure how well a
library makes electronic resources accessible
(LibQUAL).
5Early Data Collection Activities
Data was collected at seven main campus libraries
and seven academic health sciences libraries in
the U.S. between 2003 and 2005.
- Academic Medical Libraries
- U of Connecticut Health Center
- U of North Carolina
- U of Texas Medical Branch
- U of Texas Southwestern
- U of Utah
- U of Virginia
- Washington U
- Main Universities
- U of Colorado
- U of Connecticut
- U of North Carolina
- Oregon State U
- U of Utah
- U of Virginia
- Washington U
6Early Data Collection Activities
- More than 45,000 networked electronic services
uses were surveyed. - At each library, the MINES survey was one
component of a comprehensive cost analysis study
that assigned all library costs to sponsored
research, instruction/education/non-sponsored
research, patient care, other sponsored
activities and other activities.
7Recent Data Collection Activities via ARL
- Ontario Council of University Libraries (OCUL)
- University of Iowa Libraries
- University of Macedonia
8Questions Addressed
- How extensively do sponsored researchers use the
new digital information environment? - Are researchers more likely to use networked
electronic resources from inside or outside the
library? - Are there differences in usage of electronic
information based on the users location (e.g.,
in the library on-campus, but not in the
library or off-campus)? - What is a statistically valid methodology for
capturing electronic services usage both in the
library and remotely through web surveys? - Are particular network configurations more
conducive to studies of digital libraries patron
use?
9Questions Addressed by OCUL Implementation
- How extensively do sponsored researchers use
OCULs Scholars Portal? How much usage is for
non-funded research, instruction/education,
student research papers, and course work? - Are researchers more likely to use the Scholars
Portal from inside or outside the library? What
about other classifications of users? - Are there differences in Scholars Portal based on
the users location (e.g., in the library
on-campus, but not in the library or
off-campus)? - Could MINES, combined with usage counts, provide
an infrastructure to make Scholars Portal usage
studies routine, robust, and easily integrated
into OCULs administrative decision-making
process for assessing networked electronic
resources?
10MINES for Libraries Survey FormFive Questions
and a Comments Box
11Methodological ConsiderationsExperience with
the MINES Survey
- Terry Plum
- Assistant Dean
- Simmons GSLIS
Library Assessment Conference 2008 University of
Washington Seattle, WA
12Issues with Web surveys
- Research design
- Coverage error
- Unequal access to the Internet
- Internet users are different than non-users
- Response rate
- Response representativeness
- Random sampling and inference
- Non-respondents
- Data security
13MINES Strategy
- A representative sampling plan, including sample
size, is determined at the outset. Typically,
there are 48 hours of surveying over 12 months at
a medical library and 24 hours a year at a main
library. - Random moment/web-based surveys are employed at
each site. - Participation is usually mandatory, negating
non-respondent bias, and is based on actual use
in real-time. - IRB waiver or approval
- Libraries with database-to-web gateways or proxy
re-writers offer a comprehensive networking
solution for surveying all networked services
users during survey periods.
14MINES Strategy
- Placement
- Point of use
- Not remembered, predicted or critical incident
- Usage rather than user
- What about multiple usages
- Time out ?
- Cookie or other mechanism with auto-population or
more recently counting invisibly with a time out.
- Distinguish patron association with libraries.
- For example, medical library v. main library.
- But what if the resources are purchased across
campus for all. Then how to get patron
affiliation?
15Web Survey Design Guidelines
- Web survey design guidelines that MINES followed
- Presentation
- Simple text for different browsers no graphics
- Different browsers render web pages differently
- Few questions per screen or simply few questions
- Easy to navigate
- Short and plain
- No scrolling
- Clear and encouraging error or warning messages
- Every question answered in a similar way -
consistent - Radio buttons, drop downs
- ADA compliant
- Introduction page or paragraph
- Easy to read
- Must see definitions of sponsored research.
- Can present questions in response to answers
for example if sponsored research was chosen,
could present another survey
16Quality Checks
- Target population is the population frame
surveyed the patrons who were supposed to be
surveyed - except in libraries with outstanding
open digital collections. - Check usage against IP. In this case, big
numbers may not be good. May be seeing the
survey too often. - Alter order of questions and answers,
particularly sponsored and instruction. - Spot check IP against self-identified location
- Spot check undergraduates choosing sponsored
research measurement error - Check self-identified grant information against
actual grants - Content validity discussed with librarians and
pre-tested. - Turn-aways number who elected not to fill out
the survey - Library information architecture -- Gateway v.
HTML pages there is a substantial difference in
results.
17(No Transcript)
18Documenting the Purpose and Use of Electronic
ResourcesExperience with the MINES Survey
- Brinley Franklin
- Vice Provost for University Libraries
- University of Connecticut
Library Assessment Conference 2008 University of
Washington Seattle, WA
19It is useless to tell the acquisitions librarian
that half the monographs ordered will never be
used, unless we can specify which 50 to avoid
buying. (Galvin and Kent, 1977)
20Reliance on Vendor Statistics
Vendor statistics, while more reliable than
in the past, are still maturing.
21Measuring Digital Content Use
- The most popular current method of measuring
usage of electronic resources by libraries is not
through web-based usage surveys, but through
vendor supplied data of library patron usage or
transaction usage. - Web-based usage surveys are increasingly relevant
in the collection of usage data to make
collection development and service decisions, to
document evidence of usage by certain patron
populations, and to collect and analyze
performance outputs. - Brinley Franklin and Terry Plum, Successful Web
Survey Methodologies for Measuring the Impact of
Networked Electronic Services (MINES for
Libraries) IFLA Journal 32 (1) March, 2006
22Measuring Digital Content Use
- A web-based transactional survey that collects
data on users demographics and their purpose of
use. It is administered in real time over the
course of at least a year using a random moments
sampling plan. - MINES for Libraries has been administered at 40
North American universities in the last four
years. More than 100,000 North American
networked services users have been surveyed using
a standard protocol.
23Library User Survey
24Library User Survey Patron Status
25Library User Survey Affiliation
26Library User Survey Location
27Library User Survey Purpose
28Sample Survey Data File Generated
- Other UConnInstruction/Education/Departmental
(Non-Funded) Researchhttp//newfirstsearch.oclc.or
g/donerefererdbnameWorldCatautho100122319FSI
P12365012/3/2004Off CampusUConn
Faculty12.101.104.84 - Family StudiesInstruction/Education/Departmental
(Non-Funded) Researchhttp//www.jstor.org/cgi-bin/
jstor/gensearch12374312/3/2004Off CampusUConn
Undergraduate Student12.101.104.84Non-UConnOther
Activitieshttp//homerweb.lib.uconn.edu/cgi-bin/Pw
ebrecon.cgi?DBlocalPAGEFirst13084112/3/2004Of
f CampusNon-UConn12.18.36.40 - Non-UConnInstruction/Education/Departmental
(Non-Funded) Researchhttp//magic.lib.uconn.edu/in
dex_real.html13312912/3/2004Off
CampusNon-UConn12.76.131.246 - Non-UConnOther Activitieshttp//magic.lib.uconn.ed
u/index_real.html12110612/3/2004Off
CampusNon-UConn130.132.86.156Agriculture
Natural ResourcesInstruction/Education/Departmenta
l (Non-Funded) Researchhttp//magic.lib.uconn.edu/
index_real.html12335712/3/2004 - Off CampusNon-UConn131.128.89.54EducationInstructi
on/Education/Departmental (Non-Funded)
Researchhttp//www.euromonitor.com/womdas/125744
12/3/2004 - Off CampusNon-UConn134.241.135.70Non-UConnInstruct
ion/Education/Departmental (Non-Funded)
Researchhttp//homerweb.lib.uconn.edu/cgi-bin/Pweb
recon.cgi?DBlocalPAGEFirst13285212/3/2004 - Off CampusNon-UConn134.74.42.82Business
AdministrationOther Activitieshttp//homerweb.lib.
uconn.edu/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?DBlocalPAGEFirs
t12564612/3/2004In the LibraryUConn
Faculty137.99.1.122 - Liberal Arts SciencesOther Activitieshttp//www.
siam.org/journals/simax/simax.htm12521712/3/2004
On Campus - StorrsUConn Graduate
Student137.99.1.122 - EngineeringInstruction/Education/Departmental
(Non-Funded) Researchhttp//homerweb.lib.uconn.edu
/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?DBlocalPAGEFirst120431
12/3/2004On Campus - StorrsUConn Graduate
Student137.99.1.219 - Business AdministrationInstruction/Education/Depar
tmental (Non-Funded) Researchhttp//proquest.umi.c
om/pqdweb?RQT31812163312/3/2004On Campus -
StorrsUConn Graduate Student137.99.100.105 - Business AdministrationInstruction/Education/Depar
tmental (Non-Funded) Researchhttp//www.jstor.org/
journals/07322399.html12165212/3/2004On Campus
- StorrsUConn Graduate Student137.99.100.105 - Business AdministrationInstruction/Education/Depar
tmental (Non-Funded) Researchhttp//homerweb.lib.u
conn.edu/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?DBlocalPAGEFirst
12295312/3/2004On Campus - StorrsUConn Graduate
Student137.99.100.175 - Business AdministrationInstruction/Education/Depar
tmental (Non-Funded) Researchhttp//homerweb.lib.u
conn.edu/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?DBlocalPAGEFirst
12484112/3/2004On Campus - StorrsUConn Graduate
Student137.99.100.175 - Business AdministrationInstruction/Education/Depar
tmental (Non-Funded) Researchhttp//proquest.umi.c
om/login?COPTSU5UPTAmVkVSPTImREJTPTE3MjErMysxNkJD
clientId4899612042312/3/2004On Campus -
StorrsUConn Graduate Student137.99.100.175
29MINES for Libraries
Demographics by Location of User U.S. Main
Libraries
On Campus, Not in the Libraryn 6,391
Inside the Libraryn 9,172
Off-Campus n 4,953
30MINES for Libraries
Demographics by Location of User Ontario
Council of University Libraries
Off-Campus n 9,163
On Campus, Not in the Library n 7,090
Inside the Library n 4,047
31Purpose of Use
Are users engaged in coursework, funded (or
unfunded) research, public service,
patient care, or other activities?
32MINES for Libraries
Purpose of Use by Location U.S. Main Campus
Libraries 2003-05
In the Library n 9,733
On-Campus, Not in the Library n 9,460
66
Overall Use n 26,983
Off-Campus n 7,790
72 of sponsored research usage of electronic
resources occurred outside the library 83 took
place on campus.
33MINES for Libraries
Purpose of Use OCUL Scholars Portal Users
In a sample of 20,300 electronic resources uses
at OCUL Libraries, there were four uses outside
the library for each use in the library.
34Analysis
- Web deliverables
- Cross-tabulations in HTML for all institutional
data - Interactive crosstabs for all institutional
- Print deliverables
- Summary tables
- Final report
35(No Transcript)
36Web Interface
37OCUL Scholars Portal Usage Affiliation
38OCUL Scholars Portal Usage User Status
39OCUL Scholars Portal UsageLocation
40OCUL Scholars Portal UsagePurpose of Use
41Cross Tabulations Affiliation by Purpose of Use
42Cross Tabulations User Status by Purpose of Use
43Cross TabulationsLocation by Purpose of Use
44OCUL Scholars Portal Usage Reason for Use
45(No Transcript)
46(No Transcript)
47(No Transcript)
48Resources
- Web interface
- http//minesforlibraries.org
- ARL New Measures and Assessment Initiatives
MINES for Libraries - http//www.arl.org/stats/initiatives/mines/index.
shtmlplace - Articles Presentations
- http//www.arl.org/stats/initiatives/mines/minesr
esources.shtml
49Contact Us
- ARL Staff
- MaShana Davis, Technical Communications Liaison
- Martha Kyrillidou, Director, ARL Statistics and
Service Quality Programs - Gary Roebuck, Technical Operations Manager
- Project Management
- Brinley Franklin, Vice Provost for University
Libraries, University of Connecticut Libraries - Toni Olshen, Business Librarian, Peter F.
Bronfman Business Library, York University - Terry Plum, Assistant Dean for Technology and
Director, Simmons Graduate School of Library and
Information Sciences
50Questions