Title: Design of Infrastructure Development in North Korea: A Practical Approach
1Design of Infrastructure Development in North
Korea A Practical Approach
- March 2008
- Kim, Won Bae
- KRIHS
21. Rationale for Development Assistance
- To bring North Korea into dialogue so as to seek
a peaceful solution for nuclear problems - To induce North Korea to reform by helping the
recovery of the North Korean economy - To facilitate inter-Korean economic cooperation
and to build an integrated economy in the Korean
peninsula - To promote regional economic cooperation and
develop infrastructure networks in Northeast Asia
32. Preconditions for Infrastructure Assistance
- North Korea must give up its nuclear ambition
(the six-party-talks should render development
assistance to North Korea) - North Korea embarks economic reforms and opening
policy. - North Korea establishes genuine coexistence with
South Korea. - North Korea, however, can maintain its polity and
retains self-defense capability at least until
2020.
43. The importance of infrastructure in the North
Korean economy
- Food, energy and transportation are three
shortages - Food shortage can be relieved through
institutional reform and other measures (UN and
NGOs role would be significant here) - Energy shortage needs to be addressed quickly in
order to make production activities normal - Transportation is essential for the development
of the North Korean economy and it is critical
for the integration of North Korea into the
regional economy
53.1 Status of infrastructure in North Korea
- Rail Composed of east and west lines due to
topography, 10 arterial railways - Road Composed of five axes, supplementing the
rail system - Ports Underdeveloped and 8 major trade ports
- Airports 33 airports but only one international
airport - Energy Dilapidated facilities with
inefficiencies - Communication Networks centered on Pyongyang,
mostly manual exchange system
(Units 10,000 ton, Km , 10,000kW, 100 million
kWh)
Source NSO. 2005. ?Comparison of South and North
Koreas Socio-Economic Profile?.
63.2 Assessment of Infrastructure in the North
- Huge gaps between the South and the North in
terms of quantity and quality of infrastructure - Infrastructure stock value of NK is less than 1
of SK according to our estimation - On the whole, North Koreas level approximates
South Koreas mid 1970s - This poses a great obstacle to the recovery of
the North Korean economy and to the construction
of infrastructure networks in Northeast Asia
74. Demand for Infrastructure
- Three types of demands
- Type I Bilateral exchanges such as SK-NK and
NK-China - Type II Transit trade such as China or Russia
using NK transport facilities to trade with third
countries - Type III Domestic demand
84.1 Demand Assessment
95. Practical Approach to Infrastructure
- Collaborative approach is more effective
- Two or three-way collaboration first under the
six-party-talks framework and then multilateral
collaboration - Encourage international consortium of public
and/or private firms - International financial institutions support and
private project financing when North Korea
embarks on major reforms
105.1 Interests in Infrastructure Development
Assistance by Country
115.2 Inter-Korean Projects in progress
- Inter-Korean cooperation projects include rail
and road connections at Gyeongui and Donghae
lines, Kaesong industrial park, and Guemgangsan
tourism area - - 2007 Inter-Korean Summit added a few more
projects - Any further infrastructure investments in North
Korea require strong economic justifications and
national consensus in SK
125.2.1 Projects suggested by 2007 Inter-Korean
Summit
135.3 China-N. Korea Projects under discussion
- Rajin port development
- Rajin-Hunchun road
- New bridge over the Aprok river
- Pyongyang thermo power plant
- Most of these projects are related to Chinas
needs and some are packaged with natural
resources development in NK
145.4 Russia-N. Korea Projects under discussion
- Khasan-Rajin rail renovation
- Oil delivery through rail and refining at Sonbong
- Vladivostok-Chongjin electricity
- In the longer term, oil and natural gas pipelines
and TSR-TKR connection - Most of these projects are related to Russias
interest in earning income by exporting oil,
electricity and natural gas as well as by using
its transport facilities in the RFE
155.5 Problems of Bilateral Approach
- Rent-seeking by Pyongyang regime
- Unnecessary competition and duplication of
efforts by neighboring countries - Fragmented projects without coordination and loss
of efficiency - Not conducive to forging regional cooperation in
NEA
166. Economic Justifications for Infrastructure
Development
- In the short run, insufficient demand for most
projects except for a few small-scale
cross-border transport projects - Benefit-cost ratio unlikely to exceed 1
- When NK embarks major economic reforms and
opening, BC ratio will increase due to the rise
of inter- and intra-country demand for
infrastructure
177. Basic Directions for Infrastructure Building
- Multilateral approach combined with bilateral
approach - Demand-serving and yet considering the
supply-side effects - Flexible approach taking into account of larger
issues and changing circumstances - Matching with SKs long-term territorial
development goals
187.1 Basic Design for Infrastructure
- H-design composed of four corners (six later) and
three transport axes (east, west, and horizontal)
to lift up the North Korean economy and connect
to the regional economies of NEA - Six pockets of growth points to push the economy
forward
197.2 Phased Approach
- 1st phase four corners and partial connection
with neighbors - 2nd phase completion of three axes and six
growth points - 3rd phase completion of networks
- Timetable would be 2008-2012 for the 1st,
2013-2020 for the 2nd, 2021- for the 3rd phase.
But this timetable may change depending on the
conditions to be satisfied or not
207.3 Reasons for Phased Approach
- It is assumed that security issues will be
resolved one way or another by 2012 - 2012 is the year of presidential election in S.
Korea - Even small-scale projects takes minimum of 4-5
years to complete - 2020 is the target year of S. Koreas 4th
territorial development plan
217.4 H-Design Infrastructure
228. Lifting up the Economy with Four Corners
- Shinuiju, Kaesong, Guemgangsan, and Rason are the
four corners where cross-border exchanges have
been occurring - These are natural anchor points to lift NK
economy in the first stage and they have a
special status - Neighboring countries have some interest in these
areas - Bold measures are required to give them
sufficient momentum
238.1 Reinventing the Four Corners
- Shinuiju gateway city to China
- Kaesong international enterprise zone (mostly
for S Koreans now) - Guemgangsan international tourist zone (mostly
for S Koreans now) - Rason transit trade center
248.2 Two Additional Growth Points
- Nampo export-processing zone that will be turned
into a hi-tech center (esp, environment
technology) - Wonsan a center of logistics and shipbuilding in
the east sea rim as well as a hinterland city for
Guemgang-Seorak international tourist zone
258.3 Assumptions in the H-design
- Even if North Korea takes a bold switchover, its
economy would not grow rapidly if major economic
reforms are not taken. Furthermore, reforms may
not guarantee a success - In this basic design, we assume the best possible
scenario, i.e., a successful economic transition
t0
t6
t24
Successful reform
Failed reform
268.4 Corresponding industrial development in the
North
- Phases of industrial development in the North are
assumed to follow - Export of light industry goods, primary goods and
tourism and transit trade in the first phase
(border cities) - Export of selected heavy industry goods with some
technology, international logistics, and
IT-related services in the second phase (coastal
cities) - Export of intermediate goods with knowledge
components and knowledge services in the third
phase (large cities)
279. Selecting Priority Projects
- Given the variable constraints, e.g., political
and financial, priority projects need to be
identified - Priority projects should satisfy multiple
purposes of infrastructure building - Selected projects should play a catalyst role for
NEA infrastructure networks building
289.1 Selection Criteria for Priority Projects
- Revealed or potential demand (C1)
- Economic effects on the NK economy (C2)
- Geo-economic integration of the peninsula (C3)
- Contributions to regional cooperation (C4)
- Ease of acceptance by NK (C5)
- Acceptability and willingness of assistance by
neighbors (C6) - Possibility of financing (C7)
299.2 Priority Projects and Assessment
H high, M medium, L low
309.2 Priority Projects and Assessment
H high, M medium, L low
319.2 Priority Projects (1st Phase)
- Infrastructure development in the nodal points
- Rajin- Hunchun/Khasan road
- Rajin-Khasan rail, Khasan-Rajin oil delivery and
Sungri petro-plant - Rajin port renovation
- Dandong-Sinuiju new bridge electricity
- Vladivostok-Cheongjin electricity
- Second stage Kaesong Industrial Park
- Anbyun Shipbuilding yard
329.3 Catalyst Projects
- For multi-party collaboration
- ? Rajin-Khasan and Rajin-Tumen rail renovation
plus oil delivery, Rajin port renovation and
industrial park (costing about 0.5 bil.) - ? Sinuiju special zone, new bridge and
expansion of electricity supply (0.7 bil) - Inter-Korean projects
- ? 2nd phase Kaesong industrial park (0.5
bil), Mt. Baekdu tourism, Anbyun shipbuilding,
and mineral resources development
339.3.1 Tumen River Area
- - Rail and road connections among China, NK, and
Russia - Rajin as a logistic hub for Tumen River area
- TRADP as a useful mechanism
349.3.2 Crude Oil Delivery thru Rail
- 56km rail renovation from Khasan to Rajin
costing about 200 mil. - Russia supplies crude oil and imports refined
products
359.3.2 Sinuiju Special Zone
-Special zone, new bridge, and increased
electricity supply from Soopoong dam - costing
about 700 mil.
3610. Investment Needs for Infrastructure
Construction
- Estimates vary depending on assumptions, ranges
from 20 bil. to 700 bil. - KRIHS study adopted two methods (ratio of
infrastructure stock over GNI and ICOR) - Over 14 year period (2007-2020), estimates for
investment needs for infrastructure range between
18 - 42 bil. dollars (1.3 3 bil.per year)
3710.1 Public Capital Mobilization
- 3 - 4 billion possible per year at least for 10
years if NK takes a bold switch-over policy - - SK 1-2 billion
- - Japan 1 billion
- - US a few hundred million
- - Other six party members a few hundred
million - - EU and other countries a few hundred
million - Compare with the costs of Iraq war
3811. Institutional Arrangements for Infrastructure
Projects
- Maximize the opportunities for collaboration with
neighboring countries (i.e., UNDP TRADP) - KIEDO (Korean Peninsula Infrastructure
Economic Dev. Org.) can be considered during the
resolution process of security issues (in the
first phase) - Special trust fund can be set up at the World
Bank in the second stage to coordinate
infrastructure and development assistance to NK - In the long run, ideas of NEADB or NEAIC can be
considered for the NEA region including North
Korea - Or international financial institutions can be
utilized when North Korea meets the requirements
3911.1 KIEDO Structure
4010.1 Institutional Arrangement for the 1st Phase
TRADP
4110.2 Institutional Arrangement for the transition
between 2nd and 3rd Phase
4210.2 Institutional Arrangement for the 3rd Stage
4311. Remaining Issues
- Needs assessment reflecting NKs reality and
priorities - Synchronizing with NKs economic reform and
opening policy - Coordinating bilateral projects
- Setting up a channel for establishing KIEDO in
the 6PT
44Thank you for your attention
- Narrow path, thick brush and evening dew will
not deter us as long as we believe we are not
wrong - From Tao Yuanming