Design of Infrastructure Development in North Korea: A Practical Approach - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 44
About This Presentation
Title:

Design of Infrastructure Development in North Korea: A Practical Approach

Description:

Rail: Composed of east and west lines due to topography, 10 arterial railways ... Inter-Korean cooperation projects include rail and road connections at Gyeongui ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:85
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: naut
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Design of Infrastructure Development in North Korea: A Practical Approach


1
Design of Infrastructure Development in North
Korea A Practical Approach
  • March 2008
  • Kim, Won Bae
  • KRIHS

2
1. Rationale for Development Assistance
  • To bring North Korea into dialogue so as to seek
    a peaceful solution for nuclear problems
  • To induce North Korea to reform by helping the
    recovery of the North Korean economy
  • To facilitate inter-Korean economic cooperation
    and to build an integrated economy in the Korean
    peninsula
  • To promote regional economic cooperation and
    develop infrastructure networks in Northeast Asia

3
2. Preconditions for Infrastructure Assistance
  • North Korea must give up its nuclear ambition
    (the six-party-talks should render development
    assistance to North Korea)
  • North Korea embarks economic reforms and opening
    policy.
  • North Korea establishes genuine coexistence with
    South Korea.
  • North Korea, however, can maintain its polity and
    retains self-defense capability at least until
    2020.

4
3. The importance of infrastructure in the North
Korean economy
  • Food, energy and transportation are three
    shortages
  • Food shortage can be relieved through
    institutional reform and other measures (UN and
    NGOs role would be significant here)
  • Energy shortage needs to be addressed quickly in
    order to make production activities normal
  • Transportation is essential for the development
    of the North Korean economy and it is critical
    for the integration of North Korea into the
    regional economy

5
3.1 Status of infrastructure in North Korea
  • Rail Composed of east and west lines due to
    topography, 10 arterial railways
  • Road Composed of five axes, supplementing the
    rail system
  • Ports Underdeveloped and 8 major trade ports
  • Airports 33 airports but only one international
    airport
  • Energy Dilapidated facilities with
    inefficiencies
  • Communication Networks centered on Pyongyang,
    mostly manual exchange system

(Units 10,000 ton, Km , 10,000kW, 100 million
kWh)
Source NSO. 2005. ?Comparison of South and North
Koreas Socio-Economic Profile?.
6
3.2 Assessment of Infrastructure in the North
  • Huge gaps between the South and the North in
    terms of quantity and quality of infrastructure
  • Infrastructure stock value of NK is less than 1
    of SK according to our estimation
  • On the whole, North Koreas level approximates
    South Koreas mid 1970s
  • This poses a great obstacle to the recovery of
    the North Korean economy and to the construction
    of infrastructure networks in Northeast Asia

7
4. Demand for Infrastructure
  • Three types of demands
  • Type I Bilateral exchanges such as SK-NK and
    NK-China
  • Type II Transit trade such as China or Russia
    using NK transport facilities to trade with third
    countries
  • Type III Domestic demand

8
4.1 Demand Assessment
9
5. Practical Approach to Infrastructure
  • Collaborative approach is more effective
  • Two or three-way collaboration first under the
    six-party-talks framework and then multilateral
    collaboration
  • Encourage international consortium of public
    and/or private firms
  • International financial institutions support and
    private project financing when North Korea
    embarks on major reforms

10
5.1 Interests in Infrastructure Development
Assistance by Country
11
5.2 Inter-Korean Projects in progress
  • Inter-Korean cooperation projects include rail
    and road connections at Gyeongui and Donghae
    lines, Kaesong industrial park, and Guemgangsan
    tourism area
  • - 2007 Inter-Korean Summit added a few more
    projects
  • Any further infrastructure investments in North
    Korea require strong economic justifications and
    national consensus in SK

12
5.2.1 Projects suggested by 2007 Inter-Korean
Summit
13
5.3 China-N. Korea Projects under discussion
  • Rajin port development
  • Rajin-Hunchun road
  • New bridge over the Aprok river
  • Pyongyang thermo power plant
  • Most of these projects are related to Chinas
    needs and some are packaged with natural
    resources development in NK

14
5.4 Russia-N. Korea Projects under discussion
  • Khasan-Rajin rail renovation
  • Oil delivery through rail and refining at Sonbong
  • Vladivostok-Chongjin electricity
  • In the longer term, oil and natural gas pipelines
    and TSR-TKR connection
  • Most of these projects are related to Russias
    interest in earning income by exporting oil,
    electricity and natural gas as well as by using
    its transport facilities in the RFE

15
5.5 Problems of Bilateral Approach
  • Rent-seeking by Pyongyang regime
  • Unnecessary competition and duplication of
    efforts by neighboring countries
  • Fragmented projects without coordination and loss
    of efficiency
  • Not conducive to forging regional cooperation in
    NEA

16
6. Economic Justifications for Infrastructure
Development
  • In the short run, insufficient demand for most
    projects except for a few small-scale
    cross-border transport projects
  • Benefit-cost ratio unlikely to exceed 1
  • When NK embarks major economic reforms and
    opening, BC ratio will increase due to the rise
    of inter- and intra-country demand for
    infrastructure

17
7. Basic Directions for Infrastructure Building
  • Multilateral approach combined with bilateral
    approach
  • Demand-serving and yet considering the
    supply-side effects
  • Flexible approach taking into account of larger
    issues and changing circumstances
  • Matching with SKs long-term territorial
    development goals

18
7.1 Basic Design for Infrastructure
  • H-design composed of four corners (six later) and
    three transport axes (east, west, and horizontal)
    to lift up the North Korean economy and connect
    to the regional economies of NEA
  • Six pockets of growth points to push the economy
    forward

19
7.2 Phased Approach
  • 1st phase four corners and partial connection
    with neighbors
  • 2nd phase completion of three axes and six
    growth points
  • 3rd phase completion of networks
  • Timetable would be 2008-2012 for the 1st,
    2013-2020 for the 2nd, 2021- for the 3rd phase.
    But this timetable may change depending on the
    conditions to be satisfied or not

20
7.3 Reasons for Phased Approach
  • It is assumed that security issues will be
    resolved one way or another by 2012
  • 2012 is the year of presidential election in S.
    Korea
  • Even small-scale projects takes minimum of 4-5
    years to complete
  • 2020 is the target year of S. Koreas 4th
    territorial development plan

21
7.4 H-Design Infrastructure
22
8. Lifting up the Economy with Four Corners
  • Shinuiju, Kaesong, Guemgangsan, and Rason are the
    four corners where cross-border exchanges have
    been occurring
  • These are natural anchor points to lift NK
    economy in the first stage and they have a
    special status
  • Neighboring countries have some interest in these
    areas
  • Bold measures are required to give them
    sufficient momentum

23
8.1 Reinventing the Four Corners
  • Shinuiju gateway city to China
  • Kaesong international enterprise zone (mostly
    for S Koreans now)
  • Guemgangsan international tourist zone (mostly
    for S Koreans now)
  • Rason transit trade center

24
8.2 Two Additional Growth Points
  • Nampo export-processing zone that will be turned
    into a hi-tech center (esp, environment
    technology)
  • Wonsan a center of logistics and shipbuilding in
    the east sea rim as well as a hinterland city for
    Guemgang-Seorak international tourist zone

25
8.3 Assumptions in the H-design
  • Even if North Korea takes a bold switchover, its
    economy would not grow rapidly if major economic
    reforms are not taken. Furthermore, reforms may
    not guarantee a success
  • In this basic design, we assume the best possible
    scenario, i.e., a successful economic transition

t0
t6
t24
Successful reform
Failed reform
26
8.4 Corresponding industrial development in the
North
  • Phases of industrial development in the North are
    assumed to follow
  • Export of light industry goods, primary goods and
    tourism and transit trade in the first phase
    (border cities)
  • Export of selected heavy industry goods with some
    technology, international logistics, and
    IT-related services in the second phase (coastal
    cities)
  • Export of intermediate goods with knowledge
    components and knowledge services in the third
    phase (large cities)

27
9. Selecting Priority Projects
  • Given the variable constraints, e.g., political
    and financial, priority projects need to be
    identified
  • Priority projects should satisfy multiple
    purposes of infrastructure building
  • Selected projects should play a catalyst role for
    NEA infrastructure networks building

28
9.1 Selection Criteria for Priority Projects
  • Revealed or potential demand (C1)
  • Economic effects on the NK economy (C2)
  • Geo-economic integration of the peninsula (C3)
  • Contributions to regional cooperation (C4)
  • Ease of acceptance by NK (C5)
  • Acceptability and willingness of assistance by
    neighbors (C6)
  • Possibility of financing (C7)

29
9.2 Priority Projects and Assessment
H high, M medium, L low
30
9.2 Priority Projects and Assessment
H high, M medium, L low
31
9.2 Priority Projects (1st Phase)
  • Infrastructure development in the nodal points
  • Rajin- Hunchun/Khasan road
  • Rajin-Khasan rail, Khasan-Rajin oil delivery and
    Sungri petro-plant
  • Rajin port renovation
  • Dandong-Sinuiju new bridge electricity
  • Vladivostok-Cheongjin electricity
  • Second stage Kaesong Industrial Park
  • Anbyun Shipbuilding yard

32
9.3 Catalyst Projects
  • For multi-party collaboration
  • ? Rajin-Khasan and Rajin-Tumen rail renovation
    plus oil delivery, Rajin port renovation and
    industrial park (costing about 0.5 bil.)
  • ? Sinuiju special zone, new bridge and
    expansion of electricity supply (0.7 bil)
  • Inter-Korean projects
  • ? 2nd phase Kaesong industrial park (0.5
    bil), Mt. Baekdu tourism, Anbyun shipbuilding,
    and mineral resources development

33
9.3.1 Tumen River Area
  • - Rail and road connections among China, NK, and
    Russia
  • Rajin as a logistic hub for Tumen River area
  • TRADP as a useful mechanism

34
9.3.2 Crude Oil Delivery thru Rail
  • 56km rail renovation from Khasan to Rajin
    costing about 200 mil.
  • Russia supplies crude oil and imports refined
    products

35
9.3.2 Sinuiju Special Zone
-Special zone, new bridge, and increased
electricity supply from Soopoong dam - costing
about 700 mil.
36
10. Investment Needs for Infrastructure
Construction
  • Estimates vary depending on assumptions, ranges
    from 20 bil. to 700 bil.
  • KRIHS study adopted two methods (ratio of
    infrastructure stock over GNI and ICOR)
  • Over 14 year period (2007-2020), estimates for
    investment needs for infrastructure range between
    18 - 42 bil. dollars (1.3 3 bil.per year)

37
10.1 Public Capital Mobilization
  • 3 - 4 billion possible per year at least for 10
    years if NK takes a bold switch-over policy
  • - SK 1-2 billion
  • - Japan 1 billion
  • - US a few hundred million
  • - Other six party members a few hundred
    million
  • - EU and other countries a few hundred
    million
  • Compare with the costs of Iraq war

38
11. Institutional Arrangements for Infrastructure
Projects
  • Maximize the opportunities for collaboration with
    neighboring countries (i.e., UNDP TRADP)
  • KIEDO (Korean Peninsula Infrastructure
    Economic Dev. Org.) can be considered during the
    resolution process of security issues (in the
    first phase)
  • Special trust fund can be set up at the World
    Bank in the second stage to coordinate
    infrastructure and development assistance to NK
  • In the long run, ideas of NEADB or NEAIC can be
    considered for the NEA region including North
    Korea
  • Or international financial institutions can be
    utilized when North Korea meets the requirements

39
11.1 KIEDO Structure
40
10.1 Institutional Arrangement for the 1st Phase
TRADP
41
10.2 Institutional Arrangement for the transition
between 2nd and 3rd Phase

42
10.2 Institutional Arrangement for the 3rd Stage

43
11. Remaining Issues
  • Needs assessment reflecting NKs reality and
    priorities
  • Synchronizing with NKs economic reform and
    opening policy
  • Coordinating bilateral projects
  • Setting up a channel for establishing KIEDO in
    the 6PT

44
Thank you for your attention
  • Narrow path, thick brush and evening dew will
    not deter us as long as we believe we are not
    wrong
  • From Tao Yuanming
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com