CSXs I95 Corridor for the Virginians for High Speed Rail - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

CSXs I95 Corridor for the Virginians for High Speed Rail

Description:

On-time performance of Amtrak trains is largely dependent on three factors. ... Severe electrical storm caused catastrophic damage at Possum Point ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:58
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: vhsr
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CSXs I95 Corridor for the Virginians for High Speed Rail


1
CSXs I-95 Corridorfor the Virginians for
High Speed Rail
  • March 13, 2007

2
Todays discussion
  • Provide an overview of CSXs I-95 Corridor in
    Virginia
  • Discuss Amtrak performance
  • Review actions to improve performance
  • Update construction projects
  • In depth look at the Quantico Bridge cut-in
  • The path to the Corridor of the Future and to the
    funding

3
On-time performance of Amtrak trains is largely
dependent on three factors.
  • Physical characteristics of the operating
    territory
  • Single/double track?
  • Signal System?
  • The operating mix of train traffic
  • How many trains?
  • What kinds of trains?
  • The validity of schedules
  • Can they be reliably maintained?
  • Do they adjust for known activities?

4
CSXs DC to Richmond corridor is our busiest
multi-use, double track corridor and one of the
busiest in the US.
  • 110 miles of double track with centralized
    traffic control (CTC)
  • 48 Daily passenger/commuter trains
  • 18 Amtrak trains
  • 30 VRE commuter trains
  • 32 daily freight trains
  • Over half the train slots filled by passenger
    trains
  • And until recently, a single track bridge

5
Passenger operations outperform freight
operations even with increased traffic and few
capacity enhancements.
  • The high standard deviations for freight trains
    mean poor reliability for freight customers
  • Poor freight reliability means more highway
    congestion

6
CSX and BNSF have the lowest levels of freight
train interference.
7
In 2005 and 2006, CSXT delays to Amtrak trains
have been driven more by maintenance than by
freight train delay.
8
CSX is completing a robust RFP maintenance
program.
  • Invested 19 million in RFP track structure in
    2005 and 2006
  • Replaced 176,092 ties (138.2 track miles)
  • 97,165 feet of rail (9.2 track miles)
  • Another 10.5 M planned in 2007
  • Replacing 48,000 ties (43.68 track miles south of
    VRE service area)
  • Replacing 78,000 feet of rail (14.74 miles)
  • Investments benefit passenger service Better
    ride and more reliable service
  • However, tie replacement
  • Requires the removal of the rail anchors
  • Breaks the surface friction between the ties and
    the ballast
  • Destabilizes track, and
  • Requires a conservative approach to heat.

9
Last summers passengers experienced significant
delays the root cause was a lack of capacity.
  • The most severe delays resulted from a
    combination of causes
  • June flooding set records
  • Severe electrical storm caused catastrophic
    damage at Possum Point
  • Traffic congestion due to booming economy
  • Lack of capacity
  • Lack of capacity identified as the root cause of
    delays years ago
  • VRE agreement
  • 1999 Federal Railroad Administration Report to
    Congress
  • 2000 CANAC Line Capacity Study for Virginia, VRE
    and CSX
  • MAROPS (Mid Atlantic Rail Ops Study - VA, FRA,
    FHWA, state DOTs, and Ports)
  • Causes significant traffic congestion which
    inhibits reliability and growth
  • Prevents recovery, regardless of the cause of the
    initial delay
  • Few stations have platforms serving both tracks,
    resulting in a single track operation for VRE
  • Only a small portion of the delays were
    attributable to heat orders
  • Affects trains between 1 PM and 7 PM only
  • 50 MPH, not 70 MPH, but multiple station stops
    limit the impact
  • Maximum delay of 10 minutes for Fredericksburg
    riders more for Richmond and Newport News

10
As responsible partners, weve taken a number of
actions to improve performance as the capacity
improvements are underway.
  • Intensified tactical focus produces results
  • Assigned experienced dispatchers to territory
  • Added operations superintendent to network
    dispatch center to monitor daily operations
  • Established new train manager for area
  • Increased signal, track and mechanical
    maintenance presence on corridor
  • Changed freight schedules for trains departing
    Richmond, Baltimore and Cumberland
  • Partnering with Amtrak VRE on major maintenance
    work
  • Working nights to minimize disruptions when
    possible
  • Minimizes train cancellations
  • Less productive, more costly and more
    challenging for workers
  • But produces additional concerns during summer
    heat
  • Establishing an experienced based, realistic
    schedule

11
The capacity enhancements will make a real
difference, especially the opening of the
Quantico Bridge.
  • Phase One Complete
  • AF Interlocking
  • Dispatcher Consolidation
  • Phase Two Complete
  • Arkendale crossovers
  • Elmont crossovers
  • Phase Three Underway
  • LEnfant 3rd main
  • Phase Four 2007/2008
  • Quantico Bridge (Feb. 2007)
  • Slaters Lane to RO (Design)
  • Franconia 3rd main (Design)
  • Phase Five 2008
  • Fredericksburg to HA 3rd main (Design)

12
The new 2-track Quantico Bridge opened February
17.
13
P098 was the first train over the new Quantico
Bridge.
14
The 30M Quantico cut-in involves far more than
just the construction of a new bridge.
15
In addition, the Rail Advisory Board is funding
the preliminary engineering for 11 miles of 3rd
main between Arkendale and Powells Creek.
  • Increases capacity significantly
  • Eliminates congestion at Quantico Creek
  • Capitalizes on new Quantico Creek Bridge from 1
    to 3 tracks
  • Complements on-going, publicly-funded capacity
    improvements
  • Includes a new Cherry Hill VRE station stop
  • Uses match from a private developer

16
But the consensus finding is that major
investments are needed to finish the project in
three phases.
  • Phase 1
  • Build the third main track from DC to Richmond
    now
  • Exclude the high cost projects
  • Seek the preliminary engineering needed for
    firm estimates
  • Phase 2
  • Attack the challenging, high cost projects next
  • Major bridges
  • Potomac
  • Aquia
  • Ashland constraints
  • Fredericksburg viaduct
  • Phase 3
  • Develop the Corridor of the Future
  • Sealed high-speed freight passenger separation
  • Expanded freight capacity

17
The DC to Richmond Third Track Feasibility Study
provides the path for completion.
  • Complete the VTA 2000 program of projects.
  • Complete a comprehensive alternatives analysis
  • Conduct operational modeling
  • Review alternate right-of-ways
  • Analyze public and private benefits
  • Conduct an environmental review and the
    preliminary engineering
  • Determine the specific design
  • Develop accurate estimate of costs
  • Establish agreements
  • Identify a dedicated source of funding for
    capital and operating costs

18
Federal support is the key.
  • Funding
  • Federal appropriations (primary source of
    funding)
  • 2008/9 Transportation Reauthorization Bill
  • Corridors of the Future
  • State Appropriations
  • 100m spent by Commonwealth of VA
  • 20m in VA transportation bill
  • Local governments and other agencies
  • (1995 VRE agreement to fund 3rd main)
  • Amtrak
  • CSX - right of way existing improvements
  • Benefits
  • Intercity passenger capacity / reliability
  • Commuter capacity / reliability
  • Trucks off the highway
  • Reduced highway congestion on I-95
  • Environmental benefits

19
CSXs Corridor of the Future application may
surprise you.
  • Corridor stretches 1,200 miles from Washington to
    Miami.
  • Corridor must be modified to address three major
    challenges
  • Both passenger and freight trains need to travel
    faster
  • Both passenger and freight trains need greater
    reliability and recoverability
  • Both passenger and freight train volume will
    increase
  • CSXs vision for the future is
  • Passenger trains must be able to travel unimpeded
    at 110 MPH
  • Freight trains must be able to operate at speeds
    of 50 MPH to 70 MPH
  • Passenger service must be physically separated
    from freight operations
  • Higher density industrial areas may require
    freight tracks on both sides of passenger
    tracks
  • The corridor must be sealed to prevent motor
    vehicle intrusion
  • 1700 at-grade highway rail crossings must be
    addressed

20
We must finish the project the next steps are
  • Set realistic expectations during current
    construction
  • Align stakeholders around a common plan
  • Seek consensus and action on Quick Hits
  • Perform preliminary engineering refine cost
    estimates
  • Organize and energize all stakeholders to
    advocate for these changes
  • Gain federal support

21
Thanks for your attention.
  • Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com