Title: CSXs I95 Corridor for the Virginians for High Speed Rail
1CSXs I-95 Corridorfor the Virginians for
High Speed Rail
2Todays discussion
- Provide an overview of CSXs I-95 Corridor in
Virginia - Discuss Amtrak performance
- Review actions to improve performance
- Update construction projects
- In depth look at the Quantico Bridge cut-in
- The path to the Corridor of the Future and to the
funding
3On-time performance of Amtrak trains is largely
dependent on three factors.
- Physical characteristics of the operating
territory - Single/double track?
- Signal System?
- The operating mix of train traffic
- How many trains?
- What kinds of trains?
- The validity of schedules
- Can they be reliably maintained?
- Do they adjust for known activities?
4CSXs DC to Richmond corridor is our busiest
multi-use, double track corridor and one of the
busiest in the US.
- 110 miles of double track with centralized
traffic control (CTC) - 48 Daily passenger/commuter trains
- 18 Amtrak trains
- 30 VRE commuter trains
- 32 daily freight trains
- Over half the train slots filled by passenger
trains - And until recently, a single track bridge
5Passenger operations outperform freight
operations even with increased traffic and few
capacity enhancements.
- The high standard deviations for freight trains
mean poor reliability for freight customers - Poor freight reliability means more highway
congestion
6CSX and BNSF have the lowest levels of freight
train interference.
7In 2005 and 2006, CSXT delays to Amtrak trains
have been driven more by maintenance than by
freight train delay.
8CSX is completing a robust RFP maintenance
program.
- Invested 19 million in RFP track structure in
2005 and 2006 - Replaced 176,092 ties (138.2 track miles)
- 97,165 feet of rail (9.2 track miles)
- Another 10.5 M planned in 2007
- Replacing 48,000 ties (43.68 track miles south of
VRE service area) - Replacing 78,000 feet of rail (14.74 miles)
- Investments benefit passenger service Better
ride and more reliable service - However, tie replacement
- Requires the removal of the rail anchors
- Breaks the surface friction between the ties and
the ballast - Destabilizes track, and
- Requires a conservative approach to heat.
9Last summers passengers experienced significant
delays the root cause was a lack of capacity.
- The most severe delays resulted from a
combination of causes - June flooding set records
- Severe electrical storm caused catastrophic
damage at Possum Point - Traffic congestion due to booming economy
- Lack of capacity
- Lack of capacity identified as the root cause of
delays years ago - VRE agreement
- 1999 Federal Railroad Administration Report to
Congress - 2000 CANAC Line Capacity Study for Virginia, VRE
and CSX - MAROPS (Mid Atlantic Rail Ops Study - VA, FRA,
FHWA, state DOTs, and Ports) - Causes significant traffic congestion which
inhibits reliability and growth - Prevents recovery, regardless of the cause of the
initial delay - Few stations have platforms serving both tracks,
resulting in a single track operation for VRE - Only a small portion of the delays were
attributable to heat orders - Affects trains between 1 PM and 7 PM only
- 50 MPH, not 70 MPH, but multiple station stops
limit the impact - Maximum delay of 10 minutes for Fredericksburg
riders more for Richmond and Newport News
10As responsible partners, weve taken a number of
actions to improve performance as the capacity
improvements are underway.
- Intensified tactical focus produces results
- Assigned experienced dispatchers to territory
- Added operations superintendent to network
dispatch center to monitor daily operations - Established new train manager for area
- Increased signal, track and mechanical
maintenance presence on corridor - Changed freight schedules for trains departing
Richmond, Baltimore and Cumberland - Partnering with Amtrak VRE on major maintenance
work - Working nights to minimize disruptions when
possible - Minimizes train cancellations
- Less productive, more costly and more
challenging for workers - But produces additional concerns during summer
heat - Establishing an experienced based, realistic
schedule
11The capacity enhancements will make a real
difference, especially the opening of the
Quantico Bridge.
- Phase One Complete
- AF Interlocking
- Dispatcher Consolidation
- Phase Two Complete
- Arkendale crossovers
- Elmont crossovers
- Phase Three Underway
- LEnfant 3rd main
- Phase Four 2007/2008
- Quantico Bridge (Feb. 2007)
- Slaters Lane to RO (Design)
- Franconia 3rd main (Design)
- Phase Five 2008
- Fredericksburg to HA 3rd main (Design)
12The new 2-track Quantico Bridge opened February
17.
13P098 was the first train over the new Quantico
Bridge.
14The 30M Quantico cut-in involves far more than
just the construction of a new bridge.
15In addition, the Rail Advisory Board is funding
the preliminary engineering for 11 miles of 3rd
main between Arkendale and Powells Creek.
- Increases capacity significantly
- Eliminates congestion at Quantico Creek
- Capitalizes on new Quantico Creek Bridge from 1
to 3 tracks - Complements on-going, publicly-funded capacity
improvements - Includes a new Cherry Hill VRE station stop
- Uses match from a private developer
16But the consensus finding is that major
investments are needed to finish the project in
three phases.
- Phase 1
- Build the third main track from DC to Richmond
now - Exclude the high cost projects
- Seek the preliminary engineering needed for
firm estimates - Phase 2
- Attack the challenging, high cost projects next
- Major bridges
- Potomac
- Aquia
- Ashland constraints
- Fredericksburg viaduct
- Phase 3
- Develop the Corridor of the Future
- Sealed high-speed freight passenger separation
- Expanded freight capacity
17The DC to Richmond Third Track Feasibility Study
provides the path for completion.
- Complete the VTA 2000 program of projects.
- Complete a comprehensive alternatives analysis
- Conduct operational modeling
- Review alternate right-of-ways
- Analyze public and private benefits
- Conduct an environmental review and the
preliminary engineering - Determine the specific design
- Develop accurate estimate of costs
- Establish agreements
- Identify a dedicated source of funding for
capital and operating costs
18Federal support is the key.
- Funding
- Federal appropriations (primary source of
funding) - 2008/9 Transportation Reauthorization Bill
- Corridors of the Future
- State Appropriations
- 100m spent by Commonwealth of VA
- 20m in VA transportation bill
- Local governments and other agencies
- (1995 VRE agreement to fund 3rd main)
- Amtrak
- CSX - right of way existing improvements
- Benefits
- Intercity passenger capacity / reliability
- Commuter capacity / reliability
- Trucks off the highway
- Reduced highway congestion on I-95
- Environmental benefits
19CSXs Corridor of the Future application may
surprise you.
- Corridor stretches 1,200 miles from Washington to
Miami. - Corridor must be modified to address three major
challenges - Both passenger and freight trains need to travel
faster - Both passenger and freight trains need greater
reliability and recoverability - Both passenger and freight train volume will
increase - CSXs vision for the future is
- Passenger trains must be able to travel unimpeded
at 110 MPH - Freight trains must be able to operate at speeds
of 50 MPH to 70 MPH - Passenger service must be physically separated
from freight operations - Higher density industrial areas may require
freight tracks on both sides of passenger
tracks - The corridor must be sealed to prevent motor
vehicle intrusion - 1700 at-grade highway rail crossings must be
addressed
20We must finish the project the next steps are
- Set realistic expectations during current
construction - Align stakeholders around a common plan
- Seek consensus and action on Quick Hits
- Perform preliminary engineering refine cost
estimates - Organize and energize all stakeholders to
advocate for these changes - Gain federal support
21Thanks for your attention.