Passive constructions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Passive constructions

Description:

a. Hamisi a-li-pika chakula. Hamisi 3sg-past-cook food `Hamisi cooked the/some food.' b. Chakula ki-li-pika-wa (na Hamisi) food 3sg-past-cook-pass by Hamisi ` ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:46
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: Comp737
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Passive constructions


1
Passive constructions
  • Anna Siewierska
  • (Lancaster University)

2
A characterization Siewierska (2005)
  • A construction has been classified as passive if
    it displays the following characteristics
  • It contrasts with another construction, the
    active
  • The subject of the active corresponds to an
    oblique phrase or is not overtly expressed
  • The subject of the passive if there is one,
    corresponds to the direct object of the active
  • The construction is pragmatically restricted
    relative to the active
  • The construction displays some special
    morphological marking of the verb

3
Swahili
  • a. Hamisi a-li-pika chakula
  • Hamisi 3sg-past-cook food
  • Hamisi cooked the/some food.
  • b. Chakula ki-li-pika-wa (na Hamisi)
  • food 3sg-past-cook-pass by Hamisi
  • The food was cooked by Hamisi.

4
WALS 373 lgs 162 vs. 211
5
Passive prototype Shibatani (1985837)
  • An overt agent is not an integral part of
  • the passive
  • Primary pragmatic function agent defocusing
  • Semantic properties
  • Semantic valence predicate (agent, patient)
  • Subject affected
  • Syntactic properties
  • Encoding agent ? Ø
  • patient ? subject

6
Preference for agentless
  • Xiao et al (2004) English get 8.5 English be
    10.8
  • Sanso (2006) Old Italian reflexive 15.7
    Old Italian periphrastic 24.1
  • Keresztes (1998) Vogul (27)
  • Nikolaeva (1999) Ostyak (43)

7
Passive subjects
  • Prototype patient
  • Other semantic roles, e.g. recipient,
    beneficiary, locative etc.
  • My sister was given an incredible raise in
    salary.
  • No subject impersonal

8
Icelandic
  • a. Stulkan var lamin i
    klessu
  • girlnom was beaten fsgnom in mess
  • The girl was badly beaten.
  • b. Það var lamið stulkuna i
    klessu
  • it was hitneutsgacc girlacc in
    mess
  • The girl was badly beaten.

9
Pragmatic restrictions
  • Passives less frequent than actives
  • Passives are felicitous only under certain
    conditions
  • Passives vs. Philippine focus structures

10
Cebuano
  • a. Mo-palit ang tawo ug libro
  • AF-buy Top man a book
  • The man will buy a book.
  • b. Palit-on (sa tawo) ang libro
  • buy-GF the man Top book
  • The man will buy the book.

11
Against Ph. Focus as passive
  • they exhibit a very high text frequency
  • the agent is typically overt and manifests some
    properties associated with syntactic arguments as
    opposed to adjuncts
  • they are semantically highly transitive in the
    sense of Hopper Thompson (1980)
  • and the verb does not exhibit special marking, as
    it is also marked in the actor focus
    construction.

12
Verbal marking
  • periphrastic vs. synthetic
  • synthetic origin of marker
  • Former auxiliary
  • Reflexive marker
  • Generalized human subject
  • no verbal marking?

13
Three domains Givon (1984)
  • Topicalization
  • Agent defocusing (impersonalization)
  • Detransitivization

14
Topicalization
  • Not a necessary characteristic
  • In some languages passives are similar to
  • OVS
  • OV-s

15
Agent defocusing
  • Active The agent is more topical than the
    patient but the patient retains considerable
    topicality.
  • Passive The patient is more topical than the
    agent and the agent is extremely non-topical
    (suppressed, demoted).

16
Inverse
  • The direct voice is used if the agent is more
    topical or ontologically salient than the
    patient, and the inverse if the patient is more
    topical or ontologically salient than the agent.
    Traditionally the more salient or topical
    participant is called the proximate and the less
    salient or topical one the obviative

17
Inverse
  • Plains Cree (Wolfart 197325)
  • a. sekih-ew napew antim-wa
  • scare-dir manprox dog-obv
  • The man scares the dog.'
  • b. sekih-ik napew-a antim
  • scare-inv man-obv dogprox
  • The man scares the dog.'

18
Active, Passive, Inverse
  • Active The agent is more topical than the
    patient but the patient retains considerable
    topicality.
  • Inverse The patient is more topical than the
    agent but the agent retains considerable
    topicality.
  • Passive The patient is more topical than the
    agent and the agent is extremely non-topical
    (suppressed, demoted).

19
Active impersonal
  • Portuguese
  • Corta- se cabelos às terças
  • Cutpres3sg refl3sg hairpl on Tuesdays
  • One cuts hair on Tuesdays.'
  • Polish
  • W szkole Piotrowi czesto dokucza-no
  • in school Peterdat often make funimper
  • At school, Peter was often made fun of.

20
Detransitivizing
  • Anticausatives
  • a. The wind broke the branch.
  • b. The branch broke.
  • Spontaneous (uncontrolled)
  • Polish
  • Odbilo mi sie
  • hitneut3sg Idat refl
  • I hiccupped.

21
Voice
  • Narrow view of voice
  • Active vs. passive vs. middle (reflexive/reciproca
    l) vs. inverse
  • Broad view of voice (Leningrad School
    (diathesis, Kulikov 2007 Croft 2001 Langacker
    2004 Shibatani 2006)
  • Voice is primarily concerned with the way event
    participants are involved in actions, and with
    the communicative value, or discourse relevance
    pertaining to the event participants for the
    nature of this involvement (Shibatani 2006219) 1
    multiparticipant events

22
Voice Shibatani 2006
  • Origin Development Termination
  • Spontaneous Middle Benefactive
  • Passive Antipassive Applicative
  • Causative External Possessor
  • Inverse
  • Desiderative Resultative
  • Potential

23
Parameters of variation
  • Synchronic
  • The agent
  • The subject
  • Verbal morphology
  • Diachronic
  • Origin of verbal marking
  • Origin of agent marking
  • Degree of grammaticalization

24
The grammaticalization clines
  • Phonological change
  • P Attrition reduction gt erosion gt loss
  • S Fusion Free gt clitic gt affix gt zero
  • Morpho-syntactic change
  • P. obligatorification gt fossilization gt
    morphological loss
  • S. rigidification word order
  • Semantic functional change
  • P. extension of semantic range gt loss of
    function
  • S. idiomaticization compositional analyzable
    gt noncompositional analyzable gt unanalyzable
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com