gStudy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 53
About This Presentation
Title:

gStudy

Description:

New Tools, Approaches, and Issues. in Researching Self-Regulated Learning in ... where the boundaries are fuzzy (ie, is ostrich a bird, if it can't fly? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:69
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 54
Provided by: kenmaca
Category:
Tags: gstudy | ostrich

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: gStudy


1
(No Transcript)
2
  • New Tools, Approaches, and Issuesin Researching
    Self-Regulated Learning in Authentic Settings

Philip H. WinneDianne Jamieson-NoelKen
MacAllister Mingming Zhou Roger Azevedo V.K.
Kumar John Nesbit Allyson Hadwin Simon Fraser
University APA Conference 2005
3
  • Theories Informing the Design of General Tools
    for Study

4
OUTLINE
  • Introduction to gStudy Software
  • Limitations of existing systems
  • The wider context and taxonomy of educational
    technology
  • Past Development
  • Our choice of languages and schemas
  • Web browser capabilities
  • Content management and distribution
  • Tools to support active knowledge construction
  • Current Development
  • Learner-centred help
  • Coaching self-regulated learning and
    metacognition
  • Future Development
  • Tools to support goal setting, scheduling and
    planning
  • Virtual classroom and collaboration tools.

5
Introduction to gStudy Software
The Limitations of existing systems and the need
for tools to support and and conduct research on
learning with multimedia
Online Study Reference Materials
6
Introduction to gStudy Software
The Limitations of existing systems and the need
for tools to support and and conduct research on
learning with multimedia
gStudy is also a basic browser,but it includes
study tools
g
Lets take a quick look
7
Introduction to gStudy Software
The Limitations of existing systems and the need
for tools to support and and conduct research on
learning with multimedia
8
Introduction to gStudy Software
The wider context and taxonomy of educational
technology
Koedinger et al. _at_Carnegie Mellon (CTAT)
Taylor (1980)
Schwartz et al. _at_Stanford (Betty)
9
Introduction to gStudy Software
The wider context and taxonomy of educational
technology
Tutor
Koedinger et al. _at_Carnegie Mellon (CTAT)
Taylor (1980)
Tutee
Schwartz et al. _at_Stanford (Betty)
Bruce Levin (1997)
gStudy does not fit any single slot, but
facilitates all of them
10
Past Development
Our choice of languages and schemas
The most common formats for educational content
Data schemas Event logging
Browser content Authoring
HTML
XML
JAVA
Open, universal standards
11
Past Development
Content management and distribution
CONTENT MANAGER
12
Past Development
Generalization Definition Context
Enumeration Collection Sequence
Procedure Condition Event
Classification InheritanceCause-Effect
Comparison Contrast Table
CONTENT MANAGER
HTML
XML
JAVA
13
Past Development
Tools to support active knowledge construction
SELECTING
ORGANIZING
INTEGRATING
Generalization Definition Context
Enumeration Collection Procedure
Sequence Condition Event
Classification Categories Inheritance
Comparison Contrast Table
MATRIX
HIERARCHY
FLOWCHART
LIST
NETWORK
CONTENT MANAGER
HTML
XML
JAVA
14
Past Development
Tools to support active knowledge construction
By themselves, tools are not enough
SELECTING
ORGANIZING
INTEGRATING
Generalization Definition Context
Enumeration Collection Procedure
Sequence Condition Event
Classification Categories Inheritance
Comparison Contrast Table
MATRIX
HIERARCHY
FLOWCHART
LIST
NETWORK
CONTENT MANAGER
HTML
XML
JAVA
15
Current Development
Learner-centred help
Authentic Scenarios
Interactive Simulator
Study Tips
Collapsing Panels
Practical Application Exercises
Whats in it for me?
What does this button do?
How do I _____?
INTERFACE
RELEVANCE
GOAL
LEARNER-CENTRED HELP SYSTEM
MATRIX
HIERARCHY
FLOWCHART
LIST
NETWORK
TOOLS
CONTENT MANAGER
HTML
XML
JAVA
16
Current Development
Learner-centred help
Authentic Scenarios
Interactive Simulator
Study Tips
Collapsing Panels
Practical Application Exercises
(Performance/Mastery Orientations)
Whats in it for me?
What does this button do?
How do I _____?
INTERFACE
RELEVANCE
GOAL
LEARNER-CENTRED HELP SYSTEM
MATRIX
HIERARCHY
FLOWCHART
LIST
NETWORK
TOOLS
CONTENT MANAGER
HTML
XML
JAVA
17
Current Development
Coaching self-regulated learning and metacognition
  • Monitors the current state of the learner
    through activity patterns.
  • Compares patterns to, and encourages, ideal
    self-regulated actions.
  • SMART cognitive operations (Winne Marx, 1989).
  • Elaborates the learners model based on their
    feedback.
  • Makes metacognitive suggestions during dialogues
    with the learner.
  • Responds when the learner adapts their behavior.
  • Can handle questions related to help, tests,
    assignments planning.

THE COACH
INTERFACE
RELEVANCE
GOAL
LEARNER-CENTRED HELP SYSTEM
MATRIX
HIERARCHY
FLOWCHART
LIST
NETWORK
TOOLS
CONTENT MANAGER
HTML
XML
JAVA
18
Future Development
Tools to support goal setting, scheduling and
planning
  • Goal setting is critical for monitoring during
    self-regulation.
  • Students with process goals have a higher degree
    of self-efficacy, more satisfaction with their
    performance than those with outcome goals.

- Kitsantas, Reiser Doster, 2004
GOALS
EVENTS
SCHEDULE
PLANNING
CALENDAR FUNCTIONS
SELF-REGULATION
METACOGNITION
THE COACH
INTERFACE
RELEVANCE
GOAL
LEARNER-CENTRED HELP SYSTEM
MATRIX
HIERARCHY
FLOWCHART
LIST
NETWORK
TOOLS
CONTENT MANAGER
HTML
XML
JAVA
19
Future Development
Enabling the virtual classroom with collaboration
tools
  • Students who collaborate out-perform students
    who work solo.
  • - Lazonder, 2005 (on search tasks)

VIRTUAL CLASSROOM / COLLABORATION
GOALS
EVENTS
SCHEDULE
PLANNING
CALENDAR FUNCTIONS
SELF-REGULATION
METACOGNITION
THE COACH
INTERFACE
RELEVANCE
GOAL
LEARNER-CENTRED HELP SYSTEM
MATRIX
HIERARCHY
FLOWCHART
LIST
NETWORK
TOOLS
CONTENT MANAGER
HTML
XML
JAVA
20
Future Development
Enabling the virtual classroom with collaboration
tools
  • Potentially running as a browser object
  • - Eisenstadt et al. (2005) Centre for new media,
    Open University UK

VIRTUAL CLASSROOM / COLLABORATION
GOALS
EVENTS
SCHEDULE
PLANNING
CALENDAR FUNCTIONS
SELF-REGULATION
METACOGNITION
THE COACH
INTERFACE
RELEVANCE
GOAL
LEARNER-CENTRED HELP SYSTEM
MATRIX
HIERARCHY
FLOWCHART
LIST
NETWORK
TOOLS
CONTENT MANAGER
HTML
XML
JAVA
21
Current Research
Enabling research studies by logging user
interactions.
  • Event logging enables new forms of research in
    authentic contexts.

Lets take a look
EVENT LOGGING
VIRTUAL CLASSROOM / COLLABORATION
GOALS
EVENTS
SCHEDULE
PLANNING
CALENDAR FUNCTIONS
SELF-REGULATION
METACOGNITION
THE COACH
INTERFACE
RELEVANCE
GOAL
LEARNER-CENTRED HELP SYSTEM
MATRIX
HIERARCHY
FLOWCHART
LIST
NETWORK
TOOLS
CONTENT MANAGER
HTML
XML
JAVA
22
  • Self-Report and Trace Data as Tools for
    ExaminingSelf-Regulated Learning

23
Self-Regulated Learning
24
The Role of the Instructional Environment
  • Can guide students through the learning process
  • Instructional cues can help students select
    relevant information for further processing.
  • Structures can provide instructional supports to
    bootstrap methods for self-regulated learning.

25
The Role of the Study Tactics
  • Underlining as a study tactic
  • Note taking as a study tactic
  • Question generation as a study tactic

Students can
  • Label / highlight with Quicknotes.
  • Create different types of notes.
  • Create glossary entries
  • Make links

26
Purpose of Study
  • How does goal orientation influence academic
    outcomes?
  • How does goal orientation influence the choices
    students make in terms of the tactics and
    strategies they employ to study?
  • What are the similarities and differences in
    self-reports versus traces of studying?

27
Goal Orientation
  • 2 x 2 framework
  • Mastery Approach
  • Mastery Avoid
  • Performance Approach
  • Performance Avoid

28
Self-report measures
  • Self-reports and aptitude measure of
    self-regulated learning
  • Asks students to recall how often they used
    various tactics to study information
  • Commonly used
  • Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire

29
Trace Measures
  • Trace measures are records of events
  • Record of student actions completed in the
    software (e.g. create a note, highlight)
  • Recorded in a fine-grained log
  • Temporal -time stamped
  • Artifacts of tactics strategies
  • Log reader / analyzer

30
Example Log File
31
Method
  • 186 students from an undergraduate educational
    psychology class
  • Measures MSLQ, MAI, EBI filled out once in the
    3rd week of the semester
  • GOQ filled out for the first 8 weeks of the
    semester (lots of missing data later weeks)
  • Midterm (30 item MC) Final (60 item MC)
  • Study reflection assignment (2 hrs chapter 7)
  • Chapter 7 from the Woolfolk, Winne Perry
    Educational Psychology text

32
Determining a Predominant Goal Orientation
  • Subscale score for each orientation
  • Mean overall score collapsing across goal
    orientations
  • Difference score subtracting mean subscale score
    for an individual from mean
  • IF-THEN statement to indicate relationship
    amongst the difference scores to create a
    predominant goal orientation

33
Sample rule structure Performance Approach
  • IF(AgtB,IF(AgtC,IF(AgtD, "Dominant",""),""),""). IF
    the differences score for performance approach
    (A) was greater than the difference score for
    performance avoid (B) and if differences score
    for performance approach (C) was greater than
    mastery approach and if the differences score for
    performance approach was greater than the
    difference score for mastery avoid (D) then
    indicate that performance approach was
    predominant (Dominant).

34
Results
35
Achievement Differences
36
Mastery Orientation Comparison
Mastery Approach
Mastery Avoidance
Highly structured interaction, - notice 91, 12,
10
Low structure, doing only what is expected -
notice 1, 2, 3
37
Performance Orientation Comparison
Performance Approach
Settles into a single looped pattern
Performance Avoid
Completely scatteredand disconnected
38
  • The Role of Instructional Tools in Facilitating
    Approaches to Self-Regulated Learning

39
The Present Study
Three Questions
  • Do the learning tools used while studying match
    the tools students are instructed to employ?
  • Do tactics that require greater forms of
    elaboration result in better performance than
    tactics that require rehearsal?
  • Does instructing students to attend to the
    objectives embedded within the content improve
    overall performance?

40
Method
Subjects and materials
  • Ninety-nine educational psychology undergraduates
    participated.
  • Education 220 Learning Kit (Woolfolk et al.
    2003).
  • Short-answer (3), multiple choice (8).

Conditions
  • Use any tools.
  • Make a Quicknote related to the objective, then
    use any tools.
  • Make a Quicknote related to the objective, then
    study using only Quicknotes.
  • Make a Quicknote related to the objective, then
    study using only notes.
  • Make a Quicknote related to the objective, use
    only question-and-answer type notes.

41
Results
42
Did participants follow the directions they were
given to follow while studying?
  • Quicknote group 94.4 labeled at least once.
  • Note-taking group 65.2 made notes of some kind.
  • Question-Answer group 30 made questions.

Did instructing students to use various tactics
effect test performance?
43
Comparing actions between groups
  • Criteria for selection
  • Test scores - highest / lowest
  • Must follow the instructions
  • Given more than one person shared the same score,
    the participant who scored higher on the short
    answer was selected.

Use any TacticScore of 18.00 on the test.
Use any tacticScore of 2.0 on the test
questions.
44
Comparing actions between groups
Objectives and Any Tactic Score of 3.5
Objectives and Any TacticScore of 17.0
45
Comparing actions between groups
QuickNotesScore of 24.5 (33 quicknotes)
QuickNotesScore of 4.00 (5 quicknotes)
46
Comparing actions between groups
Note takingScore of 2.5 (1 summary note)
Note takingScore of 19 (7 summary notes)
47
Comparing actions between groups
Topic Definition of understanding Main Ideas 1.
By Gardner Understanding is the capacity to
take knowledge, skills and concepts and apply it
to new situations. 2. By Perkins amp Blythe
Being able to perform thought-demanding tasks on
a topic, such as generalizing, applying,
etc. Topic Definition of concept Main Ideas
Category used to group similar ideas, objects,
events, people -used to help us organize a large
amount of information. Topic Prototype Main
Ideas Best representation of a category -Image
that captures the essence of a concept -Have
graded membership, where the boundaries are fuzzy
(ie, is ostrich a bird, if it can't fly?) Topic
Exemplars Main Ideas Actual memories of specific
objects, so that we can use this to compare the
object in question, and figure out if this object
belongs to the same category as our
exemplar. Topic Schemas Main Ideas Aside from
prototypes and exemplars, we recognize our
concept through our schematic knowledge. ie.
knowing that counterfeit money is not real
money. Topic Concept Attainment Main Ideas A
strategy to help students attain an understanding
of a concept, by using thinking skills such as
'hypothesis testing'. -To encourage hypothesis
testing, components of this strategy must include
EXAMPLES, NON EXAMPLES and both RELEVANT and
IRRELEVANT attributes. Topic Results of this
(examine examples and nonexamples) Main Ideas
Prevents UNDERGENERALIZATION and
OVERGENERALIZATION.
48
Comparing actions between groups
Question and Answer groupScore of 16.75 (5 QA
notes)
Question and Answer groupScore of 2.5 (1 QA
note)
49
Comparing actions between groups
Q What do I understand? A Math Chemistry and
Physics more than English socials and arts. Q
Prototype versus exemplar? A An exemplar is an
example from experience. A prototype is a
generalization, usually a best representative of
a concept. Q A schema of concepts means
what? A The connections between different
concepts based on our notion of our world. E.g.,
the concept of mone is connected with crime
forgery act by our schema. Q Lesson
components? A The basics you need examples and
anti examples, a name and its definition. Q
Lesson structure? A It should concentrate on
prototypes, then move on to borderline examples
to help define the border of the concept. This
helps avoid under or overgeneralization.
Question and Answer groupScore of 16.75 (5 QA
notes)
50
Discussion
  • Preference vs. risk vs. awareness.
  • Nature of the instructional environment.
  • Choices for tools.
  • Study tactics and trends.
  • The role of learning objectives.
  • Amount of time.

51
  • Lessons Learned from using gStudy in Authentic
    Learning Contexts

52
Lessons Learned
53
New Features in 2.0
  • Creating documents.
  • Concept mapping.
  • Search / filter tools.

Creating instructional environments
  • Designing kits.
  • Designing authentic learning tasks.
  • Practical issues.

Methodological issues
  • Model object events create, move, link, delete
    objects
  • View events clicks, drags, scrolling, mouse
    actions.
  • Questionnaires context instructions.
  • Matching traces to self-reports.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com