Fragmentation Functions and Polarized Parton Densities - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 50
About This Presentation
Title:

Fragmentation Functions and Polarized Parton Densities

Description:

Hard reactions involving hadrons / nuclei are ubiquitous. ... J ger, SK, Stratmann, Vogelsang (PRL 2004) Frank Bauer _at_ DIS04. PHENIX hep-ex/0404027 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:40
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 51
Provided by: stefa167
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Fragmentation Functions and Polarized Parton Densities


1
Fragmentation Functions and Polarized Parton
Densities
Mini-Review
  • Stefan Kretzer
  • Brookhaven National Laboratory RIKEN-BNL

32nd International Conference on High Energy
PhysicsAugust 16 - 22, 2004Beijing, China
2
Subset of functions from a graphical
classification. R. Jakob
S. Moch NNLO
Next 20 min (Some of) The rest of it
3
Factorization and universality
p
p
p
p
a
a
c
c
b
b
p
p
4
  • Applications (Partons in Operation) Hard
    reactions involving hadrons / nuclei are
    ubiquitous. pQCD provides a predictive and
    quantitative (Next-to-next-to-leading-order
    NNLO) field theoretic framework in terms of the
    quark and gluon degrees of freedom. It also
    measures the parton luminosities for hadron
    colliding machines.
  • Investigations (Partons under the Microscope)
    pQCD is rich in structure in itself. (Some of it
    - which I will not minireview - is yet being
    investigated experimentally at the discovery
    level. )

5
Here are both aspects
6
Forward high pT particle production in DIS
  • Daleo Sassot
  • Inhomogeneous Evolution
  • Mixing with Fracture Functions
  • (Similar to n-hadron FFs de Florian, )
  • Aurenche Basu Fontannaz Godbole
  • Signal for BFKL

7
To begin at the beginning, going back 25 years
8
The Field Feynman picture of cascade
fragmentation
9
Collins Soper
Bilocal operator
hadron
P z k
D(z)
k
quark/gluon
10
Collinear factorization
ee- annihilation (1h inclusive)
11
Fragmentation (or Decay) Functions
Scale dependence from renormalization or mass
factorization DGLAP
12
?2 Analysis of ee-?hX Data
Alternative model approaches Indumathi et
al. Bourrely Soffer
Kniehl Kramer Pötter
Kretzer
Bourhis Fontannaz Guillet Werlen
13
What do we know about Fragmentation Functions
from ee-?
u,d,s flavours and gluons
Sum over all flavours (singlet combination)
14
Semi-Inclusive Deep Inelastic Scattering
Flavour Separation
15
E. Christova, SK, E. Leader
valencefavouredrank 1
seaunfavouredrank 2
Well described by leading particle ansatz
favoured gt unfavouredfavoured unfavoured
SK
Compare
16
From Guzey, Strikman, Vogelsang hep-ph/0407201
17
Factorized NLO pQCD and RHIC pp data
STAR forward rapidity
PHENIX central rapidity
Gluon FF and large-z constraints from
hadroproduction.
18
The gluon fragmentation function has been
measured. Hasnt it?
19
OPAL hep-ex/0404026
20
LO DGLAP
LO
NLO
21
Transit to longitudinally polarized parton
distributions
Schematic example Semi-inclusive DIS
22
Crucial testFactorization!
What Factorization?
23
Collinear factorization
LO
leads to the approximate factorization of x and z
dependence in LO
24
HERMES DIS pion multiplicities (unpolarized
hydrogen target)
  • Curves
  • LO
  • NLO
  • (NNLO)

Stratmann Vogelsang SK
Under investigation by HERMES
25
?G is constraint by not much else than
positivity?G(x) lt g(x)
Blümlein Böttcher
?G0.1840.103?G0.1000.075
26
Quark Model
QCD
?
  • Gluons
  • Interaction
  • Loops
  • Axial anomaly
  • Renormalization

27
In hadronic collisions (RHIC)
LO
gluons are leaders.
28
The double-spin asymmetry
for .
can be shown to be (basically) positive definite
in the few GeV range (at leading twist accuracy).
29
ALL? is (perturbatively) bounded by
Jäger, SK, Stratmann, Vogelsang (PRL 2004)
  • Positivity
  • Underlying parton (gluon) dynamics

The upper bound holds up to dependence on the
scale where positivity is saturated. The lower
bound is obtained under low p? approximations.
The order of magnitude must be correct in both
cases if the dynamics are
30
PHENIX hep-ex/0404027
Frank Bauer _at_ DIS04
31
  • Summary (with apologies for your favorite
    omission)
  • Fragmentation functions are determined from,
    mostly, ee- annihilation data. Other processes,
    such as hadro/photo-production have provided
    tests of consistency / universality. Post-LEP/SLD
    steps
  • Include new data processes in the fit
  • Update ee- fits (large-z data from uds
    continuum at e.g. BELLE)
  • Semi-inclusive DIS (flavour)
  • Hadroproduction (gluons, large-z, RHIC pp norm
    predictions for AA and spin), enabled by NLO
    Mellin moment evaluation.
  • Consistency checks with jet data.
  • Error analysis and coupled analysis with parton
    densities
  • Resummations
  • Global analysis of polarized PDFs quantifies
    partonic decomposition of spin, with experimental
    inputs beyond inclusive DIS
  • Semi-inclusive DIS asymmetries (sea
    decomposition)
  • High pT RHIC-spin processes (longitudinal gluon
    polarization)
  • And again, this mini-review left out many a
    maxi-topic.

short term
not-so-short term
32
Leftovers
33
Of particular importance, for physical (axial
anomaly) and historical (spin crisis) reasons,
is ?G
34
Factorization ? Factorization
  • The Factorization is a statement in pQCD about
    the seperation of scales in
  • The LO DIS process is so simple, indeed is just a
    vertex / ?(1-x) ?(1-z) so that ?(x,z) / F(x)D(z)
    The approximate (LO) factorization of x and z
    dependence (following from the one-particle
    phase space of LO DIS)
  • Factorization ' Factorization for SIDIS

35
Every distribution is one component of a
field-theoretic decomposition of nucleon structure
collinear part
36
Stratmann Vogelsang SK
37
Is ?SIDIS ' q(x)D(z) at not-so-high Q?
And if not then what?
  • Higher-twist interactions?
  • E.g. Glück Reya 02 suggest spin dependence of
    fragmentation into pions
  • Strictly Dq? Dq-?
  • Possible effects beyond leading twist

38
Comparison with previous leading particle guess
As seen in the HERMES pion multiplicities
Leading particle ansatz works well.
39
Global analysisofFragmentation
Functions (largely avoiding advertisement plots)
40
Fractional contributions from initial/final state
partons
Hadroproduction pp?? X at 200 GeV cms
Central Rapidity
Forward Rapidity
gq
qggq
qq
initial
gg
qq
gg
qg
Dq
Dq
final
Dg
Dg
E? GeV
P? GeV
41
Average Scaling Variables
Central Rapidity
  • Symmetric / asymmetric kinematics for central /
    forward rapidity
  • Large z fragmentation is probed.

P?? GeV
Forward Rapidity
E? GeV
42
Taking Moments, e.g.turns the non-local (xa ?
xb) convolution into a local (in N) product
The minimum by variation d(?s)/d(?g)0 is at
43
Inverted (from N to x)bounds ?s from below
44
Onset of pQCD in hadronic collisions
soft
T. Hirano _at_ QM04
hard
(1/pT)(dN/dpT)
pT
??? GeV
45
Energy Conservation
?
kT orderingDGLAP
angular orderingMLLA
Not a practical constraint.
46
(No Transcript)
47
Some Theory
  • Parton Distributions
  • Local operator product expansion in inclusive DIS
  • Bilocal operator definition
  • Fragmentation Functions
  • No local OPE (no inclusive final state)
  • Bilocal operator definition

Just as PDFs, FFs are well defined in terms of
Scale dependence enters through renormalization
DGLAP
48
2?2 channels
  • Only (ii) has a negative asymmetry at parton
    level.
  • (i) gtgt (ii) by about a factor 160!
  • Does this mean that ALL? has to be positive?
  • No Polarized parton densities may oscillate!

49
Predictions for ALL? are all positive. Is this
accidental or is ALL? bounded from below?
The upper bound on ALL? depends on the scale at
which positivity ?g(x,µ) g(x,µ) is
saturated.
50
Factorization and Universality
Add polarization
p
p
p
p
a
a
c
c
b
b
p
p
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com