Practical tools for analyzing the pro-poor quality of policies (1) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Practical tools for analyzing the pro-poor quality of policies (1)

Description:

If donors want to work in partnership, and harmonize their approaches to policy ... Buzz-group excercise: Assessing the relevance of the CPIA-Criteria ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: aaltone
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Practical tools for analyzing the pro-poor quality of policies (1)


1
Practical tools for analyzing the pro-poor
quality of policies (1)
  • If donors want to work in partnership, and
    harmonize their approaches to policy analysis,
    what approaches could we use together ?
  • We can use, e.g.
  • PSIA
  • Poverty and Social Impact Assessment
  • A variety of tools for assessing the poverty
    and social impacts of each individual reform (--gt
    Training module 3 )
  • PER
  • Public Expenditure Review
  • to assess the allocation and benefit incidence
    of public budgetary resources (--gt Training
    module 4)

2
Practical tools for analyzing the pro-poor
quality of policies (2)
  • CFAA
  • Country Financial and Accountability Assessment
  • to assess how responsibly the public
    authorities manage public funds and what is the
    quality of their systems and capacity for
    internal and external auditing.
  • --gt Training module 4.
  • CPIA
  • Country Policy and Institutional Assessment
  • This is the tool WB uses every year for
    deciding the allocation of IDA credits to LICs
    (with Portfolio Performance Assessment)
  • Main purpose To assess the quality of a
    countrys present policy and institutional
    framework
  • Quality means how conducive that framework is
    to fostering poverty reduction.

3
CPIA 20 policy aspects, grouped into 4 categories
  • A. ECONOMIC MANAGEMENT
  • 1. Management of Inflation and Macroeconomic
    Imbalances
  • 2. Fiscal Policy
  • 3. Management of External Debt
  • 4. Management and Sustainability of the
    Development Programme
  • B. STRUCTURAL POLICIES
  • 5. Trade Policy and Foreign Exchange Regime
  • 6. Financial Stability and Depth
  • 7. Banking Sector Efficiency and Resource
    Mobilization
  • 8. Competitive Environment for the Private Sector
  • 9. Factor and Product Markets
  • 10. Policies and Institutions for Environmental
    Sustainability
  • C. POLICIES FOR SOCIAL INCLUSION / EQUITY
  • 11. Gender
  • 12. Equity of Public Resource Use
  • 13. Building Human Resources
  • 14. Social Protection and Labour
  • 15. Poverty Monitoring and Analysis of Poverty
    Outcomes and Impacts
  • D. PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT AND INSTITUTIONS

4
The Democratic Principle - Who should assess
whether a government is on track or not ?
  • If the elected Parliaments and the elected Local
    Councils are not involved, the PRSPs lose in
    credibility as Economic Constitutions (?)
  • Risk that they are viewed as government and not
    state documents and thus subject to changes in
    government
  • Therefore important to involve not just
    governments and civil society but also
    Parliaments, Local Councils.
  • If PRSP-process too heavily controlled by the
    Min.of Finance/Planning, theres the risk that
    other ministries (e.g. of Social Affairs,
    Education, Health, Agriculture) feel lack of
    ownership and commitment.
  • Make sure that you know the status of PRSP, e.g.
    compared to leading Party/Government documents.

5
CPIA Country Policy and Institutional
Assessment ( See http//www.worldbank.org/ida/ID
APerfalJan02.pdf )
  • 20 aspects of policy assessed, each with a 5
    weight.
  • Each aspect of policy should be considered in
    light of its impact on poverty reduction.
  • Based on WB Country Teams subjective
    assessments, scrutinized by WB-HQ.
  • Clear definitions and presentational tools
  • Could this assessment gain in credibility if it
    were done by the wider donor community?
  • At the moment country ratings are still not
    disclosed by the WB but country rankings are
    published in quintile groups.

6
CPIA
  • Ratings Scale 1 (low) through 6 (high)
  • Unsatisfactory for an extended period
  • Unsatisfactory
  • Moderately Unsatisfactory
  • Moderately Satisfactory
  • Good
  • Good for an extended period

7
E.g. the criteria for CPIA-dimension nr 12
Equity of Public Resource Use
  • INTRO
  • This item assesses the extent to which the
    overall development strategy and the pattern of
    public expenditures and revenues favours the
    poor. National and sub-national levels of
    government should be appropriately weighted.

8
CPIA Equity of Public Resource Use
  • 2 UNSATISFACTORY
  • The Overall development strategy and the
    incidence of public expenditures benefits the
    better-off more than the poor, or the incidence
    is unknown. There are few or no policies and
    programs to address disparities among
    individuals, groups or geographic areas in their
    access to public services or outcomes. The
    overall incidence of public revenues is
    regressive.

9
CPIA Equity of Public Resource Use
  • 5 GOOD
  • Public expenditures for social services benefit
    the poor more than the better-off. The government
    has identified individuals, groups or localities
    that are poor, vulnerable or have unequal access
    to services and opportunities, and is designing,
    with their participation, appropriate targeted
    programs. The overall incidence of revenues is
    progressive.

10
Buzz-group excercise Assessing the relevance of
the CPIA-Criteria
  • 20 buzz-groups - 20 CPIA policy aspects
  • 2-3 members per group
  • just turn to your neighbour on the spot
  • Each group to read and assess the relevance of
    the criteria for 1 dimension.
  • 5 min. for work in buzz-groups
  • 20 x 1 min for a very brief feedback to plenary
  • Relevance of the policy aspect for PovRed ?
  • Relevance of the CPIA-criteria for the policy
    aspect ?
  • Total 25-35 min
  • Objectives Group dynamics becoming familiar
    with the CPIA. No serious assessment of the
    quality of CPIA.

11
CPIA 20 policy aspects, grouped into 4 categories
  • A. ECONOMIC MANAGEMENT
  • B. STRUCTURAL POLICIES
  • C. POLICIES FOR SOCIAL INCLUSION / EQUITY
  • D. PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT AND INSTITUTIONS

12
A. ECONOMIC MANAGEMENT
  • 1. Management of Inflation and Macroeconomic
    Imbalances
  • 2. Fiscal Policy
  • 3. Management of External Debt
  • 4. Management and Sustainability of the
    Development Programme

13
B. STRUCTURAL POLICIES
  • 5. Trade Policy and Foreign Exchange Regime
  • 6. Financial Stability and Depth
  • 7. Banking Sector Efficiency and Resource
    Mobilization
  • 8. Competitive Environment for the Private Sector
  • 9. Factor and Product Markets
  • 10. Policies and Institutions for Environmental
    Sustainability

14
C. POLICIES FOR SOCIAL INCLUSION / EQUITY
  • 11. Gender
  • 12. Equity of Public Resource Use
  • 13. Building Human Resources
  • 14. Social Protection and Labour
  • 15. Poverty Monitoring and Analysis of Poverty
    Outcomes and Impacts

15
D. PUBLIC SECTOR MNGT AND INSTITUTIONS
  • 16. Property Rights and Rule-based Governance
  • 17. Quality of Budgetary and Financial Management
  • 18. Efficiency of Revenue Mobilization
  • 19. Quality of Public Administration
  • 20. Transparency, Accountability and Corruption
    in the Public Sector.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com