The establishment of the limited effects paradigm - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 44
About This Presentation
Title:

The establishment of the limited effects paradigm

Description:

... nomination, another 1/4 made up their mind. 1/4 made up their mind between nomination ... c. not looking at influences outside of campaign (nomination, etc. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:71
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: jimhe
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The establishment of the limited effects paradigm


1
The establishment of the limited effects
paradigm
  • End of the powerful effects model of media
    influence

2
Powerful effects model
  • During the period from the turn of the century
    till the mid-1940s, the predominant view of media
    effects was that the media had a powerful
    influence over their audiences and society.
    Media were able to tap into the audience members
    unconscious, stir his passions and get him to
    think and behave as the message source wished.
  • Freudian psychology
  • Mass society theory

3
Limited effects model
  • Beginning in the mid-1940s and lasting until the
    mid-1960s a very different view of media effects
    came to prevailone that assigned a much more
    limited impact to the mass media
  • The American Soldier
  • Mr. Biggott studies
  • The Peoples Choice and Voting
  • Klappers Effects of Mass Communication

4
WWII American Soldier studies
  • Part of a large-scale social science
    investigation of American soldiers recruited or
    drafted for service in WWII
  • This part especially interested in the effects of
    Frank Capras propaganda films on the morale of
    new recruits/draftees
  • Why We Fight
  • Documentary explanation of the buildup to and
    early years of the war

5
Episodes taken from Why We Fight
  • Prelude to War
  • The Nazis Strike
  • Divide and Conquer
  • The Battle of Britain

6
Battle of Britain
  • Men in two camps--some exposed to film, some not
  • 2100 in one camp (before/after control group)
  • 900 in another camp (before/after control group)
  • 1200 (after-only control group)
  • Sampling by company units
  • Units matched on several demographic variables

7
Battle of Britain
  • Before and after questionnaires were slightly
    different
  • Tried to distract men from wondering why
    answering twice by writing revised on the
    questionnaire
  • One week between exposure and after measure
  • Anonymity was assured

8
Results
  • The movies had a significant impact on factual
    knowledge
  • Ex. Why werent the Germans successful at
    bombing British planes on the ground?
  • Ans. because the British kept their planes
    scattered at the edge of the field
  • Experimental group 78 correct
  • Control group 21 correct

9
Results Learning from films
10
Results
  • Opinions and interpretations
  • Effects were not as great
  • the heavy bombing attacks on Britain were an
    attempt by the Nazis to . . .
  • Answer invade and conquer England
  • Experimental group 58
  • Control group 43

11
Results
  • Effects on general attitudes were slight
  • Do you feel that the British are doing all they
    can to help win the war?
  • Experimental group 7 greater than control
  • On several measures, only 2-3 positive
    difference was found

12
Results
  • Strengthening the overall morale and motivation
    of viewers
  • The series was ineffective
  • Question concerning whether trainees would prefer
    military duty in the U.S. or overseas
  • Experimental group 41 overseas
  • Control group 38 overseas

13
Results
  • Unconditional surrender by Nazis is an important
    war aim
  • Experimental group 62
  • Control group 60

14
Results
  • 9 weeks after exposure
  • Factual material was forgotten
  • Retained only about 50 of factual items that
    1-week groups remembered
  • On 1/3 of opinion issues, the long-term group
    showed less change
  • However, on more than half of the fifteen issues
    under study, the long term group showed greater
    change than the short-term group
  • Sleeper effect

15
Hovland et al.
  • Set up Yale school research on persuasion
  • Study the effect of
  • Source characteristics
  • Message characteristics
  • Order of presentation
  • Psychological characteristics of audience

16
Source characteristics
  • Credibility
  • Topic Atomic submarines
  • Sources J. Robert Oppenheimer/Pravda
  • Topic Future of Movie Theaters
  • Sources Fortune magazine/A woman movie gossip
    columnist
  • Greater persuasion with more credible source
  • However, after 4 weeks difference had disappeared

17
Content
  • Fear appeals
  • The greater the fearfulness, the greater the
    effect on interest, tension
  • The less fearful messages had a greater effect on
    intension to change behavior
  • Fear appeals were thought to invoke some sort of
    interference

18
Message
  • Fear appeals
  • You might expect that an appeal based on fear has
    to be hard-hitting to be effective. However, a
    study conducted by Janis and Feshbach in 1954
    suggests that a minimal appeal is likely to be
    more effective. They used three different
    versions of a lecture on dental hygiene. The
    strong appeal provoked the most tension in the
    audience, but the greatest change in behavior in
    conformity with the message was produced by the
    minimal appeal to fear.
  • This probably suggests that when people feel they
    can do nothing about the threat then they are not
    likely to change their behavior.

19
Channel
  • The main study here tends to indicate that
    interpersonal channels are more effective at
    changing attitudes than are mass media channels.

20
  • An excellent example of this is provided by
    Kendall and Woolf's analysis of reactions to
    anti-racist cartoons. The cartoons featured Mr
    Biggott whose absurdly racist ideas were intended
    to discredit bigotry. In fact 31 failed to
    recognise that Mr Biggott was racially prejudiced
    or that the cartoons were intended to be
    anti-racist (Kendall Wolff (1949) in Curran
    (1990)).

21
  • Another study referred to by Curran was conducted
    by Hastorf and Cantril in 1954. Subjects were
    showed film of a particularly dirty football
    match between Princeton and Dartmouth and asked
    to log the number of infractions of the rules by
    either side. The Princeton students concluded
    that the Dartmouth players committed over twice
    as many fouls as their team. The Dartmouth
    students concluded that both sides were about
    equally at fault. The authors concluded that it
    is not accurate to say that different people have
    different attitudes to the same thing, as in
    fact, 'the thing is not the same for different
    people, whether the thing is a football game, a
    presidential candidate, communism or spinach.' As
    Curran suggests, it might be more accurate to say
    'believing is seeing' rather than 'seeing is
    believing'.

22
Audience factors
  • Scouts who valued group membership highly were
    least influenced by speaker who criticized wood
    craft learning

23
Personality
  • Personality variables such as self-esteem,
    anxiety and depression have an influence on
    persuasibility. Janis's research suggests that
    people with low self-esteem are likely to be
    relatively easily persuaded.

24
Overall conclusions
  • Mass media are not as overwhelmingly persuasive
    as the propaganda theorists considered them
  • Persuasive effectiveness varied by source of the
    message, format of the message, audience factors
    such as personality and channel of communication

25
Columbia School
  • Paul Felix Lazarsfeld emigrated from Austria to
    the U.S. in the 1930s.
  • A mathematician
  • Interested in the application of mathematics,
    especially the new statistics, to study of social
    problems
  • Set up research programs at Princeton (Radio
    Research Bureau) and at Columbia (Bureau of
    Applied Social Research) that combine study of
    practical problems with academic methods of
    research
  • Some of his first studies focused on audience
    size, reactions to and use of radio programming

26
Features of the approach
  • Interested in individual knowledge, attitudes and
    behavior resulting from exposure to media
    messages and campaigns
  • Focus groups and/or surveys were the usual
    methods of study

27
The Peoples Choice
  • Lazarsfeld, Berelson, and Gaudet
  • Study of 1940 election in Erie county, Ohio
  • 20th Century--strong, commercially successful
    newspapers, radio, mags, that had ability to say
    what they wanted to in Western European countries

28
Research Questions
  • 1. How do people decide to vote as they do?
  • 2. What were the major influences on them?
  • "Social characteristics determine political
    preference."

29
  • Lazarsfeld could predict with 76 accuracy which
    candidate a person would vote for based on her
    demographics. That was better than the people
    themselves could predict.
  • Prediction is taken as the criterion of validity
  • "Cross-Pressures"
  • Opinion Leaders (21)
  • ("Have you tried to influence someone on a
    political issue recently?" "Has anyone asked
    your advice recently on a political issue?")
  • opinion leaders were thought to be a rather small
    group of influential people
  • Evidence of actual influence was lacking

30
Media influence
  • Whenever a person in the sample changed his/her
    vote intention, the interviewer asked why
  • Democrats mentioned radio most often (30 vs. 20
    for newspapers)
  • Republicans mentioned newspapers (31 vs. 17 for
    radio).

31
  • Over half the voters said the media had the most
    important impact, 2/3 said news media were
    helpful
  • Two-step flow
  • Conclusion--interpersonal communication most
    important

32
  • Those most likely to be predisposed to vote
    Democratic were exposed to more pro-Democratic
    propaganda
  • the analogous situation was true for Republicans
  • Lazarsfeld decided this showed selective
    exposure--those who were predisposed to vote one
    way or another chose to expose themselves to
    propaganda that was positive toward the preferred
    party

33
When did they choose?
  • 1/2 made up their minds before May
  • Once they knew the nomination, another 1/4 made
    up their mind
  • 1/4 made up their mind between nomination and
    election
  • Columbia did another study in 1948, then got out
    of campaign studies
  • Voting, by Berelson, Lazarsfeld and McPhee

34
  • Since 1940, predictive power has decreased--SES,
    ethnicity, religion have declined
  • Issues may now be more important
  • --television has come in

35
  • Generalizability?
  • a. particular presidential campaign
  • b. not looking at nonvoters
  • c. not looking at influences outside of campaign
    (nomination, etc.)
  • d. formal education levels have increased since
    that time
  • e. professionalization of campaigns

36
Katz and Lazarsfeld
  • Personal influence The two-step flow of
    communication
  • Katz and Lazarsfeld (1955)
  • Decatur study of opinion leaders conducted by the
    Bureau of Applied Social Research at Columbia

37
  • Assessing opinion leaders role in four areas of
    influence
  • 1. marketing
  • 2. fashion
  • 3. public affairs
  • 4. film choice
  • Talked to women in Decatur about where they went
    to get advice on the topics
  • Women acted as opinion leaders in a topic area
    depending on their position in the life cycle,
    SES, social contacts

38
Other research
  • Prejudice studies
  • Prejudiced and non-prejudiced individuals read
    anti-racist cartoons
  • Information campaigns
  • Cincinnati United Nations campaign
  • Persuasion studies
  • Political effects surveys

39
Klapper Five Generalizations
  • 1. Mass communication ordinarily does not serve
    as a necessary and sufficient cause of audience
    effects, but rather functions among and through a
    nexus of mediating factors and influences.

40
  • 2. These mediating factors are such that they
    typically render mass communication a
    contributory agent, but not the sole cause, in a
    process of reinforcing the existing conditions.

41
  • 3. On such occasions as mass communication does
    function in the service of change, one of two
    conditions is likely to exist. Either
  • a. the mediating factors will be found to be
    inoperative and the effect of the media will be
    found to be direct or
  • b. the mediating factors, which normally favor
    reinforcement, will be found to be themselves
    impelling toward change.

42
  • 4. There are certain residual situations in which
    mass communication seems to produce direct
    effects, or directly and of itself to serve
    certain psycho-physical functions.

43
  • 5. The efficacy of mass communication, either as
    a contributory agent or as an agent of direct
    effect, is affected by various aspects of the
    media and communications themselves or of the
    communication situation (including, for example,
    aspects of textual organization, the nature of
    the source and medium, the existing climate of
    public opinion, and the like).

44
Selectivity
  • Notions of selectivity are a movement away from
    notions of mass society. It reflects a more
    sophisticated understanding of social
    organization. These three levels of selectivity
    represent somewhat different levels of analysis
    which reflect the influence and development of
    the disciplines which contributed to the
    knowledge and development of mass communication
    research.
  • this type of research contributed to the notion
    that the mass media have only limited effects
  • because they were looking only at short-term
    effects
  • reliance on experimental methodology
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com