Investors and the Employee Free Choice Act Daniel Pedrotty Director, AFLCIO Office of Investment NAS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Investors and the Employee Free Choice Act Daniel Pedrotty Director, AFLCIO Office of Investment NAS

Description:

'President Barack Obama told AFL-CIO union leaders Tuesday that the Employee Free ... If workers across economy accept a pay cut, they must cut spending. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:23
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: Richard1249
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Investors and the Employee Free Choice Act Daniel Pedrotty Director, AFLCIO Office of Investment NAS


1
Investors and the Employee Free Choice
ActDaniel PedrottyDirector, AFL-CIO Office of
InvestmentNASP 20th Annual Pension Financial
Services ConferenceJune 11, 2009Atlanta, Georgia
2
Presidential Support
  • President Barack Obama told AFL-CIO union
    leaders Tuesday that the Employee Free Choice Act
    will pass, signaling his full backing for
    legislation that makes union organizing easier.
  • President Tells Unions Organizing Act Will
    Pass
  • Wall Street Journal, March 4, 2009

3
Economic Crisis
  • 2008 exposed enormous weaknesses in our economy
    and our financial markets
  • Bursting of housing bubble upcoming problems in
    commercial real estate debt.
  • Securitization of mortgages spreads effects
    globally.
  • Viral effect of credit default swaps in spreading
    effects to all types of financial intermediaries.
  • Freeze in credit markets.
  • 40 drop in stock market capitalization.
  • Snowballing of a synchronized global financial
    and economic crisis.

4
High Productivity Has Not Led to Improved
Paychecks
5
Golden Age
  • From 1947-1973
  • This is the most prosperous period in US history.
  • The countrys economic output grew at an average
    annual rate of 3.8, nearly tripling in size.
  • Productivity grew 2.9 per year.
  • The rate of profit for nonfarm business averaged
    nearly 14 per year

6
Shared Prosperity in the Golden Age
  • Median family income grew 2.8 per year, more
    than doubling from 1947-1973

7
The New Gilded Age
  • From 1974 on
  • GDP grew at 2.9 per year, down from 3.8
    (1947-73).
  • Productivity growth slowed from 2.9 to 1.9
  • Growing inequality replaces widely shared growth.

8
Growing Inequality in the New Gilded Age
9
Family Incomes Did Poorly in the 2000s
10
The New Gilded Age
  • Weekly earnings fell 6.5 during this same period.

11
The New Gilded Age
  • Workers less likely to have health care or
    pensions
  • Only 56 of private sector workers get health
    insurance, down from 70.5 in 1981.
  • Only 45 of private sector workers get any kind
    of pension (20 DB), down from 50 (40 DB).

12
Top Heavy
13
Top Heavy
14
CEOs made on average 27 times as much as a
typical worker in 1973, but they made 275 times
as much in 2007.
15
Growing Household Debt
16
The Stock Bubble
Price
Earnings
17
The Housing Bubble
Home Prices
Building Costs
Population
Interest Rates
18
High Productivity Has Not Led to Improved
Paychecks
19
Union density cut in half in 30 years
20
Leading Voices Call For Change
Changes in the institutions that have shaped the
labor market over the past few decades may also
have been associated with some increase in wage
inequality, , the available research suggests
that it can explain between 10 percent and 20
percent of the rise in wage inequality among men
during the 1970s and 1980s. Federal Reserve
Chairman Ben S. Bernanke, February 6, 2007
21
Leading Voices Call For Change
No More Economic False Choices By ROBERT E.
RUBIN and JARED BERNSTEIN Though productivity
grew by around 20 percent from 2000 to 2007, the
real income of middle-class, working-age
households has actually fallen 2,000, down 3
percent. One factor behind this outcome is
the severely diminished bargaining power of many
workers, and here the decline in union membership
has played a key role. A true market economy
should have true labor markets in which labor and
business negotiate as peers. workers should be
allowed to choose to be unionized or not.
Published November 3, 2008
22
  • Workers Want Unions
  • The proportion of workers who want unions has
    risen substantially over the last 10 years, and a
    majority of nonunion workers in 2005 would vote
    for union representation if they could.
  • Richard Freeman, Harvard University
  • DO WORKERS STILL WANT UNIONS? MORE THAN EVER,
    February 2007

23
Obstacles to Uniting
  • 91 of employers force employees to attend
    one-on-one anti-union meetings with their
    supervisors
  • 82 hire consultants that specialize in running
    sophisticated campaigns to intimidate workers.
  • 57 openly threaten to close a worksite.
  • 47 threaten to cut wages and benefits.
  • 34 of employers illegally fire workers who
    support forming a union.

24
So much for secret ballot elections
  • Even when workers are successful in meeting the
    threshold for calling for an NLRB-supervised
    election, employer opposition has been successful
    in thwarting 40 of elections from ever taking
    place.

25
Not free and fair elections
26
No incentive to obey the law
27
Employee Free Choice Act
  • Allows workers to unite when a majority sign a
    recognition card, restoring original intent of
    NLRA.
  • Allows workers not employers - to call for an
    election by ballot.
  • Mandates arbitration for first contract after 120
    days.
  • Of unions certified by NLRB elections, only 38
    are able to negotiate first contracts after one
    year and only 56 after two years.

28
Anti-EFCA Arguments You May Have Heard
  • Takes away secret ballot from workers
  • FALSE workers retain right to choose secret
    ballot election bosses must respect workers
    choice either way.
  • Unions will intimidate workers
  • FALSE major academic study found no union
    intimidation from majority sign up in 4 states
    over a six year period.
  • Research shows less complaints of intimidation by
    both bosses and unions in majority sign-up vs.
    in-person elections.

29
Is Now The Time? YES!
  • Opponents argue now is not the time to raise
    wages, since businesses are hurting
  • Theyre Wrong In a downturn, workers cant help
    their employers by earning less, only by spending
    more
  • If workers across economy accept a pay cut, they
    must cut spending. This leads to further falls in
    sales (a negative surprise), and renewed demand
    for pay cuts. BUT, if wages rise, sales will rise
    (a positive surprise), paving the way for further
    growth.

30
Especially in Times of Crisis, Unions are a Big
Part of the Solution.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com