WP 3 report Elementary school ages 612

1
WP 3 reportElementary school (ages 6-12)

• UPDATE-meeting
• Aix -Marseille
• 22nd to 23rd May, 2008

2
(No Transcript)
3
Partners

• University of Jyväskylä, Finland
• University of Glasgow, Scotland
• IUFM, Aix-Marseille, France
• University of Koblenz, Germany
• University of Education, Austria
• IRRE MARCHE, Italy

4
Objectives
5
BackgroundGeneral frameworkJyväskyläSpecified
framework Aix-MarseilleFocusingViennaQuesti
onnaireGlasgowModificationsall partners
Framework for Curriculum Analyses Jyväskylä
6
Technology education curriculum analysis and
descriptionSuggestions for a common framework

• The French UPDATE team
• Pascale, Colette, Marjolaine, Pierre
• IUFM dAix-Marseille, France
• UPDATE
• WP 2, 3, 4.
• Characteristics of the school system
• Characteristics of the general curriculum
• Position and status of technology education in
  the curriculum
• Aims of technology education
• Pedagogical means and methods for technology
  education
• Main themes and structure of curriculum content
• Characteristics of the teachers in charge of
  technology education

7
Framework for Curriculum Analyses
8
Achieved/underway

• curriculum analyses
• questionnaire gt different approaches (For
  instance Koblenz 400 pupils, Vienna 200 pupils,
  Jyväskylä two classes)
• pedagogical practices through teacher education
  and teaching practice

9
To be done

• curriculum development
• teacher education
• piloting
• good practices
• combining the results of different countries?

10
An example of good practicesby class teacher
students, department of teacher education,
University of Jyväskylä