A Case Study in Analysis: Verifying Strain Gauge Testing with SW Simulation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

A Case Study in Analysis: Verifying Strain Gauge Testing with SW Simulation

Description:

A Case Study in Analysis: Verifying Strain Gauge Testing with SW Simulation – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:220
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: richard1018
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A Case Study in Analysis: Verifying Strain Gauge Testing with SW Simulation


1
A Case Study in AnalysisVerifying Strain Gauge
Testing with SW Simulation
  • Richard Wand, President
  • MJ Engineering Consulting Inc.

2
A Case Study in Analysis
  • What we were given by the customer
  • Known Field Failures
  • SolidWorks Models with Proposed Field Fixes

3
A Case Study in Analysis
  • What we were given by the customer
  • FEA Results done in-house of Original Design and
    Proposed Change showing significant improvement
  • Good, well documented test procedure
  • 9 different tests with original design

4
A Case Study in Analysis
  • What we were given by the customer
  • FEA Results done in-house of Original Design and
    Proposed Change showing significant improvement
  • Strain Gauge Test Results of Original Design
  • Strain Gauge Test Results of Proposed Change

Test 7 showed worst stress at gauge 3
5
A Case Study in Analysis
  • What were we able to give the customer back
    (Jumping Ahead a Bit)
  • Reasons why the in-house FEA was incorrect
  • Revised design (with FEA improvement)
  • Confidence to test revised design
  • FEA 62 improvement (strain)
  • Strain Gauge 44 improvement (max stress)
  • Strain Gauge 55 improvement (stress range)

6
A Case Study in Analysis
  • What were we able to give the customer back
  • Worst load from initial strain gauge testing,
    Revised Design showed 64 improvement

7
A Case Study in Analysis
  • A quick word about strain gauge testing
  • Make sure your tests are well defined, consistent
    and processes are repeatable and well documented.
  • Remove as many variables as possible, use loads
    and situations that are easily replicated in
    Simulation software.
  • Understand the type of gauges used, the direction
    (if applicable), the data acquisition software,
    the sampling rates etc
  • Prior to adding loads, run a baseline test, then
    run load tests and repeat baseline if baseline
    tests arent consistent and reliable, neither are
    results
  • Understand the possible effects of weather,
    moisture, wind and other aspects of testing that
    can lead to uncertainty.
  • Take pictures of the tests and processes for
    documentation purposes

8
A Case Study in Analysis
  • So how did we get to the results presented??
  • Started by Reviewing Customers SW Models
    Analysis Results (Paper Copies)
  • Large sheet metal parts meshed as solid elements
    not shells (mixed mesh)
  • Displacement plots showed inconsistent results
    between bonded members
  • Load transfers (physics) didnt appear correct
  • Strain Gauges compared to FEA results by plot
    legend/colors only

9
A Case Study in Analysis
  • When to use mixed meshes?
  • Typically Geometry Driven
  • Beams Length compared to cross section, 20
    times or more
  • Shells Rule 1 Surface Area to Wall Thickness of
    101 or greater
  • Shells Rule 2 If the part would be
    understandable when modeled with zero thickness
    surfaces to someone unfamiliar with its actual
    form, a shell model is a likely candidate
    (Source Building Better Products with Finite
    Element Analysis by Adams and Askenazi)
  • Sometimes it is Load Driven
  • Shells (particularly thin shells) neglect normal
    stress in the thickness direction, so if bending
    is a major component of the load carrying
    capability, then thick shells or solids may be
    required
  • When Thin vs. Thick Shells
  • Use Thin shells when thickness to span is less
    than 0.05
  • Shells can be a pain use selectively!

10
A Case Study in Analysis
  • Why use mixed meshes?
  • Accuracy, stress and displacement values can be
    off when using solid elements on geometry more
    suitable for shells.
  • Takes more solid elements to accurately model the
    same results that can be obtained by shells.
  • Speed, Speed, Speed and more Speed
  • Shells generally run 10-20 times quicker than
    solid elements from my experience
  • Results can be easier to interpret and visualize,
    but sometimes harder to explain to customers!

11
A Case Study in Analysis
  • So HOW do we use Simulation to verify design
    into Solidworks we go.
  • Shells, how to create and some tips to remember
    thickness
  • Split Lines
  • Contacts, Global and Local
  • Mesh Controls
  • Restraints on Shells, particularly symmetry
  • Tips for running mixed meshes (soft spring
    options)
  • Sensors
  • Checking physics by looking at displacement plots

12
A Case Study in Analysis
  • Quick Look at the Original FEA Models

13
A Case Study in Analysis
  • Shells, how to create and some tips to remember
    thickness

14
A Case Study in Analysis
  • Split Lines

15
A Case Study in Analysis
  • Contacts, Global and Local

16
A Case Study in Analysis
  • Mesh Controls

17
A Case Study in Analysis
  • Restraints on Shells, particularly symmetry

18
A Case Study in Analysis
  • Tips for running mixed meshes (soft spring
    options)

19
A Case Study in Analysis
  • Sensors

20
A Case Study in Analysis
  • Checking Physics by looking at displacement plots
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com