WHAT PLANES

1
WHAT PLANES?

• by
• Morgan Reynolds, Ph.D.
• Madison Wisconsin
• August 5, 2007

2
Or, An Inquiry into the Suspension of Newtonian
Physics on 9/11
3
Nomoregames.net

• Texas AM Professor Emeritus, economics
• Former Chief Economist US DOL 2001-2
• Former Director Criminal Justice Center at
  Dallas-based NCPA

4
Why are we here?

• Victims (from their non-graves), their families,
  the nation, the world cry out for justice

5
(No Transcript)
6

• Perpetrators must be stopped
• This means criminal convictions
• Convictions require proof the accused committed
  crimes as charged (proof is our burden)
• Only one chance because No Double Jeopardy, clean
  evidence first time

7
Principle Cannot prove a lie, only a truth

• Govt-Media-Pundit complex cannot prove OCT,
  including Boeing fraud
• Takes only one fact to refute official plane
  theory and we have dozens (NPT)
• Convictions demand proof, including truth about
  no planes
• Perps need story of hijacked airliners for Arab
  blood libel and wars

8

• Media 9/11 complicity enforcement arm of the PTB
• Media example In largest manhunt in history FBI
  took 17 years to apprehend Unabomber (his brother
  gave him up)
• Yet within 45 seconds of second hit Fox News
  anchor solved 9/11 OBL, OBL, OBL, OBL, OBLdrink
  the Kool Aid, swallow the SOMA
• OSAMA NINETEEN YOUNG ARABS ONYA, ONYA,
  ONYAcemented in American Mindkill somebody in
  Afghanistan, anybody, kill, kill,

9
(No Transcript)
10
Plane Facts Background

• No Arab names on Passenger Manifests
• No final manifests, many fake names
• Media reported 10 hijackers alive
• No verified security videos
• AA flights 11 and 77 not in BTS, officially never
  happened
• AA tail numbers deregistered
• January 14, 2002
• UA tail numbers deregistered September 28 2005

11
Plane Fact 1 No Plane Flew into the Pentagon

• Hole too small to disappear a plane--757 nearly
  1/2 football field
• Hole in Pentagon not plane-shaped yet holes at
  WTC were. Gee, no Roadrunner silhouette of
  passage at Pentagon?

12

• Impossible physics, 3-foot thick wall
• No verified debris from Boeing 757 with 3 million
  parts--four cleanest crash sites in aviation
  history
• In a 45-degree-angle crash, starboard wing/engine
  would hit first, spin plane clockwise (leftward),
  fling tail section off
• Yet straight 45-degree line allegedly sustained
  through three rings--SIMPLY MARRRRRRRVELLLLL0US!

13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
Plane Fact 2 No Plane Crashed at Shanksville

• Beamer/Bush Lets roll script worked while
  patriotic lies about Jessica Lynch, Pat Tillman
  failed
• Hole a wee bit small 20x10x6
• Witnesses reported low flying, struggling
  jetliner, versus absurd vertical crash imprint
  as if plane would remain intact during a wipe-out
  crash (meep, meep!)
• No grass burned despite alleged thousands of
  gallons of jet fuel
• No plane debris, bodies, blood

19

• No witnesses to alleged crash
• Cell phone calls impossible
• Fake dialogue Hello mom, this is your son, Mark
  Bingham.
• No cvr or fdr available to public 4x
• Shoot down stories a distraction without
  evidence--an arbitrary claim, a nullity
• FBI destroyed evidence, no comprehensive crash
  report (no crash, so save taxpayers ?)

20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
Plane Fact 3 No Plane Crashed at WTC

• TABOO subject? According to gatekeepers, ops,
  ignoramuses, et.al.
• YET NO SUCH CRASHES COULD HAVE OCCURRED as
  depicted because physics are impossible
• 9/11 WAS A HOAX, REMEMBER?
• YET MAJORITY REASON GOVT/MEDIA LIED TO ME
  ABOUT A,B,CBUT NOT D! Oh no. I saw it on TV
• HOAX CENTRAL WAS PLANE FRAUD
• NO STEP wing markings

25

• Aluminum airliner cannot disappear into a
  heavy steel/concrete tower
• Plane must smash to pieces, crumple at wall,
  break off flaps, panels, actuators, wing tips,
  wings, almost certainly rotate and break off tail
  
• Steel walls/floors/cores offering no resistance?
  Gimme a break!
• Plane does not decelerate? Absurd violation of
  Newtons first law of motion
• No plane debris below impact zones--whered it
  go?
• No plane debris in gashes--whered it go?
• Holes undersized, obstructed

26

• Plane-shaped holes--silhouettes of
  passage--impossible ( contrary to Pentagon and
  Shanksville holes)
• Video Fakery Run any WTC 2 penetration video
  frame-by-frame and no crash occurs
• Smoke from both WTC hits too gray, not
  black/charcoal enough
• Building heals itself up during penetration
• Impossible butter-smooth entry with no
  deceleration, NIST agrees no deceleration
• Explosions delayed until plane disappears
• WTC 2 plane image turning left, banking 38
  degrees yet flush hit (perpendicular). The
  wrecking ball would hit port wing first, spin
  plane counterclockwise, fling tail section off
  east/northeast, etc.

27
(No Transcript)
28

• Invincible plane upon entry yet fragile inside
  tower (plane changes physical character)
• Two experienced pilots on flight simulators the
  morning of 9/11 could not hit towers at 500 mph
  in six attempts (fit wingspan of 156 into 208
  width)
• Can a 767 fly that fast at sea level?

29
HOW STRONG ARE PLANES ANYWAY?

• Do Airplanes Have Crash Test Ratings?
• Should you fly only 5-star crash-rated planes?
• Fly only steel airplanes?
• No crash test ratings because Airplanes Are
  Fall-Apart Fragile (FAF)--duh!
• Airplane Over-Design factor is approximately 1
  because planes are built to be light, carry
  payload and meet stress of flying, landing and
  taking off
• Mundane fact Airlines worry about what your
  luggage weighs (no lead luggage) and its
  distribution aboard

30
(No Transcript)
31
(No Transcript)
32
(No Transcript)
33
(No Transcript)
34
(No Transcript)
35
(No Transcript)
36
(No Transcript)
37
(No Transcript)
38
(No Transcript)
39
(No Transcript)
40
(No Transcript)
41
(No Transcript)
42
(No Transcript)
43
(No Transcript)
44
(No Transcript)
45
(No Transcript)
46
(No Transcript)
47
(No Transcript)
48
(No Transcript)
49
(No Transcript)
50
(No Transcript)
51
(No Transcript)
52
(No Transcript)
53
(No Transcript)
54
(No Transcript)
55
(No Transcript)
56
(No Transcript)
57
(No Transcript)
58
(No Transcript)
59

60
(No Transcript)
61
(No Transcript)
62
(No Transcript)
63
(No Transcript)
64
(No Transcript)
65
(No Transcript)
66
f
67
(No Transcript)
68
(No Transcript)
69
(No Transcript)
70
(No Transcript)
71
(No Transcript)
72
(No Transcript)
73
(No Transcript)
74

• http//www.cnn.com/WORLD/9611/26/comoros.crash/cra
  sh.really.large.14sec.mov

75
How Strong is Steel Anyway?
76
Let me up on a 767 with my sledge hammer (9 lbs.
steel)and see how long it stays flyable
77
(No Transcript)
78
(No Transcript)
79
(No Transcript)
80
STEEL VS. ALUMINUM STRENGTH

• A36 Steel vs. 6061-T6 Aluminum
• Yield Strength 36 vs. 37
• Modulus (Stiffness) 29.0 vs. 10.0
• Specific Weight (x100) 28.4 vs. 9.8
• Ultimate Strength 58 vs. 42
• Source R.C. Hibbeler, Mechanics of Materials,
  6th edition.

81
Newtons Laws of Motion, 1687

• Every body continues in its state of rest, or of
  uniform motion in a right line, unless it is
  compelled to change that state by forces
  impressed on it.
• The change of motion is proportional to the
  motive force impressed and is made in the
  direction of the right line in which that force
  is impressed. (In modern terms, acceleration is
  directly proportional to applied force).
• To every action there is always opposed an equal
  reaction or, the mutual actions of two bodies
  upon each other are always equal, and directed to
  contrary parts.

82
More on Newtons Third Law

• "For every action, there is an equal (in size)
  and opposite (in direction) reaction.
• Q An unfortunate bug strikes the windshield of a
  bus moving down the road. Quite obviously, this
  is a case of Newton's third law of motion. The
  bug hit the windshield and the windshield hit the
  bug. Which of the two forces is greater the
  force on the bug or the force on the bus
  windshield?

83

• A Each force is the same size. For every action,
  there is an equal ... (equal!). The fact that the
  bug splatters only means that with its smaller
  mass and strength, it is less able to withstand
  the force resulting from the interaction.

84

• Q A speeding plane strikes the wall of a
  ("motionless") Tower. Obviously this contact
  between objects is a case of Newton's third law
  of motion. An aluminum plane hits the steel
  building and the building hits the plane. Which
  of the two forces is greater the force on the
  plane or the force on the building?

85

• A Each force is the same size. For every action,
  there is an equal and opposite reaction. It
  matters not which object is moving.
• The fact that the WTC steel beams, belts, and
  steel-reinforced concrete floors across 5-6
  stories broke up, shattered, fragmented and
  formed an airplane-shaped gash...huh? You're
  kiddin! Welcome to Islamic/Hoffman/Jones/
  OReilly 9/11 physics.

86

• Correction an aluminum plane must crumple,
  shatter and cannot leave an "airplane-shaped
  silhouette of passage" in a collision with mass
  quantities of structural steel because the
  plane--with lower mass, density and strength
  than the building--would be less able to
  withstand the equal force exerted on both bodies.
  
• The impact did nothing, the airplane did not do
  much damage, said A. Astaneh-Asl, UC Berkeley
  engineering professor
• Massiveness matters in collisions What if the
  tower fell on the plane?
• Mass estimation 1 22,727 tons (5 floors divided
  by 110 floors 4.5 percent of 500,000 tons).

87

• A Boeing 767 would weigh approximately 140 tons
  if it flew as reported, 0.6 percent of the mass
  of five floors in a Tower (140/22,757) or 1/163.
• A plane's material strength (resistance to forces
  like bending, failure, etc.) would also be vastly
  inferior to those of a Tower. Conclusion bye-bye
  airplane.
• Ok, shrink the estimated weight of the upper five
  stories by one-third, yielding 15,152 tons. The
  mass of a 767 would be 0.9 percent of the mass of
  five floors it theoretically hit. Still a
  MISMATCH.

88

• To restate In addition to vastly superior
  strength, the mass of the tower segment
  allegedly hit by an aluminum tube with engines
  and wings would be 100 times that of the plane.
  Damage inflicted scores Tower 100, aluminum can
  2.
• What if the mass of the plane were lower?
• Same answer bye-bye squashed beer can, errr,
  small plane.
• What if a plane flew faster (speeded up) into a
  tower? Kinetic energy increases as the square of
  speed

89

• So what? Impact force would be greater because
  of 4 billion joules of energy but remains equal
  for both plane and tower at any speed.
• The tower is immensely stronger, heavier and
  harder than the plane. Upshot bye-bye beer can,
  errr, plane.

90
SIZE MATTERS
91
(No Transcript)
92
(No Transcript)
93
(No Transcript)
94

• Notice how debris from the little object and big
  object remain in plane sight?

95
Plane Huggers Last Resort (My Daddy Told Me
There Were Plane Crashes!)

• The belief that fragile objects with sufficient
  speed (kinetic energy) can penetrate massive,
  hard objects, e.g., tornados drive straws into
  trees
• Has this feat been reproduced in experiments?
  Where? Twice within 17 minutes?

96

• This oddity (apparent exception to implications
  of Newtons 3d law) can happen because "intense
  winds can bend a tree or other objects, creating
  cracks in which debris (e.g., hay straw) becomes
  lodged before the tree straightens and the crack
  tightens shut again.
• Source National Oceanic and Atmospheric
  Administration (NOAA)

97
Plane Fact 4 No Official Crash Reports on the
Four Incidents

• FAA regulation 121 requires a comprehensive
  investigation of all crashes of scheduled
  commercial flights
• NTSB transferred its responsibility to the FBI,
  reason foul-play
• FBI response to FOIA enforcement proceedings and
  privacy concerns prevent release

98
Why Not Use Real Planes?

• Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy
  theories concerning the attacks of September the
  11th

99

• Bush told us the conspiracy was is outrageous
  and used outrageous methods to slow
  pursuers--years of planning and control of
  post-9/11 cover up--truth movement
• KISS, too many things could would go wrong with
  real suicide planes
• No planes eliminates need for DoD stand down
  orders because no risk of airliner interceptions
  by rogue patriots in the military
• Planes could miss towers and crash in wrong
  place, exposing the fraud
• Planes could hit towers but perps knew physics
  of fragile planes crashing into steel towers

100

• Not exactly the psy-op effect desired shock,
  awe, fear, disorientation
• Wherever real crashes occurred, outsiders would
  discover faked airliners and missing hijackers
  (Muslims required!)
• THE PSY-OP GOAL made special effects (fakery)
  vastly superior to real crashes, namely, convince
  traumatized America that hijacked airliners
  crashed and jet fuel fires caused WTC destruction
  
• Distract America from real cause
  disintegration/dustification/dissociation by the
  U.S. military-industrial-intelligence complex
  (Lookie, we got a new toy!)

101

• Ace in the hole media poodles can sell any faked
  story to the gullible and cover up glitches
• The perps always can count on the lapdogs of the
  scientific/engineering establishment, bought and
  paid for by U.S. government