Towards World Class Commissioning - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Towards World Class Commissioning

Description:

Process for creating the measures ... Results from PBC survey, Qu 5 'Agreed a commissioning plan' are 'yes' ... PBC survey results Qu 15. Dissemination of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: optimismd
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Towards World Class Commissioning


1
Towards World Class Commissioning
2
World Class Commissioning Vision
World class commissioning is not an end in
itself, so in order to prove themselves
successful, commissioners will need to
demonstrate better outcomes adding life to years
and years to life
  • Better health and well-being for all
  • People live healthier and longer lives
  • Health inequalities are dramatically reduced
  • Better care for all
  • Services are evidence based, and of the best
    quality
  • People have choice and control over the services
    that they use, so they become more personalised
  • Better value for all
  • Investment decisions are made in an informed and
    considered way, ensuring that improvements are
    delivered within available resources
  • PCTs work with others to optimise effective care

The vision for world class commissioning will be
one that is developed, articulated and owned by
the local NHS, with a strong mandate from local
people and other partners (such as local
authorities). PCTs should state what their vision
for world class commissioning is locally, and
what they will achieve through continually
commissioning better services and delivering
better outcomes based on local priorities.
Adding years to life and life to years
3
World Class Commissioning Competencies
  • Are recognised as the local leader of the NHS
  • Work collaboratively with community partners to
    commission services that optimise health gains
    and reductions in health inequalities
  • Proactively seek and build continuous and
    meaningful engagement with the public and
    patients, to shape services and improve health
  • Lead continuous and meaningful engagement with
    clinicians to inform strategy and drive quality,
    service design and resource utilisation
  • Manage knowledge and undertake robust and regular
    needs assessments that establish a full
    understanding of current and future local health
    needs and requirements
  • Prioritise investment according to local needs,
    service requirements and the values of the NHS
  • Effectively stimulate the market to meet demand
    and secure required clinical and health and
    well-being outcomes
  • Promote and specify continuous improvements in
    quality and outcomes through clinical and
    provider innovation and configuration
  • Secure procurement skills that ensure robust and
    viable contracts
  • Effectively manage systems and work in
    partnership with providers to ensure contract
    compliance and continuous improvements in quality
    and outcomes
  • Make sound financial investments to ensure
    sustainable delivery of priority outcomes

Adding years to life and life to years
4
A Commissioning Assurance system will help to
understand PCT progress towards world class
commissioning
  • Understand performance of PCTs as commissioners
    across the NHS and progress towards world class
    commissioning
  • Consistently compare performance to ensure
    comparability for patients, staff and citizens
  • Categories of assessment will be
  • Health outcomes and quality
  • Competency
  • Governance (Board governance, strategy/medium
    term finance and business processes)
  • Full review every 3 years with key data reported
    annually
  • Mix of direct observation/data,
    self-certification and peer review
  • Build on existing SHA regimes where appropriate
  • SHAs will implement and incorporate into the
    annual cycle
  • Commissioners demonstrating strong performance
    should
  • Be subject to light touch review focussed on
    elements 1 and 2, with 3 based on
    self-certification
  • Receive additional benefits e.g. borrowing,
    (non-) top slice

Adding years to life and life to years
5
by reviewing there key areas
Health outcomes and quality
Competencies
Governance
HEALTH OUTCOMES AND QUALITY
  • Measures health gain quality in health care and
    assigns ratings based on ability to deliver key
    health outcomes and services
  • Public confidence
  • Patient outcomes and satisfaction
  • Measures evidence that identifies the extent to
    which the commissioner possesses the core
    competencies associated with World Class
    Commissioners
  • Measures system and market management capabilities
  • Current and forward looking review of board
    controls and processes , strategy, and long term
    financial controls

Content
  • Focus on improvement
  • Focus on improvement
  • Maintain standards

Nature
  • SHA Assessment
  • Absolute performance against core outcomes, local
    stretch improvement targets
  • Improvement against outcomes
  • Peer review
  • SHA Assessment
  • Scoring against degrees of best practice
  • Self assessment
  • Peer/external review
  • SHA Assessment
  • Self-certification
  • Direct review
  • Peer review

Methodology
  • Baseline assessment every 3 years, with annual
    review
  • Baseline assessment every 3 years, with annual
    review
  • Interim monitoring as appropriate
  • Baseline assessment every 3 years, with annual
    review
  • Interim monitoring as appropriate

Frequency
WCC
WCC
Rating
base
base
Including 360 degree feedback Source Input
from World Class Commissioning Events (September
and November)
Adding years to life and life to years
6
1. Outcomes Assessment will be based on Vital
Signs measures
Vital Signs
Help improve every citizen's overall health,
life-expectancy and emotional well-being
  • PCTs will choose 5 measures from the Vital
    Signs that are consistent with their strategic
    objectives
  • They will be given 5 nationally identified Vital
    Signs
  • For each measure, absolute performance, ranking
    and the UK average / upper quartile will all be
    indicated
  • For each measure there will also be a rating that
    takes into account the PCTs starting point, and
    quantifies improvement

Help improve citizen's quality of life
Help the most vulnerable achieve their
aspirations, building a fairer society
Improve the safety, cleanliness and delivery of
optimum care
Make services more personal
Improve experience for patients, users and carers
Ensure an effective system
Secure long-term sustainability
Adding years to life and life to years
7
2. Competencies Process for creating assessment
  • Reviewed the World Class Commissioning
    competencies
  • Identified components that could be measured
    across
  • Inputs
  • Process
  • Outputs
  • Assigned methodologies for assessment of each
    component
  • Chose 3 measures, focusing on outputs where
    possible
  • Developed the evidence required, and described
    the thresholds between base and world class
  • For each competency there will be three measures
    that will be assessed
  • Where possible, these have focused on outputs
  • The descriptions of the thresholds are expected
    to develop over time to ensure thresholds are
    raised as performance improves
  • The output of the assessment should support PCT
    organisation talent and capability plans

Adding years to life and life to years
8
Competency 1 Are recognised as the local leader
of the NHS

PCTs should lead and steer the local health
agenda in their community. PCTs will be the
natural first stop for local political and
community leaders. Through partnership, they seek
and stimulate discussion on NHS and wider
community health matters
Evidence
Below baseline
Baseline
Intermediate
World class
  • gtX either agree or strongly agree with
    statement We recognise the PCT as the local
    leader of the NHS
  • Open text feedback reinforces rating

Reputation as the local leader of the NHS
  • Feedback from 360 survey
  • Strategic plan linked to agreed LAA
  • PCT prospectus
  • Communication strategy
  • Does not meet baseline requirements
  • XY either agree or strongly agree with
    statement We recognise the PCT as the local
    leader of the NHS
  • Open text feedback reinforces rating
  • PCT has a communications strategy
  • XY either agree or strongly agree with
    statement We recognise the PCT as the local
    leader of the NHS
  • Open text feedback reinforces rating
  • PCT regularly communicates local health agenda
    to community

360 feedback
Reputation as a change leader for local
organisations
  • gtX either agree or strongly agree with statement
    The PCT has had a significant influence on our
    decisions and actions
  • Open text feedback reinforces rating
  • Feedback from 360 survey
  • Does not meet baseline requirements
  • XY either agree or strongly agree with
    statement The PCT has had a significant
    influence on our decisions and actions
  • Open text feedback reinforces rating
  • XY either agree or strongly agree with
    statement The PCT has had a significant
    influence on our decisions and actions
  • Open text feedback reinforces rating

360 feedback
Position as the local healthcare employer of
choice
  • Staff satisfaction is positive, and staff metrics
    are in upper quartile of national performance
  • Recruitment
  • Retention
  • Satisfaction
  • Average number of applicants per advertised post
  • Total number of vacancy days per year
  • of staff employed from locality
  • Staff turnover rates
  • Staff sickness rate
  • Feedback from staff satisfaction survey
  • Does not meet baseline requirements
  • Staff satisfaction is neutral, and staff metrics
    are in line with the national average
  • Recruitment
  • Retention
  • Satisfaction
  • Staff satisfaction is positive, and staff metrics
    are above national average
  • Recruitment
  • Retention
  • Satisfaction

Metric
9
Competency 2 Work collaboratively with
community partners to commission services that
optimise health gains and reduce health
inequalities
PCTs should not commission services in isolation.
In addition to commissioning healthcare services,
they will need to consider the wider determinants
of health and the role of other partners in
improving the health outcomes of their local
population. PCTs also share responsibility for
undertaking a joint strategic needs test (JSNA)
with local authorities. Partners include local
government, healthcare providers, third sector
organisations and clinical partners such as
practice based commissioners and specialist
consortia. Working collaboratively with
partners, PCTs will stimulate innovation,
efficiency and better service design, increasing
the impact of the services they commission to
optimise health gains and reductions in health
inequalities
Evidence
Below baseline
Baseline
Intermediate
World class
  • Z of LAA targets have demonstrable supporting
    evidence in the JSNA or public and patient
    engagement information
  • PCT creates joint accountability and clearly
    delegates roles with local partners on gtX of key
    targets
  • PBC leadership and engagement in LAA

Creation of Local Area Agreement based on joint
needs
  • Local Area Agreement
  • Joint Strategic Needs test
  • Does not meet baseline requirements
  • PCT and the local authority agree LAA priorities
  • X of LAA targets directly address the needs
    highlighted in the JSNA
  • PCT and LA both independently accountable for LAA
    targets
  • PCT and the local authority and local strategic
    partners agree LAA priorities
  • Jointly ensure that the LAA priorities are based
    on joint test of needs
  • Y of LAA targets directly address the needs
    highlighted in the JSNA

Self test
Ability to conduct constructive partnerships
  • gtZ of respondents either agree or strongly agree
    with statement The PCT pro-actively engages with
    my organisation to inform and drive strategy,
    service design and resource utilisation
  • Open text feedback supports rating
  • Feedback from 360 survey
  • Example local strategic partnerships (LSPs)
  • PBC survey results Qu 5
  • Does not meet baseline requirements
  • XY of respondents either agree or strongly
    agree with statement The PCT pro-actively
    engages with my organisation to inform and drive
    strategy, service design and resource
    utilisation
  • Open text feedback supports rating
  • Results from PBC survey, Qu 5 Agreed a
    commissioning plan are yes
  • XY of respondents either agree or strongly
    agree with statement The PCT pro-actively
    engages with my organisation to inform and drive
    strategy, service design and resource
    utilisation
  • Open text feedback supports rating

360 Feedback
Reputation as an active and effective partner
  • gtZ of respondents agree or strongly agree with
    statement The PCT is an active and effective
    partner in delivering local health objectives
  • Open text feedback reinforces rating
  • Feedback from 360 survey
  • List of joint milestones agreed with partners
  • Does not meet baseline requirements
  • gtX of respondents agree or strongly agree with
    statement The PCT is an active and effective
    partner in delivering local health objectives
  • Open text feedback reinforces rating
  • Meets milestones with partners
  • gtY of respondents agree or strongly agree with
    statement The PCT is an active and effective
    partner in delivering local health objectives
  • Open text feedback reinforces rating

360 feedback
10
Competency 3 Proactively build continuous and
meaningful engagement with the public and
patients to shape services and improve health
PCTs are responsible through the commissioning
process for investing public funds on behalf of
their patients and communities. In order to make
commissioning decisions that reflect the needs,
priorities and aspirations of the local
population, PCTs will have to engage the public
in a variety of ways, openly and honestly. They
will need to be proactive in seeking out the
views and experiences of the public, patients,
their carers and other stakeholders, especially
those least able to act as advocates for
themselves
Evidence
Below baseline
Baseline
Intermediate
World class
Influence on local health opinions and aspirations
  • Feedback from 360 survey
  • gtX of respondents either agree or strongly agree
    with statement The PCT has substantially and
    proactively shaped the health opinions and
    aspirations of the local population leading to
    demonstrable change
  • Open text feedback supports rating
  • Does not meet baseline requirements
  • XY of respondents either agree or strongly
    agree with statement The PCT has pro-actively
    shaped the health opinions and aspirations of the
    local population leading to demonstrable change
  • Open text feedback supports rating
  • XY of respondents either agree or strongly
    agree with statement The PCT has pro-actively
    shaped the health opinions and aspirations of the
    local population leading to demonstrable change
  • Open text feedback supports rating

360 feedback
Public and patient engagement
  • PCT Engagement and consultation strategy,
    including strategy for reaching disengaged groups
  • of practices with patient participation groups
  • PBC survey results Qu 16
  • PCT has successfully deployed innovative
    approaches to engagement
  • Which have been shared with other PCTs
  • Which have led to high levels of engagement with
    hard-to-reach groups
  • Which accessed non-traditional partners e.g.,
    criminal justice system
  • PCT can demonstrate how patient views have
    affected commissioning plans
  • Does not meet baseline requirements
  • PCT Engagement and consultation strategy
  • Identifies engagement existing initiatives and
    processes
  • Fulfils statutory obligations e.g. focus groups,
    open policy meetings
  • Agreed through consultation
  • Includes regular surveys to gather feedback
  • Results from PBC survey, Qu 16 engagement with
    local population demonstrate methods that are
    used
  • Clear distinction between information shared for
    reference vs. that shared for consultation
  • PCT Engagement and consultation strategy
  • Identifies local aspirations for PPI
  • Explores use of new channels e.g., schools,
    businesses, voluntary groups
  • PCT formally involves patients and public in
    review of services

Metric and self test
Delivery of patient satisfaction
  • Healthcare Commission patient survey data
  • gtX of respondents either agree or strongly agree
    with statements indicating overall satisfaction
    in survey
  • Does not meet baseline requirements
  • XY of respondents either agree or strongly
    agree with statements indicating overall
    satisfaction in survey
  • XY of respondents either agree or strongly
    agree with statements indicating overall
    satisfaction in survey

Metric
11
Competency 4 Lead continuous and meaningful
engagement of all clinicians to inform strategy
and drive quality, service design and resource
utilisation
Clinicians are best placed to advise and lead on
issues relating to clinical quality and
effectiveness. They are the local care pathway
experts who work closely with local people
understanding clinical needs. PCTs should ensure
that through the involvement of clinicians in
strategic planning and service design, services
commissioned build on the current evidence base,
maximise local care pathways and utilise
resources effectively. Professional Executive
Committees (PECs) have a crucial role to play in
building and strengthening clinical leadership in
the strategic commissioning process. Practice
based commissioning (PBC) is the key methodology
for this and should be maximised to drive
innovative and transformational change
Evidence
Below baseline
Baseline
Intermediate
World class
Clinical engagement
  • Delegated authority to clinical committees
  • Number of PBC proposals approved and live
  • of clinicians leading initiatives
  • PEC chairs, consortia reps, acute trusts, local
    social care, and allied health practitioners are
    embedded into and are active participants in PCT
    planning and service development
  • Does not meet baseline requirements
  • PCT can identify several non-PEC clinicians that
    have made substantive contributions to PCT
    strategy, planning and policy development
  • Clinicians are regularly present and actively
    participate in PEC meetings
  • Includes clinicians that represent all healthcare
    and well-being delivery methods

Self test/Metric
  • Data analysis at PBC level e.g., number of
    defined procedures per
  • Practice reports e.g., activity and financial
  • Evidence of regular communications about quality
    improvement ideas
  • PBC survey results Qu 15

Dissemination of information to support clinical
decision making
  • PCT can calculate PBC return on investment and is
    in upper quartile
  • PCT proactively solicits and disseminates status
    updates and quality improvement ideas from all
    practices on a monthly basis
  • Quality reports include recent clinical evidence,
    benchmarks, and changes in clinical practice
  • Does not meet baseline requirements
  • PCT can calculate PBC level return on investment
  • PCT proactively solicits and disseminates status
    updates and quality improvement ideas from all
    practices on a biannual basis
  • Provided data is valued by clinicans
  • Results from PBC survey, Qu 15 Rating of
    information are fairly good or very good
  • PCT can calculate PBC return on investment and is
    in third quartile
  • PCT proactively solicits and disseminates status
    updates and quality improvement ideas from all
    practices on a quarterly basis
  • Quality reports include recent clinical evidence
    and benchmarks

Self test
  • Feedback from 360 survey

Reputation as leader of clinical engagement
  • gtX either agree or strongly agree with statement
    The PCT pro-actively engages all clinicians to
    inform and drive strategy, service design and
    resource utilisation
  • Open text feedback supports rating
  • Does not meet baseline requirements
  • XY either agree or strongly agree with
    statement The PCT pro-actively engages all
    clinicians to inform and drive strategy, service
    design and resource utilisation
  • Open text feedback supports rating
  • XY either agree or strongly agree with
    statement The PCT pro-actively engages all
    clinicians to inform and drive strategy, service
    design and resource utilisation
  • Open text feedback supports rating

360 feedback
12
Competency 5 Manage knowledge and undertake
robust and regular needs tests that establish a
full understanding of current and future local
health needs and requirements
Commissioning decisions should be based on sound
knowledge and evidence. By identifying current
needs and anticipating future trends, PCTs will
be able to ensure that current and future
commissioned services address and respond to the
needs of the whole population, especially those
whose needs are the greatest. The joint
strategic needs test (JSNA) will form one part of
this test but when operated at world class levels
will require more and richer data, knowledge and
intelligence than the minimum laid out within the
proposed duty of a JSNA. Fulfilling this
competency will require a high level of knowledge
management with associated actuarial and
analytical skill
Evidence
Below baseline
Baseline
Intermediate
World class
Analytical skills and insights
  • Joint Strategic Needs test
  • Reports analysing time-series progress toward
    PCT health status objectives
  • PCT has a consistent and validated methodology
    for contributing to the JSNA
  • PCT analyses progress and any gaps, identifies
    the key drivers of variance from expectations and
    develops solutions
  • Does not meet baseline requirements
  • PCT public health team conducts regular needs
    tests with a consistent methodology to identify
    gaps in care
  • PCT prioritises major health needs for its local
    population
  • PCT analyses progress towards reducing gaps and
    identifies the key causes of variance
  • PCT has clear, robust segmentation of population
    by healthcare needs

Self test
Understanding of health needs trends
  • Joint Strategic Needs test
  • PCT has a view of unmet needs for disadvantaged
    subgroups and on an ongoing basis identifies gaps
    in care and opportunities to improve services for
    these populations
  • PCT uses model to analyse progress, identify any
    gaps, identify the key drivers of variance from
    expectations, and monitor emerging trends. PCT
    uses this information to develop solutions
  • Does not meet baseline requirements
  • PCT has a fact-based list of the major health
    risks and priorities facing its local population
    by demographic and disease group, as identified
    in the JSNA
  • Priorities are aligned with vital signs
  • PCT can identify over time trends in major health
    and well being issues
  • PCT has a view of unmet needs for its local
    population and can disaggregate to locality/ward
    level
  • PCT uses its model to analyse progress, and
    identify any gaps

Self test
Use of health needs benchmarks
  • Reports comparing local health status against
    national benchmarks
  • Reports comparing local health status, vital
    signs and health deliverables relative to peer
    PCTs
  • PCT benchmarks itself continuously against other
    PCTs, national and international targets on local
    health needs status
  • PCT has developed plans to match the top
    performers on each benchmark and identifies the
    key capabilities it will need to develop to match
    their performance
  • PCT has identified key health needs gaps
  • Does not meet baseline requirements
  • PCT occasionally benchmarks itself against
    national targets and other PCTs on local health
    needs status
  • PCT has developed plans to improve its
    performance on each benchmark
  • PCT effectively disseminates reports e.g., to
    providers, public
  • PCT regularly bench-marks itself against national
    targets and other PCTs on local health needs
    status
  • PCT has developed plans to improve its
    performance to meet third quartile performance on
    each benchmark

Self test
13
Competency 6 Prioritise investment according to
local needs, service requirements and the values
of the NHS
By having a clear understanding of the needs of
different sections of the local population, PCTs,
with their partners, will set strategic
priorities and make investment decisions, focused
on the achievement of key clinical and other
outcomes. This will include investment plans that
address areas of greatest health inequality.
Evidence
Below baseline
Baseline
Intermediate
World class
Predictive modelling skills and insights
  • Example scenarios
  • PCT staff can lead knowledgeable discussion and
    defence of all predictive models, including
    evidence to support modelling techniques and
    assumptions used
  • PCT has, and effectively uses, predictive
    modelling to support its ability to target
    required interventions with precision
  • PCT forecasting is based on full understanding of
    all relevant root causes, and linked with other
    public forecasts
  • Does not meet baseline requirements
  • PCT demonstrates simple analysis of extremes
    including best and worst case outcomes scenarios
  • PCTs model conducts sensitivity analysis to
    project probable ranges by altering inputs to
    determine impact on scenario

Self test
Prioritisation of investment to improve
populations health
  • Clear list of prioritisation criteria, or
    equivalent prioritisation tool or matrix
  • Definition of value for money
  • PCT has criteria for evaluating and prioritising
    projects and initiatives as a result of extensive
    consultation with key stakeholders, including GPs
    and other clinicians PCT managers, caregivers,
    service users and the public include criteria
    related to value for money
  • Does not meet baseline requirements
  • PCT has defined criteria for evaluating and
    prioritising of key initiatives, including value
    for money and return on investment
  • PCT Board consults with PCT clinicians, local GPs
    and key stakeholders when evaluating strategic
    initiatives
  • Value is linked directly to PCTs key public
    health objectives, such as significant reductions
    in morbidity, or the elimination of health
    inequalities

Self test
Incorporation of priorities into strategic
investment plan
  • Prioritised list from last years strategic
    planning
  • Current strategic plan
  • Planning and budgeting cycles
  • of allocation in pooled budgets
  • Programme budgets
  • Projects and initiatives evaluated against
    prioritisation with effective targeting of
    resources toward projects that offered the
    highest value for money
  • Planning and budgeting cycles are aligned to
    facilitate coordination and joint financing
    arrangements
  • Mature programme budgets for all key priority
    care pathways/ disease groups with integrated
    investment plans of up to 10 years
  • Does not meet baseline requirements
  • Projects and initiatives evaluated against
    prioritisation
  • Some alignment between identified gaps, current
    initiatives to address those gaps, and strategic
    investment plan
  • Clear and consistent alignment between identified
    gaps, current initiatives to address those gaps,
    and strategic investment plan
  • PCT, local authority and other stakeholders have
    identified clear responsibility for financing
  • PCT develops programme budgets demonstrating a
    whole system approach to investment

Self test
14
Competency 7 Effectively stimulate the market
to meet demand and secure required clinical and
health and wellbeing outcomes
PCTs will need to have in place a range of
responsive providers that they can choose from.
They must understand the current and future
market and provider requirements. Employing
their knowledge of future priorities, needs and
community aspirations, PCTs will use their
investment power to influence improvement, choice
and service design through new or existing
providers to secure the desired outcomes and
quality, effectively shaping their market and
increasing local choice of provision. This will
include building upon local social capital and
encouraging provision via third sector
organisations. Where adequate provider choice
does not exist, PCTs will need clear strategies
to address this need, especially in areas of
relatively poor health experience, access or
outcome
Evidence
Below baseline
Baseline
Intermediate
World class
Knowledge of current and future provider capacity
and capability
  • Complete list of providers in the region
  • Itemised list of spend by provider
  • PBR test of providers
  • PCT has identified cost and quality for each
    procedure in each area of care by HRG / tariff
  • PCT has dedicated resource containing expertise
    and experience to support provider capability
    development
  • PCT can demonstrate several cases where knowledge
    and influencing of provider capacity and
    capability led to noticeable improvements
  • Does not meet baseline requirements
  • PCT has identified a range of core providers for
    each speciality and level of care, including NHS
    providers and independent sector providers
  • PCT assesses relative cost and quality of
    providers
  • Uses patient feedback to gain richer
    understanding of commissioned services
  • PCT has a complete and prioritised list of NHS
    providers, independent sector providers and PCT-
    or GP-organised diagnostic and treatment centres,
    third sector and social enterprise groups
  • PCT assesses relative cost and quality of
    providers by disease group / care pathway

Self test
Alignment of provider capacity with health needs
projections
  • Demand projections
  • Capacity plans
  • JSNA
  • PCT takes demand projections and incorporates
    demand management assumptions from strategic plan
    (e.g., pathway redesign) to identify required
    capacity by provider type, by speciality and by
    care/patient pathway
  • PCT indicates specific changes to provider
    capacity driven by needs modelling, including
    long term structural changes
  • PCT understands real capacity of local providers
    and directs patient flow accordingly
  • Does not meet baseline requirements
  • PCT uses demand projections to project required
    capacity by speciality and matches this with
    provider capacity
  • PCT takes demand projections and incorporates
    demand management assumptions from strategic plan
  • PCT indicates specific changes to provider
    capacity
  • PCT models demand and supply scenarios that can
    be varied and tested with risk test

Self test
Creation of effective choices for patients
  • Capacity plans
  • Patient choice metric
  • PCT has clear investment/disinvestment processes
    which achieve an optimal mix of providers based
    on clinically defined cost/quality trade-off
  • Does not meet baseline requirements
  • PCT occasionally reviews the healthcare provision
    marketplace and identifies potential providers
  • PCT investigates potential providers and examines
    both costs and quality
  • PCT uses patient experience data to develop
    specification of services
  • PCT has clear investment/ disinvestment processes

Self test
15
Competency 8 Promote and specify continuous
improvements in quality and outcomes through
clinical and provider innovation and configuration
PCTs are the driver of a continually improving
NHS. They seek innovation, knowledge and best
practice, applying this locally to improve the
quality and outcomes of commissioned services.
In partnership with local clinicians, PBCs, and
providers, they will specify required quality and
outcomes, facilitating supplier and contractor
innovation that delivers at best value. Through
open and effective commissioning and
decommissioning decisions, PCTs transform
clinical and service configuration, meeting local
needs and securing world class improvements in
outcomes and quality
Evidence
Below baseline
Baseline
Intermediate
World class
Identification of improvement opportunities
  • Patient pathway redesign initiatives, including
    process maps and implementation plans
  • of clinicians leading initiatives
  • PCT and providers regularly review and agree
    clinical pathways and engage on opportunities for
    improvement and innovation
  • For each pathway initiative, PCT has outlined
  • A process map listing the specific
    interventions that are required at each point in
    the pathway and clear criteria for moving
    patients along the pathway
  • Clinical guidelines sourced from international
    best practice
  • Plans to ensure smooth patient flow along the
    pathway and between different levels of care
  • Does not meet baseline requirements
  • PCT demonstrates some recent examples of clinical
    pathway reconfiguration due to innovative
    initiatives led by PCT and providers
  • PCT has identified a process map listing the
    specific interventions that are required at each
    point in the pathway
  • PCT and providers review and agree clinical
    pathways and engage on opportunities for
    improvement and innovation
  • For each pathway initiative, PCT has outlined a
    process map listing the specific interventions
    that are required at each point in the pathway
    and clear criteria for moving patients along the
    pathway

Self test
Implementation of improvement initiatives
  • Example report of patient pathway redesign
  • of spend shifted to new clinical pathways
  • Initiative milestones
  • Milestones of clinical pathway change programmes
    are actively tracked
  • Initiatives demonstrate overall improvement in
    service as a result of initiatives
  • Map of Medicine pathways used to inform
    improvement initiatives
  • Does not meet baseline requirements
  • PCT conducted a pilot of the pathway redesign and
    measured progress against objectives (e.g.
    improved quality, improved patient experience)
  • Changes in clinical pathways has led to
    demonstrable changes e.g. shift in spend,
    improvement in access

Metric and self test
Collection of real time quality and outcome
information
  • List of key clinical quality and outcome metrics
    for in-year and annual monitoring
  • Example reports that include clinical evidence /
    international best practice
  • PCT has developed strategies for monitoring the
    impacts of specific initiatives on clinical
    quality/ outcomes
  • Reporting arrangements process and transmit data
    directly to key decision-makers
  • PCT actively seeks out clinical evidence for
    comparison with international best practice
  • Does not meet baseline requirements
  • Identification of key clinical quality and
    outcome metrics to monitor
  • Specified monitoring frequency and reporting
    arrangements with major providers
  • Information is able to be disaggregated to
    sufficient detail to support identification of
    drivers of performance

Self test
16
Competency 9 Secure procurement skills that
ensure robust and viable contracts
Procurement and contracting processes ensure that
agreements with providers are set out clearly and
accurately with both commissioner and provider
clear about what is expected. By putting in place
excellent procurement and contracting processes,
PCTs can specify quality standards and outcomes
and facilitate good working relationships with
their providers, offering protection to service
users and ensuring value for money.
Evidence
World class
Below baseline
Baseline
Intermediate
Understanding of providers economics
  • PCT can use its database to sort and extract a
    variety of metrics and bench-marks by providers
    and by disease group e.g., capacity, average
    and marginal cost and financial results.
  • PCT uses target costing, i.e. forecasts service
    cost before providers supply estimate
  • PCT understands the cost impact of
  • Increasing activity volume through a provider
  • Changing service specification
  • PCT also has an ongoing process for challenging
    and disseminating the fact base of providers
  • Examples of provider cost vs. quality
  • Baseline reference costs
  • Does not meet baseline requirements
  • Understanding of
  • Provider economics
  • Provider market dynamics
  • PCT has a database on economics of existing
    providers and performs analyses on commissioned
    or in-house providers economics
  • Uses cost-benefit analysis

Self test
Negotiation of contracts around defined variables
  • Examples of defined provider negotiation
    variables
  • Tariff re-negotiations
  • Examples of negotiation preparation
  • Negotiation has successfully delivered changes to
    variables
  • PCT rigorously prepares for contract negotiations
    including
  • Establishing a target price
  • Establishing the best alternative to a negotiated
    agreement (BATNA)
  • Defining a negotiation strategy
  • Defining negotiation team roles
  • Does not meet baseline requirements
  • Identification of negotiation variables e.g.,
    cost, quality
  • Competitive tendering forall new services in
    excess of 2m
  • PCT explicitly uses negotiation variables

Self test
Creation of robust contracts based on outcomes
  • Example contracts
  • contracts in place on time (ALE metric)
  • 100 of contracts include clearly specified,
    measurable, and practical outcomes and quality
    metrics, with a transparent arbitration process
  • Clinicians are involved in review and
    finalisation of contracts
  • Specific measurable performance improvement
    targets are jointly agreed
  • Contract incentives drive desired provider
    performance which results in health improvements
  • Does not meet baseline requirements
  • All elective and non-elective acute existing
    contracts include clearly specified outcomes and
    quality metrics, with a transparent arbitration
    process, including ISTC
  • All newly negotiated contracts are based on
    desired outcomes and service quality with defined
    performance improvement targets
  • All contracts agreed and signed by 1st April
  • Outcome and quality targets are an explicit part
    of all negotiations and are incorporated in
    contracts
  • gtX existing contracts include clearly specified
    outcomes and quality metrics, with a transparent
    arbitration process, including ISTC

Self test
17
Competency 10 Effectively manage systems and
work in partnership with providers to ensure
contract compliance and continuous improvement in
quality and outcomes and value for money

Commissioners will need to manage their
relationships and contracts with providers in
order to ensure that they deliver the highest
possible quality of service and value for money.
This will involve working closely with providers
to sustain and improve provision, engaging in
constructive performance discussions to ensure
continuous improvement. Commissioners will need
to ensure that their providers understand and
promote the values of the NHS.
Evidence
World class
Below baseline
Baseline
Intermediate
Use of real time performance information
  • Examples of provider performance reports /
    comparative scorecards
  • Example of public dissemination of performance
    information
  • Ownership and management control of data is
    clearly defined
  • Data is proactively shared with providers to
    drive fact-based continuous improvement in
    quality and outcomes
  • Data is readily available and actively managed
  • Data supports key performance indicators across
    all domains (clinical quality, access, etc)
  • Performance information is available for and
    accessible to the pubic
  • Data is shared with providers when requested
  • Data is accessible and used to monitor provider
    performance
  • Data is proactively shared and discussed with
    providers
  • Data is accessible and actively managed
  • Data supports key performance indicators
  • Does not meet baseline requirements

Self test
Implementation of regular provider performance
discussions
  • Provider reports performance tracking
  • Comparative scorecards
  • Meeting minutes
  • Regular reports addressing performance of major
    providers, acute care, primary and community care
    and social care
  • Quarterly performance discussions with key
    providers
  • Annual performance improvement discussions
  • Continuous performance improvement discussions
    leading to demonstrable change
  • Ongoing provider capability building through
    sharing of international best practice
  • PCT clearly defines responsibility for the
    performance management interface for each supplier
  • Quarterly performance improvement discussions
  • Performance tracking for all providers, segmented
    by type
  • Does not meet baseline requirements

Self test
Resolution of ongoing contractual issues
  • Breach of contract escalation guidance, including
    formal arbitration
  • Example contracts with defined governance
    framework
  • Example interventions
  • Contracts indicate when intervention is required
  • Contracts ensure PCT can intervene when necessary
  • Non-compliance with contracts is investigated
  • Strict, pro-active contract compliance management
    with all providers
  • Actionable next steps for improvement are agreed,
    with assigned leads, time frames and milestones
  • Required improvements are delivered
  • Contract compliance management with major
    providers
  • Actionable next steps for improvement are agreed
  • Improvement plans are actively monitored and
    tracked
  • Does not meet baseline requirements

Self test , metrics
18
3. Governance Assessment will address four
questions
Question
Assessment methodology
  • Is there a coherent strategy in place that will
    deliver quality and health outcomes?
  • Panel review of Strategic plan
  • Is the strategy underpinned by a long term
    financial plan?
  • Panel review of long term Financial plan
  • Does the organisation have controls in place to
    know what is going on?
  • Is the organisation developing talent and
    capability to support organisation development?
  • Board self certification
  • Panel review to verify certification

Adding years to life and life to years
19
There are 4 methods of assessment that will be
utilised
Description
Adding years to life and life to years
20
Sample output for a PCT
PCT XXXXX Review Date XXXX
3 yrs
Now
Governance
Health outcomes and quality
Competencies
A
Outcomes measures chosen from vital signs by PCT
Improvement of outcomes are quantified
Metrics and assessments aggregate to give an
overall rating
10
0
  • Stroke
  • CVD
  • Cancer
  • Life expectancy
  • Inequality
  • Obesity
  • Choice
  • 18 weeks
  • LTCs
  • MRSA

3
  • Local leader of NHS
  • Collaborates with partners
  • Engagement
  • Clinical leadership
  • Assess needs
  • Prioritisation
  • Stimulates provision
  • Innovation
  • Procurement and contracting
  • Performance management
  • Investment

7
5
2
10
8
7
23
Historic performance and improvement could also
be shown as well as UK average
6
12
Adding years to life and life to years
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com