-The MMPP/D/2/K System - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

-The MMPP/D/2/K System

Description:

Own results of the MMPP system computed with Sharpe. Conclusion. References. 3 /10 ... http://www.ee.duke.edu/~chirel/IRISA/sharpeGui.html. Danamics ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:11
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: Alf652
Category:
Tags: mmpp | ee | modeling | system

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: -The MMPP/D/2/K System


1
-The MMPP/D/2/K System
  • Steven Pilarski

2
Contents
  • Introduction
  • Examples for source modelling with Petri Nets
  • The MMPP/D/2/K system
  • How it works
  • Token game with Danamics
  • Important performance results
  • Own results of the MMPP system computed with
    Sharpe
  • Conclusion
  • References

3
Source Models with Petri Nets
  • Some examples
  • Poisson source
  • (Markov)1
  • ON/OFF source
  • (IPP)2

1,2 Stochastische Netze 1, Prof.Dr.
Müller-Clostermann (http//www.informatik.uni-esse
n.de/SysMod/lehre/SN/)
4
MMPP/D/2/K Model as a DSPN
Source
Buffer/Mux
Operators
http//www.dspnexpress.de/
5
Values
  • Given
  • Duration of bursty mode and normal mode are
  • Average arrival rate
  • Searched
  • With these values and a burst factor B we can
    compute the necessary ?s (Bursty_Arrival and
    Normal_Arrival)

6
Some Performance Results
  • It is interesting to see how the loss probability
    behaves when the buffer size or/and burst factor
    are increasing/decreasing

3,4 Thümler, Axel Stochastic Modeling and
Analysis of 3G Mobile Communication Systems
(http//eldorado.uni-dortmund.de8080/FB4/ls4/fors
chung/2003/Thuemmler/Thuemmlerunt.pdf
7
Some Sharpe results (1)
  • Restrictions
  • With Sharpe it is not possible to model
    deterministic SPNs (only GSPNs), beause of that
    the service rates are neg.ex. distributed

Burst_Factor Loss_Probability bei K100 Loss_Probability K200 Loss_Probability K300 Loss_Probability K500
B1 0 0 0 0
B10 0 0 0 0
B25 1,36E-09 0 0 0
B50 0,00000061 3,6E-11 0 0
B100 0,0000338 0,000000152 6E-10 0
B200 0,000276 0,00000845 0,00000026 2,45E-10
B300 0,00052 0,0000301 0,00000185 6,7E-09
8
Some Sharpe results (2)-Burst Factor vs. Buffer
Size

Loss Probability
Burst Factor
9
Conclusion
  • Burst traffic influences loss probability
    enormously
  • Big buffers can help to avoid these problems, but
    they (can) offer other problems too
  • Increasing of Jitter and End-to-End delay
    (important for VoIP e.g.)
  • Buffers are expensive
  • Fast memory is necessary
  • Queuing algorithms are complex, particularly if
    priorities have to be implemented (e.g. Fair
    Queuing, Loss Priorities)
  • But without or too little buffer, packet loss can
    grow about all limits and service level
    agreements are hard to keep
  • E.g. Typical values for cell loss in ATM are in
    the range of 10-8 to 10-10!!

10
References
  • MMPP/D/2/K System
  • http//mobicom.cs.uni-dortmund.de/gsmp/DSPN/mmppd2
    k/mmppd2k.html
  • Thümmler, Axel
  • Stochastic Modeling and Analysis of 3G Mobile
    Communication Systems (http//eldorado.uni-dortmu
    nd.de8080/FB4/ls4/forschung/2003/Thuemmler/Thuemm
    lerunt.pdf)
  • Müller-Clostermann, Bruno
  • Stochstische Netze 1, Modelle der Informatik
    (http//www.informatik.uni-essen.de/SysMod/lehre/i
    ndex.html)
  • Rathgeb, Erwin
  • Hochgeschwindigkeitsnetze (http//tdrwww.exp-math.
    uni-essen.de/index2.php)
  • Sharpe
  • http//www.ee.duke.edu/chirel/IRISA/sharpeGui.htm
    l
  • Danamics
  • http//www.cs.uct.ac.za/Research/DNA/DaNAMiCS/
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com