Search with Context - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Search with Context

Description:

Reiner Kraft and his colleagues, Yahoo! Research ... Major Findings. QR performs quite well. IFM performs well in recall and relevance ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:19
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: Ale8277
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Search with Context


1
Search with Context
  • Reiner Kraft and his colleagues, Yahoo! Research
  • CIKM05 Y!Q Contextual Search at the Point of
    Inspiration
  • WWW06 Searching with Context

2
Outline
  • Motivation
  • Algorithm
  • Evaluation

3
Motivation
  • User queries often convey ambiguous and
    incomplete user information need
  • Context can help clarify user information need
  • Capturing context (Y!Q, CIKM05)
  • Exploiting context (WWW06)

4
Y!Q
  • Demo of Y!Q
  • Contextual search engine (server side)
  • JavaScript at front-end for user interaction
    (client side), like IntelliZap

5
Y!Q Architecture
6
Three Modules of Y!Q
  • Content Analysis (CA)
  • Select terms from context and queries
  • Query Planning and Rewriting Framework (QPR)
  • Determine Service Providers (SE, News)
  • Rewrite queries
  • Contextual Ranking (CR)
  • Aggregate search results

7
Overview of WWW06 Paper
  • Algorithms to do contextual search
  • Query Rewriting (QR)
  • Rank Biasing (RB)
  • Iterative Filtering Meta-search (IFM)

8
Algorithm Description
9
Query Rewriting and Rank Biasing
  • Query Rewriting
  • Use standard search engine (Simple)
  • Parameter terms in contextual query
  • Rank Biasing
  • Special search engine (rank biasing operator)
  • ltquerygt ltselectioncatgtltoptionPersian, 2.0gt

10
Iterative Filtering Meta-search
  • Query generation sliding window
  • Ranking aggregation
  • Ranking average
  • Markov Chain
  • States are URL
  • If average URL u rank higher than URL v, there is
    a link from u to v
  • Small transition probability from every url to
    every other url (ergodic and aperiodic)

11
Evaluation
  • Dataset 200 context benchmark collected from the
    logs
  • Relevance judgment 24,566 judgments from 28
    judge expert
  • Evaluation metrics P_at_1, P_at_3, SP_at_1, SP_at_3

12
Experiment Procedure
  • A judge selects context (most or least
    comfortable) from the benchmark
  • For each web search result, four choices 1)
    relevant, 2) somewhat relevant, 3) no, 4) cant
    tell

13
Major Findings
  • QR performs quite well
  • IFM performs well in recall and relevance
  • Human manually queries are not good enough

14
Experiment Results Query Rewriting
15
Experiment Results (cont.)
16
  • The End
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com