8 8 Addressing for IPv6 End to End Multihoming <draft-ohta-multi6-8plus8-00.txt> - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

8 8 Addressing for IPv6 End to End Multihoming <draft-ohta-multi6-8plus8-00.txt>

Description:

8 byte locators mostly ignored by ULPs. 8 byte IDs to identify ULP entities ... MA (multi address) option is provided. DNS. Works as is ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:25
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: ietf
Learn more at: http://www.ietf.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 8 8 Addressing for IPv6 End to End Multihoming <draft-ohta-multi6-8plus8-00.txt>


1
88 Addressing for IPv6 End to End
Multihomingltdraft-ohta-multi6-8plus8-00.txtgt
  • Masataka Ohta
  • Tokyo Institute of Technology
  • mohta_at_necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp

2
88 Addressing
  • Addresses are constructed from
  • 8 byte locators mostly ignored by ULPs
  • 8 byte IDs to identify ULP entities
  • For multihoming with multiple addresses
  • The Internetworking layer is stateless and can
    not hold session information
  • as exemplified by PMTUD gotcha
  • no change on the Internetworking layer
  • Interoperability with legacy v6 is an issue

3
Leagacy IPv6 and EUI-64 based IPv6 unicast
address
  • Transport layer needs to know when to support 88
    addressing
  • hopefully not with any packet exchange
  • EUI-64 based IPv6 unicast address format reserves
    group bit
  • can be used to enable 88

4
ID Space Structure
  • IDs may be derived from locators
  • IDs have structure corresponding to routing
    hierarchy
  • IDs may be used anywhere including sites outside
    of a site from where the IDs are derived
  • May be useful for temporary ID for privacy
  • IDs may be assigned like domain names
  • without trademark issues

5
Destination Locator Selection
  • Choose randomly
  • Consult the global routing table
  • site administrators can tell its preference as
    some metric for load balancing

6
Source Locator Selection
  • Not an issue
  • is an issue of a peer as a destination locator
    selection
  • Is an issue for ingress filtering
  • let routing protocols carry the proper source
    locator

7
IP Mobility
  • Not an Issue of M6
  • IP mobility may be improved using IDs

8
TCP
  • Have mechanism to tell locator set to its peer
  • MA (multi address) option is provided

9
DNS
  • Works as is
  • already support multiple addresses of nameservers

10
Assessment Against RFC3582
  • Have all the desirable properties
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com