Modeling Carbon Diffusion in W - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Modeling Carbon Diffusion in W

Description:

Use spatial Carbon implantation profile at time t=0 ... Quasi Steady State Carbon Concentration: ... The high W-surface layer temperatures facilitate C diffusion in W. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:37
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: shahrams
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Modeling Carbon Diffusion in W


1
Modeling Carbon Diffusion in W Armor and
SiC Shahram Sharafat and N. Ghoniem University
of California Los Angeles, CA.
HAPL Materials Working Group Meeting UCLAMay
15 and 16, 2006
2
OUTLINE
  • Current Capabilities (7 slides)
  • Since 14th HAPL (2 slides)
  • Planned Improvements (1 slide)

3
Current Capabilities
  • Model the Carbon buildup using multi-physics PDE
  • (1) Carbon mass diffusion combined and
  • (2) temperature evolution
  • Use spatial Carbon implantation profile at time
    t0
  • Use end of shot temperature profile at time t0
  • Determine Carbon buildup in tungsten armor

Carbon Implantation Profile
4
Carbon Diffusion Model
  • Consider only Carbon Diffusion with R 0
  • No WC or W2C formation

Carbon Diffusion in Tungsten ?
http//FusionNET.seas.ucla.edu
(Eckstein, 1999)
5
Carbon Concentration Profile
6
Carbon Concentration Profile
7
Quasi Steady State Diffusion Approximation
  • Quasi Steady State Parameters
  • Carbons per shot 1.07 ? 1019 ions
  • Avg. Carbon Flux (r10.1 m, 10 Hz) 8.35 ?
    1016 m-2 s-1
  • Avg. W-Temperature (50 um) 500 oC
  • Diffusion Pre-exponential (Do) 3.15 ?107 m2 s-1
  • Activation Energy (Q) 1.78 eV

8
Current Capabilities
  • Model the Carbon buildup using multi-physics PDE
  • (1) Carbon mass diffusion combined and
  • (2) temperature evolution
  • Use spatial Carbon implantation profile at time
    t0
  • Use end of shot temperature profile at time t0
  • Determine Carbon buildup in tungsten armor

Carbon Buildup Profile
Carbon Implantation Profile
9
Carbon Diffusion Observations
  • The high W-surface layer temperatures facilitate
    C diffusion in W.
  • Carbon does not preferentially diffuse out from
    surface but also spreads inwards (towards F82H).
  • C-to-W ratio of 1 can be reached in lt10 days (2
    mm at 10 Hz r 10.1 m, 405 MJ).
  • Quasi Steady State Analysis shows that F82H steel
    wall is protected from C pickup (C reaches 20
    um lt 1 year).
  • Formation of W2C and WC was not considered
    (would slow C-diffusion until C/W ratio gt 1).
  • Evaporation of C from WC surface was not
    considered It would increase C loss from
    surface WC?W2C above 2000 oC(1).

1Yamada, JNM 2000
10
Since 14th HAPL
  • Accumulated thermodynamic properties of WC and
    W2C (formation energies and solubility limits)
  • Set up model to include reactions between W and
    C.
  • Based on solubility limits of C in W (at 2000 oC
    0.05 at. ) all Carbon is consumed in
    reactions.
  • Revisited C diffusion in SiC

11
WC and W2C Formation
Solubility of C in W
  • Need Experiments with WC including the effects of
    H and He implantation on
  • Mechanical Properties of WC
  • Helium and Hydrogen Release

UCLA FusionNETWORK fusionNET.seas.ucla.edu
  • At 2000 oC solubility of C in Tungsten is of the
    order of 0.05 at.

12
Carbon Implantation in SiC
Implantation of 12C per shot
  • Carbon Implantation range 1.75 mm
  • Number of C per shot 6.8x1019 C/shot
  • After 1x106 shots (1.2 days) C/SiC ratio
    approaches unity (or SiC2) assuming no diffusion
  • Concerns Regarding Excess Carbon in SiC
  • Carbon diffuses readily (int.
    substit./detrapping)
  • Carbon can bond chemically with H, D, and T
  • Formation of Hydro-carbons CxHy ?T retention?

Huanchen, Ghoniem 1994
  • Chemical Trapping of H, D, T slows down proton
    diffusion, defect annealing, and may interact
    synergistically with He
  • Pursuing rate of Hydro-Carbon formation

13
Planned Improvements
  • Complete modeling of WC and W2C formation in
    multi-physics analysis of C-diffusion
  • Expecting less of a spread of Carbon ? highly
    localized WC formation (implantation profile may
    be maintained until W/C 1)
  • Investigate effects of simultaneous H
    implantation ? will H compete with W for Carbon
    ??
  • Model C diffusion in SiC using Multi-physics PDE
    solver.

14
WC-W2C Thermo-Mechanical Impact
  • Concerns
  • Lower KIC , s affects mechanical response (crack
    nucl. growth).
  • Lower k, Tm may impacts thermal performance of
    FW.
  • High C-content might impact Tritium release rates
  • W2C forms at 800 oC and WC forms(1) at 1000 oC
  • Helium release from WC above 1200 oC is similar
    to W(2).

2 SiC-B4C data Hino-JNM-1999
1Hatano 2005 Roth 2001
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com