2005 ITRS Public Conference

1
2005 ITRS Public Conference
Emerging Research Devices
San Francisco, CA
July 13, 2005

• Jim Hutchby SRC
• Mike Garner Intel

2
ITRS Emerging Research Devices Working Group

• George Bourianoff Intel/SRC
• Joe Brewer U. Florida
• Toshiro Hiramoto Tokyo U.
• Jim Hutchby SRC
• Mike Forshaw UC London
• Tsu-Jae King UC Berkeley
• Rainer Waser RWTH A
• In Yoo Samsung
• John Carruthers OGI
• Lothar Risch Infineon
• Ming-Jinn Tsai ERSO/ITRI
• Wei-Tsun Shiau UMC
• Peter Zeitzoff ISMT
• Rama Muraldihar Freescale

• Makoto Yoshimi SOITEC
• Kristin De Meyer IMEC
• Tak Ning IBM
• Philip Wong Stanford U.
• Luan Tran Micron
• Victor Zhirnov SRC/NCSU
• Simon Deleonibus LETI
• Thomas Skotnicki ST Me
• Yuegang Zhang Intel
• Kentaro Shibahara Hiroshima U.
• Fred Boeuf ST Me
• Dan Hammerstrom OGI
• Philippe Coronel ST Me
• Phil Kuekes HP

3
ITRS Emerging Research Materials Working Group

• Susan Holl Intel
• Jim Hutchby SRC
• Rafael Reif MIT
• Sadasivan Shankar Intel
• Shinichi Takagi U. Tokyo
• Eric Vogel NIST
• Kang Wang UCLA
• Victor Zhirnov SRC
• Dave Roberts Air Products
• Rudd Tromp IBM

• Charles Black IBM
• John Carruthers OGI
• Alex Demkov UT Austin
• Gerhard Klimeck Purdue
• Mike Garner Intel
• Bruno Ghysiene SOITEC
• Jeff Grossman LLNL
• David Muller Cornell
• Dan Herr SRC
• George Bourianoff Intel
• John Henry Scott NIST

4
ITRS Emerging Research Architectures Working
Group

• Rainer Waser Aachen U.
• Victor Zhirnov SRC/NCSU
• Dan Hammerstrom OGI
• Vwani Roychowdery UCLA
• Phil Kuekes HP
• Christian Gamrat CEA

• Mike Forshaw UCL
• John Carruthers OGI
• George Bourianoff Intel/SRC
• Tobias Noll Aachen U.
• Erik DeBenedictis SNL
• Lou Lome IDA

5
Charter of ERD Chapter

• Develop an Emerging Research Devices chapter to
• Critically assess currently proposed approaches
  to Information Processing beyond ultimate CMOS
• Identify promising new approach(es) to
  Information Processing technology to be
  implemented by 2020
• To offer substantive guidance to
• Global research community
• Relevant government agencies
• Technology managers
• Suppliers

6
A Taxonomy for Nano-Information Processing
Hierarchy
Computational models
Bio inspired
Quantum
Analogue
Digital
Architec- tures
Reconfigurable
Quantum
Cellular arrays
Bio inspired
Boolean
Molecular state
Phase state
Electric charge
State variables
Scaled CMOS
Spin orientation
RTDs
1D FETs
Molecular
SETs
Devices
Ferromagnetic
Spintronic
7
Scope of Emerging Research Devices2003
Bulk CMOS
Double-Gate CMOS
8
Scope of Emerging Research Devices2005
9

Single Gate Non-classical CMOS
Transfer to PIDS/FEP in 2005
10
Multiple Gate Non-classical CMOS
Transfer to PIDS/FEP in 2005
11
Emerging Research Memory Devices
Remove SET Memory from 2005 ERD
12
Emerging Research Memory Devices(Additional
Changes in 2005)
13
Emerging Research Logic Devices
Replace with Ferromagnetic Logic
Remove RSFQ from 2005 ERD
14
ERD Key Messages

• New Emerging Research Materials Section
• Revised the Nano-architectures Section Added
  Reconfigurable Implementations
• Emerging Memory Section
• Expanded the Baseline Memory Section Include
  SRAM, NOR NAND Flash in addition to DRAM
• Added new Prototype Section Include FeRAM,
  MRAM, PCRAM
• Changed Emerging Memory Section Including
  Polymer Memory
• Emerging Logic Section
• Dropping Electronic Quantum Cellular Automata,
  Rapid Single Flux Quanta (RSFQ), and some
  Spintronic Logic (Dattta-Das transistor)
• Including Ferromagnetic Logic as a new entry
• New Critical Review Emerging Logic Memory
  devices
• New Section of Guiding Principles looking
  forward to Beyond CMOS information processing
  technologies.

15
Guiding Principles Selection
Top Down Approach

• Driven by Principles
• Not Based on solely on Charge
• Non Thermal Equilibrium
• Novel Energy Transfer
• Nanoscale Thermal Management
• Sub-lithographic Mfg Process

• Spin-based System?
• Molecular based System?
• Multiferroics/Orbitronics?

16
What are we looking for?

• Alternative state variables
• Spinelectron, nuclear, photon
• Phase
• Quantum state
• Magnetic flux quanta
• Mechanical deformation
• Dipole orientation
• Molecular state

• Required characteristics
• Scalability
• Performance
• Energy efficiency
• Gain
• Operational reliability
• Room temp. operation
• Preferred approach
• CMOS process compatibility
• CMOS architectural compatibility

• Alternative state variables (Beyond Charge State)
• Spin state
• Molecular state
• Strongly coupled electron state
• Phase state
• Quantum state
• Magnetic flux quanta
• Mechanical deformation
• Dipole orientation

17
Critical EvaluationMemory
For each Technology Entry (e.g. 1D Structures,
sum horizontally over the 8 Criteria Max Sum
24 Min Sum 8
DRAFT Work In Progress - NOT FOR PUBLICATION
13 July 2005
18
Critical EvaluationLogic
For each Technology Entry (e.g. 1D Structures,
sum horizontally over the 8 Criteria Max Sum
24 Min Sum 8
gt 20
gt16 - 18
gt18 - 20
lt 16
DRAFT Work In Progress - NOT FOR PUBLICATION
13 July 2005