Title: Mantech eIC Enterprise Information Interoperability Workshop
1Mantech e-IC Enterprise Information
Interoperability Workshop
2Current As-Is Environment
Email
Supplier
Payment System
CSV File
Requisition System
Widget Procurement System
Supplier
Manual Entry into
Web-Based Purchasing Interface
Supplier
Access DB File
Customers
3As-Is Architecture
- Vendor Side
- Deliver catalog data in ad-hoc fashion (email,
CSV File, Excel Spreadsheet) - Order notification via WPS
- Customer Side
- Web portal interface for purchasing
- Ordering fulfilled based on quantity required,
price, and delivery schedule
4Obstacles
- Resistance to change
- Cultures fragmented
- Must overcome Works as-is mindset (look beyond
man-hour savings for automating data entry) - Business rules and meaning of underlying data are
hard coded - Differences in stakeholder terminology
- Business rules in the buyer community vary
- Mapping is point-to-point
5Assumptions
- No Big Bang approach, support legacy systems
- Global Environment
- Must be Expandable
- Vendor interface should be net-enabled
- Customer interface should remain web-based
- One class (commodity) can have many items
- Assume no ERP system interfaces
6Objectives
- Reduce TCO
- Use Metadata consistently
- Minimal Intrusion to legacy system
- Flexible environment
- Future-resistant
- Utilize emerging industry best practices
7Proposed System (Architectural View)
Payment
Supplier
Widget Procurement System
Map Into
Supplier
Requisition
Common Information Model (CIM)
Supplier
Proposed Inventory Management System
OWL, ISO 11179, XML Schema, UML, OOetc
8The Key is a Common Information Model
- Multilevel Model
- - Can also be ontology driven
- Is Object Oriented
- Hierarchical
- Defines classes
- Has business rule engine
- Has semantic layer
- Utilizes semantic mediation
9Additional Functionality
- Ability to publish metadata to authorized users
- Ability to track and query metadata to track
actual data using semantic discovery - Structured Standard Mapping (Tables -gt Classes,
Columns -gt Attributes)
10Proposed System (Functional View)
Procurement Contracting
Order Processing
Invoice Payment
Supplier Portal
Buyer Portal
E-Marketplace
Price Determination
Supplier Procurement
Buyer Procurement
Supplier Inventory Management
Buyer Inventory Management
Shipper
As-Is
To-Be
11Metrics
- Better addressing of customers needs (reduce
lead time for acquisition and increase inventory
turnover) - Value of seamless data exchange within/across ALL
stakeholders - Reduction in time to add new interfaces
- Electronic updates result in more timely and
accurate information - Cost of implementing CIM (upfront costs) versus
significant downstream benefits
12Objectives Revisited
- Reduce TCO
- - Interfaces less costly to maintain and augment
- - Seamless data visibility for all stakeholders
- - Increase inventory turnover
- - More correct data
- - Reduced lead time for procurement
- Use Metadata consistently
- - Outcome of using a Common Information Model
- Minimal Intrusion to legacy system
- - Yes, map to existing database is sufficient,
but can be augmented as needed
13Objectives Revisited
- Flexible environment
- - Map once, reuse many
- - Authoritative sources responsible for data
integrity - - Ease of adding new interfaces/suppliers
- Future-resistant
- - Utilizing open standards
- - Architecture scales easily as interfaces and
users increase - Utilize emerging industry best practices
- - Is being used in industries such as insurance,
banking, health care