Title: Science and Society: how societal beliefs and values can inform good science
1- Science and Society how societal beliefs and
values can inform good science - Ape Genius how views of non-human animals,
including other primates, shaped what was
observed for centuries and how this is changing. - Gould on 19th century anthropology, psychology,
biology how social views about innate
differences between alleged biological groups
shaped scientific hypotheses, auxiliary
assumptions, and observations - Science and Society Are there (should there be)
ethical constraints on scientific research? - Secrets of the Wild Child The Case of Genie
2Science and its social context How society can
affect science
- How social context can inform (good) science
- Gould on 19th century craniometry and
anthropology class and race differences. - Gould on 19th century craniometry and psychology
gender/sex differences.
3How society can affect science
- How social context can inform (good) science
- Things we have studied to consider
- The presence and role of auxiliary assumptions
- The role of systems or bodies of theories or
hypotheses in generating If H, then I - The role of paradigms in setting up a
puzzle-solving tradition - The theory-ladenness of observation
4How society can affect science
- Are the only relevant auxiliary assumptions,
bodies of theories, paradigms, etc. internal to
science or can they include social beliefs? - When are Broca and colleagues studying a
biological basis for (allegedly) innate
differences between races, classes, and sexes?
What is the specific historical and cultural
context?
5How social context can inform (good?) science
- S.J. Gould, Wide Hats and Narrow Minds
- The hypothesis intelligence is caused by brain
size (larger is better!) - The players Paul Broca
- Founder of The Anthropological Society and
Renowned Craniologist - Players continued Louis Gratiolet
- Comparative anatomist
6How social context can inform (good?) science
- Broca Among the questions heretofore discussed
within the Anthropological Society, none is equal
in interest and importance to the question before
us now. . . . - The great importance of craniology has struck
anthropologists with such force that many among
us have neglected the other parts of our science
in order to devote ourselves almost exclusively
to the study of skulls. ... - In such data, we hope to find some information
relevant to the intellectual value of the various
human races.
7How social context can inform (good?) science
- S.J. Gould, Wide Hats and Narrow Minds
- The players contd (the late!) Cuvier
- The crucial test
- The size of his hat
8How social context can inform (good?) science
- Goulds bottom line
- On the surface, this tale seems ludicrous. The
thought of France's finest anthropologists
arguing passionately about the meaning of a dead
colleague's hat could easily provoke the most
misleading and dangerous inference of all about
historya view of the past as a domain of naive
half-wits, the path of history as a tale of
progress, and the present as sophisticated and
enlightened.
9How social context can inform (good?) science
- Goulds bottom line
- But if we laugh with derision, we will never
understand. ..
10How social context can inform (good?) science
- What do we fail to understand about their world
if we laugh at this example? - Long standing beliefs (beginning with the Ancient
Greeks!) about the inferiority of women, slaves,
servants - Given a relatively monolithic science community
in terms of gender, ethnicity, social class it
was easy to take such differences as a starting
point, rather than something to be established - Given restrictions on education opportunities for
members of groups regarded as inferior, it was
hard to establish ones intellectual equality
11How social context can inform (good?) science
- A then current paradigm, or current auxiliary
assumptions, or current system of theory as
background and as shaping observations - Among the questions heretofore discussed within
the Anthropological Society, none is equal in
interest and importance to the question before us
now. . . . - Discovering the intellectual worth of the
various human races.
12How social context can inform (good?) science
- S.J. Gould, Womens Brains
- The hypothesis Women had smaller brains than men
and, like it or not, could not equal men in
intelligence. - Players Broca, Le Bon, and others.
- The tests head/skull measuring of contemporary
women in autopsies, and skull measuring of fossil
remains.
13How social context can inform (good?) science
- Sex differences
- Broca Anthropometrists studiers of human body
size are working very hard to measure with
scientific certitude the inferiority of women - Broca There is no faith, however respectable,
no interest, however legitimate, which must not
accommodate itself to the progress of human
knowledge and bend before truth. - Broca (et al) Sad to say, but we must, that
womens smaller brain size renders them inferior
to men.
14How social context can inform (good?) science
- Goulds argument some of Brocas numbers are
impeccable - I have the greatest respect for Brocas
meticulous procedure in the measurement of
autopsied brains. His numbers are sound. - But
- Numbers by themselves do nothing. All depends on
what you do with them.
15How social context can inform (good?) science
- Goulds conclusions some of Brocas numbers are
impeccable but - He did not take into account the age of the women
whose brain he autopsied - The number of ancient skulls on which he based
his argument that mens brains are now bigger
than womens because of their need for
intelligence to survive and provide, was way too
small. - And what if womens brains are smaller on average
simply because their bodies are smaller? And
thus have the same ratio of body size/brain size
as men?
16How social context can inform (good?) science
- Brocas response to such queries
- We might ask if the small size of the females
brain depends exclusively upon the small size of
her body as some colleagues ask. - But we must not forget than women are, on the
average, a little less intelligent than men, a
difference which we should not exaggerate but
which is, nonetheless, real. - That they are less intelligent was supposed to be
what he was establishing not assuming!
17How social context can inform (good?) science
- Gould, again, trying to understand their world,
and his bottom line in the essay - To appreciate the social role of Broca and his
school, we must recognize that his statements
about the brains of women do not reflect an
isolated prejudice toward a singular
disadvantaged group. - They must be weighed in the context of a general
theory that supported contemporary social
distinctions as biologically ordained.
18How social context can inform (good?) science
- Contemporary lessons?
- If we dont take past scientists to be dimwits,
and we recognize that the human brain hasnt
changed, then we need to consider how if at all,
in our own time and world, social beliefs and
context can impact (good) science. - Exhibit A The Bell Curve
- Exhibit B Larry Summers when president of
Harvard!
19What ethical responsibilities (if any) are
attendant to the practice of science?
- Recall the norms
- The autonomy of science
- Knowledge is a good for its own sake
- The case the discovery of a so-called feral
child in California - The scientific question Were Chomsky and other
linguists correct that there is a critical
window for language acquisition, beyond which
language cant be learned.
20What ethical responsibilities (if any) are
attendant to the practice of science?
- Genie as a natural experiment to study the
question of whether there is a critical window
for a childs acquisition of language after
which, it is too late to learn a language. - The players linguists, psychologists, social
workers, social agencies, Genie (!) and her
mother - Did those studying Genie protect her well being?
Suffer from rescue fantasies that motivated too
much attention to teaching her language and too
little to the other needs she had? - In this case, was/is the knowledge to be gained
a good in itself that trumped ethical
questions?