Title: Knowledge and attitudes to reporting adverse drug reactions by health professionals: Implications fo
1Knowledge and attitudes to reporting adverse drug
reactions by health professionals Implications
for immunisation programmes?
- Andrew Pulford
- Senior Public Health Research Officer - NHS
Ayrshire Arran - William Malcolm
- Pharmaceutical Adviser - Health Protection
Scotland
2UK Immunisation Programme
- The two public health interventions that have
had the greatest impact on the worlds health are
clean water and vaccines - (World Health Organisation)
- Immunisation programme in UK is constantly
developing - Inclusion of new vaccines into the programme in
an attempt to protect the population against a
range of infectious diseases and their
complications
3Adverse drug reactions (ADRs)
- Although the safety of new drugs is tested in
clinical trials prior to licensing, not all
adverse reactions will be discovered - Only with widespread use in the general
population that any rare side effects or benefits
can be detected - Because of these limitations, post-marketing
surveillance is important in identifying
potential dangers caused by medicines
4Reporting adverse drug reactions
- Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory
Agency (MHRA) has statutory responsibility for
monitoring the safety of all medicines, including
vaccines, in the UK - MHRA operates a spontaneous reporting system
called the Yellow Card Scheme - Relies on healthcare professionals, patients and
general public to report suspected ADRs
5Reporting adverse drug reactions
- Not all reactions need to be reported
- At-risk groups
- children aged under 18
- adults aged 70 years and over
- pregnant women
- Serious Reactions
- reactions that are fatal
- life threatening, disabling or incapacitating
- resulting in or prolonging hospitalisation
- congenital abnormalities
- or otherwise medically significant
6Black Triangle Medicines
- Some medicines are placed under enhanced
surveillance - Healthcare professionals are advised to report
any suspected adverse reactions, regardless of
individual risk factors or seriousness - Medicines that are to be monitored intensively
are assigned an inverted Black Triangle to
indicate this
7Underreporting of adverse drug reactions
- Universally accepted that ADRs are greatly
underreported - Seven deadly sins (Inman 1976)
- Ignorance (unsure how to report)
- Diffidence (may appear foolish)
- Fear (legal liability)
- Lethargy (too busy)
- Guilt (reluctant to admit that may have caused
harm) - Ambition (rather collect cases and publish them)
- Complacency (only safe drugs are marketed)
8Expansion of responsibility for reporting
- Yellow Card System initially only allowed doctors
and dentists to report - To address underreporting responsibility has been
widened to include all healthcare professionals - Coincided with nurses taking a lead role for
administering vaccines as part of national
immunisation programmes
9Aim of study
- To evaluate knowledge of and attitudes to
reporting ADRs among the professional groups most
likely administer - and therefore most likely to
see suspected reactions to - vaccines, including
nursing professionals whose views have not been
included in previous studies
10Methodology
- Self-completion questionnaire
- Study target population practice nurses, school
nurses, health visitors, GPs and community
paediatricians working for NHS AA during
June-Aug 2007 - All members of identified professional groups
surveyed with the exception of GPs - Each practice asked to identify one GP felt was
most interested in vaccination issues
11Respondent profile
Total number of GPs invited to participate in
the survey
12Awareness of reporting system
- 90 aware of responsibility to report
- 49 felt they had good knowledge of Yellow Card
system - 32 had ever received training on reporting ADRs
- Some confusion over functions of Yellow Card
System - 46 correctly identified meaning of Black Triangle
13Awareness of reporting system
- 10 hypothetical situations were devised which
outlined possible adverse reactions to vaccines - Mean 6 hypothetical ADRs identified correctly
- Higher levels of knowledge appear in relation to
serious reactions and ADRs that do not require to
be reported - Lower levels of knowledge seem to be apparent in
relation to Black Triangle medicines and
reactions in under-18s
14Attitudes/barriers to reporting
- Strong agreement
- professional obligation to report ADRs
- aware which ADRs should be reported
- would feel confident in discussing a suspected
ADR with the prescriber
- Strong disagreement
- too busy to report ADRs
- reporting ADR may breach patient confidentiality
- one suspected ADR cannot contribute to medical
knowledge - too complicated
- too time consuming
- Yellow Cards unavailable when needed
15Potential solutions
- Suggestions thought to be most effective
- clearer priorities for reporting
- making reporting a professional responsibility
- training on reporting suspected ADRs
- electronic submission of Yellow Cards with fields
populated automatically from GP prescribing and
recording systems - Divided views
- financial reimbursement for providing the
service of reporting ADRs
16Conclusions
- Respondents showed positive knowledge and
attitudes towards reporting ADRs, however, some
gaps in knowledge were apparent - Low levels of training reported in our study
raises concerns - Gaps in respondents knowledge of the
requirements for reporting non-serious reactions
to Black Triangle medicines and among those at a
greater risk of harm
17Conclusions
- Given the increasing role of nursing staff in
immunisation programmes it is important that the
planning of nurses role in such programmes
addresses not just the physical administration of
vaccines, but also pharmacovigilance issues
18Knowledge and attitudes to reporting adverse drug
reactions by health professionals Implications
for immunisation programmes?
- Andrew Pulford
- Senior Public Health Research Officer - NHS
Ayrshire Arran - William Malcolm
- Pharmaceutical Adviser - Health Protection
Scotland