Knowledge and attitudes to reporting adverse drug reactions by health professionals: Implications fo - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Knowledge and attitudes to reporting adverse drug reactions by health professionals: Implications fo

Description:

reporting ADR may breach patient confidentiality. one suspected ADR cannot contribute to medical knowledge. too complicated. too time consuming ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:82
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: coli124
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Knowledge and attitudes to reporting adverse drug reactions by health professionals: Implications fo


1
Knowledge and attitudes to reporting adverse drug
reactions by health professionals Implications
for immunisation programmes?
  • Andrew Pulford
  • Senior Public Health Research Officer - NHS
    Ayrshire Arran
  • William Malcolm
  • Pharmaceutical Adviser - Health Protection
    Scotland

2
UK Immunisation Programme
  • The two public health interventions that have
    had the greatest impact on the worlds health are
    clean water and vaccines
  • (World Health Organisation)
  • Immunisation programme in UK is constantly
    developing
  • Inclusion of new vaccines into the programme in
    an attempt to protect the population against a
    range of infectious diseases and their
    complications

3
Adverse drug reactions (ADRs)
  • Although the safety of new drugs is tested in
    clinical trials prior to licensing, not all
    adverse reactions will be discovered
  • Only with widespread use in the general
    population that any rare side effects or benefits
    can be detected
  • Because of these limitations, post-marketing
    surveillance is important in identifying
    potential dangers caused by medicines

4
Reporting adverse drug reactions
  • Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory
    Agency (MHRA) has statutory responsibility for
    monitoring the safety of all medicines, including
    vaccines, in the UK
  • MHRA operates a spontaneous reporting system
    called the Yellow Card Scheme
  • Relies on healthcare professionals, patients and
    general public to report suspected ADRs

5
Reporting adverse drug reactions
  • Not all reactions need to be reported
  • At-risk groups
  • children aged under 18
  • adults aged 70 years and over
  • pregnant women
  • Serious Reactions
  • reactions that are fatal
  • life threatening, disabling or incapacitating
  • resulting in or prolonging hospitalisation
  • congenital abnormalities
  • or otherwise medically significant

6
Black Triangle Medicines
  • Some medicines are placed under enhanced
    surveillance
  • Healthcare professionals are advised to report
    any suspected adverse reactions, regardless of
    individual risk factors or seriousness
  • Medicines that are to be monitored intensively
    are assigned an inverted Black Triangle to
    indicate this

7
Underreporting of adverse drug reactions
  • Universally accepted that ADRs are greatly
    underreported
  • Seven deadly sins (Inman 1976)
  • Ignorance (unsure how to report)
  • Diffidence (may appear foolish)
  • Fear (legal liability)
  • Lethargy (too busy)
  • Guilt (reluctant to admit that may have caused
    harm)
  • Ambition (rather collect cases and publish them)
  • Complacency (only safe drugs are marketed)

8
Expansion of responsibility for reporting
  • Yellow Card System initially only allowed doctors
    and dentists to report
  • To address underreporting responsibility has been
    widened to include all healthcare professionals
  • Coincided with nurses taking a lead role for
    administering vaccines as part of national
    immunisation programmes

9
Aim of study
  • To evaluate knowledge of and attitudes to
    reporting ADRs among the professional groups most
    likely administer - and therefore most likely to
    see suspected reactions to - vaccines, including
    nursing professionals whose views have not been
    included in previous studies

10
Methodology
  • Self-completion questionnaire
  • Study target population practice nurses, school
    nurses, health visitors, GPs and community
    paediatricians working for NHS AA during
    June-Aug 2007
  • All members of identified professional groups
    surveyed with the exception of GPs
  • Each practice asked to identify one GP felt was
    most interested in vaccination issues

11
Respondent profile
Total number of GPs invited to participate in
the survey
12
Awareness of reporting system
  • 90 aware of responsibility to report
  • 49 felt they had good knowledge of Yellow Card
    system
  • 32 had ever received training on reporting ADRs
  • Some confusion over functions of Yellow Card
    System
  • 46 correctly identified meaning of Black Triangle

13
Awareness of reporting system
  • 10 hypothetical situations were devised which
    outlined possible adverse reactions to vaccines
  • Mean 6 hypothetical ADRs identified correctly
  • Higher levels of knowledge appear in relation to
    serious reactions and ADRs that do not require to
    be reported
  • Lower levels of knowledge seem to be apparent in
    relation to Black Triangle medicines and
    reactions in under-18s

14
Attitudes/barriers to reporting
  • Strong agreement
  • professional obligation to report ADRs
  • aware which ADRs should be reported
  • would feel confident in discussing a suspected
    ADR with the prescriber
  • Strong disagreement
  • too busy to report ADRs
  • reporting ADR may breach patient confidentiality
  • one suspected ADR cannot contribute to medical
    knowledge
  • too complicated
  • too time consuming
  • Yellow Cards unavailable when needed

15
Potential solutions
  • Suggestions thought to be most effective
  • clearer priorities for reporting
  • making reporting a professional responsibility
  • training on reporting suspected ADRs
  • electronic submission of Yellow Cards with fields
    populated automatically from GP prescribing and
    recording systems
  • Divided views
  • financial reimbursement for providing the
    service of reporting ADRs

16
Conclusions
  • Respondents showed positive knowledge and
    attitudes towards reporting ADRs, however, some
    gaps in knowledge were apparent
  • Low levels of training reported in our study
    raises concerns
  • Gaps in respondents knowledge of the
    requirements for reporting non-serious reactions
    to Black Triangle medicines and among those at a
    greater risk of harm

17
Conclusions
  • Given the increasing role of nursing staff in
    immunisation programmes it is important that the
    planning of nurses role in such programmes
    addresses not just the physical administration of
    vaccines, but also pharmacovigilance issues

18
Knowledge and attitudes to reporting adverse drug
reactions by health professionals Implications
for immunisation programmes?
  • Andrew Pulford
  • Senior Public Health Research Officer - NHS
    Ayrshire Arran
  • William Malcolm
  • Pharmaceutical Adviser - Health Protection
    Scotland
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com