Title: Pakistans IPRSP in the Light of Evaluative Experience of the World Banks Poverty Reduction Strategy
1Pakistans I-PRSP in the Light of Evaluative
Experience of the World Banks Poverty Reduction
Strategy and the Global Experience with the PRSPs
so far
- Sohail Jehangir Malik
- Chairman
- Innovative Development Strategies (Pvt.) Ltd
2Global Poverty Reduction during the 1990s
- The World Banks three pronged poverty reduction
strategy of 1990 - Growth
- social sector development
- and safety nets
- had mixed results
- In terms of the money-metric measure of poverty
3By the end of the 1990s Global poverty rates were
down but progress was extremely uneven
4Take away China and there was actually a
worsening of poverty headcount numbers over the
1990s!!!
5Reduction in child malnutrition has been slow?
prospect of reaching the targets of Millennium
Development Goal is in doubt
6120 million primary-school-age children were not
in school in 1999.53 of them girls.74
living in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa.
7Ratio of girls to boys in primary and secondary
school ()
8Infant mortality rates
9Pakistan - by the end of the 1990sNot only was
the poverty situation alarming!but prospects for
its reduction were also bleak
10Headcount Of Poor - Pakistan
11(No Transcript)
12(No Transcript)
13(No Transcript)
14Details of the Poverty Trends in Pakistan
15Poverty Trends across Provinces
16Poverty Diagnostics
- Poverty is strongly related to lack of basic
needs - Poor have low access to health related
infrastructure - Poor communities have lower access to health
facilities and immunization coverage - Poor have higher dependency ratios
- More than 1/3rd of the poor households are headed
by aged persons
17Poverty Diagnostics (contd.)
- 27 poor versus 52 non-poor households are
headed by literate persons - Poverty is higher when head of the household is
unskilled agricultural worker - Cultivable land owned by poor versus the non-poor
is 0.27 and 0.84 acres per capita, respectively
18Investment as of GDP
19Consolidated Public Expenditures(as of GDP)
20The Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers
- Born in late 1999 out of the pressures from
- HIPC
- The lessons from the experience with the World
Banks 1990 strategy of Poverty Reduction - The Recommendations of the Meltzer Commission
Report to the American Congress
21The PRSPs are an essential requirement for debt
relief under the HIPC initiative and good
business plan for concessional assistance under
IDA
22The PRSP requires
- A long term domestically owned holistic Vision
with a strategic articulation of the perceptions
of poverty and how to address these encapsulated
in a three year plan - Clear and Verifiable time-bound M E Indicators
- A participatory consultative process at the grass
roots level - Coordination and Efficiency through a Medium Term
Budgetary Framework - PRSPs ensure IFI partnership as well as means to
monitor domestic performance
23Lessons from the WB Experience - Policies
- A strategy that emphasizes the mutually
reinforcing benefits of growth and human resource
development is relevant. - Most recent empirical evidence however, points to
the importance of contingent factors such as - property rights,
- a capable bureaucracy and
- the distribution of assets in mediating the
poverty reducing effects of growth, and to the
negative effects of corruption on both inequality
and poverty.
24Lessons from the WB Experience - Policies
- Human development has proven to be vital for
long-term growth. However - Need to improve the interaction between policies
that sustain long-term growth, - Need to improve the distribution as well as the
stock of human capital, - Need to curb corruption and enhance the social
and physical capital of the poor, that are likely
to make the real difference. - These are all elements making up the new
Comprehensive Development Framework underpinning
the PRSP process.
25Lessons from Country Studies
- Growth that is based on rural development has a
notable impact on overall levels of poverty. - Lack of social consensus and government
commitment can be a major obstacle to reform,
while weak institutional capacity can hinder
prospects for implementation of an effective
country poverty strategy. - Slow private sector development, weak governance
and high aid-dependence slow down the prospects
for growth and reduce the long-term
sustainability of growth and improvements in the
social sectors. - There is a need to monitor not only the level,
but also the depth and severity of poverty.
Safety nets are a necessary condition for
ensuring that the poor are protected. All three
elements of the 1990 strategy are important for
sustained poverty reduction.
26Lessons from Project Experience
- Reaching the poor and making tangible differences
to their well-being depends on - a good project design
- macro institutional environment
- specific local institutional capabilities
- cultural acceptability of different types of
interventions. - Tightly targeted projects with good
communication, supervision and in-built
flexibility can work, even in difficult
institutional/policy environments.
27Lessons from Project Experience (contd.)
- There is no reason to expect that the benefits
from social funds and decentralization will
always be pro-poor. - There is a need to better understand the synergy
between key areas of public and private actions
to better address the priority needs of the
chronically poor.
28Core Principles of Pakistans I-PRSP
- Engendering growth
- Governance reforms
- Creating income generating opportunities
- Improving human development
- Reducing vulnerability to shocks
29(No Transcript)
30Revenue and Expenditures (1998-99 to 2000-01
actual)(2001-02 to 2003-04 IPRSP)
31Trends in Crucial Growth Rates(1998-99 to
2000-01 actual)(2001-02 to 2003-04 IPRSP)
32Trends in Poverty(1992-93 to 1998-99
actual)(2000-01 to 2003-04 IPRSP)
33I-PRSP Challenges
- extracting Pakistan from a debt trap,
- accelerating growth,
- improving social indicators, and
- restoring the credibility and integrity of public
institutions.
34Major I-PRSP Challenge
- Macroeconomic stabilization
- Increasing tax revenue in order to provide more
fiscal space for poverty reduction initiatives - overcoming adverse debt dynamics.
- Maintaining a prudent monetary policy in order to
keep inflation low - Increasing export growth to improve the external
debt situation.
35Major I-PRSP Challenge
- Growth promotion
- Acceleration of reforms in the areas of
- Privatization
- Irrigation and drainage
- Energy tariff rationalization
- Karachi electric Supply Company
- Gas pricing
- Civil service reforms
- Tax administration
- Agriculture support services
36The Bigger Challenge!
- Getting growth going and ensuring that the Growth
is pro-poor and translates into faster poverty
reduction - tackling the distribution issue
37Success of the I-PRSP hinges on
- Governance reforms and devolution
- Reducing incentives for corruption
- Governance reform agenda that includes reforms of
fundamental institutions - Central bank
- Tax authority
- CBR
- Police
- Judicial system
- Civil service
- Auditor general and controller general of
accounts - Reforms in the public financial management
systems and institutions - Establishment of an effective anti-corruption
agency.
38And the crucial assumption for Poverty Reduction
under the I-PRSP
- The success of the devolution plan in improving
access to education, health and other public
services
39Major Strength of the I-PRSP
- Confirms the governments commitment to
sustaining and expanding targeted interventions
that focus on disadvantaged sections of society,
especially in rural areas - Highlights the key role of agricultural sector in
poverty reduction
40Weaknesses
- I-PRSP does not question whether current policies
of poverty reduction are appropriate or adequate,
especially in the rural strategy. - It does not present an analysis of alternatives
41Weaknesses
- The I-PRSP does not
- recognize the fact that greater tariff
adjustments will be required in the energy sector
in future and that tariff increases must be
accompanied by improvements in operational
performance. - acknowledge that privatization will take time,
and that in the interim pressing investments will
be needed.
42Weaknesses
- I-PRSP does not fully exploit the potential role
of the private sector in bringing education to
the underprivileged.
43Challenges and Risks Outlined by the I-PRSP
- Challenges
- To raise financing, and
- To improve governance and institutional capacity
- Risks
- Political opposition to reforms,
- Lack of continuity,
- Insufficient institutional capacity, and
- Exogenous shocks
44Common weaknesses in all PRSPs
- Inadequate information on the determinants of
pro-poor growth - Inadequate linkages between economic growth,
macroeconomic and structural policies and poverty
reduction - Inadequate linkages between public expenditures,
poverty outcomes, and costing.
45Comparison of I-PRSPs and PRSPs shows
- significant differences between the full and
interim PRSPs in terms of - data availability
- quality of data analysis and policy formulation
- development of medium term budgeting procedures
- participatory processes
46Pakistan has committed to developing a FULL PRSP
by March 2003
- This requires
- A wide ranging consultative process to ensure
that there is consensus on the long-term vision,
ownership and sustainability of the program - The long term vision requires consensus on the
perception of poverty and on the strategic
prioritization of interventions at all levels
47The full PRSP requires
- Strategic coordination of resources - including
aid - over the medium term - Development of detailed Provincial and
sub-provincial level PRSPs
48The full PRSP requires
- Expenditure tracking
- To monitor spending in important sub-sectors and
programs - To track expenditure data by economic
classification - Monitoring of intermediate and outcome indicators
- Adequate implementation of monitoring system.
And the building of technical capacity (at
provincial and district level) - Consensus on a nationally acceptable poverty line
49The full PRSP requires
- Systematic data collection and analyses of
poverty dynamics and vulnerability that is
domestically owned - Analyses informing of possible adverse impacts of
some key macro/structural policies on the poor
and other socio-economic groups - Assessment of key poverty programs like Khushal
Pakistan and Katchi Abadi etc.
50The time is extremely short the challenges are
enormous!