A Markov chain model for juvenile salmon - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

A Markov chain model for juvenile salmon

Description:

Tornado model ... a region for several days, conducive to tornado activity. ... In southern Tornado alley frontal systems cease around mid-May, decreasing p11, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:163
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: peterg1
Learn more at: https://stat.uw.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A Markov chain model for juvenile salmon


1
A Markov chain model for juvenile salmon
  • E. A. Steel and P. Guttorp (2001) Modeling
    juvenile salmon migration using a simple Markov
    chain. Journal of Agricultural, Biological and
    Environmental Statistics 6 80-88.
  • Scientific issue As few as 15 of hatchery
    salmon survive to the first dam.
  • Need to understand fish movement and the role of
    covariates, such as river speed
  • Data radio tags at 129 yearling chinook in Snake
    River read at 12 receiving stations
  • Travel time calculated at each segment (between
    stations). 7 31 observations/segment
  • Missing data due to signal strength, antenna
    orientation, tag failure

2
The model
  • Each fish make 10 decisions per hour (to move 1km
    or to stay)
  • It is observed after it has traveled Li km.
  • A wait time is defined as a 1-0-0-0...-0-1
    transition. The expected value and variance can
    be computed as a function of the transition
    probabilities.
  • Total travel time for a segment is the sum of the
    wait times (independent)

3
Estimated parameters
Stretch Obs Length p00 p11
1 31 41 .988 .992
4 16 25 .946 .947
7 21 6 .973 .886
10 20 1 .9996 .932
11 20 7 .9999 .989
4
Model intepretation
  • Long runs of staying or of moving
  • Implication for time spent moving and staying?
  • Fish behavior different in different parts of the
    river.
  • Confounded with river speed. Length of movement
    can be made depend on average speed. Clearer
    differences between different parts of river,
    higher precision of estimates.

5
Tornado model
  • C. Marzban, M. Drton and P. Guttorp (2003) A
    Markov chain model of tornadic activity. Monthly
    Weather Review 131 2941-2953.
  • Scientific issue Tornado prediction
  • Data 49 years of daily indicators of occurrence
    of a tornado in continental US
  • Varies with time of year

6
Time-dependent transition probabilities
7
Tornado alley
8
Regional differences
9
Why is it so?
  • Frontal systems stay in a region for several
    days, conducive to tornado activity. So then p11
    gt p01.
  • In southern Tornado alley frontal systems cease
    around mid-May, decreasing p11, but p01 continues
    to increase for another month due to lots of
    moisture and weak upper atmosphere systems
  • SE tornado activity related also to tropical
    storms, so lasts longer, less pronounced peaks

10
Quality of forecast
11
Precipitation modeling
  • J. P. Hughes and P. Guttorp (1994) Incorporating
    spatial dependence and atmospheric data in a
    model of precipitation. Journal of Applied
    Meteorology 33 1503-1515. IPCC SAR.
  • Scientific problem Downscaling climate models to
    model regional precipitation

12
A spatial Markov model
  • Three sites, A, B and C, each observing 0 or 1.
    Notation AB (A1,B1,C0)
  • Markov model
  • Great Plains data1949-1984 (Jan-Feb)

13
A hidden weather state
  • Two-stage model
  • Ct Markov chain, c states
  • (RtCt,Rt-1,Ct-1,...,C1,R1) (RtCt)pt(Ct)
  • We observe only R1,...,RT.
  • C clusters similar rainfall patterns. In
    atmospheric science called a weather state

14
The spatial case
  • MC 8 states, 56 parameters
  • HMM 2 hidden states (one fairly wet, one fairly
    dry), 8 parameters, rain conditionally
    independent at different sites given weather state

15
Nonstationary transition probabilities
  • Meteorological conditions may affect transition
    probabilities
  • At-1 At
  • Ct-2 Ct-1 Ct
  • Rt-2 Rt-1 Rt

16
A model for Western Australia rainfall
  • 19781987 (1992) winter (May Oct) daily rainfall
    at 30 stations
  • Atmospheric variables in model E-W gradient in
    850 hPa geopotential height, mean sea level
    pressure, N-S gradient in sea-level pressure
  • Final model has six weather states

17
Rain probabilities
18
Blood production in animals
  • J. L. Abkowitz, S. N. Catlin, and P. Guttorp
    (1996) Evidence that hematopoiesis may be a
    stochastic process in vivo. Nature Medicine 2
    190-197
  • Scientific problem Understanding how stem cells
    for blood production work
  • Stem cells are not identifiable except by function

19
Hematopoiesis model
Stem cells
Contributing clones
Symmetric division
Specialization
Exhaustion
Asymmetric division
Apoptosis
Observations
20
Observation model
Niche hypothesis
21
A cat experiment
  • Female Safari cats (mix of Geoffroy and domestic)
  • Autologous bone marrow transplant
  • Smallish number of stem cells replaced
  • X-chromosome linked enzyme G6PD
  • electrophorically distinguishable
  • genetically neutral
  • binary marker for phenotype
  • tracks contribution of stem cell

22
Some data
23
A Markov chain Monte Carlo approach
  • Want p(?y)
  • Marginalize p(?,x0,Ty)
  • Outer step (parameter update)
  • Draw ? from p(?x0,T,y)
  • Gibbs sampler
  • Inner step (state update)
  • Draw x0,T from p(x0,T?,y)
  • RJMCMC
  • Non-local updates

24
State update moves
  • Deletion of randomly chosen event
  • Insertion of randomly chosen event
  • Shuffle move a randomly chosen event to a new
    time
  • Deletion and insertion change state space
    dimension
  • Difficulty if too many events between
    observation times

25
Insertion of emigration
26
Parameter values for different animals
l n a ? N
Cats 1/10 1/13 0-1/50 1/6.7 11.2-22.4k
Mice 1/2.5 1/3.4 1/20 1/6.9 6-16.8k
Rhesus 1/20 (1/6.7)
Baboon 1/30-70 (1/6.7) (11k)
Human 1/23-50 (.71?) (.14?) (1/6.7) (11k)
Independently verified Using different
approaches
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com