Data Sharing and Intellectual Capital Working Group (DSIC WG) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Data Sharing and Intellectual Capital Working Group (DSIC WG)

Description:

... development of common set of security administration tools and services as ... Many cancer centers are health care providers ' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:20
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: NCI1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Data Sharing and Intellectual Capital Working Group (DSIC WG)


1
Data Sharing and Intellectual Capital Working
Group (DSIC WG)
  • Accomplishments and Goals

2
The DSIC WGs Mission
  • Consider issues presented by caBIG activities
    related to data sharing, intellectual property,
    and intellectual capital
  • Recommend best practices, develop guidance, and
    draft white papers
  • Sponsor two Special Interest Groups (SIGs)
  • Regulatory SIG
  • Proprietary SIG

3
Regulatory and Proprietary SIGs
  • The Regulatory SIG is focused on legal and policy
    issues relating to study participant consent, IRB
    and HIPAA authorization, and confidentiality and
    data security.
  • The Proprietary SIG is concerned with
    intellectual property matters such as software
    licensing, data sharing and biospecimen resources
    and intellectual capital (e.g., authorship and
    attribution).

4
DSIC WG Previous Accomplishments
  • caBIG Publication Policy
  • Documents the process for review and provides
    guidelines for authorship, attribution, and
    acknowledgement in caBIG Publications
  • caBIG Publications are those funded by the
    National Cancer Institute (NCI) in connection
    with the caBIG initiative
  • Preliminary feedback has been received and will
    be addressed once all participants have had a
    full opportunity to comment

5
DSIC WGPrevious Accomplishments
  • Security Administration Recommendation
  • Recognizes that access to some data via caBIG
    must be controlled to meet privacy and security
    needs
  • Recommends development of common set of security
    administration tools and services as part of
    overall caBIG architecture
  • Tools and services should be flexible,
    extensible, interoperable and scalable since
    security requirements can change at any time
  • Draft recommendation currently pending for review
    before Strategic Planning SLWG

6
Regulatory Issues HIPAA Covered Entities
  • Only certain institutions
  • Health care plans
  • Health care providers
  • Health care clearinghouses
  • Many cancer centers are health care providers
  • Hybrid entities can isolate HIPAA- and
    non-HIPAA covered functions

7
Regulatory IssuesDe-Identification
  • Covered entities are required to de-identify
    information transmitted to other entities for
    research purposes
  • Safe Harbor method
  • Statistical Method
  • Limited data set An alternative to
    de-identification

8
Regulatory IssuesPatient Identifiers
  • A code or other means of record identification
    (patient identifier) may be assigned
  • Code may not be derived from PHI, or otherwise be
    usable to re-identify the patient
  • The means or code of generating the patient
    identifier is not disclosed

9
Regulatory SIG Next Steps Statement on
De-Identification Tools
  • Automated De-Identification Tools
  • May be an effective method of lowering the burden
    related to complying with the safe harbor
    method
  • Need to be coordinated with manual review to
    minimize error rate
  • May not address certain safe-harbor data
    elements if they are entirely text-driven

10
Regulatory SIGUpcoming Issues
  • Building awareness that
  • collection of data for de-identification requires
    notification or waiver
  • IRB approval is necessary for submitting data to,
    and also for retrieving data from, a repository
  • Expedited IRB review for research on
    de-identified data may be appropriate

11
Regulatory SIG Next Steps Solicitation of Use
Cases
  • Request for use case that
  • describe the ways in which health information
    will be used in caBIG
  • Address both identifiable and de-identified
    information
  • Include information on how data will be
    collected, stored, used, and/or exchanged
  • Extensive detail not necessary

12
Next Steps IRB and HIPAA Issues
  • White paper on best practices
  • FAQs for caBIG DSIC WG Web page

13
Proprietary SIGPrevious Accomplishments
  • Open Source Software (OSS) Licensing Guidelines
    and Model Agreement
  • Source code for all caBIG software tools will be
    available to end-users no restrictions on how
    source code modified by end users is distributed
  • Use of model agreement is not mandatory guidance
    document will assist caBIG institutions in
    formulating alternatives
  • Draft documents discussed at caBIG Annual
    Meeting Breakout Session

14
Proprietary SIGFuture Activities
  • Model Data Sharing Agreement
  • Samples are being collected by SIG Subcommittee
  • Model Materials Transfer Agreement (Biospecimens)
  • Samples are being collected by SIG Subcommittee
  • Investigate role of industry collaborators and
    proprietary software vendors
  • Explore institutional and individual investigator
    concerns about sharing data

15
Communications
  • Working Group Facilitator (NCI)
  • Wendy Patterson, J.D.
  • (301) 435-3110
  • pattersw_at_mail.nih.gov
  • Working Group Coordinator (BAH)
  • Dan Steinberg, J.D.
  • (703) 289-5675
  • steinberg_daniel_at_bah.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com