Changes to International Regulatory Requirements - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Changes to International Regulatory Requirements

Description:

New amendment to the regulation ... Two (2) year implementation time frame after approval ... to adopt a risk based approach to clinical study requirements ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:133
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: andre691
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Changes to International Regulatory Requirements


1
Changes to International Regulatory Requirements
  • Gail Christie
  • December 2, 2009

2
Agenda
  • Brazil
  • Mexico
  • Canada
  • India
  • China
  • Japan
  • European Union
  • Saudi Arabia
  • Turkey

3
Brazil
  • ANVISA (National Health Surveillance Agency)
  • Regulates medical device by Law No. 6360, Decree
    74.094/97. Brazil is included in Mercosur
    Harmonization Group (Argentina, Paraguay,
    Uruguay)
  • 6 24 months review time
  • Rule RDC 25 issued and signed into regulation
    May 22, 2009
  • GMP certificate due with all registrations post
    March 2010
  • Applies to all Class III, IV, specific Class II
    devices, and in-vitro diagnostics

4
Brazil (cont)
  • ANVISA will require inspection and a GMP
    Certificate for each manufacturing plant
    importing devices into Brazil.
  • Certificates will be valid for two (2) years,
    audits will occur every two (2) years
  • Yearly renewal certification fee of approximately
    US 18,500.00 plus audit expense, when applicable
  • Open GMP certificate issue,
  • Legal Manufacture
  • Manufacturing Site
  • Both

5
Brazil (cont)
  • According to industry working groups, ANVISA
    recently stated that they may accept a Notified
    Body audit and evidence of a ANVISA audit request
    due to capacity.
  • Currently, the auditing task force consists of
    Brazil state agencies and reviewer regulatory
    specialists. Industry is concerned that the task
    force will result in an increase in product
    review times.
  • ANVISA committed to answering industry concerns
    regarding RDC 25 by 12/2009.
  • RDC 25 audit does not negate the requirement for
    an IEC audit
  • http//anvisa.gov.br/eng/index.htm

6
Mexico
  • COFEPRIS (Comision Federal para a Proteccion
    contra Riesgos Sanitarios), a div of Mexican
    Ministry of Health Department (Established 2001)
  • General Health Law
  • Issued Regulation of Health Supplies
  • Grants COFEPRIS power to act independent of the
    Ministry of Health
  • Acts as the implementing regulation
  • Based on a three (3) Class system
  • Classification guidance document issued

7
Mexico (cont)
  • New amendment to the regulation posted January 2,
    2008
  • All current registrations older than 5 years to
    be renewed by February 24, 2010
  • 5 year expiration date
  • COFEPRIS backlog
  • New amendment posted June 19, 2009 to amend
    approval times
  • National Development Plan 2007 2012
  • Class 1, no response from COFEPRIS within 30
    days, approved
  • Class 2, no response from COFEPRIS within 30
    days, rejected
  • Class 3, no response from COFEPRIS within 60
    days, rejected
  • Labeling standard change (NOM-137-SSA1-2008)
    effective February 2009
  • Third party manufacture information must be on
    the label
  • http//portal.salud.gob.mx/index_eng.html

8
Mexico (cont)
  • Recent update from Advamed (11/30/09)
  • Commissioner Toscano publically recognized that
    getting the medical devices into the Renewal
    Process was a mistake
  • and that the Law would have to be reformed
    again..
  • ..but he is not pushing back on the 24 of
    February 2010 requirement.
  • http//portal.salud.gob.mx/index_eng.html

9
Canada
  • Implementation of the Summary Technical Document
    (STED) - Medical Devices Bureau will update the
    existing guidance document.
  • Increased use of outside scientific expertise to
    reduce current backlog and speed up review times
    for applications.
  • Increased emphasis on the use and recognition of
    standards in pre-market reviews.
  • E-review Capability plan to establish an
    electronic review environment to provide support
    to the electronic submission and increase
    efficiency of the review for device applications.
  • Cost Recovery - Current fees are out-of-date
    based on Health Canadas costs of doing business.
    Updated fees could be in place in 2010/2011.
  • http//www.hc-sc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/md-im/index-eng.php

10
India
  • Government assigned Central Drugs Standard
    Control Organization (CDSCO) and Department of
    Science and Technology (DST) to develop medical
    device regulations
  • Government plans to amend current Drug
    regulations, rather than create a separate law
    for the device regulation
  • Recent information indicates that the CDSCO
    branch will be responsible for medical device
    dossier review
  • M-III Final draft amendment submitted for public
    review on Feb 23, 2009
  • Two (2) year implementation time frame after
    approval

11
India (cont)
  • Government created the Expert Committee at the
    Drugs Controller General of India (DCGI) to
    review and comment on the M(III) draft
  • Participants, not inclusive list
  • Confederation of Indian Industries (CII)
  • Federation of Indian Chamber of Commerce and
    Industry (FICCI)
  • Association of Indian Medical Device Industry
    (AIMED)
  • Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR)
  • Bureau of Indian Standards
  • Medical Fraternity

12
India (cont)
  • Expert Committee Responsibilities
  • Define modalities of Notified Bodies
  • List Class C D devices
  • Define the required changes to the Drug rules
  • Develop a plan for Medical Device Regulations Act
    (MDRA) incorporation into M(III)
  • Create guideline for 2 year implementation
  • GHTF alignment
  • Device class regulated by listing
  • Current situation at Drugs Controller Government
    (India) DCG(I)
  • Chaotic
  • Misplaced dossiers
  • Registrations expiring
  • No response from regulators due to conflicting
    responsibilities
  • http//cdsco.nic.in/

13
China
  • State Council Order 276 and SFDA Order 16, draft
    updates to regulation
  • AdvaMed and Joint Commission on Commerce and
    Trade (JCCT) met with SFDA on Sept 10, 2009
  • Highlights from meeting
  • China agreed to adopt GS1 standard for UDI.
  • Appeared to consider accepting the GHTF
    registrations, rather than country of origin
    registrations. To be determined in the next
    draft.
  • Manufacturing site inspections by China officials
    in the future
  • Delegation was not successful in gaining
    agreement to limit China clinical study
    requirements
  • Next draft to be submitted to industry before end
    of year
  • http//eng.sfda.gov.cn/eng/

14
China (cont)
  • US Department of Commerce released a news update
    on October 29, 2009 describing further agreements
  • China agreed,
  • product recalls will not be duplicative and will
    be managed by one government organization
  • to adopt a risk based approach to clinical study
    requirements
  • to accept a prior approval document issued by a
    foreign country regardless of the country of
    origin
  • to consider an exemption of requiring samples to
    be tested in Chinese test labs prior to approval
    if manufacturer meets international standards and
    provides sound scientific evidence
  • to strive to implement regulations in line with
    GHTF guidelines

15
China (cont)
  • Notification on Matters Concerning Registration
    of Drugs and Medical Device Combination Products,
    SFDA Issued November 16, 2009
  • Drug and medical device combination products in
    which the drug plays the leading role shall apply
    for drug registration drug and medical device
    combination products in which medical device
    plays the leading role shall apply for medical
    device registration.
  • Article six states that combination products not
    approved in the country of export and/or products
    whose drug has not been approved in the country
    of legal manufacture will not be accepted.  
  • Not compatible with recent discussions regarding
    country of origin
  • Overlooks the situation in which a drug may only
    be used in combination with a medical device and
    would not have a separate drug approval

16
Japan
  • PMDA (Pharmaceuticals and Medical Device Agency)
  • MHLW (Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare)
  • Action Program Established April 2009 to monitor
    reform
  • Update from Action Program Working Groups
  • Partial change definition in line with FDA 510(k)
    process
  • Stability Test Data
  • MHLW issued a guidance document on accelerated
    aged data
  • Clinical Data notification issued 2008
  • Clinical evaluation guidance drafted
  • PMDA is likely to issue a guidance document on
    this subject sometime next year
  • Submission bundling subgroup review
  • orthopedics pacemakers dialyzers oxygenators
    and medical equipment/machinery under
    consideration

17
Japan (cont)
  • Future
  • 3 track submission system by 2011
  • Yearly 3rd party reviewer to summarize action
    plan progress against goals
  • Increase to 104 reviewers by 2013, decrease
    review times to
  • 12 months for new device application
  • 7 months for improved device application
  • http//www/pmda.go.jp/english/index/html

18
European UnionMedical Device Directive 93/42/EE
Amendment 2007/47/EC
  • Amendment to 93/42/EC and AIMDD 90/385/EEC
    (Active Implantable)
  • Published Oct 11, 2007
  • European Commission issued an interpretative
    document June 9, 2009
  • ENTR/F3/PBE/D(2009)119003
  • March 21, 2010 enforcement, not inclusive
  • Definition of central circulatory system has been
    expanded for Class III
  • Includes the vessels aortic arch and descending
    aorta to the aortic bifurcation.
  • Record retention lifetime of the product, not
    less than five years. Implantable devices at
    least 15 years after the last product has been
    manufactured

19
European UnionMedical Device Directive 93/42/EE
Amendment 2007/47/EC(cont)
  • March 21, 2010 enforcement, not inclusive (cont)
  • Clinical Evaluations required for all devices,
    regardless of classification
  • Clarification on single use
  • Phthalates labelling for all products
  • Product for use on children or pregnant women
    require justification in the Technical File and
    Instructions for Use
  • Stand alone software as an active medical device
  • Outsourced design and manufacturing must be more
    closely monitored
  • Instructions for Use must be revision controlled
  • Definitions of continuous use expanded

20
European Union (cont)
  • Medical Device Directive Recast
  • On hold, projected to resume 2010
  • Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC applicable to
    Medical Device as of December 29, 2009
  • Where a medical device is also a machinery, it
    shall meet the essential health and safety
    requirements of the Machinery Directive to the
    extent to which they are more specific than the
    essential requirements of the MDD

21
Turkey
  • Country of Origin Discrimination at Customs due
    to 2009/16 regulation
  • Effective January 1, 2009, one day after
    publication
  • If country of Origin is not an EU state, 3 day to
    3 week hold delay
  • DOC, EC certificate, Application, Turkish IFU
    required at Customs
  • Physical product checks, when requested
  • Missed tender deadlines
  • Turkish Labeling Requirements
  • Checked at customs, hospitals and reimbursement
    authorities
  • All words must be translated to Turkish,
    including symbol statements
  • Introducing a product to market starts at
    customs, therefore label must be applied prior to
    customs entry
  • Additional label required for importers contact
    information
  • TITUBB (Turkish National Drug and Medical Data
    Base)
  • EAN 13 required on label

22
Saudi Arabia
  • Saudi Food and Drug Authority (SFDA)
  • Posted Regulations and Implementing Rules
  • Medical Device Interim Regulations Decree
    1-8-1429, December 27, 2008 (published April 17,
    2009)
  • Implementing Rules for
  • Establishing Licensing
  • Establishment Registration
  • Medical Device Listing
  • Designation and Oversight of Conformity
    Assessment Bodies
  • CAB shall not be the manufacturer's assigned
    Notified Body or authorized representative
  • GHTF alignment
  • http//www.sfda.gov.sa

23
The views expressed are those of the author. They
do not necessarily reflect the position of
Covidien.
24
Supplemental InformationGlobal Glossary
25
Global Glossary
  • Brazil
  • ABIMO Domestic Medical Device Association
  • ANVISA National Health Surveillance Agency. GOB
    - Government of Brazil
  • Mexico
  • AMID Association for Medical Industries for
    Innovative Medical Devices
  • China
  • AmCham The American Chamber of Commerce in
    China Industry association
  • AQSIQ General Administration of Quality
    Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine One of
    the two main Chinese government agencies that
    tests medical devices prior to regulatory
    approval and conducts audits of manufacturing
    facilities.
  • CAMDI China Association for Medical Device
    Industry Chinas largest domestic medical
    device industry association, which has a formal
    relationship with several government agencies,
    including SFDA and the NDRC.
  • JCCT - Joint Commission on Commerce and Trade
  • MHRSS - MHRSS  Ministry of Human Resources and
    Social Security
  • MOFCOM Ministry of Commerce Chinese
    government ministry..
  • MOH Ministry of Health Chinese government
    ministry.
  • NDRC National Development and Reform Commission
    Chinese government agency PRC Peoples
    Republic of China The formal legal name of the
    country of China.
  • SFDA State Food and Drug Administration
    Chinese government agency

26
Global Glossary
  • Europe Union
  • COCIR Association of the European Radiological,
    Electro medical and Healthcare IT Industry. 
  • EDMA European Diagnostic Manufacturers
    Association
  • EUCOMED European medical device association
  • MDD Medical Device Directive (93/42/EEC)
  • France
  • APIDIM  Association of US-Based device
    manufacturers in France.
  • APPAMED Syndicat de lIndustrie des
    Dispositifs de Soins Médicaux, Association of
    Medical Disposables and Therapies
  • CEPP Commission dÉvaluation des Produits et
    Prestations Committee for Assessment of Devices
    and Health Technologies, within the HAS.
  • CEPS -- Comité Économique des Produits de Santé,
    Economic Committee for Health Products, within
    the French Ministry of Health.
  • GHS Groupes Homegenes de Sejour, French
    DRG-style system of payment groups, under the
    T2A  payment system.

27
Global Glossary
  • France (cont)
  • HAS French High Authority on Health,
    responsible for health technology assessment.
  • SNITEM  Syndicat National de l'Industrie des
    Technologies Médicales, French Medical Devices
    and Equipment Association
  • DRG - Diagnosis Related Groups
  • Germany
  • Aktion Meditech joint public relations campaign
    by BVMed, AdvaMed and interested member companies
  • BVMed German medical technology association
  • GOG Government of Germany
  • IQWiG - Institute for Quality and Efficiency in
    Healthcare (IQWiG)
  • JFC - Joint Federal Committee (Bundesausschuss
    Krankenhaus also called G-BA) - The G-BA performs
    the political and economical appraisals.
  • SHI Statutory Health Insurance
  • India
  • DCG(I) Drug Controller Government (India)
    regulatory agency
  • GOI- Government of India

28
Global Glossary
  • Italy
  • Assobiomedica Italian association for medical
    devices
  • CUD technical body of the MOH with the function
    to analyze the minimum and maximum unit prices
    for medical devices.
  • DEHP Bis (2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate
  • GOI Government of Italy
  • MOEF Ministry of Economy and Finance
  • MOH Ministry of Health
  • NHS National Health System
  • REACH - is a new European Community Regulation
    on chemicals and their safe use (EC 1907/2006).
    It deals with the Registration, Evaluation,
    Authorisation and Restriction of Chemical
    substances.
  • SVHC Substance of Very High Concern
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com