QA For Web Sites - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

QA For Web Sites

Description:

Latest results can be obtained by clicking on link to testing service ... Projects are at different stages of development (and some have finished) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:17
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: brian89
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: QA For Web Sites


1
QA For Web Sites
Ed Bremner ILRT University of Bristol Ed.Bremner_at_b
ris.ac.uk
Marieke Guy UKOLN University of
Bath M.Guy_at_ukoln.ac.uk
  • Aims Of Todays Talk
  • To discuss the approaches taken to QA by projects
  • To summarise findings of surveys of project Web
    sites
  • To make recommendations for future QA work

Brian Kelly UKOLN University of
Bath B.Kelly_at_ukoln.ac.uk
2
Contents


  • Introduction
  • QA For Digitisation
  • QA For Web Sites
  • Conclusions

EIB
3
Introduction

EIB
4
Approach Taken
  • Possible approaches to ensuring compliance with
    standards and best practices
  • Strict auditing, with penalties for no-compliance
  • Developmental, explaining reasons for compliance,
    documenting examples of best practices and
    providing advice on implementation and monitoring
  • The second approach is being taken

5
QA For Web Sites
  • The issues
  • The Web is the main delivery mechanism for
    projects and services
  • There is an increasing awareness of the
    importance of
  • Accessibility
  • Use of new devices (PDAs, WAP, e-books, )
  • Repurposing of Web content (e.g. archiving)
  • Technologies such as XSLT will support
    repurposing of valid XML resources
  • But
  • Invalid HTML is the norm
  • Many authoring tools produce poor HTML
  • Authors arent aware of the problems

MG
6
Guidelines
  • We often say
  • Open standards are important
  • HTML, XML, XHTML, CSS, are important
  • but fail to explain why and how
  • JISCs QA Focus is addressing such concerns by
  • Documenting example of best practices in which
    projects can share their implementation successes
    (and difficulties they experienced)
  • Provide brief advice in specific aspects of the
    standards and best practices
  • Surveying its communities to highlight best
    practices and areas in which improvements can be
    made
  • Demonstrating use of testing tools and procedures

MG
7
Standards Best Practices
  • Standards For Web
  • Use compliant HTML / XHTML
  • Use CSS
  • Support WAI accessibility guidelines
  • Best Practices For Web
  • Ensure Web resources can are suitable for reuse
    and repurposing
  • Where proprietary formats need to be used, flag
    them and use in most open way

MG
8
Surveying The Community
  • Surveys of project Web sites have been carried
    out in order to
  • Obtain a profile for the community
  • Identify examples of best practices
  • Identify areas in which further advice is needed
  • Surveys included
  • HTML CSS compliance ? Accessibility
  • 404 error pages ? HTTP headers
  • Repurposing resources

MG
9
Survey Philosophy
  • The surveys made use of freely-available
    Web-based tools
  • Methodology is open
  • No software needs to be installed locally (apart
    from Web browser)
  • Findings can be reproduced
  • Latest results can be obtained by clicking on
    link to testing service
  • The surveys typically examined project entry
    points and not entire Web site as
  • This page has the highest profile
  • The aim is to validate a methodology which can be
    deployed by projects themselves, not to test
    every page on behalf of the projects

MG
10
Survey Findings
  • Initial set of findings available from
    lthttp//www.ukoln.ac.uk/qa-focus/surveys/web-10-2
    002/gt

MG
11
Providing Motivation
  • We have found evidence of failure to comply with
    HTML standards
  • There is a need to explain why compliance is
    important (and avoid the its OK in my browser
    argument) and to provide motivation for projects
    to update their tools, authoring procedures, etc.
  • A further set of surveys look at repurposing of
    the project Web sites
  • Availability of Web sites in the Internet Archive
  • Ease of making Web sites available on a PDA
  • Transformation of embedded metadata

MG
12
Repurposing Resources
  • We examined the Web sites to see if they were
    available in the Internet Archive and could be
    transformed into a format for viewing on a PDA

MG
13
Transforming Resources
  • Project entry points were processed by several
    online transformation services in order to
    validate and visualise embedded Dublin Core
    metadata

HTMLresource
Original page, containing embedded DC metadata
MG
14
Providing Advice
  • We have
  • Survey project Web sites and identified areas of
    lack of compliance with standards and best
    practices
  • Demonstrated examples of the potential importance
    of compliance for repurposing resources
  • In addition we need to provide
  • Brief focussed advice on the standards
  • Information on how to monitor compliance
  • Case studies on solutions deployed by projects
    themselves
  • Guidance on dealing with implementation
    difficulties and what to do when strict
    compliance is difficult to achieve

MG
15
Documentation Advice
  • Advisory briefing documents are being produced
  • These are
  • Brief, focussed documents
  • Informed by findings of the surveys

MG
16
Documentation Case Studies
  • Case Studies are being commissioned
  • These are
  • Written by projects themselves
  • Describe the solution adopted to a particular
    problem
  • Include details of lessons learnt not just a
    press release!

17
Next Steps
  • Extended Coverage
  • We will be moving on from Web and digitisation to
    include other areas including
  • Metadata ? Multimedia
  • Software development ? Deployment into service
  • Moving On From Automated Testing
  • The initial work made use of automated testing
    tools
  • Can be used remotely ? Objective
  • Applicable across all projects
  • We have started work on QA procedures in areas
    which are not suitable for automated checking

MG
18
Limitations
  • There are a number of limitations to the work we
    have carried out so far
  • Project Web sites have different purposes
    (information about the project communications
    with project partners project deliverables
    themselves etc.)
  • Projects have different levels of funding,
    resources, expertise, etc.
  • Projects are at different stages of development
    (and some have finished)
  • The surveys are intended to demonstrate a
    methodology which projects can use for themselves

MG
19
Self Assessment Toolkit
  • Further Deliverables
  • We will be developing a self-assessment toolkit
    for projects to use, by individual projects or
    across project clusters
  • The toolkit will consist of
  • Examples of QA procedures
  • Documented examples of use of testing tools
  • Self-assessment questionnaires
  • Advice on standards and best practices
  • Case studies
  • FAQs

MG
20
Questions
  • Any questions?

MG
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com