Response to Intervention: What Does It Mean to Me in Florida PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 58
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Response to Intervention: What Does It Mean to Me in Florida


1
Response to Intervention What Does It Mean to
Me in Florida?
  • Mary E. Little, Ph. D.

2
Critical Question
  • How do we create a system of school improvement
    focused on improving student results that meets
    the current policies, mandates, and expectations
    for use of data, continuous progress monitoring,
    and research-based instructional practices in
    Floridas schools and classrooms?

3
Participant Outcomes
  • Briefly highlight the background of
    implementation of RtI, both nationally and in
    Florida
  • Describe the framework and processes of
    Response-to-Intervention (RtI) within FDOE state
    plan
  • Highlight current and projected actions for
    scaling up RtI in Florida and
  • Share feedback for school and classroom
    implementation of the RtI Process.

4
What is RtI?Why RtI?Why Now?
5
IDEA 2004 - Congressional Findings 20 U.S.C.
1400(c)(5)
  • Having high expectations ensuring access to
    general education curriculum in the regular
    classroom
  • Providing special education services and supports
    in the regular classroom whenever appropriate
  • Providing incentives for whole-school approaches,
    scientifically based early reading programs,
    positive behavioral interventions and supports,
    and early intervening services to reduce the need
    to label children as disabled in order to address
    the learning and behavioral needs of such children

6
AlignmentChanging Educational Focus NCLB
IDEA
  • Improved student outcomes
  • Early intervention and prevention
  • Use of evidence-based interventions
  • Data-driven accountability
  • Reduced need for disability label to get
    assistance
  • Highly qualified teachers

7
What is RtI?
  • RTI is the practice of
  • providing high quality instruction/intervention
    matched to student needs and,
  • using level of performance and learning rate over
    a time to
  • make important educational decisions to guide
    instruction.
  • National Association of State Directors of
    Special Education, 2005

7
8
Core Principles of RtI
  • Frequent data collection on student performance
  • Early identification of students at risk
  • Early intervention (K-3)
  • Multi-tiered model of service delivery
  • Research-based, scientifically validated
    instruction/interventions
  • Ongoing progress monitoring - interventions
    evaluated and modified
  • Data-based decision making - all decisions made
    with data

9
Thinking Differently
  • Every Ed, not just ESE anymore
  • Focus on interventions not placement
  • Aim of assessment is to identify effective
    interventions
  • Effective interventions are identified prior to
    eligibility
  • Student outcomes drive decisions
  • Problem Solving RtI is continual and fluid

10
Florida Research in Reading First
SchoolsIdentification of learning disabilities
  • Research conducted by Torgesen in 318 RF
    elementary schools 2003-2004
  • High proportion of students in poverty (72)
  • High minority students (62)
  • After implementation of research-based
    instructional methods, Torgesen reports the
    percent of students identified as learning
    disabled at the end of kindergarten was reduced
    by 81 from year 1 to year 3 (Torgesen, 2007,
    pg. 4).

11
Floridas Administrative Rule 6A-6.0331
  • Approved on June 17, 2008
  • . . . districts responsibility to develop and
    implement coordinated general education
    intervention procedures for students who need
    additional academic and behavioral support to
    succeed in the general education environment and
    in implementing such procedures, a school
    district may carry out activities that include
    the provision of educational and behavioral
    evaluations, services, and supports . . .

11
12
Funding General Education Interventions Early
Intervening Services
  • LEA may use 15 percent of Part B funds . . . to
    develop and implement coordinated, early
    intervening services for students not identified
    as needing special education, but who need
    additional academic and behavioral support to
    succeed in a general education environment.
    34 CFR 300.226(a)
  • Requires LEAs with significant disproportionality
    to use 15 percent of Part B funds to provide
    comprehensive coordinated early intervening
    services to children in over-identified groups.
    34 CFR 300.646(b)(2)

12
13
Paradigm Shift
  • Eligibility focus
  • Diagnose and Place
  • Get label
  • Outcome focus
  • Problem Solving and Response to Intervention
  • Get help

14
Two Inter-related Issues
  • INSTRUCTIONAL MODEL Used as a school and
    classroom model for providing instruction to
    young students that can help prevent the
    emergence of early reading or other learning
    difficulties.
  • Torgesen, 2007
  • DIAGNOSTIC MODEL
  • May use a process that determines if the child
    responds to scientific, research-based
    intervention as a part of the evaluation
    procedures.
  • Torgesen, 2007

15
Three-Tiered Model of School Supports the
Problem-solving Process
ACADEMIC SYSTEMS Tier 3 Comprehensive
Intensive Students who need individualized
interventions. Tier 2 Strategic Interventions
Students who need more support in addition to the
core curriculum. Tier 1 Core Curriculum All
students, including students who require
curricular enhancements for acceleration.
BEHAVIOR SYSTEMS Tier 3 Intensive
Interventions Students who need individualized
intervention. Tier 2 Targeted Group
Interventions Students who need more support in
addition to school-wide positive behavior
program. Tier 1 Universal Interventions All
students in all settings.
15
15
16
Problem Solving
  • A systematic and structured process that uses
    the skills of professionals from different
    disciplines to develop, implement, and evaluate
    intervention plans that result in the significant
    improvement (closing the gap) of student
    performance.

17
Intervention Framework
  • Intensive Interventions
  • A few
  • Supplemental Interventions
  • Some
  • Core/Universal Interventions
  • All

Academic
Behavior
18
How do we KNOW when students are achieving?How
do we create a SYSTEM of instructional support?
19
Florida Department of Education 2008
20
Purpose
  • Facilitate successful implementation of PS/RtI
  • Formalize and coordinate state-wide efforts
  • Build upon the successes of Reading First (RF)
    and Positive Behavior Support (PBS)
    implementations in Florida where special
    education referral rates have dropped
    approximately 40 in RF schools (Torgesen, 2007)
    and office discipline referrals have dropped 40
    in PBS schools (Kincaid, 2007).
  • Provide districts with the critical components,
    definitions and applications of RtI to support
    the development of district plans
  • p. 1 of the Statewide RtI Implementation Plan

21
Alignment with Existing Initiatives
  • The basic elements of RtI are required by NCLB
    and IDEA, therefore, they are included in all
    broad-based initiatives for schools striving to
    meet (AYP), such as
  • K-12 Reading Plan and Reading First
  • Floridas Continuous Improvement Model (FCIM)
  • Floridas Positive Behavior Supports (PBS)
  • PS/RtI Pilot Project
  • Early Learning Success (ELS) Initiative
  • p. 1 of the Statewide RtI Implementation Plan

22
Parent Involvement
  • Meaningful and effective involvement is critical
  • Parents must understand that
  • RtI is relevant and beneficial to all students,
    regardless of placement
  • RtI seeks to find out what specific instruction
    and interventions work best for their child
  • RtI is not a categorical system that students
    must progress through laterally to become
    eligible for special education
  • RtI does not override other rights under IDEA
  • p. 2 of the Statewide RtI Implementation Plan

23
Foundation Beliefs
  • Maximum benefits to students occur if
  • Scientific, research-based instruction is
    delivered by highly qualified personnel
  • Reliable, valid, and instructionally relevant
    assessments are used
  • Problem-solving method is used to make decisions
    based on a continuum of student need
  • p. 3 of the Statewide RtI Implementation Plan

24
Foundation Beliefs
  • Maximum benefits to students occur if
  • Data are used to guide instructional decisions
  • Professional development and follow-up modeling
    and coaching are provided to ensure effective
    instruction at all levels
  • Leadership is vital
  • All students and their families are part of one
    proactive and seamless system
  • pp. 3-4 of the Statewide RtI Implementation Plan

25
Impact of RtI Implementation
  • Maximum effect of core instruction for all
    students
  • Targeted instruction and interventions for
    at-risk learners
  • Significant improvements in pro-social behaviors
  • Reduction in over-representation of diverse
    student groups in low academic performance,
    special education, suspension/expulsion, and
    alternative education.
  • Reduction in referrals for special education
  • Overall improvement in achievement rates
  • p. 7 of the Statewide RtI Implementation Plan

26
State Responsibilities
  • Establish and facilitate teams to obtain on-going
    stakeholder input and build capacity to sustain
    implementation over time
  • Align terminology and requirements across related
    initiatives reading, math, behavior, school
    improvement, student progression)
  • Provide On-line Training Courses
  • Collaborate with PIRC and PTI to disseminate
    resources for families
  • pp. 7-8 of the Statewide RtI Implementation Plan

27
State Responsibilities
  • Revise Statutes, Rules and Policies to support
    implementation
  • Develop and disseminate TA regarding gifted, ELL,
    assessment accommodations, pre-service efforts
    and teacher qualifications, secondary
    implementation, special education eligibility
  • Provide web-based self-assessment and planning
    tools for districts
  • Evaluate and report the effects of RtI
  • p. 8 of the Statewide RtI Implementation Plan

28
District Responsibilities
  • Based on self-assessment results, and in
    conjunction with the student progression plan and
    K-12 Comprehensive Reading Plan, develop an RtI
    implementation plan organized around building
    consensus, infrastructure, and implementation.
    Plans should also address
  • How current resources will be used to implement
    RtI and identify additional resources needed
  • How stakeholders will be educated
  • How stakeholders will be involved
  • p. 8 of the Statewide RtI Implementation Plan

29
Current Activities
  • Dissemination of State Plan
  • Statewide projects funded through the DOE
  • Collaborative Partnerships
  • Technical Assistance and Tools
  • Professional Development Activities
  • pp. 8-10 of the Statewide RtI Implementation Plan

30
Tools to Support Districts, Schools,
Pre-Service Institutions
  • District/School Self-assessment Tool (Appendix B
    of the Statewide RtI Implementation Plan)
  • Critical Components for District Planning
    (Appendix C of the Statewide RtI Implementation
    Plan)
  • On-line Introductory Training Course(s)
  • p. 9 of the Statewide RtI Implementation Plan
  • Florida RtI Introductory Training Course
    http//floridarti.usf.edu/intro_course
  • Earn 5 in-service credits, free!
  • More to come

31
Accessing Floridas Plan, Resources Tools
31
32
State Infrastructure
  • State Management Team
  • Role Provide leadership and facilitate
    policy-level changes to support implementation of
    effective educational practice
  • State Transformation Team
  • Role Analyze progress toward statewide efforts,
    recommend actions for improvement, and support
    District Based Leadership Teams DBLT to build the
    capacity of districts to implement evidence-based
    practices and to establish integrated RtI
    academic and behavior systems in each school
  • District Implementation Teams
  • Role Provide leadership, advisement, and
    training at the district level and assist schools
    in their implementation efforts
  • School Based Leadership Team
  • Role Develop a school implementation plan. The
    school based team will become trainers and
    coaches for the school staff and will be
    responsible for schoolwide implementation
  • Advisory Group
  • Role Provide on-going stakeholder input
  • pp. 11-13 of the Statewide RtI Implementation
    Plan

33
Funding Considerations
  • Consideration of fiscal needs (ex. release time,
    substitutes, registration fees, etc.)
  • District responsibilities and flexibility
  • Potential funding sources
  • Title I, Title II, Title III
  • Reading First Grants
  • IDEA
  • Research-based Reading Instruction Allocation
  • Annual School Improvement Allocations
  • pp. 13-15 of the Statewide RtI Implementation Plan

34
  • Application of RtI to ELL
  • Current research is promising that RtI will
    decrease the number of ELLs who are
    inappropriately referred to and placed in special
    education.
  • p. 15 of the Statewide RtI Implementation Plan
  • Application of RtI to Special Education
    Eligibility
  • School teams use student progress data as part of
    the evaluation process to determine eligibility.
  • p. 15 of the Statewide RtI Implementation Plan

35
  • How is Florida supporting
  • the development and implementation of
  • Response to Instruction/ Intervention?

36
Three Core Support Projects funded through the
Florida Department of Education Collaborate to
promote school-wide practices
  • Problem-solving/Response to Intervention State
    Pilot Project http//floridarti.usf.edu
  • Floridas Positive Behavior Support Project
    http//flpbs.fmhi.usf.edu/
  • Response to Interventions Teaching Learning
    Connections http//rtitlc.ucf.edu
  • Common Elements
  • Systems-Change
  • Building Capacity
  • Scaling-Up
  • Program Evaluation
  • Data-based Decision-making
  • Fidelity of Implementation
  • Research and Evaluation

37
Florida Problem Solving/RtI Project
  • Purpose
  • Evaluate the impact of PS/RtI on educator,
    student, and systemic outcomes in pilot sites
    implementing the model
  • Statewide professional development in PS/RtI

38
FL PS/RtI Project Where Does It Fit?
  • Districts must develop a plan to guide
    implementation of their use of PS/RtI
  • State Project can be one component of the plan
  • It cannot be THE plan for the district
  • District must own their implementation process
    and integrate existing elements and initiate new
    elements

39
  • Contact Information
  • George Batsche, Co-Director
  • Michael Curtis, Co-Director
  • Clark Dorman, Project Leader
  • University of South FloridaPsychological
    Social Foundations4202 E. Fowler Ave., EDU
    162Tampa, Florida 33620-5650813.974.9472
  • Website http//www.floridarti.usf.edu/index.ht
    ml

40
(No Transcript)
41
Floridas PBS Project
  • Mission
  • Increasing the capacity of Floridas school
    districts to address problem behavior using
    positive behavior support
  • What we do
  • Provide training and technical assistance to
    districts across the state in the development and
    implementation of positive behavior supports at
    the school-wide, targeted group, classroom and
    individual student levels

42
  • Donald Kincaid, Director
  • Heather George, Coordinator
  • Karen Childs, Research Coordinator
  • University of South Florida
  • 13301 Bruce B. Downs Blvd.
  • DARES/CFS/FMHI MHC2113A
  • Tampa, FL 33612-3899
  • 813.974.6440
  • E-mail flpbs_at_fmhi.usf.edu
  • Website http//flpbs.fmhi.usf.edu

43
RtI-Teaching Learning Connections
  • Focus Academic Performance
  • Goal The purpose of this project is to
    collaboratively identify, disseminate, and
    facilitate high fidelity implementation of
    current and emerging research-based instructional
    practices in curriculum, instruction, and
    assessment within the framework of Response to
    Intervention (RtI) to educational personnel in
    the state of Florida.

44
RtI-TLC Current Initiatives
  • identify and disseminate information about
  • resources,
  • professional development, and
  • research
  • related to current and emerging evidence-based
    instructional practices, especially within
  • early literacy,
  • adolescent literacy, and
  • mathematics. 

45
Current Activities
  • Activities Training, School Improvement,
    Evaluation
  • Training Provide training and technical
    assistance support for implementation of
    evidence-based instructional practices in the
    specific content areas of in literacy and
    mathematics.
  • School Improvement Collaborate with FDOE teams
    in Scaling-Up Evidence-based Practices
  • Evaluation Conduct student, classroom school,
    district, and state-wide evaluation and research
    of high fidelity implementation of evidence-based
    instructional practices.

46
  • Mary Little, Principal Investigator
  • Anna OConnor-Morin, Project Coordinator
  • Shelby Robertson, Project Coordinator
  • University of Central Florida
  • 4000 Central Florida Parkway
  • Bldg TA Room 403
  • Orlando, Florida
  • 386.274.0175
  • Email rtitlc_at_mail.ucf.edu
  • Website http//rtitlc.ucf.edu

47
Project Partners
  • Bureau of School Improvement
  • http//www.bsi.fsu.edu/
  • Just Read, Florida!
  • www.justreadflorida.com
  • Bureau of Exceptional Education and Student
    Services
  • http//www.fldoe.org/ese/
  • Office of Early Learning- VPK Program
  • www.fldoe.org/earlylearning/sruss.asp
  • Problem-Solving/RtI Pilot Project
  • www.floridarti.usf.edu
  • Statewide Positive Behavior Support
  • www.flpbs.fmhi.usf.edu
  • RtI-Teaching Learning Connections (TLC)
  • Site forthcoming
  • Florida Center for Reading Research
  • www.fcrr.org

47
48
Current and Projected Next Steps
  • On-line Module-Awareness of RtI in Florida
  • Alignment of Floridas Accountability and
    Programmatic Documents and Procedures
  • Conduct Awareness Focus Group Sessions
  • Co-construct RtI Adolescent Literacy Model
  • Facilitate RtI Regional Workshops Series of
    three for Development of District RtI Plan
  • Rule and Policy Adoptions/Revisions
  • Plan for Statewide Professional Development
    activities across multiple stakeholders within
    RTI Framework
  • Keep smiling!

49
Havent I Heard ALL this Before?
  • Take a few minutes to think about, talk about
    some critical components about Response to
    Intervention (RtI).
  • How is what you have heard SIMILAR to current
    practices, initiatives, etc.?

50
Expanded Roles in Reading
  • RtI is not owned by one profession.
  • Schools should establish high-quality reading
    instruction in all classrooms based on
    evidence-based research, develop multi-tiered
    interventions to match students needs, and
    develop comprehensive school-wide problem solving
    approaches.
  • Taken from Reading teachers play key role in
    successful RtI Approaches at www.reading.org/downl
    oads/resources/RTI

51
Roles of Reading Specialists and Literacy Coaches
in RtI
  • Service providers in the RtI process
  • Sharing expertise with the other members of the
    RtI team
  • Suggesting interventions that are integrally
    connected with the core reading program used in
    the classroom and school
  • Members of data collection/data discussion teams
  • Adopt a systems approach to serving students
  • www.reading.org/downloads/resources/rti_role

52
  • District Response to Intervention (RtI)
    Implementation

5
0
10
Full implementation
Work not begun to create district RtI plan
District RtI Plan formulated and initial
implementation in place
53
How will teachers learn about, implement, and
continuously monitor student progress?
  • Given the identified student needs, selected
    research-based instructional materials to offer a
    continuum of reading, writing and math programs,
    and identified teacher needs, how is an efficient
    and effective system of continuous,
    standards-based professional development created
    and sustained?

54
Please share!
  • At this time, Florida is scaling up efforts to
    assure comprehensive and statewide implementation
    of RtI.
  • Please share your thoughts with us today.
  • Lets take some time to discuss the questions
    provided.

55
Remember Our Common Goal
  • We are dedicated
  • to improve achievement for all students through
    continuous problem solving using assessment data
    related to instructional
  • decision-making.

56
  • Isnt it wonderful that were all different?
    Each of us has strengths and skills to share.
    And when we link together, we are invincible.
  • Fullan, 2006

57
Contacts
  • Melinda Webster
  • Elementary Reading Specialist
  • Florida Department of Education
  • Just Read, Florida! Office
  • Melinda.Webster_at_fldoe.org
  • Mary Little/Anna OConnor-Morin
  • Response to Intervention Teaching Learning
    Connections
  • University of Central Florida
  • RtITLC_at_mail.ucf.edu

58
National Resources to Support District and School
Implementation
  • www.nasdse.org
  • Building and District Implementation Blueprints
  • Current research (evidence-based practices) that
    supports use of RtI
  • www.rtinetwork.org
  • Blueprints to support implementation
  • Monthly RtI Talks
  • Virtual visits to schools implementing RtI
  • Webinars
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com