Title: Response to Intervention: What Does It Mean to Me in Florida
1Response to Intervention What Does It Mean to
Me in Florida?
2Critical Question
- How do we create a system of school improvement
focused on improving student results that meets
the current policies, mandates, and expectations
for use of data, continuous progress monitoring,
and research-based instructional practices in
Floridas schools and classrooms?
3Participant Outcomes
- Briefly highlight the background of
implementation of RtI, both nationally and in
Florida - Describe the framework and processes of
Response-to-Intervention (RtI) within FDOE state
plan - Highlight current and projected actions for
scaling up RtI in Florida and - Share feedback for school and classroom
implementation of the RtI Process.
4What is RtI?Why RtI?Why Now?
5IDEA 2004 - Congressional Findings 20 U.S.C.
1400(c)(5)
- Having high expectations ensuring access to
general education curriculum in the regular
classroom - Providing special education services and supports
in the regular classroom whenever appropriate - Providing incentives for whole-school approaches,
scientifically based early reading programs,
positive behavioral interventions and supports,
and early intervening services to reduce the need
to label children as disabled in order to address
the learning and behavioral needs of such children
6AlignmentChanging Educational Focus NCLB
IDEA
- Improved student outcomes
- Early intervention and prevention
- Use of evidence-based interventions
- Data-driven accountability
- Reduced need for disability label to get
assistance - Highly qualified teachers
7What is RtI?
- RTI is the practice of
- providing high quality instruction/intervention
matched to student needs and, - using level of performance and learning rate over
a time to - make important educational decisions to guide
instruction. - National Association of State Directors of
Special Education, 2005
7
8Core Principles of RtI
- Frequent data collection on student performance
- Early identification of students at risk
- Early intervention (K-3)
- Multi-tiered model of service delivery
- Research-based, scientifically validated
instruction/interventions - Ongoing progress monitoring - interventions
evaluated and modified - Data-based decision making - all decisions made
with data
9Thinking Differently
- Every Ed, not just ESE anymore
- Focus on interventions not placement
- Aim of assessment is to identify effective
interventions - Effective interventions are identified prior to
eligibility - Student outcomes drive decisions
- Problem Solving RtI is continual and fluid
10Florida Research in Reading First
SchoolsIdentification of learning disabilities
- Research conducted by Torgesen in 318 RF
elementary schools 2003-2004 - High proportion of students in poverty (72)
- High minority students (62)
- After implementation of research-based
instructional methods, Torgesen reports the
percent of students identified as learning
disabled at the end of kindergarten was reduced
by 81 from year 1 to year 3 (Torgesen, 2007,
pg. 4).
11Floridas Administrative Rule 6A-6.0331
- Approved on June 17, 2008
- . . . districts responsibility to develop and
implement coordinated general education
intervention procedures for students who need
additional academic and behavioral support to
succeed in the general education environment and
in implementing such procedures, a school
district may carry out activities that include
the provision of educational and behavioral
evaluations, services, and supports . . .
11
12Funding General Education Interventions Early
Intervening Services
- LEA may use 15 percent of Part B funds . . . to
develop and implement coordinated, early
intervening services for students not identified
as needing special education, but who need
additional academic and behavioral support to
succeed in a general education environment.
34 CFR 300.226(a) - Requires LEAs with significant disproportionality
to use 15 percent of Part B funds to provide
comprehensive coordinated early intervening
services to children in over-identified groups.
34 CFR 300.646(b)(2)
12
13Paradigm Shift
- Eligibility focus
- Diagnose and Place
- Get label
- Outcome focus
- Problem Solving and Response to Intervention
- Get help
14Two Inter-related Issues
- INSTRUCTIONAL MODEL Used as a school and
classroom model for providing instruction to
young students that can help prevent the
emergence of early reading or other learning
difficulties. - Torgesen, 2007
-
- DIAGNOSTIC MODEL
- May use a process that determines if the child
responds to scientific, research-based
intervention as a part of the evaluation
procedures. - Torgesen, 2007
15Three-Tiered Model of School Supports the
Problem-solving Process
ACADEMIC SYSTEMS Tier 3 Comprehensive
Intensive Students who need individualized
interventions. Tier 2 Strategic Interventions
Students who need more support in addition to the
core curriculum. Tier 1 Core Curriculum All
students, including students who require
curricular enhancements for acceleration.
BEHAVIOR SYSTEMS Tier 3 Intensive
Interventions Students who need individualized
intervention. Tier 2 Targeted Group
Interventions Students who need more support in
addition to school-wide positive behavior
program. Tier 1 Universal Interventions All
students in all settings.
15
15
16Problem Solving
- A systematic and structured process that uses
the skills of professionals from different
disciplines to develop, implement, and evaluate
intervention plans that result in the significant
improvement (closing the gap) of student
performance.
17Intervention Framework
- Intensive Interventions
- A few
- Supplemental Interventions
- Some
- Core/Universal Interventions
- All
Academic
Behavior
18How do we KNOW when students are achieving?How
do we create a SYSTEM of instructional support?
19Florida Department of Education 2008
20Purpose
- Facilitate successful implementation of PS/RtI
- Formalize and coordinate state-wide efforts
- Build upon the successes of Reading First (RF)
and Positive Behavior Support (PBS)
implementations in Florida where special
education referral rates have dropped
approximately 40 in RF schools (Torgesen, 2007)
and office discipline referrals have dropped 40
in PBS schools (Kincaid, 2007). - Provide districts with the critical components,
definitions and applications of RtI to support
the development of district plans - p. 1 of the Statewide RtI Implementation Plan
21Alignment with Existing Initiatives
- The basic elements of RtI are required by NCLB
and IDEA, therefore, they are included in all
broad-based initiatives for schools striving to
meet (AYP), such as - K-12 Reading Plan and Reading First
- Floridas Continuous Improvement Model (FCIM)
- Floridas Positive Behavior Supports (PBS)
- PS/RtI Pilot Project
- Early Learning Success (ELS) Initiative
- p. 1 of the Statewide RtI Implementation Plan
22Parent Involvement
- Meaningful and effective involvement is critical
- Parents must understand that
- RtI is relevant and beneficial to all students,
regardless of placement - RtI seeks to find out what specific instruction
and interventions work best for their child - RtI is not a categorical system that students
must progress through laterally to become
eligible for special education - RtI does not override other rights under IDEA
- p. 2 of the Statewide RtI Implementation Plan
23Foundation Beliefs
- Maximum benefits to students occur if
- Scientific, research-based instruction is
delivered by highly qualified personnel - Reliable, valid, and instructionally relevant
assessments are used - Problem-solving method is used to make decisions
based on a continuum of student need - p. 3 of the Statewide RtI Implementation Plan
24Foundation Beliefs
- Maximum benefits to students occur if
- Data are used to guide instructional decisions
- Professional development and follow-up modeling
and coaching are provided to ensure effective
instruction at all levels - Leadership is vital
- All students and their families are part of one
proactive and seamless system - pp. 3-4 of the Statewide RtI Implementation Plan
25Impact of RtI Implementation
- Maximum effect of core instruction for all
students - Targeted instruction and interventions for
at-risk learners - Significant improvements in pro-social behaviors
- Reduction in over-representation of diverse
student groups in low academic performance,
special education, suspension/expulsion, and
alternative education. - Reduction in referrals for special education
- Overall improvement in achievement rates
- p. 7 of the Statewide RtI Implementation Plan
26State Responsibilities
- Establish and facilitate teams to obtain on-going
stakeholder input and build capacity to sustain
implementation over time - Align terminology and requirements across related
initiatives reading, math, behavior, school
improvement, student progression) - Provide On-line Training Courses
- Collaborate with PIRC and PTI to disseminate
resources for families - pp. 7-8 of the Statewide RtI Implementation Plan
27State Responsibilities
- Revise Statutes, Rules and Policies to support
implementation - Develop and disseminate TA regarding gifted, ELL,
assessment accommodations, pre-service efforts
and teacher qualifications, secondary
implementation, special education eligibility - Provide web-based self-assessment and planning
tools for districts - Evaluate and report the effects of RtI
- p. 8 of the Statewide RtI Implementation Plan
28District Responsibilities
- Based on self-assessment results, and in
conjunction with the student progression plan and
K-12 Comprehensive Reading Plan, develop an RtI
implementation plan organized around building
consensus, infrastructure, and implementation.
Plans should also address - How current resources will be used to implement
RtI and identify additional resources needed - How stakeholders will be educated
- How stakeholders will be involved
- p. 8 of the Statewide RtI Implementation Plan
29Current Activities
- Dissemination of State Plan
- Statewide projects funded through the DOE
- Collaborative Partnerships
- Technical Assistance and Tools
- Professional Development Activities
- pp. 8-10 of the Statewide RtI Implementation Plan
30Tools to Support Districts, Schools,
Pre-Service Institutions
- District/School Self-assessment Tool (Appendix B
of the Statewide RtI Implementation Plan) - Critical Components for District Planning
(Appendix C of the Statewide RtI Implementation
Plan) - On-line Introductory Training Course(s)
- p. 9 of the Statewide RtI Implementation Plan
- Florida RtI Introductory Training Course
http//floridarti.usf.edu/intro_course - Earn 5 in-service credits, free!
- More to come
31Accessing Floridas Plan, Resources Tools
31
32State Infrastructure
- State Management Team
- Role Provide leadership and facilitate
policy-level changes to support implementation of
effective educational practice - State Transformation Team
- Role Analyze progress toward statewide efforts,
recommend actions for improvement, and support
District Based Leadership Teams DBLT to build the
capacity of districts to implement evidence-based
practices and to establish integrated RtI
academic and behavior systems in each school - District Implementation Teams
- Role Provide leadership, advisement, and
training at the district level and assist schools
in their implementation efforts - School Based Leadership Team
- Role Develop a school implementation plan. The
school based team will become trainers and
coaches for the school staff and will be
responsible for schoolwide implementation - Advisory Group
- Role Provide on-going stakeholder input
- pp. 11-13 of the Statewide RtI Implementation
Plan
33Funding Considerations
- Consideration of fiscal needs (ex. release time,
substitutes, registration fees, etc.) - District responsibilities and flexibility
- Potential funding sources
- Title I, Title II, Title III
- Reading First Grants
- IDEA
- Research-based Reading Instruction Allocation
- Annual School Improvement Allocations
- pp. 13-15 of the Statewide RtI Implementation Plan
34- Application of RtI to ELL
- Current research is promising that RtI will
decrease the number of ELLs who are
inappropriately referred to and placed in special
education. - p. 15 of the Statewide RtI Implementation Plan
- Application of RtI to Special Education
Eligibility - School teams use student progress data as part of
the evaluation process to determine eligibility. - p. 15 of the Statewide RtI Implementation Plan
35- How is Florida supporting
- the development and implementation of
- Response to Instruction/ Intervention?
36Three Core Support Projects funded through the
Florida Department of Education Collaborate to
promote school-wide practices
- Problem-solving/Response to Intervention State
Pilot Project http//floridarti.usf.edu - Floridas Positive Behavior Support Project
http//flpbs.fmhi.usf.edu/ - Response to Interventions Teaching Learning
Connections http//rtitlc.ucf.edu
- Common Elements
- Systems-Change
- Building Capacity
- Scaling-Up
- Program Evaluation
- Data-based Decision-making
- Fidelity of Implementation
- Research and Evaluation
37Florida Problem Solving/RtI Project
- Purpose
- Evaluate the impact of PS/RtI on educator,
student, and systemic outcomes in pilot sites
implementing the model - Statewide professional development in PS/RtI
38FL PS/RtI Project Where Does It Fit?
- Districts must develop a plan to guide
implementation of their use of PS/RtI - State Project can be one component of the plan
- It cannot be THE plan for the district
- District must own their implementation process
and integrate existing elements and initiate new
elements
39- Contact Information
- George Batsche, Co-Director
- Michael Curtis, Co-Director
- Clark Dorman, Project Leader
- University of South FloridaPsychological
Social Foundations4202 E. Fowler Ave., EDU
162Tampa, Florida 33620-5650813.974.9472 - Website http//www.floridarti.usf.edu/index.ht
ml
40(No Transcript)
41Floridas PBS Project
- Mission
- Increasing the capacity of Floridas school
districts to address problem behavior using
positive behavior support - What we do
- Provide training and technical assistance to
districts across the state in the development and
implementation of positive behavior supports at
the school-wide, targeted group, classroom and
individual student levels
42- Donald Kincaid, Director
- Heather George, Coordinator
- Karen Childs, Research Coordinator
- University of South Florida
- 13301 Bruce B. Downs Blvd.
- DARES/CFS/FMHI MHC2113A
- Tampa, FL 33612-3899
- 813.974.6440
- E-mail flpbs_at_fmhi.usf.edu
- Website http//flpbs.fmhi.usf.edu
43RtI-Teaching Learning Connections
- Focus Academic Performance
- Goal The purpose of this project is to
collaboratively identify, disseminate, and
facilitate high fidelity implementation of
current and emerging research-based instructional
practices in curriculum, instruction, and
assessment within the framework of Response to
Intervention (RtI) to educational personnel in
the state of Florida.
44RtI-TLC Current Initiatives
- identify and disseminate information about
- resources,
- professional development, and
- research
- related to current and emerging evidence-based
instructional practices, especially within - early literacy,
- adolescent literacy, and
- mathematics.
45Current Activities
- Activities Training, School Improvement,
Evaluation - Training Provide training and technical
assistance support for implementation of
evidence-based instructional practices in the
specific content areas of in literacy and
mathematics. - School Improvement Collaborate with FDOE teams
in Scaling-Up Evidence-based Practices - Evaluation Conduct student, classroom school,
district, and state-wide evaluation and research
of high fidelity implementation of evidence-based
instructional practices.
46- Mary Little, Principal Investigator
- Anna OConnor-Morin, Project Coordinator
- Shelby Robertson, Project Coordinator
- University of Central Florida
- 4000 Central Florida Parkway
- Bldg TA Room 403
- Orlando, Florida
- 386.274.0175
- Email rtitlc_at_mail.ucf.edu
- Website http//rtitlc.ucf.edu
47Project Partners
- Bureau of School Improvement
- http//www.bsi.fsu.edu/
- Just Read, Florida!
- www.justreadflorida.com
- Bureau of Exceptional Education and Student
Services - http//www.fldoe.org/ese/
- Office of Early Learning- VPK Program
- www.fldoe.org/earlylearning/sruss.asp
- Problem-Solving/RtI Pilot Project
- www.floridarti.usf.edu
- Statewide Positive Behavior Support
- www.flpbs.fmhi.usf.edu
- RtI-Teaching Learning Connections (TLC)
- Site forthcoming
- Florida Center for Reading Research
- www.fcrr.org
47
48Current and Projected Next Steps
- On-line Module-Awareness of RtI in Florida
- Alignment of Floridas Accountability and
Programmatic Documents and Procedures - Conduct Awareness Focus Group Sessions
- Co-construct RtI Adolescent Literacy Model
- Facilitate RtI Regional Workshops Series of
three for Development of District RtI Plan - Rule and Policy Adoptions/Revisions
- Plan for Statewide Professional Development
activities across multiple stakeholders within
RTI Framework - Keep smiling!
49Havent I Heard ALL this Before?
- Take a few minutes to think about, talk about
some critical components about Response to
Intervention (RtI). - How is what you have heard SIMILAR to current
practices, initiatives, etc.?
50Expanded Roles in Reading
- RtI is not owned by one profession.
- Schools should establish high-quality reading
instruction in all classrooms based on
evidence-based research, develop multi-tiered
interventions to match students needs, and
develop comprehensive school-wide problem solving
approaches. - Taken from Reading teachers play key role in
successful RtI Approaches at www.reading.org/downl
oads/resources/RTI
51Roles of Reading Specialists and Literacy Coaches
in RtI
- Service providers in the RtI process
- Sharing expertise with the other members of the
RtI team - Suggesting interventions that are integrally
connected with the core reading program used in
the classroom and school - Members of data collection/data discussion teams
- Adopt a systems approach to serving students
- www.reading.org/downloads/resources/rti_role
52- District Response to Intervention (RtI)
Implementation
5
0
10
Full implementation
Work not begun to create district RtI plan
District RtI Plan formulated and initial
implementation in place
53How will teachers learn about, implement, and
continuously monitor student progress?
- Given the identified student needs, selected
research-based instructional materials to offer a
continuum of reading, writing and math programs,
and identified teacher needs, how is an efficient
and effective system of continuous,
standards-based professional development created
and sustained?
54Please share!
- At this time, Florida is scaling up efforts to
assure comprehensive and statewide implementation
of RtI. - Please share your thoughts with us today.
- Lets take some time to discuss the questions
provided.
55Remember Our Common Goal
- We are dedicated
- to improve achievement for all students through
continuous problem solving using assessment data
related to instructional - decision-making.
56- Isnt it wonderful that were all different?
Each of us has strengths and skills to share.
And when we link together, we are invincible. - Fullan, 2006
57Contacts
- Melinda Webster
- Elementary Reading Specialist
- Florida Department of Education
- Just Read, Florida! Office
- Melinda.Webster_at_fldoe.org
- Mary Little/Anna OConnor-Morin
- Response to Intervention Teaching Learning
Connections - University of Central Florida
- RtITLC_at_mail.ucf.edu
58National Resources to Support District and School
Implementation
- www.nasdse.org
- Building and District Implementation Blueprints
- Current research (evidence-based practices) that
supports use of RtI - www.rtinetwork.org
- Blueprints to support implementation
- Monthly RtI Talks
- Virtual visits to schools implementing RtI
- Webinars