Title: Flow Influences on Particulate Organic Matter Settlement Within Tidal Creek Mudflat and Oyster Reef Habitats
1Flow Influences on Particulate Organic Matter
Settlement Within Tidal Creek Mudflat and Oyster
Reef Habitats Young, Ginger, Mauldin, Ashley and
Walters, Keith, Department of Marine Science,
Coastal Carolina University, Conway, SC 29528
- There were no significant habitat by day (F 3,30
2.87, p gt 0.05), habitat (F 1,30 0.11, p gt
0.05) or day (F 3,30 1.53, p gt 0.05)
effects on the settlement of POM total carbon gt
63 µm (Fig 4).
Abstract
The small-scale (m) effects of tidal flow on
particulate organic matter (POM) settlement
within intertidal mudflat and natural oyster reef
habitats were examined as part of a long-term
study focusing on oyster reef restoration in
South Carolina. POM settlement was considered an
indirect measure of total water column food
availability that affects growth and survival of
oysters on developing reefs. The study was
conducted within a Waites Island, SC tidal creek
at mudflat and adjacent natural oyster reef
sites. Sites were located in close proximity to
ongoing experiments examining the suitability and
spatial arrangement of different hard substrate
types (e.g., shell clutch, cement-covered stakes)
for oyster reef restoration. POM settlement data
were collected over 24 h periods for 5 d during
spring tides using replicate settlement traps.
Tidal flow was determined indirectly over the 5 d
period with dental plaster clod cylinders.
Ash-free dry weight values were determined from
settlement trap samples. Mudflat and oyster reef
habitat settlement differences resulted from
different amounts of suspended POM in the water
column and not different rates of flow between
sites.
Close-up of Settlement Traps w/ the Mud Site
Clods, Platforms Settlement Traps w/ the Reef
Site
Results
- There was no significant difference in the daily
loss of plaster from clods between mud and
reef sites (F 1,17 2.1, p gt 0.05) - no
difference in flow between sites (Fig1).
Figure 4 Total POM carbon collected (mean SE)
in settlement samplers for the gt63µm fraction.
- There was a significant habitat by day
interaction (F 3,30 4.66, p lt 0.01) in the
settlement of lt 63 µm total POM carbon (Fig 5).
Objective
To determine if there are significant flow and
POM settlement differences between mudflat and
oyster reef habitats.
Figure 1 The mean (SE) daily erosion of plaster
(hydrodynamic flow) at mud and reef sites.
Tidal Creek
- There were no significant habitat by day (F 3,30
0.06, p gt 0.05), habitat (F 1,30 0.31, p gt
0.05) or day (F 3,30 2.20, p gt 0.05) effects
on the total settlement of material gt 63 µm
(Fig 2).
Map shows an aerial view of the tidal creek study
site
Figure 5 Total POM carbon collected (mean SE)
in settlement samplers for the lt 63µm fraction.
Conclusions
Waites Island tidal creek study site with
ongoing clutch bag and stake reef restoration
treatments shown
- Mud and reef differences in the settlement of
POMl could not be explained by differences in
flow characteristics between the sites. - Settlement of lt63 µm POM, both total and
organic carbon amounts, was effected by habitat
and date. These results could represent the
effects of daily or tidal differences in flow
and/or could represent actual differences in
the amount of POM passing over each site. - Our results suggest, but do not confirm, that
oyster reef restoration success may depend on
the initial habitat in which the reef is being
established because of habitat effects on POM
availability.
Figure 2 Total settlement dry mass per day (mean
SE) for the gt63µm fraction.
- There was a significant habitat by day
interaction (F 3,30 3.05, p lt 0.045) in the
settlement of the total material lt 63 µm (Fig
3).
Materials and Methods
- The analysis of flow within the study site was
measured using the clod card protocol (see
Judge pers. com.) -Clods (2 ea.) were mounted on
5 platforms positioned flush with the sediment
in mud and reef sites -Clods were collected
after 5 d -The difference in clod mass was used
as an indirect measure of flow - POM settlement was measured using 50 ml tubes
placed w/ mud and reef sites -5 tubes
haphazardly placed and recovered at low tide w/
each site every day for a total of 5 d -Tubes
were pushed into the sediment at each site
leaving ca. 2 mm above the surface -Each tube
was filled with seawater -Samples were frozen _at_
-20 ºC until processed -Sediments were divided
into gt and lt63µm fractions -Fractions were dried
_at_ 60 ºC, weighed, and ashed _at_ 500 ºC,
reweighed to determine total dry and POM mass
of the settled material - All results were analyzed using SAS
Figure 3 Total settlement dry mass per day (mean
SE) for the lt63µm fraction