Title: Natural Variation in Light Response using Whole Genome Tiling Arrays Justin Borevitz Ecology
1Natural Variation in Light Response using Whole
Genome Tiling ArraysJustin BorevitzEcology
EvolutionUniversity of Chicagohttp//naturalvari
ation.org
2Light Affects the Entire Plant Life Cycle
de-etiolation
hypocotyl
3(No Transcript)
4Light Affects the Entire Plant Life Cycle
Light response variation can be seen under
constant conditions in the lab
5(No Transcript)
6Quantitative Trait Loci
7(No Transcript)
8(No Transcript)
9differences may be due to expression or
hybridization
10PAG1 down regulated in Cvi
PLALE GREEN1 knock out has long hypocotyl in red
light
11Local Population Variation
12Sweden Spain
Seasons in the Growth Chamber
Seasons in the Growth Chamber
- Changing Day length
- Cycle Light Intensity
- Cycle Light Colors
- Cycle Temperature
- Changing Day length
- Cycle Light Intensity
- Cycle Light Colors
- Cycle Temperature
13Talk Outline
- Single Feature Polymorphisms (SFPs)
- Potential deletions
- Bulk segregant/ eXtreme Mapping
- Haplotype analysis
- Aquilegia
- Single Feature Polymorphisms (SFPs)
- Potential deletions
- Bulk segregant/ eXtreme Mapping
- Haplotype analysis
- Aquilegia
14Which arrays should be used?
- Spotted arrays Arizona 29,000 - 70mers
- ATH1, Affymetrix expression GeneChip
- 202,806 unique 25bp oligo nucleotides features
- AtTILE1, universal whole genome array
- every 35bp, gt 3Million PM features
- Re-sequencing array 120M8bp
- 20 Accessions, Perlegen,
- Max Planck (Weigel), USC (Nordborg)
GeneChip
15Universal Whole Genome Array
RNA
DNA
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation ChIP chip
Gene Discovery Gene model correction Non-coding/
micro-RNA Antisense transcription
Methylation
Transcriptome Atlas Expression levels Tissues
specificity
Polymorphism SFPs Discovery/Genotyping
Comparative Genome Hybridization
(CGH) Insertion/Deletions
Alternative Splicing
35 bp tile, non-repetitive regions, good
binding oligos, evenly spaced
16Improved Genome Annotation
ORFa
Transcriptome Atlas
ORFb
start
AAAAA
deletion
M
M
M
M
M
M
SFP
M
M
M
M
M
M
SNP
SNP
SFP
SFP
conservation
Chromosome (bp)
17Potential Deletions
18SFP detection on tiling arrays
Delta p0 FALSE Called FDR 1.00 0.95 18865 160145
11.2 1.25 0.95 10477 132390 7.5 1.50 0.95 6545
115042 5.4 1.75 0.95 4484 102385 4.2 2.00 0.9
5 3298 92027 3.4
19False Discovery and Sensitivity
PM only
GeneChip
SAM threshold
SFPs
nonSFPs
Cereon marker accuracy
5 FDR
3806
89118
100
Sequence
817
121
696
Sensitivity
Polymorphic
340
117
223
34
Non
-
polymorphic
477
4
473
False Discovery rate
3
Test for independence of all factors
Chisq 177.34, df 1, p
-
value 1.845e
-
40
GeneChip
SAM threshold
SFPs
nonSFPs
Cereon marker accuracy
18 FDR
10627
82297
100
Sequence
817
223
594
Sensitivity
Polymorphic
340
195
145
57
Non
-
polymorphic
477
28
449
False Discovery rate
13
Test for indep
endence of all factors
Chisq 265.13, df 1, p
-
value 1.309e
-
59
20100 bibb mutant plants
Map bibb
100 wt mutant plants
21Array Mapping
Hazen et al Plant Physiology 2005
22LUX ARRHYTHMO encodes a Myb domain protein
essential for circadian rhythms Hazen et al
PNAS, 2005 Cloned with Array Mapping
23eXtreme Array Mapping
15 tallest RILs pooled vs 15 shortest RILs pooled
24eXtreme Array Mapping
LOD
Allele frequencies determined by SFP genotyping.
Thresholds set by simulations
Red light QTL RED2 from 100 Kas/ Col RILs
(Wolyn et al Genetics 2004)
25Potential Deletions
gt500 potential deletions 45 confirmed by Ler
sequence 23 (of 114) transposons Disease
Resistance (R) gene clusters Single R gene
deletions Genes involved in Secondary
metabolism Unknown genes
26Potential Deletions Suggest Candidate Genes
FLOWERING1 QTL
Chr1 (bp)
MAF1
Flowering Time QTL caused by a natural deletion
in FLM
(Werner et al PNAS 2005)
27Fast Neutron deletions
FKF1 80kb deletion CHR1
cry2 10kb deletion CHR1
28Natural Variation on Tiling Arrays
29Array Haplotyping
- What about Diversity/selection across the genome?
- A genome wide estimate of population genetics
parameters, ?w, p, TajimaD, ? - LD decay, Haplotype block size
- Deep population structure?
- Col, Lz, Bur, Ler, Bay, Shah, Cvi, Kas, C24, Est,
Kin, Mt, Nd, Sorbo, Van, Ws2 - Fl-1, Ita-0, Mr-0, St-0, Sah-0
30Array Haplotyping
Inbred lines Low effective recombination due to
partial selfing Extensive LD blocks
31Chromosome Wide Diversity
32Diversity 50kb windows
33Tajimas D like 50kb windows
RPS4
unknown
34R genes vs bHLH
35Review
- Single Feature Polymorphisms (SFPs) can be used
to - Identify recombination breakpoints
- eXtreme Array Mapping
- Potential deletions (candidate genes)
- Haplotyping
- Diversity/Selection
- Association Mapping
36Aquilegia (Columbines)
Recent adaptive radiation, 350Mb genome
37Species withgt 20k ESTs 11/14/2003
Animal lineage good coverage
38Aquilegia (Columbines)
- 300 F3 RILs growing (Evadne Smith)
- 85,000 5 3 ESTs -- 51,000 clones, gt3500 SNPs
- TIGR gene index and GenBank
- arrays being designed by Nimblegen
39Genetics of Speciationalong a Hybrid Zone
40NSF Genome Complexity
- Physical Map (BAC tiling path)
- Physical assignment of ESTs
- QTL for pollinator preference
- 400 RILs, map abiotic stress
- QTL fine mapping/ LD mapping
- Develop transformation techniques
- http//www.AQgenome.org
Scott Hodges (UCSB) Elena Kramer (Harvard) Magnus
Nordborg (USC) Justin Borevitz (U Chicago) Jeff
Tompkins (Clemson)
41NaturalVariation.org
NaturalVariation.org
University of Chicago Xu Zhang Evadne Smith Ken
Okamoto Purdue Ivan Baxter UC Davis Julin
Maloof University of Guelph, Canada Dave
Wolyn Sainsbury Laboratory Jonathan Jones
University of Chicago Xu Zhang Evadne Smith Ken
Okamoto Purdue Ivan Baxter UC Davis Julin
Maloof University of Guelph, Canada Dave
Wolyn Sainsbury Laboratory Jonathan Jones
Salk Jon Werner Joanne Chory Joseph Ecker Max
Planck Detlef Weigel UC San Diego Charles
Berry Scripps Sam Hazen Elizabeth Winzeler
Salk Jon Werner Joanne Chory Joseph Ecker Max
Planck Detlef Weigel UC San Diego Charles
Berry Scripps Sam Hazen Elizabeth Winzeler