Education - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Education

Description:

In California, since 70s and Serrano v Priest decisions, most ... 2000 voters rejected school vouchers for 2nd time. 2006 first use of high school exit exam ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:21
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: mollyp8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Education


1
Education
2
Governance structuretraditionally a local affair
  • Usually elected school board decides policy for
    school district
  • State board of Ed is appointed by governor
  • With elected state superintendent, selects
    curriculum and textbooks for K-8, sets statewide
    standards and testing for K-12

3
Education Reform
  • After Racial Integration
  • Social Integration
  • Funding reform
  • Standards/outcome reform

4
Primary and secondary school funding
  • Schools traditionally funded by local property
    tax
  • In California, since 70s and Serrano v Priest
    decisions, most funding from state, not local
    property tax
  • still, substantial differences remain between
    local communities
  • Especially if considering special bonds and
    private sources of income

5
Digression prop 13
  • Limits property taxes to 1 of assessed valuation
  • Limits assessment increases to 2 per year.
  • Prohibits state lawmakers from imposing new taxes
    without a 2/3 vote of the legislature.
  • Prohibits local governments from enacting most
    new taxes without a 2/3 vote of the electorate.

6
CA Decline
  • By late 80s, with booming immigrant child
    population, CA slipped in ranking of per student
    spending
  • Will communities continue to support education
    when funding is disbursed to the state as a
    whole, not just for their community?
  • Will (older) whites support education for mostly
    immigrant and minority kids?

7
(No Transcript)
8
Partial Recovery
  • In late 90s, spending increasedespecially for
    class size reduction
  • 2003 overturned the super majority requirement
    for ED bonds to 55
  • CA still below national average, but not by so
    much

9
California Standards Reform API
  • Since 1999 all schools receive a score between
    200 and 1000, and a ranking from 1 to 10
  • Goal is for each school to reach 800
  • Schools below target qualify for grants, but
    eventually admin change or closure

10
(No Transcript)
11
Standards reform No child Left Behind 2001
  • states must devise yearly tests for 3-8, one in
    10-12
  • schools must show adequate yearly progress for
    all subgroups
  • schools not showing AYP for two consecutive years
    must provide parents with choice of another
    school in district
  • then must offer tutoring
  • then must take corrective action
  • all students proficient by 2014

12
Critique of NCLB
  • Feds did not provide enough money to accommodate
    those in failing schools
  • Teachers hate teaching to the test
  • But in CA, statewide scores have mostly been
    improving

13
Other issues
  • 2000 voters rejected school vouchers for 2nd time
  • 2006first use of high school exit exam

14
Higher Ed
  • 1960 Master Plan
  • UCtop 12 (plus top 4 of each school), CSUstop
    1/3, CCsmost students
  • not keeping up with growthsince 2003 UCs turning
    down qualified applicants
  • Fees increasing at all levelsis this OK?
  • Still a bargain compared to other states (if not
    countries)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com