Results-Based Management (RBM) and the UNDAF Results Matrix - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Results-Based Management (RBM) and the UNDAF Results Matrix

Description:

'business ... documents using different formats, timelines, and preparation processes ... Letter of Agreement signed. Substantive expertise. Operational ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:267
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: GOOD123
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Results-Based Management (RBM) and the UNDAF Results Matrix


1
Results-Based Management (RBM) and the UNDAF
Results Matrix
Main Menu
2
UNDAF Results
  • Before
  • There was an agreed plan, but each agency
    implemented individually the UNDAF was driven
    by agency mandates and became fragmented
    business as usual
  • And now
  • There is a single matrix within the UNDAF that
    links the strategic contribution of UN agencies
    country programmes to targeted national
    priorities

3
What is a Results Matrix?
  • The core of the UNDAF
  • An at-a-glance expression of UN system support
    at country level, and
  • How it will make a strategic contribution towards
    National Development Goals and MDG targets
  • Uses principles and terminology of Results Based
    Management (RBM)

4
Principles of RBM
  • If-Then causality between levels of results
  • Common results language to describe changes
  • Collective accountability increases as you move
    up the chain of results towards outcomes and
    impacts
  • Key message ? No agency can go it
    alone!
  • A results matrix is a means not an end
  • A results matrix is contextual (anchored in the
    current context of the country)
  • AND Uses the best judgment of the UNCT at all
    times

5
Definitions (adapted from OECD/DAC)
Positive and negative, primary and
secondary long-term effects produced by
a development intervention, directly or
indirectly, intended or unintended.
Impact
Human Change
Outcome
The likely or achieved short-term and medium-term
effects of an interventions outputs.
Institutional Behavioural Change
Outputs
The products and services which result from the
completion of activities within a development
intervention.
Products Services Skills Abilities
6
Definitions
Positive and negative, primary and
secondary long-term effects produced by
a development intervention, directly or
indirectly, intended or unintended.
Impact
Outcome
The likely or achieved short-term and medium-term
effects of an interventions outputs.
Output
The products and services which result from the
completion of activities within a development
intervention.
7
Types of Change
Changes in the lives of people
Impact
Outcome
Institutional Change values, ethic, rules, laws
associated with to institutional performance,
access.. Behavioural change knowledge, skills,
practices (individual level)
Output
Operational Change provision of goods and
services
8
A Typology for RBM
9
Group Activity
  • Using the set of cards provided, develop a
    results matrix

10
Other Definitions
  • Role of Partners
  • Identifies stakeholders involved in the
    achievement of each CP output and explains their
    contribution
  • Resource Mobilisation Targets
  • The estimated financial resource mobilisation
    target of each UN agency (and partners if
    possible) related to the CP outcome. These are
    aggregated for a UN targeted contribution towards
    the UNDAF outcome
  • Coordination Mechanisms Programme Modalities
  • (1) individual agency programmes/projects, or
  • (2) parallel programmes, or
  • (3) joint programmes

11
From Results Matrix to ME Framework
National Target/ MDG
UNDAF Outcome
CP Outcome CP Outputs Role of Partners Resource Mob. Targets

Primary school completion rates are improved by
10
By 2011, policies and programmes implemented for
increased enrollment and improved quality
Improved quality of instruction
Skills of 1500 teachers strengthened
ME Framework ME Framework ME Framework
Expected UNDAF Outcomes Indicators (w. baseline) Sources of Verification
Outcome 1 Indicator 1 Baseline Source
CP Outcome Indicator 1 Baseline
CP Outputs Indicator 1 Baseline
Outcome 2
National education legislation adopted
No reliable source
Information transferred
By 2011, policies and programmes implemented for
increased enrollment and improved quality
??
Improved quality of instruction
Learning performance
MoED reports
1. MoED reports 2. Spot visits
Skills of 1500 teachers strengthened
Teacher testing results
12
Table 2 UNDAF ME Calendar
Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5
Surveys/ Studies
Monitoring Systems
Evaluations
Reviews
UNDAF Eval. Milestones
Capacity Building
Use of info
Partner ME Activities
UNCT ME Activities
Planning Refs.
13
Table 1UNDAF ME Framework
Outcomes Indicators (w. baseline) Sources of verification Risks Assumptions
UNDAF Outcome 1 CP Outcome 1.1 Major Outputs CP Outcome 1.2 Major Outputs Indicator 1 Baseline Indicator 1.1 Baseline Indicator 1.2 Baseline Source 1 Agency resp. Source 1.1 Agency resp. Source 1.2 Agency resp. Summary of risks and assumptions for each UNDAF and CP outcome
UNDAF Outcome 2
UNDAF Outcome 3
14
JOINT PROGRAMMING and JOINT PROGRAMMES
15
  • What is a Country Programme Action Plan
  • What is an Annual Work Plan
  • What is your role as Junior Professional Officers
    in the CPAP and AWP

16
Country Programme Action Plan
  • Before
  • A mixed bag of programme and project documents
    using different formats, timelines, and
    preparation processes with partners
  • And now
  • Readable, transparent and accessible programme
    action plans, linked explicitly to common, longer
    term UN development results

17
Annual Work Plan
  • Before
  • a variety of project documents
  • large variations in detail
  • not always linked to CDPs or UNDAF priorities
  • And now
  • standardised work plan that provides operational
    detail
  • connected to the UNDAF / CPDs strategic results

18
From Results Matrix to CPAP
National Priority and Goals
UNDAF Outcome
CP Outcome CP Outputs Role of Partners Resource Mob. Targets

Primary school completion rates are improved by
10
By 2005, 30 more children are enrolled in
primary school
Quality of instruction increased
Skills of 1500 teachers strengthened
Country Programme Action Plan (CPAP) Country Programme Action Plan (CPAP) Country Programme Action Plan (CPAP) Country Programme Action Plan (CPAP) Country Programme Action Plan (CPAP)
UNDAF Outcome 1 UNDAF Outcome 1 UNDAF Outcome 1
Agency Programme Component CP Outcome 1.1 Output 1.1.1 Output targets and indicators Indicative Resources (per yr)


UNDAF Outcome 2 UNDAF Outcome 2 UNDAF Outcome 2 UNDAF Outcome 2 UNDAF Outcome 2
By 2005, 30 more children are enrolled in
primary school
Quality of instruction increased
Skills of 1500 teachers strengthened
Basic Education
Teacher testing results
Regular and Other Resources
19
From CPAP to AWP
Country Programme Action Plan Country Programme Action Plan Country Programme Action Plan Country Programme Action Plan Country Programme Action Plan
UNDAF Outcome 1 UNDAF Outcome 1 UNDAF Outcome 1
Agency Programme Component CP Outcome 1.1 Output 1.1.1 Output targets and indicators Indicative Resources (per yr)

By 2005, 75 of children complete a quality
primary ed.
Quality of instruction increased
Skills of 1500 teachers strengthened
Basic Education
Teacher testing results
Regular and Other Resources
Annual Work Plan Annual Work Plan Annual Work Plan Annual Work Plan Annual Work Plan Annual Work Plan Annual Work Plan Annual Work Plan Annual Work Plan Annual Work Plan
Outputs Monitoring Activities Key Activities Timeframe Timeframe Timeframe Timeframe Responsible Party Planned Budget Planned Budget Planned Budget
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Source Descr. Amount

1.1.1 Skills of 1500 teachers strengthened
-To train 300 teachers -To revise curriculum etc.
1.1.2
20
 
 
The Annual Work Plan (AWP) Monitoring
Tool Year_______ CP Component__________________
____ Implementing Partner ________________
   
21
Joint Programs
22
Why ?
  • When it makes sense or adds value from a
    programmatic point of view
  • Maximize impact of collective UN interventions.
  • Contributes to a more coherent, effective and
    efficient UN in its endeavour to help realize
    national goals and priorities.
  • Reduces duplication, transaction costs and
    maximizes synergies.

23
What is a Joint Programme ?
A set of activities contained in a common work
plan and related budget involving two or more UN
organizations and national partners
24
JP Management Options
  • Parallel Fund Management
  • Agencies work for common result with various
    partners
  • Pass-Through Fund Management
  • Agencies work for common result and donor funds
    are channeled through one agency for efficiency
  • Pooled Fund Management
  • Agencies work for common result with common
    partner


25
JP Management Options
  • Parallel Fund Management
  • Different partners
  • Each agency manages its own funds
  • Common work plan agreed by all agencies
  • Aggregated / common budget showing different
    inputs


26
Parallel Fund Management
27
JP Management Options
  • Pass-Through Fund Management
  • Agencies approach donors for funding for JP
  • Donor funds pass through Administrative Agent
  • Administrative Agent selected by participating
    agencies
  • Letter of Agreement signed
  • Substantive expertise
  • Operational capacity country presence
  • 1 admin fee for Administrative Agent
  • Each agency recovers their indirect costs as
    per their rules
  • Administering Agent prepares consolidated
    progress financial reports


28
Pass-through Fund Management
29
JP Management Options
  • Pooled Fund Management
  • Common national or sub-national partner
  • Agencies pool funds
  • Managing Agent manages funds through MOU
  • Agent chosen jointly by agencies and government
  • Substantive expertise
  • Operational capacity country presence
  • Managing Agent recovers indirect costs


30
Pooled Fund Management
31
UNDAF Annual Review
  • Theme Groups review progress (including
    assessment of joint programmes) for each UNDAF
    Outcome (based on Annual Work plans) and produces
    2-3 page report
  • UNCT reviews theme group reports
  • Informs RCs annual report as well as agency and
    donor reports

32
UNDAF Evaluation
  • A joint UN review which assesses
  • - to what extent the UNDAF outcomes have been
    achieved and if this has contributed to achieving
    national goals (impact)
  • - to what extent the UNDAF outcomes continue
    to be relevant
  • - the effectiveness of the UNDAF as a tool for
    UN system collaboration, including joint
    programmes
  • And informs subsequent CCA-UNDAF preparation for
    the next 5year cycle

33
UNCT Joint Programming Process
Programme Implementation M and E
Strategic Planning
1 2 3 4 5
Penultimate Year
Ultimate Year
Jan - Jun
Dec
Sept - Dec
Jan - Mar
Nov
Readers group
Readers group
Exec Boards
UNDAF Evaluation CCA 2 UNDAF 2
CPAPs
CCA
UNDAF
CPDs
AWPs
Results Matrix
JSM
AWPs
JSM
Workshops
AWPs
Articulate Joint Programmes Projects
Identify Potential Areas for Joint Programmes
AWPs
Theme Groups, Annual Reviews, RC Annual Report
M E Plan
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com