THE STRUCTURAL GENERALIZATION IN DIFFERENT MODELS OF THERAPY FOR PHONOLOGICAL DISORDERS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 3
About This Presentation
Title:

THE STRUCTURAL GENERALIZATION IN DIFFERENT MODELS OF THERAPY FOR PHONOLOGICAL DISORDERS

Description:

... comparativa da efici ncia de tr s diferentes modelos de terapia fonol gica. ... comparativo da generaliza o em tr s modelos de terapia para desvios fonol gicos. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:60
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 4
Provided by: FAT98
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: THE STRUCTURAL GENERALIZATION IN DIFFERENT MODELS OF THERAPY FOR PHONOLOGICAL DISORDERS


1
MÁRCIA KESKE-SOARES MARIZETE ILHA CERON
FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA MARIA -
BRAZILContacts keske-soares_at_uol.com.br,
marizeteceron_at_hotmail.com
  • THE STRUCTURAL GENERALIZATION IN DIFFERENT MODELS
    OF THERAPY FOR PHONOLOGICAL DISORDERS

2
  • INTRODUCTION
  • The generalization is a fundamental criterion in
    the assessment of the effectiveness of the
    therapeutic process, and is characterized by the
    expansion of production and correct use of sound
    in the target environments and contexts not
    treated (Elbert Gierut, 1986). The
    generalization can be structural when it was
    observed the circumstances in which it occurs.
    The speech therapist analyses beyond the learning
    of sounds worked in therapy, the sounds that are
    non-trained and are learned and automated, the
    sounds acquisition in other positions in the
    syllable and the word, in other words not worked,
    for sounds of the same class of sound trained, as
    well as for the sounds of different classes of
    sound trained. The structural generalization
    identifies the efficiency of the therapy to the
    sound trained, as well as the other sounds
    untreated, without to teach all sounds incorrect
    in all positions of the word, in all environments
    or contexts in which they occur. Some researches
    with phonological therapy indicated the
    generalization in your results (Mota et al, 2002
    Blanco, 2003 Barberena, Keske-Soares Mota,
    2004 Ceron Keske-Soares, 2007 Ceron
    Keske-Soares, 2008).
  • PURPOSE
  • The purpose of this research was to verify the
    structural generalization obtained in three
    different models of therapy in subjects with
    different degrees of phonological disorder
    severity speakers of Brazilian Portuguese.
  • METHODS
  • The group was composed by 21 subjects with
    phonological disorders, 11 males and 10 females,
    with average age of 57. The data were analyzed
    with phonological assessment applied at the
    beginning and end of treatment. After the
    contrastive analysis (Yavas, Hernandorena
    Lamprecht, 1991), the phonological disorders were
    classified into different degrees of severity
    from Percentage of Correct Consonants-Revised
    (Shriberg et al., 1997) severe (S)
    moderate-severe (MS) mild-moderate (MM) mild
    (M). Of these, 6 were treated with Modified
    Cycles Model (Hodson Paden, 1983), 8 with
    ABAB-Withdrawal and Multiple Probes (Tyler
    Figurski, 1994), and 7 with Modified Maximum
    Opposition Model (Bagetti, Mota e Keske-Soares,
    2005). The structural generalization was analyzed
    to the items not used in the treatment (other
    words), to other positions of the word, for the
    same class of sounds and to other classes of
    sounds, considering the models of therapy at each
    level of severity.
  • RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
  • Treatment by ABAB-Withdrawal and Multiple Probes
    Model brought biggest changes to the items not
    used in the treatment (MM, M), another position
    in the word (S, M), in a class of sounds (MM, M)
    and for other classes of sounds (MMM). Treatment
    by Modified Maximum Opposition Model brought
    larger generalizations to the items not used in
    the treatment (MS), to another position in the
    word (MS, MM) and in a classes and for other
    classes of sounds (MS). Treatment by Modified
    Cycles Model brought larger generalizations to
    the items not used in the treatment (S), and in
    a classes and for other classes of sounds (MM).
    Equal results with different therapeutic models
    was showed by Mota et al (2002), Crosbie, Holm
    Dodd (2005), Ceron Keske-Soares (2007), Ceron
    Keske-Soares (2008).

3
  • RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
  • The development of the phonetic inventory and
    phonological system was observed in all the
    therapy models studied. This results was also
    found by Mota et al. (2007) and Keske-Soares et
    al. (2008), who observed improvement in the
    phonological systems with different therapeutic
    models. The ABAB-Withdrawal and Multiple Probes
    and Modified Maximum Opposition Model were the
    most effective for the subject with
    moderate-severe phonological disorder, while
    ABAB-Withdrawal and Multiple Probes was better to
    the subject with severe phonological disorder.
    The efficacy of this therapeutic models was
    showed by another researches (Tyler, Edwards
    Saxman, 1987 Mota et al., 2002 Barberena,
    Keske-Soares Mota, 2004 Mota et al., 2005
    Bagetti, Mota Keske-Soares, 2005 Mota et al.,
    2007).
  • CONCLUSION
  • This research shows changes in the phonological
    system by treatment with different therapeutic
    models, and permits to know which more effective
    therapy model in the different degrees of
    severity for phonological disorders considering
    the different kinds of structural generalization.

REFERENCES BAGETTI, T. MOTA, H. B.
KESKE-SOARES, M. Modelo de oposições máximas
modificado uma proposta de tratamento para o
desvio fonológico. Revista da Sociedade
Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia, v.10, n.1, p.36-42,
2005. BARBERENA, L. S., KESKE-SOARES, M. MOTA,
H. B. Generalização no tratamento com o /R/ em um
caso de desvio fonológico médio-moderado. Revista
da Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia, v.9,
n.4, p.229-236, 2004. BLANCO, AP. A generalização
no Modelo de Ciclos Modificado em pacientes com
diferentes graus de severidade de desvio
fonológico mestrado. Santa Maria (RS)
Faculdade de Fonoaudiologia da Universidade
Federal de Santa Maria 2003. CERON, M. I.
KESKE-SOARES, M. Terapia Fonológica a
generalização a itens não utilizados no
tratamento (outras palavras). Revista CEFAC
Atualização Científica em Fonoaudiologia, v.9,
n.4, p.453-460, 2007. CERON, M. I.
KESKE-SOARES, M. Terapia Fonológica a
generalização dentro de uma classe de sons e para
outras classes de sons. Revista CEFAC
Atualização Científica em Fonoaudiologia, v.10,
n.3, p.311-320, 2008. ELBERT, M. GIERUT, J. A.
Handbook of clinical phonology. London, Taylor
Francis Ltda, 1986. HODSON, B. W. PADEN, E. P.
Targeting intelligible speech a phonological
approach to remediation. San Diego, College-Hill
Press, 1983. KESKE-SOARES, M et al. Therapy
effectiveness for phonological disorders with
different therapeutic approaches. Pró-Fono R.
Atual. Cient. 2008, v.20, n.3, p.153-158. MOTA,
H. B. BAGETTI, T. KESKE-SOARES, M. PEREIRA,
L. F. A generalização baseada nas relações
implicacionais em sujeitos submetidos à terapia
fonológica. Pró-Fono R Atual. Cient., V. 17,
p.99-110, 2005. MOTA, H. B. KESKE-SOARES, M.
BAGETTI, T. CERON, M. I. FILHA, M. G. C. M.
Análise comparativa da eficiência de três
diferentes modelos de terapia fonológica.
Pró-Fono R Atual. Cient., v.19, n.1, p.67-74,
2007. MOTA, H. B. KESKE-SOARES, M. FERLA, A.
ZASSO, L. DUTRA, L. V. Estudo comparativo da
generalização em três modelos de terapia para
desvios fonológicos. Revista Saúde, v.28,
p.36-47, 2002. SHRIBERG, L. D. AUSTIN, D.
LEWIS, B. A. MCSWEENY, J. L. WILSON, D. L. The
percentage of consonants correct (PCC) metric
extensions and reliability data. Journal of
Speech Language and Hearing Research, v.40, n.4,
p. 708-722, 1997. TYLER, A. FIGURSKY, G. R.
Phonetic inventory chances after treating
distinctions along implicatonal hierarchy.
Clinical Linguistics Phonetics. v.8, n.2,
p.91-107, 1994. YAVAS, M., HERNADORENA, C. M.
LAMPRECHT, R. R. Avaliação fonológica criança
reeducação e terapia. Porto Alegre Artes
Médicas, 1991. 148p.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com