Parking Study Overview:

1
Parking Study Overview

• Available Alternate Parking Capacity
• Determination of Shortfall at 20,000 Students
• Alternative Studies Design Options
• Evaluation, Ranking, Changes and Recommendations

2
Available Alternate Parking Options to capture
parking spaces at peak times

• 1a b Soccer Field lawn (not paved) 394
• 2 Football at down ramp 71
• 3a 2-Way Loop Road with parallel parking 88
• ______
• Net Captured Parking 553

3
Adjusted Parking InventoryAnd Determination of
Shortfall

• Existing spaces 3,907
• Less spaces lost due to construction (172)
• _____
• A. Net Remaining 3,735
• B. Number Spaces Needed 5,091
• at 20,000 Students, Week 2 _____
• SHORTFALL B A spaces short 1,356
• Less Net Captured Parking
  ( 553)
• Net Shortage at Build Out 803

4
Parking Alternatives

• Options Reviewed

5
College Meetings Held to Review Material

• 9/15/05 Combined Planning Budget Council and
  Facilities Committee meeting to discuss
  parking alternatives and finalize needed
  parking count
• 9/21/05 - Facilities Committee meeting to review
  options make recommendations to PB
  Council
• 9/27/05 ASGC Board Meeting to Discuss Parking
  Options and feasibility studies with Students
• 9/29/05 Planning Budget Council meeting,
  discuss Facilities Committee
  recommendations, made funding Plan
  request

6
(No Transcript)
7
SOCCER FIELD

• 394 Spaces Gained

8
Soccer Field Parking StructureProject Cost
Estimate Per Space Estimated Cost

• Disadvantages with this option include
• The soccer field is already counted in the
  alternate parking plan, so structure would have
  to add 1200 spaces to include parking
  augmentation spaces.
• Some minor EIR issues, update College EIR
• Extended walking distance to the central campus.
• Loss of instructional and athletics space during
  construction
• Cost of constructing soccer field on top level,
  (possibly 4th level)
• Aesthetics issues, extremely tall structure at
  high point of campus
• Fill area that would require significant
  earthwork
• Possible exiting issues with all parking exiting
  through parking lot 4A
• Advantages with this option include
• Would minimize disruption of the campus during
  construction, and have a minimal impact on
  existing student parking.
• Would replace existing soccer field with new
  field.

9
NO. PROPERTY (Access from Lot 4-A)

• 818 Spaces Gained

10
North Property Parking through Lot 4AProject
Cost Estimate 4,990,982 Per Space
Estimated Cost 6,101Does not include land
costs

• Disadvantages with this option include
• The property owner has been reluctant to discuss
  the sale of the property with the district.
• EIR issues including, protected species, shrubs
  and possible vernal pools. Risk of expending
  funds to find out discretionary approval for
  vernal pools can not be obtained
• Time needed to complete an EIR on the site.
• Extended walking distance to the central campus.
• Possible exiting issues and back up with all
  parking exiting through parking lot 4A
• Advantages with this option include
• Gives the college additional land to expand its
  services in the future.
• Would minimize disruption of the campus during
  construction, and have a minimal impact on
  existing student parking.
• If land is available it is the least expensive
  option, depending on sale price of land which is
  not included in cost estimate attached.
• Dr. Martinez has been working with the Foundation
  to work up a proposal about a possible donation
  of the property.

11
NO. PROPERTY (Access through Maintenance Yard)

• 805 Spaces Gained

12
North Property Parking though Maint.Project Cost
Estimate 8,930,897Per Space Estimated Cost
11,094Does Not Include Land Costs

• Disadvantages with this option include
• The property owner has been reluctant to discuss
  the sale of the property with the district.
• EIR issues including, protected species, shrubs
  and possible vernal pools. Risk of expending
  funds to find out discretionary approval for
  vernal pools can not be obtained
• Time needed to complete an EIR on the site.
• Extended walking distance to the central campus.
• Additional cost and service disruption caused by
  relocation of maintenance buildings
• Advantages with this option include
• Gives the college additional land to expand its
  services in the future.
• Would minimize disruption of the campus during
  construction, and have a minimal impact on
  existing student parking.
• Provides better traffic flow than lot 4A option.
• If land is available it is the second least
  expensive option, depending on sale price of land
  which is not included in cost estimate attached.
• Dr. Martinez has been working with the Foundation
  to work up a proposal about a possible donation
  of the property.

13
EAST CANYON
Cal Trans Property

• 1121 Spaces Gained

14
East Canyon StructureProject Cost Estimate
20,957,443 Per Space Estimated Cost 18,695

• Disadvantages with this option include
• EIR issues including protected species and
  plants.
• Encroachment on Cal Trans property and possibly
  already mitigated land
• Some of the parking in lot seven would be lost
  and traffic issues may result from this structure
  would need to be studied.
• Aesthetic Issues of having a parking structure be
  located at the front entrance of campus.
• Security issues on a multistoried lot with
  minimal view corridors.
• Advantages with this option include
• Minimal loss of existing student parking during
  construction
• Over 1,100 new spaces created, more than any
  other design.
• Cost per space is lowest of all parking
  structures.
• Ability to possibly add signage or lettering that
  could be seen from SR. 125.
• Ability to utilize untapped, already owned campus
  property.

15
FOOTBALL FIELD Upper Level

• 873 Spaces Gained

16
FOOTBALL FIELD Ground Level

• 873 Spaces Gained

17
Football Field StructureProject Cost Estimate
24,941,512 Per Space Estimated Cost 28,570

• Disadvantages with this option include
• Loss of classes and athletics during construction
  time estimated at 12 -18 months.
• Traffic flow conflicts with student traffic
  having to turn left across the perimeter road to
  exit the structure.
• The football field is an old canyon fill some
  areas are 100 ft. deep. Much of this will need
  to be re-compacted if this was the option
  selected.
• Mitigation required not yet determined
• Would probably require pedestrian bridge to
  central campus from location.
• Advantages with this option include
• Provide the utilities for future stadium
  location.
• Close walking distance to central campus
• Replace both the track and football field
  surfaces.
• Probable requirement to install accessible
  pedestrian ramp to field area from the 400
  Buildings.

18
PARKING STRUCTURE Lot 5

• Net 756 Spaces Gained
• Gross 1400 Overall Spaces Built

19
Parking Lot 5 StructureProject Cost Estimate
22,396,310 Per Space Estimated Cost 29,625

• Disadvantages with this option include
• Loss of 1000 student and staff parking spaces
  during construction.
• High per space and project cost due to having to
  build on existing parking, so we do not gain any
  additional parking on ground floor, and cost
  estimate does not include resurfacing parking lot
  5.
• Advantages with this option include
• Already have construction plans ready and have
  spent 750,000 to date on this project.
• No additional EIR work required. Project could
  be built quickly upon approval.
• Close walking distance to central campus.
• Would rebuild part of the existing parking lot 5
  surface parking under the structure footprint so
  gross yield is 1,397
• Provides additional accessible route to central
  campus.

20
Request From Planning Budget Council on 9/29/05

• The Facilities Committee is to provide a
  recommended Prop R funding plan for each of the
  options listed below , and make a recommendation
  on the preferred option. Each of these options
  would require cuts to other proposed projects
• East Canyon Parking Structure
• North Property Parking Lot, Both Options
• Soccer Field Parking Structure
• Parking Lot 5 parking structure

21
College Meetings Held to Work On Funding Plan

• 10/4/05 - Facilities Committee meeting to work
  on alternate funding plans
• 10/13/05 Facilities Committee meeting to work
  on alternate funding plans
• 10/19/05 - Facilities Committee meeting to work
  on alternate funding plans
• 10/26/05 Facilities Committee meeting to work
  on alternate funding plans
• 11/1/05 Facilities Committee meeting to
  finalize alternate funding plan
  recommendations
• 11/3/05 - Planning and Budget meeting to
  discuss Facilities Committee recommendation
  to move forward with East Canyon North
  Property parking options

22
Facilities Committee Recommendation Supported by
Planning Budget Council on 11/03/05

• After reviewing all of the impacts and funding
  plans of each proposed parking solution the
  following recommendation was approved by PBC.
• Recommend to proceed with North Property Option,
  with time and dollar restrictions.
• Recommend East Canyon Structure if North Property
  options are not feasible due to cost, time delay,
  or environmental constraints

23
Re-evaluation of the Lot 5 and East Canyon
Structure Cost Estimates

• Updated cost information was requested for the
  following reasons.
• Construction escalation had slowed
• East Canyon parking structure cost estimate
  appeared low.
• The district had current information from
  Cuyamaca on retaining wall costs that could be
  used for the east Canyon structure.
• Needed to include updated construction timelines
  in evaluation.

24
East Canyon Updated Information

• Design time of 26 months
• Construction time of 20 months
• Parking loss
• New estimated costs of 32 million

25
Parking Lot 5 Updated Information

• No design time, design is completed
• Phase 1construction time 3 months
• Phase 2 Construction time 9 months
• Parking loss of 800 spaces for 9 months
• New estimated costs of 21 million

26
Cost ComparisonIncluding Soft Costs
27
Planning Budget CouncilChange structure
recommendation

• On August 31, 2006, The Planning Budget Council
  agrees with the Facilities Committee to remove
  East Canyon Structure from consideration.
• The North Property and Parking Lot 5 Structure
  are forwarded as the college recommended parking
  options
• It is agreed that if the North Property
  negotiations do not progress, the college would
  move forward with the Parking Lot 5 Structure.

28
Resulting in a move to address our Parking
shortage by constructing a parking structure in
parking lot 5

• Environmental constraints including vernal pools
  have eliminated our ability to purchase and
  build parking to the north of the district

29
PHASE IConstruction Time 10/07 thru
12/07Estimated Parking Loss 400
SpacesEstimated Parking Available 600 Spaces

• PHASE II
• Construction Time 3/08 thru 12/08
• Parking Loss Approx. 812 Spaces
• Parking Available Approx 218 spaces

30
Parking Lot 5 Upon Completion

• At Completion, parking lot 5 will contain 1861
  total parking spaces
• A new Public Safety Building
• Upgraded accessibility to the center of campus
• Completely upgraded surrounding surface parking
• Upgraded landscaping