NuMuBars Caius Howcroft and Jeff Hartnell MINOS Collaboration Meeting MarchApril 2006 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

NuMuBars Caius Howcroft and Jeff Hartnell MINOS Collaboration Meeting MarchApril 2006

Description:

... the concept across and gives a rough guide to our sensitivity ... Rough Guide Only! Measuring Beam Nue flux using NuMuBar (David Jaffe, Pedro, Miland... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:34
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: wwwpnpPh
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: NuMuBars Caius Howcroft and Jeff Hartnell MINOS Collaboration Meeting MarchApril 2006


1
NuMuBarsCaius Howcroft and Jeff HartnellMINOS
Collaboration MeetingMarch/April 2006
2
Outline
  • Multiple physics motivations for studying
    NuMuBars
  • NuMuBar appearance searches in FD (NuMu-gtNuMuBar
    transitions)
  • Constraining the Nue flux of the beam
  • Measurement of dm2Bar (and sin2thBar)
  • Cross-section measurements in ND
  • Understanding hadron production issues
  • Many Common Issues
  • Understand charge separation
  • Understand the beam
  • Understand reconstruction effects
  • Ideas for the future (special runs)
  • A lot of work in the last few months this is a
    whirlwind tour!
  • Apologies if I miss anyone...

3
A Search for NuMu-gtNuMuBar Transitions
  • Work from many people over the last few months
    (Rustem, David Jaffe, PedroCaius, JustinGiles,
    JJH)
  • See DocDB 1571, 1583, 1647, 1663 and more
  • It's an important test of
  • lepton number conservation
  • helicity conservation
  • The experimental question that MINOS can answer
    is very simple
  • do neutrinos stay as neutrinos 2.5 ms after
    production (as a function of energy)
  • but...

4
How to present our data is not straightforward
  • Lack of physically motivated models
  • Normal oscillations and different xsections
    complicate matters
  • Several ideas put forward, lots of bouncing of
    ideas around between people, highlights (and
    possible champions) are
  • Exotic oscillations (PedroCaius...)
  • Decay oscillations (?)
  • Double ratio (David J., Rustem...)
  • Fractional Appearance (JJH, Giles, Justin...)

5
Exotic Oscillations(PedroCaius)
6
Double-ratio(Rustem, David Jaffe)
7
Fractional Appearance(JJH, Justin, Giles,...)
  • Model Independent technique
  • Takes advantage of varying sensitivity with
    energy
  • Try to present data in a way that conveys maximum
    information and plays on the strengths of the
    experiment
  • (NuMuBar_Obs NuMuBar_Bkg) / NuMu_Expected (vs.
    E)
  • where NuMuBar_Obs observed spectrum in FD
  • and NuMuBar_Bkg mis-id NuMu NC beam
    NuMuBar assuming oscillations
  • and NuMu_Expected prediced NuMu spectrum in FD
    assuming

8
A quick look at our model-independent
sensitivity toNuMu -gt NuMuBar transitions
  • Plot this
  • (NuMuBar_Obs NuMuBar_Bkg) / NuMu_Expected vs.
    Energy
  • use FD MC (R1.18.2)
  • Use dm2 and sin2th from CC analysis for MC
    expectation
  • Assume
  • equal cross-sections (actually a factor of 2-3
    typically)
  • 100 efficiency
  • 100 purity
  • Zero systematics
  • Gaussian errors
  • Very idealised, but I hope it gets the concept
    across and gives a rough guide to our sensitivity
  • Very preliminary!

9
(Very Rough) Sensitivity for 1e20 POT
  • (NuMuBar_Obs NuMuBar_Bkg) /
    NuMu_Expected
  • Expect very few NuMuBars
  • Sensitivity is dominated by number of NuMus
    available to make the transition (oscillations
    make this worse)
  • Energy dependence is clear
  • Best in the peak of the oscillated NuMu spectrum
  • Worst in the high energy tail where NuMu
    statistics are poor
  • The usual 1/Sqrt(N) scaling

Rough Guide Only!
10
Measuring Beam Nue flux using NuMuBar(David
Jaffe, Pedro, Miland...)
  • See Pedro David's talk in nue plennary session
    and NuMuBar parallel session
  • Nues at low energy mostly come from Mu decay
  • gives a Nue NuMuBar (electron)
  • Measure NuMuBar from Mu decay and you have a
    measurement of your Nue contamination for the
    theta13 analysis
  • Intrinsic background is NuMuBar from pi-
  • Can estimate using horn-off data since Mu come
    predominantly from focused pi

11
dm2Bar sin2thBar(Pedro Caius)
  • Test of CPT conservation
  • Do neutrinos and anti-neutrinos have different
    mass splittings and hence different masses?
  • Do they mix differently?
  • Requires anti-neutrino running
  • Take a factor of 3 hit in event rate
  • different cross-sections
  • different hadron production yields (pi / pi-)
  • BUT can take advantage of neutrino running to
    accumulate events in the high energy tail!
  • Only need a small amount of reversed horn current
    running...

12
Dm2Bar Plots
13
Charge Separation
  • Many people working on improving efficiencies and
    purities many good ideas!
  • Majority Curvature (JustinGiles)
  • Directional PID (RustemKarol)
  • NuMuBar-ID (Pedro)
  • Cuts (JJH)

14
Majority Curvature(Justin Giles)
  • Break the track up into smaller segments
  • Look at the curvature of each segment
  • See which way the majority of the segments bend
  • That should weight the consistent B-field
    curvature above the single scattering curve

15
The Problem
  • Negative muon
  • Scatters at z 5.7m
  • Gets reconstructed with wrong charge sign

16
Directional PID(Rustem Karol)
  • Don't have to do a fit
  • Look at spatial differences

17
Cross-sections in the ND(Donna, Debdatta,
Minsuk,...)
  • See ND working group talks
  • Share many of the same issues
  • Understanding charge sign separation in data and
    MC
  • level of agreement of B-field between data and MC
  • Understanding acceptances, efficiencies,
    purities...
  • effect of tracking, shower assignment, etc
  • differences between data and MC

18
Ideas for the future
  • Runs with reversed magnetic field in the Near
    detector
  • focus Mu rather than Mu-
  • rather different acceptance and backgrounds
  • important test of how well we understand our data
  • good for understanding NuMu as well
  • study in MC first
  • Anti-neutrino running (reversed horn current)
  • With a month or two of data should make a 20 (?)
    measurement of dm2Bar
  • High energy running good for us too!

19
Organisation
  • Lots of work needed and exciting physics to be
    done!
  • We have had two small, informal phone meetings so
    far to get started
  • Productive focus to some important problems
  • We will advertise more widely in the future

20
Conclusions
  • Much work and progress in the last few months on
    NuMuBar analyses
  • charge sign separation
  • assessing agreement between data and MC
  • for detector quantities
  • for beam quantities
  • Much exciting physics to be done
  • NuMuBar appearance searches in FD (NuMu-gtNuMuBar
    transitions)
  • Constraining the Nue flux of the beam
  • Measurement of dm2Bar (and sin2thBar)
  • Cross-section measurements in ND
  • Understanding hadron production issues
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com