Title: NuMuBars Caius Howcroft and Jeff Hartnell MINOS Collaboration Meeting MarchApril 2006
1NuMuBarsCaius Howcroft and Jeff HartnellMINOS
Collaboration MeetingMarch/April 2006
2Outline
- Multiple physics motivations for studying
NuMuBars - NuMuBar appearance searches in FD (NuMu-gtNuMuBar
transitions) - Constraining the Nue flux of the beam
- Measurement of dm2Bar (and sin2thBar)
- Cross-section measurements in ND
- Understanding hadron production issues
- Many Common Issues
- Understand charge separation
- Understand the beam
- Understand reconstruction effects
- Ideas for the future (special runs)
- A lot of work in the last few months this is a
whirlwind tour! - Apologies if I miss anyone...
3A Search for NuMu-gtNuMuBar Transitions
- Work from many people over the last few months
(Rustem, David Jaffe, PedroCaius, JustinGiles,
JJH) - See DocDB 1571, 1583, 1647, 1663 and more
- It's an important test of
- lepton number conservation
- helicity conservation
- The experimental question that MINOS can answer
is very simple - do neutrinos stay as neutrinos 2.5 ms after
production (as a function of energy) - but...
4How to present our data is not straightforward
- Lack of physically motivated models
- Normal oscillations and different xsections
complicate matters - Several ideas put forward, lots of bouncing of
ideas around between people, highlights (and
possible champions) are - Exotic oscillations (PedroCaius...)
- Decay oscillations (?)
- Double ratio (David J., Rustem...)
- Fractional Appearance (JJH, Giles, Justin...)
5Exotic Oscillations(PedroCaius)
6Double-ratio(Rustem, David Jaffe)
7Fractional Appearance(JJH, Justin, Giles,...)
- Model Independent technique
- Takes advantage of varying sensitivity with
energy - Try to present data in a way that conveys maximum
information and plays on the strengths of the
experiment - (NuMuBar_Obs NuMuBar_Bkg) / NuMu_Expected (vs.
E) - where NuMuBar_Obs observed spectrum in FD
- and NuMuBar_Bkg mis-id NuMu NC beam
NuMuBar assuming oscillations - and NuMu_Expected prediced NuMu spectrum in FD
assuming
8A quick look at our model-independent
sensitivity toNuMu -gt NuMuBar transitions
- Plot this
- (NuMuBar_Obs NuMuBar_Bkg) / NuMu_Expected vs.
Energy - use FD MC (R1.18.2)
- Use dm2 and sin2th from CC analysis for MC
expectation - Assume
- equal cross-sections (actually a factor of 2-3
typically) - 100 efficiency
- 100 purity
- Zero systematics
- Gaussian errors
- Very idealised, but I hope it gets the concept
across and gives a rough guide to our sensitivity - Very preliminary!
9(Very Rough) Sensitivity for 1e20 POT
- (NuMuBar_Obs NuMuBar_Bkg) /
NuMu_Expected - Expect very few NuMuBars
- Sensitivity is dominated by number of NuMus
available to make the transition (oscillations
make this worse) - Energy dependence is clear
- Best in the peak of the oscillated NuMu spectrum
- Worst in the high energy tail where NuMu
statistics are poor - The usual 1/Sqrt(N) scaling
Rough Guide Only!
10Measuring Beam Nue flux using NuMuBar(David
Jaffe, Pedro, Miland...)
- See Pedro David's talk in nue plennary session
and NuMuBar parallel session - Nues at low energy mostly come from Mu decay
- gives a Nue NuMuBar (electron)
- Measure NuMuBar from Mu decay and you have a
measurement of your Nue contamination for the
theta13 analysis - Intrinsic background is NuMuBar from pi-
- Can estimate using horn-off data since Mu come
predominantly from focused pi
11dm2Bar sin2thBar(Pedro Caius)
- Test of CPT conservation
- Do neutrinos and anti-neutrinos have different
mass splittings and hence different masses? - Do they mix differently?
- Requires anti-neutrino running
- Take a factor of 3 hit in event rate
- different cross-sections
- different hadron production yields (pi / pi-)
- BUT can take advantage of neutrino running to
accumulate events in the high energy tail! - Only need a small amount of reversed horn current
running...
12Dm2Bar Plots
13Charge Separation
- Many people working on improving efficiencies and
purities many good ideas! - Majority Curvature (JustinGiles)
- Directional PID (RustemKarol)
- NuMuBar-ID (Pedro)
- Cuts (JJH)
14Majority Curvature(Justin Giles)
- Break the track up into smaller segments
- Look at the curvature of each segment
- See which way the majority of the segments bend
- That should weight the consistent B-field
curvature above the single scattering curve
15The Problem
- Negative muon
- Scatters at z 5.7m
- Gets reconstructed with wrong charge sign
16Directional PID(Rustem Karol)
- Don't have to do a fit
- Look at spatial differences
17Cross-sections in the ND(Donna, Debdatta,
Minsuk,...)
- See ND working group talks
- Share many of the same issues
- Understanding charge sign separation in data and
MC - level of agreement of B-field between data and MC
- Understanding acceptances, efficiencies,
purities... - effect of tracking, shower assignment, etc
- differences between data and MC
18Ideas for the future
- Runs with reversed magnetic field in the Near
detector - focus Mu rather than Mu-
- rather different acceptance and backgrounds
- important test of how well we understand our data
- good for understanding NuMu as well
- study in MC first
- Anti-neutrino running (reversed horn current)
- With a month or two of data should make a 20 (?)
measurement of dm2Bar - High energy running good for us too!
19Organisation
- Lots of work needed and exciting physics to be
done! - We have had two small, informal phone meetings so
far to get started - Productive focus to some important problems
- We will advertise more widely in the future
20Conclusions
- Much work and progress in the last few months on
NuMuBar analyses - charge sign separation
- assessing agreement between data and MC
- for detector quantities
- for beam quantities
- Much exciting physics to be done
- NuMuBar appearance searches in FD (NuMu-gtNuMuBar
transitions) - Constraining the Nue flux of the beam
- Measurement of dm2Bar (and sin2thBar)
- Cross-section measurements in ND
- Understanding hadron production issues