Division of Monoclonal Antibodies Overview - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 64
About This Presentation
Title:

Division of Monoclonal Antibodies Overview

Description:

Knowledge Space' Molecular mechanism of action. Biological Plausibility ... Awareness of the nuts & bolts of many review issues. Multiplicity is a challenge ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:337
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 65
Provided by: stevenko
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Division of Monoclonal Antibodies Overview


1
Division of Monoclonal Antibodies Overview
ACPS Presentation 10/19/04
Steven Kozlowski DMA/OBP/OPS/CDER
2
Overview
  • Quality Deconstruction Dot Connection
  • Biological Characterization
  • Research Reviewer Model
  • DMA Organization Products
  • DMA Ongoing Research
  • Critical Path
  • Critical Pathways Directions

3
Pharmaceutical Quality System
PAT
Drug Safety
Process Capability
Continuous Learning and Improvement
Clinical
CGMPs
Clin Pharm Bio
Controls
CGMP Design Knowledge Space
Pharm/Tox
Clinical Design Knowledge Space
Chemistry
Manufacturing
CMC Design and Knowledge Space
Ajaz Hussain
4
A Slice of the Polygon
Clinical
Controls
Chemistry
Manufacturing
  • Chemistry to classic analytical controls
  • Characterization to release specifications

5
ICH Q6B Specifications
TEST PROCEDURES AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR
BIOTECHNOLOGICAL /BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS
  • Characterization of a biotechnological or
    biological productis necessary to allow relevant
    specifications to be established.
  • Specifications are chosen to confirm the quality
    of the drug substance and drug product rather
    than to establish full characterization and
    should focus on
  • those molecular and biological characteristics
    found to be useful in ensuring the safety and
    efficacy of the product.

6
The Weakest Links
Clinical
Controls
Chemistry
Manufacturing
  • Chemistry to clinical
  • Relevant structural attributes (safety
    efficacy)
  • Controls to clinical
  • Relevant attributes or processes to control

7
Overview
  • Quality Deconstruction Dot Connection
  • Biological Characterization
  • Research Reviewer Model
  • DMA Products
  • DMA Ongoing Research
  • Critical Path
  • Critical Pathways Directions

8
Structure of complex molecules
  • 1o sequence
  • higher order structure
  • post-translational modifications
  • heterogeneity

Monoclonal Ab MW 150,000 Da
9
ICH Q6BSpecifications for Biotechnology Products
for complex molecules, the physicochemical
information may be extensive but unable to
confirm the higher-order structure
which, however, can be inferred from the
biological activity
10
Biological Activity (Q6B)
  • the specific ability or capacity of the product
    to achieve a defined biological effect.
  • Potency is the quantitative measure of biological
    activity
  • Bioassays
  • Animal based
  • Cell culture based
  • Biochemical based
  • Other procedures, such as ligand/receptor binding
    assays may be acceptable

11
Bioassay Continuum
12
How do we choose the relevant biological
activity?
Q6B 2.1.2 Biological activity
  • Assessment of the biological properties
    constitutes an equally essential step in
    establishing a complete characterization profile.

Biological Characterization
13
Biological Characterization
  • Characterization --gt classical specifications
    (Q6B)
  • those molecular and biological characteristics
    found to be useful in ensuring the safety and
    efficacy of the product.
  • Defining those characteristics relevant to
  • Risk management
  • CGMPs for the 21st century
  • PAT
  • Relevant to small molecules

  • Molecular mechanism of action
  • Biological Plausibility

14
Molecular Mechanism of Action
  • Therapeutic Proteins potency assays
  • All CDER Products facilitate prediction of
  • Relevant physiochemical properties
  • Toxicity
  • Drug interactions
  • Efficacy
  • May suggest appropriate animal models and
    clinical monitoring

15
Biological Plausibility
  • Biomarker development/validation
  • Interpretation of
  • Pharmacogenomic data
  • Proteomic data

If Biological Characterization is so important
why is there such variability and limited
guidance on this topic?
16
Biological Characterization
Guidance for Industry IND Meetings for Human
Drugs and Biologics EOP2 Biotech
  • Adequacy of physicochemical and biological
    characterization (e.g., peptide map, amino acid
    sequence, disulfide linkages, higher order
    structure, glycosylation sites and structures,
    other post-translational modifications, and plans
    for completion, if still incomplete)
  • Bioassay (e.g., appropriateness of method,
    specificity, precision)
  • Bioactivity of product-related substances and
    product-related impurities relative to desired
    product

17
Biological Characterization
  • Levels
  • Binding conformational changes
  • Signal transduction
  • Cell culture effects
  • Tissue studies
  • In vivo studies
  • Multiplicity
  • Relevant models
  • Receptor/pathway/cells/tissues/species
  • Molecular mechanism of action (circular)
  • No linear algorithm
  • Systems approach
  • Product specific
  • Greater variability in methods
  • Expense

18
Biological Activity Matrix
Purified/induced variants
Developmental lots
Clinical lot extremes
Stressed lots
Clinical lots
Multiple binding/cellular assays
Small Animal/Complex Bioassay
Clinical/Clin Pharm
Validated bioassay
19
Biology Expertise
  • A biological characterization is only as good as
    the experimental data supporting it
  • If regulatory decisions are impacted by
    biological characterization
  • a framework for an appropriate interpretation of
    cell molecular biology information is needed
  • This expertise will become more important over
    time
  • Guidance for biological characterization
  • Mechanism for consultation
  • With the recent consolidation, CDER now has
    additional cell molecular biology expertise in
    place.

20
Overview
  • Quality Deconstruction Dot Connection
  • Biological Characterization
  • Research Reviewer Model
  • DMA Products
  • DMA Ongoing Research
  • Critical Path
  • Critical Pathways Directions

21
Researcher Reviewer Model
Pleiotropy
  • Awareness of the nuts bolts of many review
    issues
  • Multiplicity is a challenge
  • Research producivity
  • PCE
  • Regulatory workload
  • Investigator independence relevance

22
Researcher Reviewer Model
Catalysis Synergy
  • Not all reviewers can have active research
    programs
  • A small nucleus can encourage
  • biochemical/biological characterization
  • process understanding
  • mechanistic consideration
  • This group can consult when a key decision is
    dependent on biological characterization
  • This may include evaluating the validity of
    experimental data used to support the molecular
    mechanism of action
  • The research reviewer group can network
  • NIH and other academic experts
  • OTR staff
  • Full time review staff

23
Research Organization
A Tapestry
24
Overview
  • Quality Deconstruction Dot Connection
  • Biological Characterization
  • Research Reviewer Model
  • DMA Organization Products
  • DMA Ongoing Research
  • Critical Path
  • Critical Pathways Directions

25
DMA Organization
Lymphocyte and monocyte biology Tumor suppressors
and oncogenes
Manufacturing process validation
26
Initial Indications for Licensed Monoclonal
Antibodies
27
Approved Products
  • Biological Response Modifiers

28
Approved Products
Oncological Therapeutic Drugs
Product reviewers participate in PAIs in
biennials
29
Approved Products
Radio-immuno-imaging Agents
  • PTC for MAb
  • Plant Transgenic Products
  • Orphan Drug Status MAb
  • Use of MAb as a Reagent for Further Manufacture
  • Scientific Considerations for Follow on Proteins
  • Stakeholder mtg
  • DIA mtg
  • Q5E

30
Overview
  • Quality Deconstruction Dot Connection
  • Biological Characterization
  • Research Reviewer Model
  • DMA Products
  • DMA Ongoing Research
  • Critical Path
  • Critical Pathways Directions

31
Research Areas
Clinical
Controls
Chemistry
Manufacturing
  • Structure
  • TNF multimerization effects (Dr. Kathleen Clouse,
    Ph.D.)
  • Use of SPR in protein thermodynamics (Dr. Steven
    Kozlowski, M.D)
  • Antibody Structure

32
IgG Structure
V region CDRs
Jefferis et al. Immunology Letters (2002) 82
57-65. PDB 2IG2, 1FC1
FcgRI,II,III C1q
FcRn MBL MR
33
Antibody Structural Diversity
Dr. Marjorie Shapiro, Ph.D.
  • A number of molecular processes are involved to
    generate a mature specificity
  • V(D)J Recombination
  • Switch Recombination
  • Somatic Mutation
  • Positive and negative selection in a normal
    microenvironment
  • New technologies
  • Phage display
  • Transgenic animals expressing human ab genes

34
Antibody Structure Immunogenicity
  • Murine n8
  • Whole antibodies
  • 55 to gt80
  • Fab or Fab
  • lt1 to 8
  • Chimeric, n5, 3/5 whole mAbs, 1 Fab
  • lt1 to 13
  • Humanized, n7, whole antibodies
  • lt1 to 8
  • Human (f display), n1
  • 12

35
Antibody Effector Interactions
Dr. Mate Tolnay, Ph.D.
  • Complement receptors play a critical role in
    antibody function and production
  • A new family of FcR-like genes may play a role in
    antibody effector function

Dr. Gerald Feldman, Ph.D.
  • Immune complex-mediated regulation of cell
    function as a side effect of Ab treatment

36
Research Areas
Clinical
Controls
Chemistry
Manufacturing
  • Biological Characterization
  • In vitro
  • In vivo

37
Adhesion CostimulationSteven Kozlowski, M.D.
Selective Effects on CD8 versus CD4 T-cells
Keratinocyte proliferation
38
Lymphocyte Signaling Barbara Rellahan, Ph.D.
Cbl participates in Herceptin response
39
Cytokines Sustain HIV Reservoir
Dr. Kathleen Clouse, Ph.D.
HIV
HIV infected macrophage
PDI Viral entry
40
GTPase Cycle Targets Neoplasia
Wen Jin Wu, M.D. Ph.D.
Erbitux
41
Epithelial Differentiation NeoplasiaWendy
Weinberg, Ph.D.
p53 family members play distinct roles in
regulation of cell growth, differentiation and
cancer pathology
42
Research Areas
Clinical
Controls
Chemistry
Manufacturing
  • Contaminants
  • Process Understanding

43
Prion Peptide Cell Signaling
Dr. Gerald Feldman, Ph.D.
  • NF-kB pathway
  • Cytokine Induction
  • On DCs
  • Activation and maturation
  • Lack of calcium flux
  • Resistance to PT
  • No involvement of FPRL-1
  • On Monocytes
  • Chemotactic
  • Induction of calcium flux
  • Sensitivity to PT
  • Involvement of the FPRL-1

44
Contamination Process Control Kurt Brorson,
Ph.D.
  • Retroviral testing
  • implementation of Q-PCR based assays
  • Process understanding
  • unit operation robustness predictability-
    chromatography, membrane adsorbers, fermentation,
    virus inactivation

45
Cell Culture Process Changes
Which of these can impact endogenous retrovirus
expression?
Photo courtesy of Applikon, Inc.
46
Overview
  • Quality Deconstruction Dot Connection
  • Biological Characterization
  • Research Reviewer Model
  • DMA Products
  • DMA Ongoing Research
  • Critical Path
  • Critical Pathways Directions

47
Critical Path
48
Critical Path
  • A. The technical hurdle or problem
  • Dimensions of product development
  • Unique vantage point of FDA
  • Industry segments facing the problem
  • - role of partnerships/collaborations
  • The government role in solving this problem
  • Solution impact on product development
  • - breadth of solution on products/classes/sector
    s

49
Critical Path David Frucht, M.D., LCB
  1. Problem Limited bioassays for anthrax lethal
    toxin activity and neutralization
  2. questionable relevance to the in vivo mechanism
  3. widely accepted assays involve analysis of the
    viability of two murine macrophage cell lines
  4. murine but not human cell lines undergo apoptosis
    in response to anthrax lethal toxin
  5. appropriate bioassays are critical since that it
    is not feasible to assess the efficacy of anthrax
    therapeutics in humans directly (Animal Rule).
  6. in vitro potency assays involving human cells or
    cell lines are more likely to be of predictive
    value for efficacy in humans
  7. Dimensions Medical Utility Industrialization

50
Critical Path David Frucht, M.D.
  • FDA unique vantage the FDA is
  • evaluating several INDs for anthrax therapeutics
  • involved in the discussions regarding the
    stockpiling of anthrax therapeutics for Project
    BioShield.
  • in a unique position to compare cell-based
    bioassays for anthrax lethal toxin
  • Industry segments/partnerships
  • small large biotechnology and pharmaceutical
    companies are developing products targeting
    anthrax
  • academic collaborationsinternal expertise CDC
    NIH interactions additional public-private
    partnerships can be developed.

51
Critical Path David Frucht, M.D.
  • The government role
  • BioShield regulator stakeholder
  • IND product awareness
  • internal expertise
  • anthrax lethal toxin activates a pro-inflammatory
    cytokine pathway involving the enzyme caspase-1
    and its downstream effectors IL-1? and IL-18.
    This assay is more sensitive than existing assays
    examining cell viability.
  • although human macrophages and macrophage cell
    lines are resistant to anthrax LT-induced cell
    death, the caspase- 1/IL-1?/IL-18 cytokine
    pathways are highly activated and readily
    detectable.
  • Impact a relevant toxin assay helps to assure
  • development and quality of efficacious products
  • recognition of more suitable biomarkers for
    infection
  • impacts the companies currently developing
    anthrax therapeutics, other toxin therapies and
    the public health

52
Molecular Mechanism of Anthrax ToxinDavid
Frucht, M.D.
IL-1b and IL-18 Release In vitro and in vivo
(Frucht lab)
53
Critical Path Wendy Weinberg, Ph.D.
  1. Problem the need for animal models with higher
    predictive value for drug effectiveness
  2. models applied to development and evaluation of
    effective cancer treatments should reflect the
    molecular changes contributing to cancer
    evolution.
  3. transgenic mice with inducible expression of
    commonly mutated genes provide a more physiologic
    context of tumor development that is
    representative of the human situation than models
    commonly utilized by drug developers.
  4. Dimensions Medical Utility

54
Critical Path Wendy Weinberg, Ph.D.
  • FDA unique vantage the FDA is
  • evaluating numerous INDs/NDAs/BLAs for cancer
    therapeutics
  • in a unique position to compare in vivo and in
    vitro assays used to demonstrate product activity
  • Industry segments/partnerships
  • numerous biotechnology and pharmaceutical
    companies are developing products targeting
    cancers
  • failed phase 3 studies for oncology products may
    have been prevented by better animal models
  • academic collaborationsinternal expertise
    additional public-private partnerships can be
    developed.

55
Critical Path Wendy Weinberg, Ph.D.
  • The government role
  • product awareness
  • internal expertise
  • experience in animal models of epithelial cancers
    that appropriately reflects the genetic changes
    observed in human cancer pathogenesis.
  • the most frequently altered pathway in human
    cancers is that of the nuclear transcription
    factor p53 recently a related protein p63 has
    been identified that can modulate p53 activity
    and also act independent of p53 to alter growth
    properties of cells.
  • the contribution of specific p63 isotypes will be
    determined in combination with additional changes
    such as p53 mutations (as observed in lung
    cancer), the presence of human papilloma virus
    (HPV) (as seen in cervical and some oral
    cancers), and her2 neu overexpression (as in
    breast cancers)
  • Impact this project helps to assure
  • development of animal models reflective of human
    cancers
  • impacts a very large segment of the industry

56
Critical Path Kurt Brorson, Ph.D.
  • Problem the need for less expensive strategies
    to assure viral safety
  • Mammalian cells used in the production of
    monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) produce endogenous
    type C retrovirus particles and are capable of
    being infected by adventitious agents.
  • Regulatory agencies require a demonstration that
    mAbs intended for human use are free of virus
    with an adequate margin of safety.
  • Small scale viral clearance studies can be
    prohibitively expensive for small biotech firms
    and academic investigators
  • Dimensions Safety Industrialization
  • FDA unique vantage This problem has been
  • communicated to the agency at conferences
  • noted in review of multiple INDs.

57
Critical Path Kurt Brorson, Ph.D.
  • It impacts multiple sponsors of biotech INDs,
    particularly small biotech firms and academic
    investigators.
  • The government role
  • government can provide a broad perspective for
    identifying acceptable solutions and approaches
    that comply with GMP standards
  • industry-government collaboration may facilitate
    solution of this issue by pooling resources and
    expertise
  • work on membrane absorbers and viral clearance
    will be part of a larger collaborative study
    concerning virus membrane interactions with
    Genentech, the University of Maryland, Baltimore
    County and the University of Wisconsin, Madison

58
Critical Path Kurt Brorson, Ph.D.
  • Impact this project helps to assure
  • lower barriers against innovation by biotech
    companies
  • regulatory relief for these organizations
  • In earlier collaborative studies, Genentech Inc.
    and the Division of Monoclonal Antibodies
    performed two matrix/bracket studies of robust
    viral clearance steps (e.g. low pH inactivation
    and anion exchange chromatography Brorson et
    al., Biotechnol Bioeng 82321-9 Curtis et al.
    Biotechnol Bioeng 84179-186, 2003).

59
PR772- suitability for testing large virus filters
Genome sequence resolved- AY441783 Highly similar
to other Tectiviridae
150,000 x
Lute et al., Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 704864,
2004
60
Critical Path Kurt Brorson, Ph.D.
Dimensions Safety Industrialization
  • Gene arrays, cell culture process changes, and
    comparability
  • Chromatography media decay and virus removal
    validation
  • Databases of viral clearance experience and TSE
    risk (with Gerry Feldman, Ph.D.)

61
Overview
  • Quality Deconstruction Dot Connection
  • Biological Characterization
  • Research Reviewer Model
  • DMA Products
  • DMA Ongoing Research
  • Critical Path
  • Critical Pathways Directions

62
Critical Pathways
Cell Molecular Biology
  • Toxicity
  • Drug interactions
  • Efficacy
  • May suggest appropriate animal models and
    clinical monitoring

Manufacturing process validation
Regulatory relief fewer failed studies
63
Critical directions
  • Better define biological characterization
  • eventual guidance
  • role for follow on proteins
  • Maintaining OBP biological expertise and research
    across relevant areas of biology for our products
    (critical pathways)
  • Facilitating access to between OBP biologists
  • interactions with other OPS offices, pharmacology
    and clinical review groups
  • Biotech Rounds
  • MAJIC/ Bioprocessing Journal Club
  • mechanism for consults

64
Critical directions
  • Extending some OBP research into defined Critical
    Path projects
  • Relational databases
  • viral clearance (Kurt Brorson)
  • review management, USAN, targets (Patrick Swann)
  • specifications (Patrick Swann)
  • TSE (Gerry Feldman Kurt Brorson)
  • internal meetings
  • workload
  • structural/sequence information
  • Enhancing safety facilitating regulatory relief
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com