International Political Economy: A Bridgeable Divide, A Bridge Too Far, or a Bridge to Nowhere - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 46
About This Presentation
Title:

International Political Economy: A Bridgeable Divide, A Bridge Too Far, or a Bridge to Nowhere

Description:

Marxism (1%) Realism (17.5) Liberalism (17.2) Constructivism (16.4) Non-paradigmatic (11.1) Marxism (8.2) Atheoretic (7.9) Average number of citations (1990-2006) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:44
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 47
Provided by: danielm78
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: International Political Economy: A Bridgeable Divide, A Bridge Too Far, or a Bridge to Nowhere


1
International Political Economy A Bridgeable
Divide, A Bridge Too Far, or a Bridge to Nowhere?
  • Daniel Maliniak (UCSD)
  • and
  • Michael Tierney (WM)
  • Paper from William and Marys Teaching, Research
    and International Politics (TRIP) Project.
  • Prepared for the 2007 Meeting of the IPES,
    Stanford CA

2
Cohens Observation and Challenge
  • The Transatlantic Divide in IPE
  • The American School
  • Positivist, Quantitative, Closed to other
    disciplines
  • The British School
  • Normative, Qualitative, Critical, Open
  • Need for Bridge Building and Synthesis
  • The Transatlantic Gap is Wide and Growing
  • Both Sides would Benefit from Trade

3
IPE Within IR
  • Purpose of IPES Interdisciplinary Bridge
  • Nature of IPE to Date Sub-Field of IR
  • Comparing IPE to Broader IR Sub-Field
  • TRIP Project and Data
  • 2004 Survey U.S. IR Scholars
  • 2006 Survey U.S. and Canadian IR Scholars
  • Journal Article Database Top 12 IR Journals
  • No Books, No Econ Journals, Limited Journals

4
Top 12 Journals (Impact)
  • American Political Science Review
  • American Journal of Political Science
  • British Journal of Political Science
  • European Journal of International Relations
  • International Organization
  • International Security
  • International Studies Quarterly
  • Journal of Conflict Resolution
  • Journal of Peace Research
  • Journal of Politics
  • Security Studies
  • World Politics

5
All Variables in Coding Project
  • - Ideational Variables Used
  • Material Variables Used
  • Epistemology
  • Time Period Studied
  • Contemporary Timeframe
  • Policy Prescription
  • Issue Area
  • Methodology
  • Level of analysis
  • Region under study
  • Substantive Focus
  • Authors Affiliation
  • Authors Rank.
  • Citations
  • Country of Origin
  • Year, volume and number
  • Journal publication name
  • Journal Editor
  • Journal Editor Paradigm
  • Total articles/Total IR articles
  • Article Title
  • Authors Name
  • Number of Authors
  • Authors Gender
  • Paradigm advanced
  • Paradigms taken seriously by author or used as
    alternative explanation
  • Theoretical Synthesis

6
Paradigm IPE
7
Paradigm IPE
8
Paradigm IPE
9
Paradigm IPE
10
Paradigms IR
11
Paradigmatic and Atheoretic work
12
Paradigmatic and Atheoretic work
13
Paradigmatic and Atheoretic work
14
Paradigmatic and Atheoretic work
  • Take home Points
  • IPE much more Theoretic and Paradigmatic than the
    IR field more generally
  • Articles in the liberal paradigm dominate
    American IPE

15
Methodology IR
16
Methodology IR
17
Methodology IR
18
Methodology IR
19
Methods Employed by Survey Respondents
20
Primary Method of IPE scholars by PhD year
21
Methodology IPE
  • Take Home Points
  • Qualitative was the majority, now quantitative is
    by far the leading method employed in 87.

22
The Material Turn in IPE
23
The Material Turn in IPE
24
The Material Turn in IPE
25
Epistemology of IPE and IR compared
26
Epistemology of IPE and IR compared
  • Take Home Message
  • IPE has always been more positivist than IR, and
    is now 99 Positivist

27
Best Presses in area of expertise
Most Read Journalsin area of expertise
28
IPE Publications rates at Highest Ranked journals
by IPE respondents
29
Journals publishing the most IPE work
30
Top PhD programs in IR, as ranked by IPE scholars
31
Summary
32
Faculty Perceptions of IR Literature and Teaching
33
Paradigm per year 1980-2006
34
Paradigm per year 1980-2006
35
Paradigm per year 1980-2006
36
Paradigm per year 1980-2006
37
Paradigm per year 1980-2006
38
Percent of articles (1990-2006)
Average number of citations (1990-2006)
  • Non-paradigmatic (45)
  • Liberalism (23)
  • Atheoretic (12)
  • Realism (10)
  • Constructivism (9)
  • Marxism (1)
  • Realism (17.5)
  • Liberalism (17.2)
  • Constructivism (16.4)
  • Non-paradigmatic (11.1)
  • Marxism (8.2)
  • Atheoretic (7.9)

39
Methods utilized 1980-2006
40
Methods utilized 1980-2006
41
Methods utilized 1980-2006
42
Methods of Respondents and Methods used in
Publication (2000-06)
43
Epistemology of articles 1980-2006
44
Comparison of Positivists vs. number of
positivist articles published
45
Usefulness of various types of research for Policy
46
Research, Importance and Percent of Publications
on Different Regions 2000-2007
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com