MARY LAND Always thinking ahead. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

MARY LAND Always thinking ahead.

Description:

Bill Text: http://mlis.state.md.us/2005rs/bills/hb/hb1284e.pdf ... Annapolis, MD 21401 (410) 841-3800 main (410) 841-3995 direct (410) 841-3888 fax ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: mga92
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: MARY LAND Always thinking ahead.


1
MARY LANDAlways thinking ahead.
  • A Look at Marylands Fair Share Health Care Fund
    Act
  • Kristin Jones
  • SCI Workshop for State Officials
  • Chicago, Illinois
  • August 3-4, 2006

2
I. Fair Share Health Care Fund Act, HB 1284 /
SB 790, 2005II. Health Insurance Premium
Subsidy Program, HB 1121, 2006
3
Fair Share Health Care Fund Act, 2005
  • Bill Text http//mlis.state.md.us/2005rs/bills/hb
    /hb1284e.pdf
  • Fiscal Note http//mlis.state.md.us/2005rs/fnotes
    /bil_0004/hb1284.pdf
  • General Information http//mlis.state.md.us/2005
    rs/billfile/hb1284.htm

4
Fair Share Summary
  • Applies to employers with 10,000 or more
    employees effective January 1, 2007.
  • Imposes a tax on employers equal to 8 of payroll
    (or 6 for non-profit employers) to help fund the
    state Medicaid program.
  • Employers can avoid paying all or some of the tax
    based on the percentage of payroll spent on
    health care.
  • Employers that spend less than 8 of payroll (6
    for non-profits) on employee health care can pay
    the difference to the state Medicaid program or
    increase amount spent.

5
Fair Share Summary contd
  • For the purpose of calculating amount spent
  • employers must count both full-time and part-time
    employees.
  • eligible health care expenses include only those
    deductible for federal tax purposes (e.g. medical
    care, prescription drugs, vision care, medical
    savings accounts, etc).
  • employer may exempt from their calculation wages
    paid to each employee above the median household
    income (55,213) and wages paid to Medicare
    eligible employees.

6
Fair Share Summary contd
  • Employers must report data annually to Department
    of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation (DLLR)
  • Penalties
  • 250 per day for each day that employer data are
    not timely filed
  • 250,000 for failure to remit payroll tax due

7
Origin of Fair Share
  • Concept of the legislation was part of a more
    comprehensive expansion plan that called for
  • employer pay or play
  • individual mandate for high-income
  • Medicaid eligibility expansion
  • small group market expansion
  • prescription drug purchasing pool
  • creation of a quasi-public insurer

8
Why Now?Motivations for Passing Fair Share
  • Pressures on public health programs
  • Medicaid and MCHP account for approx. 17 of
    state General Fund expenditures
  • Medicaid costs are estimated to rise at a rate of
    about 8 annually while revenues are forecast to
    grow at 5
  • Potential federal government cutbacks
  • Troubling trends in employer-based health
    insurance
  • Cutting benefits and increasing employee cost
    sharing
  • Dropping coverage especially retiree coverage
  • Marylands unique position as the only state in
    the country with an all-payor hospital system
  • Uncompensated care costs factored into hospital
    rates for all

9
Fair Share Timeline
  • 2/11/05 Fair Share Act Introduced
  • 4/8/05 Final passage by MGA
  • 5/19/05 Vetoed by the Governor
  • 1/17/06 Legislature overrides veto
  • 2/7/06 RILA files suit in U.S. Dist Ct
  • 7/19/06 Dist. Ct. rules against state
  • 7/21/06 State appeals to 4th Circuit

10
Legal Arguments
  • Retail Industry Leaders Association (RILA)
  • ERISA
  • Equal Protection
  • State
  • Tax Injunction Act
  • ERISA
  • Equal Protection Act

11
And the U.S. District Court Says . . .
  • Fair Share does not violate Equal Protection
    Clause
  • Passes rational basis scrutiny
  • State is permitted to approach a perceived
    problem incrementally

12
But the U.S. Dist. Court Also Says . . .
  • Fair Share Act is preempted by ERISA
  • requires an employer to provide a certain level
    of benefits
  • violates ERISAs fundamental purpose of
    permitting multi-state employers to maintain
    uniform nationwide health benefit plans and
    administration

13
Link to U.S. District Court Decision
  • RILA v. James D. Fielder, Jr., Secretary of
    Labor, Licensing, and Regulation
  • Civil No. JFM-06-316
  • In the United States District Court for the
    District of Maryland
  • J. Frederick Motz, U.S. District Court Judge
  • Opinion issued July 19, 2006
  • www.mdd.uscourts.gov/Opinions152/Opinions/Walmarto
    pinion.pdf

14
Where do we go from here . . .
  • Wait for 4th Circuit to rule
  • If District Court decision is upheld, use appeal
    courts guidance to craft legislation likely to
    pass legal muster
  • Explore other incremental reforms

15
Tax Incentives to Promote Purchase of Health
Insurance
  • HB 1121 of 2006, Health Insurance Premium Subsidy
    Program
  • Bill text http//mlis.state.md.us/2006rs/bills/hb
    /hb1121f.pdf
  • Fiscal note http//mlis.state.md.us/2006rs/fnotes
    /bil_0001/hb1121.pdf
  • Bi-partisan group of sponsors
  • Legislation has been introduced in some form for
    past 3 years not passed out of committee
  • Aimed at higher income uninsured

16
HB 1121 Summary
  • Creates an insurance premium subsidy program for
    individuals up to 300 FPG without employer
    sponsored or other group health insurance
  • State subsidy for first year equals lesser of
  • 40 of monthly health insurance premium or
  • 100/mo for individual coverage or 200/mo for
    individualspouse or other family coverage

17
HB 1121 Summary contd
  • State subsidy after first year of eligibility
    equals lesser of
  • 20 of monthly health insurance premium or
  • 50/mo.individual coverage or 100/mo.
    individualspouse or family coverage
  • Health department is directed to enroll children
    of eligible individuals in MCHP

18
HB 1121 Summary contd
  • Premium subsidy program funded by tax penalties
    imposed on higher income individuals who do not
    maintain health insurance
  • Individuals whose federal AGI exceeds 500 FPG
    must pay an annual surcharge of 1000 (2000 for
    married couple), unless the individual
  • Had creditable health care coverage for at least
    6 months of the taxable year

19
HB 1121 Motivating Factors
  • According to a 2005 Families USA report, the cost
    of providing uncompensated care in Maryland
    increases private health insurance premiums
  • 332/year for an individual policy
  • 948/year for group/family policy
  • According to a 2004 Maryland Health Care
    Commission report
  • 12 of states uninsured (82,800) have incomes
    between 400-600 FPG
  • 15 of states uninsured (103,500) have incomes
    over 600 FPG

20
2006 Federal Poverty Guidelines
Family Size 300 FPG 500 FPG
1 29,400 49,000
2 39,600 66,000
3 49,800 83,000
21
Contact Information
  • Kristin F. Jones, Chief of Staff
  • Office of the Speaker
  • Maryland General Assembly
  • 100 State Circle
  • Annapolis, MD 21401
  • (410) 841-3800 main
  • (410) 841-3995 direct
  • (410) 841-3888 fax
  • Kristin.Jones_at_mlis.state.md.us
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com