Title: The Effects of Multiplexity of Support Providers and Strong Ties
1The Effects of Multiplexity of Support Providers
and Strong Ties Visualization on Viewers
Perception of Personal Networks
- Isidro Maya Jariego
- Daniel Holgado
- Esperanza Vergara
- Universidad de Sevilla (España)
2- Visualization is a powerful tool for exploring
network data and communicating their properties. - But it is important to understand how viewers
perceive graphical representations.
3- In this paper we explore the reactions and
interpretations of respondents when they
visualize their own personal networks... - ...and compare two different ways of representing
personal networks...
4Strong ties vs. Multiplexity of support providers
5- We analyse the personal networks of university
students that commute almost every day between
Alcalá and Sevilla - to analyse the changes in structure and
composition associated with this ecological
transition.
6Method
- We interviewed 208 university students, obtaining
information on their personal networks. - We elaborated 3 graphic representations of each
network (624 representations). - And finally, 6 months after the first interview,
the graphs were shown to the respondents (n
173), - To examine their reactions in a qualitative
interview and - To compare two ways of representing the personal
network.
7Method /1. Personal networks
- The Arizona Social Support Interview Schedule was
applied to analyse the core of support providers
(six types of social support). - Then we ask the respondent to complete the list
of people until 25 alteri. - Finally, we proceed with the pair tie evaluations
(25 x 25), obtaining also information on the
type of relationship, place of residence and
usual way of communication of each alteri.
8Method /2. Graphical representation
- Three dimensions were used to represent the
personal networks - Composition blue nodes are from Alcalá, red
nodes from Sevilla and black nodes from other
places... - Multiplexity of the providers the size of the
node represent the number of types of support
according to ASSIS. - Strength of the relationship 0, they dont know
each other 1 they know each other 2 they
know very well each other.
9Type 1. Strong ties representation
Composition with level 2 in strength of
relationship
10Type 2. Multiplexity of support providers
representation
Composition and number of types of support by
each node
11Method /3. The interview
- Both types of graphics were presented to each
respondent (altering the order of presentation in
half of the sample). - During the interview the students were asked (a)
to describe, (b) to divide in groups, (c) to
detect key actors and (d) to inform of errors in
each graphic.
12Method /3. The interview
- And finally they were informed of the different
ways of constructing both graphics... - ...before of comparing both types in a list of
characteristics aesthetic, novelty, utility,
etc.
13Results reactions, interpretations... And
comparison between two types of representation
14Results /1. Reactions and interpretations
- General impression of validity of the personal
networks description. And few errors... - Respondents describe their personal networks in
concentric circles, from center to periphery.
15Results /1. Reactions and interpretations
- The Strong ties representation induces a
description based in groups and social spaces... - The representation of the multiplexity of support
providers induces a description based in groups
of different levels of importance.
16Results /2. Comparison of two types of
representation (n 170)
17Personal networks visual representation
- It seems that social support is a more salient
characteristic in the perception of the
respondents than the structural properties of the
personal network. - But the visualization of strong ties is a way to
facilitate the identification of clear groups in
the personal network of the respondent.
18 Laboratorio de Redes Personales y
Comunidades Universidad de Sevilla isidromj_at_us.es