Muon Capture Rates for Double Beta Decay - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

Muon Capture Rates for Double Beta Decay

Description:

Nuclear -rays of interest (delayed) Energy. Time after -stop. Corfu 26.09.2005. V.Egorov JINR ... 1s1/2 X-transition in Cd target. Corfu 26.09.2005. V.Egorov ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:24
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: kastori
Category:
Tags: beta | capture | cd | decay | double | interest | muon | rates

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Muon Capture Rates for Double Beta Decay


1
Muon Capture Rates for Double Beta
Decay
?CR42?
  • Status report

2
?CR42?
(d,2He) PR C70(2004)
OMC
?
??
3
What happens with muon in matter?
4
µ-
3d -2p
4d -2p
2p -1s
3p -1s
4p -1s
5
Two possible destinies of the muon stopped in a
target
  • Beta-decay (both positive and negative)
  • ?- ? ?? ?e e- (0
    - 50 MeV)
  • Nuclear capture (only negative)
  • ?- (A,Z) ? ?? (A, Z-1)

  • ?
  • (A-1,
    Z-1) n (p,d,..)

  • ?
  • (A-1,
    Z-1) ?

6
Ordinary Muon Capture (OMC)
?CR42?
  • Electron Capture
  • e- (A,Z) ? (A, Z-1) ?e
  • Q
    me ? 0.5 MeV
  • Muon Capture
  • ?- (A,Z) ? (A, Z-1) ??
  • Q m?
    ? 100 MeV

7
?CR42?
OMC
8
?CR42?
95.8 -enriched Is available
9
Nuclei candidates for measurement
?CR42?
  • 2?-decaying nuclei
    48Ca, 150Nd, 96Zr, 100Mo, 82Se, 116Cd, 106Cd,
    130Te, 136Xe, 136Ce, 76Ge,
  • Enriched targets availability
  • (not available today) 100Ru
  • (probably) 130Xe
  • (sure) 48Ti, 76Se, 82Kr, 106Cd, 116Sn,
    150Sm

10
Set-up
?CR42?
11
PSI 2002, 2004
12
PSI 2002, 2004
13
PSI 2004, 2006
14
Spectra measured with 48Ti target
Uncorrelated background
ng?4f
µX-rays (prompt)
nf?3d
nd?2p
np?1s
Nuclear ?-rays of interest (delayed)
15
Time after µ-stop
Energy
16
Time-evolution of a ?-line (method)
17
Muon Life Time in 48Ti
370 keV
1297 keV
808 keV
767 keV
780 keV
18
?CR42?
Total ?-Capture Rates
48Ca 5992 ns
40Ca 3622 ns
48Ti 3601 ns
19
Partial OMC rates in 48Ti target
?CR42?
20
Unfortunately,
  • it is not the case for the 76Se, 106Cd,
    116Sn and 150Sm targets

21
Failures and mistakes
  • Detection system was optimized only for light
    targets. For the heavier we need
  • Lower energy region (smaller Ge-detectors)
  • Better timing (suppress µX-rays)
  • Better E-resolution (instead of regular RF)
  • Hot summer.
  • We did not take enough care about temperature and
    voltage stability (separate feeding of
    acquisition electronics)

22
Summer 2004
  • 76Se, natSe, 106Cd, natCd remeasured with the
    above improvements (1 week per target)
  • Gaseous 12C target failed.
  • Solid 12C target measured, but useless
  • Reason bad beam quality (µ e)
  • Reason of the reason reconstruction

23
Spectra measured with 76Se target
24
Target 76Se
?-line 264.7 keV (75As)
?-line 279.5 keV (75As)
?-line 198.6 keV (75As)
Target natSe
?-line 109.6 keV (79As)
?-line 165.0 keV (76As)
?-line 215.5 keV (77As)
?-line 336.0 keV (81As)
25
?-lines observed with 76Se target
26
(No Transcript)
27
(Z,A)-dependence of the ?capture
  • Primakoff rule
  • ?c(Zeff)4 X1 1 - X2(A-Z)/2A
  • X1 120..170
  • X2 3.0

28
(No Transcript)
29
2p3/2,1/2 ? 1s1/2 µX-transition in Cd target
30
(No Transcript)
31
? -spectrum in 12C(?,? n)11B
2125
4445
5021
32
(No Transcript)
33
Beam-time allocated in 2006 (?E4)
  • 1 week SetUp
  • 2 weeks 82Kr (for 2? of 82Se)
  • 1 week 12C (C4H10?)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com