Natural and Engineered Barriers at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Natural and Engineered Barriers at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant

Description:

Natural and Engineered Barriers at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:44
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: cri87
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Natural and Engineered Barriers at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant


1
Natural and Engineered Barriers at the Waste
Isolation Pilot Plant
  • Frank D. Hansen
  • Sandia National Laboratories
  • SAND2008-6989P

Sandia is a multiprogram laboratory operated by
Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin
Company,for the United States Department of
Energys National Nuclear Security
Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000.
2
WIPP A Solution of a National Problem
3
Waste Types/Packaging
Various Transuranic Waste Packages
4
TRUPACT-II Shipping Container
  • Built and maintained according to Nuclear
    Regulatory Commission standards
  • Tested to ensure containment of radioactive
    materials

5
Waste Types/Packaging
  • Monitored by satellite tracking system
  • Drivers are highly trained
  • Procedures for accident prevention
  • Emergency responders are trained

6
Unloading Typical Waste Packages
7
CH Waste in Disposal Room
8
Bedded Salt Was Chosen for the Siting of the US
Defense Nuclear Wastes
  • Salt can be mined easily
  • Salt has a relatively high thermal conductivity
  • Wide geographic distribution (many potential
    sites)
  • Salt is plastic
  • Salt is essentially impermeable
  • Fractures in salt are self healing
  • Salt has existed underground for millions of
    years
  • Attributes of Natural Barrier

9
Natural Barrier of the Delaware Basin
1981 First shaft completed 1996 CCA submitted
to EPA 1998 WIPP certified by EPA 1999 First
waste shipment received 2004 First
recertification 2007 Begin RH disposal
WEST
EAST
Castile Formation
Location of WIPP
10
WIPP Underground Layout
Shaft Seal System
11
Full Scale Behavior
Figure 2. Typical Level of Agreement between
Underground Test Results and Predicted Closure
12
Salt Behavior is well Understood
13
WIPP Disposal Room Evolution
14
Disturbed Rock Zone around a Disposal Room
15
WIPP Room Evolution at Time0 years
16
WIPP Room Evolution at Time12 years
17
WIPP Room Evolution at 1000 years
18
Shaft Seal System Design Guidance
  • Limit hazardous constituents reaching regulatory
    boundaries
  • Restrict groundwater flow through the sealing
    system
  • Use materials possessing mechanical and chemical
    compatibility
  • Protect against structural failure of system
    components
  • Limit subsidence and prevent accidental entry
  • Utilize available construction methods and
    materials

19
Material Specification
  • Functions
  • Material characteristics
  • Construction
  • Performance requirements
  • Verification methods

20
Shaft Sealing System
21
Shaft Seal System Conclusions
  • The WIPP shaft seal system effectively limits
    fluid flow within the seal system.
  • Brine flow volumes from the Rustler downward are
    insignificant relative to the salt-column gas
    saturated pore volume and the repository pore
    volume.
  • The salt column becomes an effective barrier to
    gas and brine migration by 100 years after
    closure.
  • Long-term flow rates within the seal system are
    limited.

22
Option D Panel Closure System
23
Proposed Panel Closure System
24
Definition of Barriers
  • EPA defines barriers as any material or
    structure that prevents or substantially delays
    movement of water or radionuclides toward the
    accessible environment
  • Barriers can be a geologic structure, a
    canister, a waste form, or a material placed over
    and around waste provided that material or
    structure substantially delays movement of water
    or radionuclides

25
MgO Engineered Barrier
  • MgO will act as an engineered barrier in the WIPP
    by decreasing actinide solubilities.
  • Will remove CO2 and control PCO2 and pH within
    favorable ranges.
  • Only engineered barrier recognized by EPA.
  • Ongoing lab studies imply MgO will effectively
    remove H2O and CO2.

26
Natural and Engineered Barriers Summary
  • Site Selection/Characterization Studies
  • Geologic mapping of surface and borehole data.
  • Geophysical surveys for structure, brine pockets.
  • Geochemistry/Mineralogy for geologic process
    analysis.
  • Hydrology Program
  • Characterize the flow and transport in subsurface
    ground water through field and lab tests and
    describe with flow models.
  • Chemistry Program
  • Estimate the solubility and mobility of
    radionuclides in WIPP environment through
    experiments.
  • Sorption of actinides during transport.

27
Natural and Engineered Barriers Summary
  • Rock Mechanics and Shaft Seal Design
  • Measure and predict behavior of salt around waste
    rooms
  • Design an effective, impermeable shaft seal
    system using natural and man-made materials
  • Performance Assessment Modeling
  • Comparison to the EPA standards
  • Compliance Certification Application

28
Natural and Engineered Barriers Summary
  • Robust Site Confirmed through Selection and
  • Characterization Studies
  • Natural Barriers include Salt Formation
  • Room Enclosure, Fractured healing, and
    Entombment
  • Favorable Hydrological Setting
  • Minimal Water
  • Flow Characterized and Modeled
  • Engineered Barriers
  • Shaft Seals and Panel Closure Systems
  • MgO Assurance
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com