IDA Legislation and CoalitionBuilding: Broader Policy Implications of a Midwest BiState Coalition - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

IDA Legislation and CoalitionBuilding: Broader Policy Implications of a Midwest BiState Coalition

Description:

CED Committee of MASW helped draft model legislation, ... Salina, Kansas. Discussed at GC forum. Spring, 2002. Jefferson City, Missouri. Promote FDA program ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:20
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: lisam54
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: IDA Legislation and CoalitionBuilding: Broader Policy Implications of a Midwest BiState Coalition


1
IDA Legislation and Coalition-BuildingBroader
Policy Implicationsof a Midwest Bi-State
Coalition
  • Melinda Lewis, El Centro, Inc.
  • Lisa Mason, MOKANSave

2
IDA Legislation in Missouri
  • CED Committee of MASW helped draft model
    legislation, secured sponsors, and mobilized a
    highly active coalition. Key factors physical
    presence in the capitol (staff and practicum
    students), statewide network, and specific tasks
    for coalition members to accomplish.
  • 1999 Family Development Account Tax Credit
    Program established. Authorizes 50 state income
    tax credits for contributions to organizations
    that administer an FDA project. Organizations
    must have a 352 status.

3
IDA Legislation in Kansas
  • Comprehensive IDA legislation has been introduced
    3 times, without passage.
  • 2001 Assistive Device IDA Program Act passed,
    with limited state tax credits to leverage
    matching funds for individuals with disabilities
    to purchase assistive technology devices.

4
MOKANSave
  • New bi-state effort across Missouri and Kansas to
    promote asset-building programs and policies such
    as IDAs.
  • Launched in February 2002 by the CED Committee of
    the Missouri Association for Social Welfare, in
    partnership with the Ewing Marion Kauffman
    Foundation, the Center for Social Development, El
    Centro, Inc., and Heart of America Family
    Services.

5
Why Bi-State?
  • Affiliation with Kansas City organizations.
  • Opportunity to share knowledge, experiences, and
    resources.
  • Opportunity to explore a collaborative effort
    across state lines, to generate valuable
    information about translating asset-building
    policies across states.
  • Step towards a multi-state or regional effort to
    promote IDAs.

6
Goals
  • Increase access to information and research on
    asset-building and IDAs in Missouri and Kansas.
  • Assist coalition-building efforts of
    organizations and groups in both states.
  • Provide assistance with policy efforts in both
    states.

7
Strategies
  • Organize community informational forums about
    IDAs.
  • Develop the MOKANSave webpage.
  • Organize an annual bi-state IDA conference.

8
Community Forums
  • Accomplished
  • Wichita, Kansas
  • June 26
  • 35 participants
  • Garden City, Kansas
  • October 15
  • 20 participants
  • Projected
  • Salina, Kansas
  • Discussed at GC forum
  • Spring, 2002
  • Jefferson City, Missouri
  • Promote FDA program
  • Spring, 2002
  • Rural Missouri
  • Raise awareness about IDAs

9
MOKANSave Webpage
  • Launched July, 2002 www.masw.org/mokansave
  • Areas
  • Asset-Building Basics - IDA Program Development
  • Calendar of Events - IDA Advocacy
  • In the News - Links
  • Surveys to all Missouri and Kansas contacts for
    guidance and suggestions.

10
Bi-State IDA Conference
  • May 8-9, 2003 at the Ewing Marion Kauffman
    Foundation in Kansas City.
  • Coalition-Building
  • Training
  • Policy Development
  • Building Support

11
Policy Implications
  • Missouri
  • Contribute to the implementation of existing
    policy.
  • Coalition in place if/when legislation is
    revisited.
  • Increase support across state lines.
  • Kansas
  • Generate interest in IDAs statewide.
  • Coalition in place if/when legislation is
    introduced.
  • Increase support across state lines.

12
Policy Implications (contd)
  • Bi-state
  • Monthly updates, listserv (planned), and annual
    conference will enable policy and program
    practices, experiences, and ideas to be readily
    disseminated across both states.
  • Beyond
  • Multi-state initiatives?
  • Regional initiatives?

13
Impact of MOKANSave in Kansas
14
Discussion
  • Coalition-Building Models
  • Pros and Cons
  • Considerations in Choosing a Model
  • Starting a Coalition
  • Questions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com