Report of the Abalone Fisheries Research Assessment Group (FRAG) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Report of the Abalone Fisheries Research Assessment Group (FRAG)

Description:

Consider the outcomes of the annual abalone stock assessment, the interim data ... be expressed as a percentage and that TACs should be based on the maximum catch ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:44
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: iancart
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Report of the Abalone Fisheries Research Assessment Group (FRAG)


1
Report of the Abalone Fisheries Research
Assessment Group (FRAG)
  • Ian Cartwright
  • Independent Chair, FRAG

2
FRAG - Origins
  • Tasmanian Abalone Council agreed to establish a
    transparent and effective process so that
    stakeholders in the abalone fishery could provide
    advice on/recommend appropriate levels of TAC and
    associated issues to
  • AbFAC
  • the Abalone Council and
  • the Minister.
  • The FRAG will also consider associated management
    arrangements, including spatial distribution of
    catch/effort, zone boundaries and size limits.

3
FRAG TORs
  • Consider the outcomes of the annual abalone stock
    assessment, the interim data report and updates
  • review performance of the fishery, at the block
    level
  • discuss and suggest key drivers in the fishery
    e.g. market and processer preferences
  • consider TAC setting motions and provide comments
    prior to the AGM
  • provide recommendations to AbFAC and the Council
    AGM on the annual TAC and related issues and
  • provide other advice from time to time, including
    size limits and zone boundaries.

4
Decision making at the FRAG
  • Decision making by consensus and not voting
    where agreement not possible, views will be
    recorded and provided in the advice of the Group.

5
FRAG Membership
  • independent Chairperson
  • the full membership of the Tasmanian Abalone
    Council Board
  • CEO of the Council
  • 3 scientific representatives from TAFI
  • 1 DPIW fisheries manager
  • executive support for the FRAG will be provided
    by the Council

6
Observers
  • Observers always welcome at the FRAG requests
    through the Chair.
  • Very useful input provided to date, including a
    number of submissions for improving management/
    TAC setting.
  • At two most recent meetings, a total of eight
    abalone divers have attended and provided advice
    to the FRAG on future management of the Western
    Zone.

7
FRAG Schedule
  • Four meetings a year
  • April Review outcome of Stock Assessment
    Working Group meeting, including preliminary data
  • June Consider full annual stock assessment
    report
  • August Review updates on data from the fishery
    and stock assessment
  • October Develop TAC recommendation options for
    consideration by Council AGM

8
FRAG process in 2008
  • Had to shorten process and deal with bedding in
    of arrangements.
  • Four meetings 30 May, 24 June, 31 July, and 25
    August.
  • First two meetings mostly on TORs etc
  • Recommended mechanism to deal with SW
    catch/effort issues this was agreed by FAC and
    Minister (over).

9
SW Arrangements
  • Agreed that if a trigger point is reached during
    2008, the FRAG will review the performance of the
    region, and recommend action, where appropriate.

10
FRAG recommendations for 2009 W. Zone (1)
  • TAFI recommendation that catch in SW (10-13B) be
    reduced by around 200t.
  • Catch/effort to be moved northwards to relieve
    pressure on SW.
  • TAFI and some industry concerned at the ability
    of mid-west to absorb additional catch and the
    wisdom of rapidly increasing catches there.
  • Agreed to a phased approach by reducing the catch
    in (10-13B) in 2009 by 140t and review after one
    year.
  • Overall 30 Tonne reduction in Western zone quota
    to 1230 tonnes, which corresponds to the total of
    upper confidence limit of long term average
    catches (agreed principle).

11
FRAG recommendations for 2009 W. Zone (2)
  • Considered caps vs. new zone at length, both have
    drawbacks, but zone considered to deal with
    sustainability, rational harvesting and equity
    issues better.
  • Position of boundaries need to recognise
    sustainability issues while minimising adverse
    impacts in terms of compliance, diver movement,
    dingy vs. mother ship ops, processing and
    marketing influences.
  • Preferred southern boundary option currently
    between sub-blocks 8C and 9A (Ocean Beach)
  • more consideration of boundary position
    needed.

12
Arthur River
Mid-West Zone Arthur River to Ocean Beach Blocks
5D, 6, 7, 8 304.5 tonnes 87 kg/unit
Ocean Beach
Western Zone Ocean Beach to Whale Head Blocks 9,
10, 11, 12, 13A, 13B 924 tonnes 264 kg/unit
Whale Head
13
FRAG recommendations for 2009 W. Zone (3)
  • Agreed need to ensure adequate distribution of
    catch and encourage/provide incentive to catch
    older, less desirable fish potential of shell
    study discussed
  • one view that long term average catches
    (including data prior to 1985) and lack of
    fishing (esp. block 6) indicate that mid-west
    zone (5D-8) capable of absorbing additional catch
    and could support an increase in fishing effort.

14
FRAG recommendations for 2009 Western Zone (4)
  • TAC
  • Assumes creation of a new zone.
  • Hard cap for block 9 at 166 Tonne
  • (upper confidence limit)

15
FRAG recommendations for 2009 E. Zone
  • A 5 increase for the Eastern Zone for next year
    noting that there may be a sentiment towards
    seeking a greater increase.
  • Also noted that there may well be some need for
    caps and/or other management mechanisms to
    achieve a 5 increase in 2010.
  • View expressed that TAC increases should not be
    expressed as a percentage and that TACs should be
    based on the maximum catch an area can stand.

16
Concluding Remarks
  • First year so a learning process, especially for
    the Chair.
  • Many different view points and considerations
    provided and considered in advance of TAC
    setting.
  • TAFI cooperating in terms of updating assessments
    and answering specific queries on new proposals,
    additional data etc.
  • Focus on transparency, and information to support
    decision making.
  • Excellent spirit of discussions and input by all.
  • Chairmans summary posted on TAC website
  • Minutes of FRAG meetings available on request
  • Will do better next yearhave your say as to how
    we can improve
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com