The Cosmological Argument - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

The Cosmological Argument

Description:

A priori arguments based on reason alone. A posteriori arguments that depend on premises that ... that exists must have a reason that explains why it ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: josephul
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Cosmological Argument


1
The Cosmological Argument
  • Weber State University
  • Spring 2007
  • PHIL 1000

2
What is the foundation of the arguments for Gods
existence?
  • A priori arguments based on reason alone.
  • A posteriori arguments that depend on premises
    that can only be known on the basis of experience.

3
Why is there something rather than nothing?
  • If you peer into the night sky and see a saucer
    shaped object hovering over your house, then
    youll probably wonder what it is, where it came
    from, and why it was hovering over your house?
  • Similarly, when you receive a package, you wonder
    where it came from?
  • These questions arise because we believe that
    something cannot just materialize it had to have
    come from somewhere.

4
The Cosmological Argument
  • Why is there something rather than nothing?
  • What is it that has caused us to exist?

5
The First Cause Argument
  • The world contains things whose existence depends
    on some cause. (premise)
  • Everything that exists is either uncaused or
    caused to exist by another. (premise)
  • There cannot be an infinite regress of causes.
    (premise)
  • So there must be an uncaused first cause. (2,3)
  • An uncaused first cause is (in part) what we mean
    by God. (premise)
  • Thus, God exists. (1,4,5)

6
Infinite Series Objection
  • The uncaused cause could have a cause. (premise)
  • If the uncaused cause was caused, then there
    could be an infinite series of causes. (premise)
  • Thus, there can be an infinite regress of causes.
    (1,2)

7
Is that You, God?
  • The argument fails to identify the uncaused cause
    with God. (premise)
  • God has characteristics the uncaused cause might
    not have, e.g., a will and self-awareness.
    (premise)
  • So, the argument does not prove that God exists.
    (1,2)

8
Argument from Contingency
  • The world contains a collection of contingent
    things. (premise)
  • A contingent being cannot cause itself to exist
    it depends on other things for its existence.
    (premise)
  • Everything in the world could not be contingent.
    (1,2)
  • If everything that exists must have a reason that
    explains why it exists and why it has the
    properties it does, then we believe that there
    has to be a sufficient reason for the existence
    of anything. (premise)
  • So, there has to be a reason for the worlds
    existence that is noncontingent, nondependent,
    self-sufficient, and uncaused, and that is God.
    (3,4)

9
What of necessity?
  • Necessity applies only to propositions and not
    entities. (premise)
  • The argument from contingency applies necessity
    to God. (premise)
  • Hence, God does not necessarily exist. (1,2)

10
The Mother of all Objections
  • Every human being has a mother. (premise)
  • Therefore, the entire collection of human beings
    has a mother. (1)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com