Is USPAP Good for Residential Appraisers? Friday, August 6, 2004 PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Is USPAP Good for Residential Appraisers? Friday, August 6, 2004


1
Is USPAP Good for Residential
Appraisers?Friday, August 6, 2004
2
Introduction
  • Moderator
  • Dave Snook, ASB Chair 1996 and 1997
  • Instructor
  • Danny Wiley, ASB Chair 2002 - 2004
  • Schedule
  • Materials
  • Housekeeping

3
Goals for the Day
Survive After all, it IS USPAP!! Have a
little fun Share useful information
Take home practical information Answer YOUR
Question
This may be a little uncomfortable
4
The Question
Is USPAP Good for Residential Appraisers?
5
My (Expected) Answer
USPAP Is Good for ALL Appraisers
6
Public Trust
USPAP Promotes Public Trust in the Appraisal
ProfessionIt is that trust that makes an
appraisers opinion valuable
7
Benefits of USPAP
  • Provides common basis for appraisers to follow in
    an assignment
  • Provides protection for appraisers to defend
    against unwarranted charges/claims
  • Provides users and courts a source of reference
  • Facilitates uniform enforcement

8
Topics For Today
  • Who/What is the ASB
  • Review of Fundamental Concepts
  • Significant Changes for 2005
  • Changes for 2004
  • Scope of Work vs Departure
  • Other Issues

9
Appraisal Standards Board
  • Danny Wiley, Chair (4 years)
  • Carla G. Glass, Vice-Chair (4 years)
  • Lawrence E. Ofner (6 years)
  • Gregory J. Accetta (2 years)
  • Paula K. Konikoff (2 years)
  • Dawn M. Molitor Gennrich (2 years)

10
Duties of the ASB
  • Writes and Interprets the Uniform Standards of
    Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP).
  • Promulgates USPAP

11
Primary USPAP Concepts
  • Assignment Elements
  • Problem Identification
  • Scope of Work

12
Assignment Elements
  • Client Intended Users
  • Intended Use
  • Type and Definition of Value
  • Effective Date
  • Assignment Conditions
  • Subject Relevant Characteristics

13
Problem Identification

14
Client Intended Users
  • Identified by the appraiser through communication
    with the client at the time of the assignment.
  • Obligations to intended users impose development
    and reporting requirements.

15
Intended Use
  • Established by the client
  • Identified by the appraiser through communication
    with the client at the time of the assignment
  • An appraiser must not allow the intended use or a
    clients objectives to cause the assignment
    results to be biased.

16
Intended Use
  • Development - scope of work
  • Extent of research and analysis
  • Reporting - level of detail in report
  • Benchmark
  • Credibility
  • Due Diligence

17
Type and Definition of Value
  • Provides the objective basis for determining
    what kind of information and analysis to
    include in these processes.

18
Intended Use User
  • Provide objective basis for deciding how much
    information and analysis to include in the
    development and reporting processes

19
Effective Date
  • Effective date
  • Retrospective
  • Current
  • Prospective
  • Date of the report

20
Assignment Conditions
  • Include, among other things, assumptions,
    extraordinary assumptions, hypothetical
    conditions, supplemental standards, and
    jurisdictional exceptions
  • Driven by intended use and intended users

21
Subject Property
  • Relevant characteristics identified by the
    appraiser
  • Relevant characteristics driven by
  • Type and definition of value
  • Intended use
  • Relevant characteristics drive relevance of
    Standards Rules

22
Problem Identification

23
Scope of Work
24
Significant Changes for 2005
  • Reporting of Exposure Time
  • Reporting Requirements Related to Extraordinary
    Assumptions and Hypothetical Conditions
  • When Does USPAP Apply?

25
Reporting of Exposure Time
  • Currently required to report exposure time
    whenever developing an opinion of market value
  • This requirement is in Statement No. 6

26
Reporting of Exposure Time
  • Confusion about the term
  • Not in the normal reporting Standards
  • Is this truly necessary?

27
Reporting of Exposure Time
  • Starting in 2005, this will be required only when
    significant to the assignment

28
Extraordinary Assumptions/Hypothetical Conditions
  • EXTRAORDINARY ASSUMPTION an assumption, directly
    related to a specific assignment, which, if found
    to be false, could alter the appraisers opinions
    or conclusions.

29
Extraordinary Assumptions/Hypothetical Conditions
  • HYPOTHETICAL CONDITION that which is contrary to
    what exists but is supposed for the purpose of
    analysis.

30
Extraordinary Assumptions/Hypothetical Conditions
  • Currently required to
  • Analyze Impact on Value
  • Disclose in Conjunction with Each Opinion and
    Conclusion Affected

31
Extraordinary Assumptions/Hypothetical Conditions
  • For 2005 USPAP
  • Clear and Conspicuous Disclosure
  • Warning in Report

32
When Does USPAP Apply?
  • AO-21
  • Individuals perform numerous roles within the
    broad realm of property services

33
When Does USPAP Apply?
  • What does acting as an appraiser or performing
    a service as an appraiser mean?
  • Acting as an appraiser means representing
    oneself as an appraiser
  • Appraiser is one who is expected to perform
    property services competently and in a manner
    that is independent, impartial, and objective

34
When Does USPAP Apply?
  • What are the responsibilities of an appraiser
    regarding intended user expectations?
  • The appraiser has a professional responsibility
    to recognize the capacity in which he or she is
    performing. The responsibility includes inquiry
    about, and recognition of, the clients
    expectations.

35
When Does USPAP Apply?
  • What are the USPAP obligations for property
    services outside of appraisal practice?
  • An appraiser acting in another role must ensure
    that intended users are not misled as to the
    individuals role in providing that property
    service.

36
When Does USPAP Apply?
  • AO-21 Illustrations
  • Brokerage and Appraisal
  • Appraisal Review
  • Rent Survey
  • Appraisal and Market Information
  • Property Measurement

37
2004 Changes - What is it?
  • Its a new assignment!

38
Its a New Assignment
  • An appraiser has previously appraised the
    property, then is asked to
  • Readdress (or transfer) the report to another
    party
  • Provide subsequent appraisal involving the
    property (update)
  • Appraise the property for a new client

39
Its a New Assignment
  • The common feature of these requests is that the
    appraiser has previously appraised the property
    that is the subject of the new request.
  • How does an appraiser deal with these situations?

40
Its a New Assignment
  • Assignments linked to prior assignments
  • Update of a Prior Assignment (AO-3)
  • Readdressing (Transferring) a Report to Another
    Party (AO-26)
  • Appraising the Same Property for a New Client
    (AO-27)

41
Assignments are Specific
  • The characteristics of a given assignment are
    defined by assignment elements
  • Assignment elements are the basis for
  • Scope of work
  • Content and level of report
  • Assignment results are specific to assignment
    elements and the assignment

42
Assignments are Specific
  • Modification of the assignment elements alter the
    scope of work and report content.
  • When an service is requested on a property that
    was the subject of a previous assignment, the
    scope of work in the new assignment may be
    different from the scope of work in the prior one.

43
Readdressing/Transferring
  • AO-26
  • Simply put, USPAP does not allow readdressing a
    report to a new client after the assignment has
    been completed

44
Readdressing/Transferring
  • Why not?
  • Intended users intended use are established at
    the time of the assignment
  • Intended users intended use are drivers of
    scope of work and report content. Any change
    alters assignment.
  • Solution its a new assignment!

45
Update of Prior Assignment
  • AO-3
  • When a client seeks a more current value or
    analysis of a property that was the subject of a
    prior assignment, it is simply a new assignment.
  • Not an extension of a prior assignment-- simply a
    new assignment.

46
Update of Prior Assignment
  • The same USPAP requirements apply when appraising
    or analyzing a property that was the subject of a
    prior assignment.
  • Appraiser may incorporate all or part of the
    previous analysis and all or part of the previous
    report
  • In certain circumstances, you may incorporate the
    previous report by reference

47
Update of Prior Assignment
  • No restrictions on
  • who the appraiser is
  • who the client is
  • what length of time may have elapsed, or
  • whether the characteristics of the subject
    property are unchanged or significantly different
    than in the prior assignment

48
Recertification
USPAP Myth 147 USPAP Does NOT Prohibit
Recertifications of Value It Simply Defines the
Term
49
Recertification
  • AO-3
  • Performed to confirm whether or not the
    conditions of a prior appraisal have been met
  • Does not change the effective date of the value
    opinion.
  • Most common Recertifications of Value are the
    final inspection for a new construction appraisal
    and compliance inspections.

50
Same Property New Client
  • AO-27
  • Client and the assignment results are specific to
    an assignment
  • If you have a new client, then you must have a
    new assignment
  • New assignment would produce new assignment
    results

51
Same Property New Client
  • New assignment to appraise the same property
    would not be considered revealing the first
    clients assignment results to the second client,
    even if the value conclusions were the same.
  • Value conclusion could easily be different if the
    scope of work changed in any manner

52
Same Property New Client
  • If a prior assignment included any confidential
    information, its disclosure to a different client
    or intended user would violate the ETHICS RULE if
    the information were still classified as
    confidential information

53
Its a New Assignment
  • Client Expectations
  • The decision to be made is about business
    practice, not appraisal standards
  • Obtaining a release is a matter of choice, but
    not required by USPAP
  • Informing a client about the existence of an
    assignment for another client may not comply with
    confidentiality obligations

54
Normal Course of Business
NORMAL COURSE OF BUSINESS AO-24
55
Normal Course of Business
  • Scope of Work Acceptable When
  • Expectations of Market Participants
  • Actions of Appraisers Peers
  • Appraisers Peers
  • Other appraisers who have expertise and
    competency in the same or a similar type of
    assignment

56
Normal Course of Business
Normal Course of Business is NOT - Work
habits of an individual appraiser
57
SCOPE PROJECT
58
Scope of Work Project
  • Exposure Draft Currently Out for Comments
  • Biggest Change in 10 Years
  • No Real Change

59
Scope of Work Project
  • Departure a misunderstood concept
  • When can you depart?
  • Purpose of Departure

60
Scope of Work Project
  • Look at SR 1-4(b)
  • When a cost approach is applicable, an appraiser
    must
  • (i) develop an opinion of site value by an
    appropriate appraisal method or technique
  • (ii) analyze such comparable cost data as are
    available to estimate the cost new of the
    improvements (if any) and
  • (iii) analyze such comparable data as are
    available to estimate the difference between the
    cost new and the present worth of the
    improvements (accrued depreciation).

61
Scope of Work Project
  • When it is applicable, you must do it
  • What does applicable mean?
  • But this is a Specific Requirement, not a Binding
    Requirement
  • Is it necessary for credible results
  • Really, must you do the cost
  • approach whenever it is applicable?

62
Scope of Work Project
  • Pieces of the Puzzle
  • Standards Rules
  • DEFINITIONS
  • DEPARTURE RULE
  • Applicable
  • Necessary

63
Scope of Work Project
  • You MUST do a Cost Approach When it is Necessary
    for Credible Results

64
Scope of Work Project
  • Proposed New Version of SR 1-4(b)
  • When a cost approach is necessary for credible
    results, an appraiser must.

65
Scope of Work Project
  • No change to existing requirements for the work
    you must do
  • More simple statement of the requirement
  • New SCOPE OF WORK RULE to lay out obligations for
    developing the Scope of Work, and effectively
    communicating it in the report

66
Fannie Mae Forms
  • ASB has NOT reviewed, approved, endorsed, etc.,
    the new forms
  • We will be submitting comments to Fannie Mae

67
Fannie Mae Forms
  • Forms do NOT comply with USPAP, appraisers do
  • Forms help organize presentation
  • No form could comply for ALL assignments

68
The End
  • Questions
  • Thank You!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com