Title: Is USPAP Good for Residential Appraisers? Friday, August 6, 2004
1Is USPAP Good for Residential
Appraisers?Friday, August 6, 2004
2Introduction
- Moderator
- Dave Snook, ASB Chair 1996 and 1997
- Instructor
- Danny Wiley, ASB Chair 2002 - 2004
- Schedule
- Materials
- Housekeeping
3Goals for the Day
Survive After all, it IS USPAP!! Have a
little fun Share useful information
Take home practical information Answer YOUR
Question
This may be a little uncomfortable
4The Question
Is USPAP Good for Residential Appraisers?
5My (Expected) Answer
USPAP Is Good for ALL Appraisers
6Public Trust
USPAP Promotes Public Trust in the Appraisal
ProfessionIt is that trust that makes an
appraisers opinion valuable
7Benefits of USPAP
- Provides common basis for appraisers to follow in
an assignment - Provides protection for appraisers to defend
against unwarranted charges/claims - Provides users and courts a source of reference
- Facilitates uniform enforcement
8Topics For Today
- Who/What is the ASB
- Review of Fundamental Concepts
- Significant Changes for 2005
- Changes for 2004
- Scope of Work vs Departure
- Other Issues
9Appraisal Standards Board
- Danny Wiley, Chair (4 years)
- Carla G. Glass, Vice-Chair (4 years)
- Lawrence E. Ofner (6 years)
- Gregory J. Accetta (2 years)
- Paula K. Konikoff (2 years)
- Dawn M. Molitor Gennrich (2 years)
10Duties of the ASB
- Writes and Interprets the Uniform Standards of
Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP). - Promulgates USPAP
11Primary USPAP Concepts
- Assignment Elements
- Problem Identification
- Scope of Work
12Assignment Elements
- Client Intended Users
- Intended Use
- Type and Definition of Value
- Effective Date
- Assignment Conditions
- Subject Relevant Characteristics
13Problem Identification
14Client Intended Users
- Identified by the appraiser through communication
with the client at the time of the assignment. - Obligations to intended users impose development
and reporting requirements.
15Intended Use
- Established by the client
- Identified by the appraiser through communication
with the client at the time of the assignment - An appraiser must not allow the intended use or a
clients objectives to cause the assignment
results to be biased.
16Intended Use
- Development - scope of work
- Extent of research and analysis
- Reporting - level of detail in report
- Benchmark
- Credibility
- Due Diligence
17Type and Definition of Value
- Provides the objective basis for determining
what kind of information and analysis to
include in these processes.
18Intended Use User
- Provide objective basis for deciding how much
information and analysis to include in the
development and reporting processes
19Effective Date
- Effective date
- Retrospective
- Current
- Prospective
- Date of the report
20Assignment Conditions
- Include, among other things, assumptions,
extraordinary assumptions, hypothetical
conditions, supplemental standards, and
jurisdictional exceptions - Driven by intended use and intended users
21Subject Property
- Relevant characteristics identified by the
appraiser - Relevant characteristics driven by
- Type and definition of value
- Intended use
- Relevant characteristics drive relevance of
Standards Rules
22Problem Identification
23Scope of Work
24Significant Changes for 2005
- Reporting of Exposure Time
- Reporting Requirements Related to Extraordinary
Assumptions and Hypothetical Conditions - When Does USPAP Apply?
25Reporting of Exposure Time
- Currently required to report exposure time
whenever developing an opinion of market value - This requirement is in Statement No. 6
26Reporting of Exposure Time
- Confusion about the term
- Not in the normal reporting Standards
- Is this truly necessary?
27Reporting of Exposure Time
- Starting in 2005, this will be required only when
significant to the assignment
28Extraordinary Assumptions/Hypothetical Conditions
- EXTRAORDINARY ASSUMPTION an assumption, directly
related to a specific assignment, which, if found
to be false, could alter the appraisers opinions
or conclusions.
29Extraordinary Assumptions/Hypothetical Conditions
- HYPOTHETICAL CONDITION that which is contrary to
what exists but is supposed for the purpose of
analysis.
30Extraordinary Assumptions/Hypothetical Conditions
- Currently required to
- Analyze Impact on Value
- Disclose in Conjunction with Each Opinion and
Conclusion Affected
31Extraordinary Assumptions/Hypothetical Conditions
- For 2005 USPAP
- Clear and Conspicuous Disclosure
- Warning in Report
32When Does USPAP Apply?
- AO-21
- Individuals perform numerous roles within the
broad realm of property services
33When Does USPAP Apply?
- What does acting as an appraiser or performing
a service as an appraiser mean? - Acting as an appraiser means representing
oneself as an appraiser - Appraiser is one who is expected to perform
property services competently and in a manner
that is independent, impartial, and objective
34When Does USPAP Apply?
- What are the responsibilities of an appraiser
regarding intended user expectations? - The appraiser has a professional responsibility
to recognize the capacity in which he or she is
performing. The responsibility includes inquiry
about, and recognition of, the clients
expectations.
35When Does USPAP Apply?
- What are the USPAP obligations for property
services outside of appraisal practice? - An appraiser acting in another role must ensure
that intended users are not misled as to the
individuals role in providing that property
service.
36When Does USPAP Apply?
- AO-21 Illustrations
- Brokerage and Appraisal
- Appraisal Review
- Rent Survey
- Appraisal and Market Information
- Property Measurement
372004 Changes - What is it?
38Its a New Assignment
- An appraiser has previously appraised the
property, then is asked to - Readdress (or transfer) the report to another
party - Provide subsequent appraisal involving the
property (update) - Appraise the property for a new client
39Its a New Assignment
- The common feature of these requests is that the
appraiser has previously appraised the property
that is the subject of the new request. - How does an appraiser deal with these situations?
40Its a New Assignment
- Assignments linked to prior assignments
- Update of a Prior Assignment (AO-3)
- Readdressing (Transferring) a Report to Another
Party (AO-26) - Appraising the Same Property for a New Client
(AO-27)
41Assignments are Specific
- The characteristics of a given assignment are
defined by assignment elements - Assignment elements are the basis for
- Scope of work
- Content and level of report
- Assignment results are specific to assignment
elements and the assignment
42Assignments are Specific
- Modification of the assignment elements alter the
scope of work and report content. - When an service is requested on a property that
was the subject of a previous assignment, the
scope of work in the new assignment may be
different from the scope of work in the prior one.
43Readdressing/Transferring
- AO-26
- Simply put, USPAP does not allow readdressing a
report to a new client after the assignment has
been completed
44Readdressing/Transferring
- Why not?
- Intended users intended use are established at
the time of the assignment - Intended users intended use are drivers of
scope of work and report content. Any change
alters assignment. - Solution its a new assignment!
45Update of Prior Assignment
- AO-3
- When a client seeks a more current value or
analysis of a property that was the subject of a
prior assignment, it is simply a new assignment. - Not an extension of a prior assignment-- simply a
new assignment.
46Update of Prior Assignment
- The same USPAP requirements apply when appraising
or analyzing a property that was the subject of a
prior assignment. - Appraiser may incorporate all or part of the
previous analysis and all or part of the previous
report - In certain circumstances, you may incorporate the
previous report by reference
47Update of Prior Assignment
- No restrictions on
- who the appraiser is
- who the client is
- what length of time may have elapsed, or
- whether the characteristics of the subject
property are unchanged or significantly different
than in the prior assignment
48Recertification
USPAP Myth 147 USPAP Does NOT Prohibit
Recertifications of Value It Simply Defines the
Term
49Recertification
- AO-3
- Performed to confirm whether or not the
conditions of a prior appraisal have been met - Does not change the effective date of the value
opinion. - Most common Recertifications of Value are the
final inspection for a new construction appraisal
and compliance inspections.
50Same Property New Client
- AO-27
- Client and the assignment results are specific to
an assignment - If you have a new client, then you must have a
new assignment - New assignment would produce new assignment
results
51Same Property New Client
- New assignment to appraise the same property
would not be considered revealing the first
clients assignment results to the second client,
even if the value conclusions were the same. - Value conclusion could easily be different if the
scope of work changed in any manner
52Same Property New Client
- If a prior assignment included any confidential
information, its disclosure to a different client
or intended user would violate the ETHICS RULE if
the information were still classified as
confidential information
53Its a New Assignment
- Client Expectations
- The decision to be made is about business
practice, not appraisal standards - Obtaining a release is a matter of choice, but
not required by USPAP - Informing a client about the existence of an
assignment for another client may not comply with
confidentiality obligations
54Normal Course of Business
NORMAL COURSE OF BUSINESS AO-24
55Normal Course of Business
- Scope of Work Acceptable When
- Expectations of Market Participants
- Actions of Appraisers Peers
- Appraisers Peers
- Other appraisers who have expertise and
competency in the same or a similar type of
assignment
56Normal Course of Business
Normal Course of Business is NOT - Work
habits of an individual appraiser
57SCOPE PROJECT
58Scope of Work Project
- Exposure Draft Currently Out for Comments
- Biggest Change in 10 Years
- No Real Change
59Scope of Work Project
- Departure a misunderstood concept
- When can you depart?
- Purpose of Departure
60Scope of Work Project
- Look at SR 1-4(b)
- When a cost approach is applicable, an appraiser
must - (i) develop an opinion of site value by an
appropriate appraisal method or technique - (ii) analyze such comparable cost data as are
available to estimate the cost new of the
improvements (if any) and - (iii) analyze such comparable data as are
available to estimate the difference between the
cost new and the present worth of the
improvements (accrued depreciation).
61Scope of Work Project
- When it is applicable, you must do it
- What does applicable mean?
- But this is a Specific Requirement, not a Binding
Requirement - Is it necessary for credible results
- Really, must you do the cost
- approach whenever it is applicable?
62Scope of Work Project
- Pieces of the Puzzle
- Standards Rules
- DEFINITIONS
- DEPARTURE RULE
- Applicable
- Necessary
63Scope of Work Project
- You MUST do a Cost Approach When it is Necessary
for Credible Results
64Scope of Work Project
- Proposed New Version of SR 1-4(b)
- When a cost approach is necessary for credible
results, an appraiser must.
65Scope of Work Project
- No change to existing requirements for the work
you must do - More simple statement of the requirement
- New SCOPE OF WORK RULE to lay out obligations for
developing the Scope of Work, and effectively
communicating it in the report
66Fannie Mae Forms
- ASB has NOT reviewed, approved, endorsed, etc.,
the new forms - We will be submitting comments to Fannie Mae
67Fannie Mae Forms
- Forms do NOT comply with USPAP, appraisers do
- Forms help organize presentation
- No form could comply for ALL assignments
68The End