Generic Simulation Approach for Multi-Axis Machining, Part 2: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Generic Simulation Approach for Multi-Axis Machining, Part 2:

Description:

Demonstrate results through airfoil case study. Methodology. Model Calibration ... Case Study: 'Airfoil like surface' 19mm solid carbide ball end mill. 30 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:37
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: fami351
Learn more at: http://www.et.byu.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Generic Simulation Approach for Multi-Axis Machining, Part 2:


1
Generic Simulation Approach for Multi-Axis
Machining, Part 2
  • Model Calibration and Feed Rate Scheduling
  • Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering
    (August 2002)
  • T. Bailey
  • M. A. Elbestawi
  • T. I. El-Wardany
  • P. Fitzpartick
  • Presented By
  • Levi Haupt
  • 22 March 2014
  • ME 482

2
Overview
  • Development of Least-Squares Fit model of
    multi-axis machining
  • Process optimization for specified parameters
  • Determine instantaneous feed rate based on load
    prediction model
  • Improve machining time while maintaining
    geometric specifications

3
Outline
  • Purpose of Paper
  • Methodology
  • Results
  • Conclusion

4
Purpose of Paper
  • Develop methodology to simulate machining of
    complex surfaces (Calibrating Coefficients)
  • Validate simulated results with experimental data
  • Demonstrate results through airfoil case study

5
Methodology
  • Model Calibration
  • Calibration of cutting for coefficients
  • Formulate force model to separate cutting force
    coefficients and geometric factors
  • Cutting test performed varying cutting speed,
    feed rate, axial depth of cut, radial width of
    cut, from test cutting force data obtained
  • Coefficients found from test data utilizing
    Least-Square Fit Regression
  • Feed per tooth coefficients found from constant
    feed rate coefficient
  • Average Coefficients found from tooth
    coefficients

6
Methodology
Calibration Results Solid line coefficient from
step 4 Third graphs comparison of coefficients
7
Methodology
  • Feed Rate Scheduling
  • Variation of feed rate will prevent tool damage
    (chatter) and improve surface finish
  • Productivity traditionally decreased to improve
    process parameters
  • Process constraints shank and tooth breakage,
    chatter limits, surface dimensional error
  • Utilizing chip load or force constraints will
    satisfy all other constraints
  • Roughing Max force constraint
  • Finishing Max chip load constraint
  • Feed rate determined for instantaneous cut
    geometry and forces based on constraints

8
Results
  • Average Coefficient model predictions of loads
    within 5 of experimental data
  • Case Study Airfoil like surface
  • 19mm solid carbide ball end mill
  • 30 roughing passes

Roughing Stages
Surface Profile
9
Results
Approximately 30 reduction in machine time with
implemented feed rate schedule methodology
Feed Schedule 210 seconds
No feed schedule 293 seconds
10
Conclusion
  • Successful analytical model
  • Demonstrated accurate force predictions
  • Within 5 of experimental data
  • Versatile for complex machining surfaces
  • Can also be used to predict static and dynamic
    tool deflections, dynamic cutting forces
  • Technical Advancements
  • Improved model accuracy
  • Improve feed rate scheduling
  • 30 reduction of machining time
  • Methodology implemented in industry
  • Possible limitations
  • Excitation of dynamics in feed rate controller
    system
  • Parallel research was conducted (source 17)

11
References
12
Questions?
Happy Halloween!!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com