Optical Signaling IntraDomain, Next Generation Optical Control Planes, and Photonic Path Services - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Optical Signaling IntraDomain, Next Generation Optical Control Planes, and Photonic Path Services

Description:

Optical Signaling (Intra-Domain), Next Generation Optical Control ... Single master is single point of policy control and single Delphic Oracle of network state ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:53
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: joem178
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Optical Signaling IntraDomain, Next Generation Optical Control Planes, and Photonic Path Services


1
  • Optical Signaling (Intra-Domain), Next Generation
    Optical Control Planes, and Photonic Path
    Services
  • Joe Mambretti, Jeremy Weinberger, David
    Lillethun, International Center for Advanced
    Internet Research, Northwestern University --
    http//www.icair.org
  • OptIPuter
  • Feb 6-7, 2003

iCAIR
2
The Global Lambda Grid Concepts
  • Q How can data-intensive, bandwidth-intensive,
    and compute-intensive global applications
    interact dynamically with highly distributed
    resources while optimizing performance under
    changing conditions?
  • A1 Liberate applications from the multiple
    restrictions inherent in todays communication
    infrastructure
  • A2 Create an innovative architectural method
    that envisions a close integration between
    applications and advanced optical network
    resources, allowing for communication services
    that are dramatically more dynamic, flexible,
    responsive, powerful etc.
  • A3 Allow applications to use intelligent
    signaling to design, provision, and manage their
    own global virtual private optical networks
    through lightpaths, based on wavelength switching
  • Key technologies
  • a) Innovative intelligent application signaling
    architecture
  • b) Dynamic lambda/lightpath provisioning using
    next generation optical technologies,
  • c) Extensions to lightpaths through dynamically
    provisioned L2 and L3 configurations, in part, to
    allow for access to multiple types of edge
    resources.

iCAIR
3
Prototyping The Global Lambda Grid A
Photonic-Switched Experimental Network of Light
Paths
l1
l2
iCAIR
4
Apps
Clusters
C O N T R O L P L A N E
Dynamically Allocated Lightpaths


NEW!
Switch Fabrics
Physical Monitoring
Multi-leveled Architecture
iCAIR
5
10GE Links
GE Links
iCAIR
CSW
ASW
IEEE 802.3 LAN PHY Interface, eg, 15xx nm 10GE
serial
l1 l2 l3 l4
10GE Links
Multiwavelength Fiber
Multiple l Per Fiber
ASW
DWDM Links
GE Links

NNN
Multiwavelength Optical Amplifier
  • Optical,
  • l Monitors, for
  • Wavelength Precision, etc.

Power Spectral Density Processor, Source
Measured PSD
Computer Clusters Each Node 1GE Multi 10s,
100s, 1000s of Nodes
Multiple Optical Impairment Issues, Including
Accumulations
iCAIR
6
Control Plane Architecture
  • 4 primary architectural models for data/IP over
    DWDM (Overlay, Signaled Overlay, Peer,
    Integrated)
  • Currently, signaled overlay is a primary
    architecture and is being using on the
    StarLight/OMNInet testbed
  • Requires out of band management plane
  • Currently, control plane has been implemented on
    separate fiber
  • Later, it will be implemented on dedicated
    lightpaths

iCAIR
7
Optical Layer Control Plane
Client Layer Control Plane
Client Controller
Optical Layer Control Plane
UNI
Controller
Controller
Controller
Controller
Controller
I-UNI
CI
CI
CI
Client Device
Client Layer Traffic Plane
Optical Layer Switched Traffic Plane
iCAIR
8
Application Signaling and ODIN
  • Simple Lightpath Control Protocol Specification
    (SLCP)
  • Signaling - the request for services by a device
    peer, a user, or an app (LDP/RSVP/SOAP
    req/TeraAPI message to Optical Service Layer)
  • Also this architecture includes a concept of
    understanding changing network conditions via
    detecting feedback from the network
  • Signaling vs Control
  • Control - commands issued by an administrator
  • Although results may look similar on the fiber,
    the first is subject to policy, the second (when
    valid) is always implemented
  • ODIN Optical Dynamic Intelligent Network
    services
  • ODIN An Architecture for Dynamic Network
    Service Provisioning
  • Terascale High-Performance Optical Resource
    Regulator (THOR) the Lambda God Extensions
    allowing for others types of path services

iCAIR
9
ODIN Architectural Issues
  • What problem is being addressed?
  • - Dynamic optimized provisioning of optical
    paths for application traffic
  • - GMPLS-controlled DWDM is layer one only -
    layers two and three must be also be
    addressed/configured or the lambda path is
    useless
  • - Application can request specific
    types/classes of service, i.e., premium network
    service, e.g. protected capacity, jitter
    tolerances
  • - Single, simple domain of control - no
    restrictions on implementation types (e.g.,
    hierarchical vs. peer model)
  • Currently using signaled overlay architecture
  • Does not preclude peering model
  • - Can be used to limiting the impact of
    potentially disruptive, resource-intensive
    traffic on other types of traffic (e.g.,
    best-effort)
  • This simple architecture could be enhanced to
    address complex architectures, e.g. large
    domains, multiple domains.
  • E.g., diagram of tree of odins, or chain of odins
  • Policy engine is required

iCAIR
10
ODIN
  • ODIN in a Nutshell
  • - A single point of policy control for network
    service provisioning
  • - Applications talk to the front end, identify
    themselves and make their request ("I need at
    least n Mbps of capacity between A and B at xyzw
    hours with maximum jitter q.")
  • -Applications will be able to detect, and adjust
    to, quality of performance
  • - ODIN's processes attempt to implement a
    globally optimal provisioning, considering all
    real-time information available, eg, using
    wavepath distribution protocol
  • - ODIN's back end controls network hardware,
    configuring it to fulfill the provisioned
    request, eg using a wavepath routing protcol

iCAIR
11
Advantages of Architecture
  • Opportunities for global optimization
  • Opportunities to consider real-time resource
    state
  • Single master is single point of policy control
    and single Delphic Oracle of network state
  • Frontends and backends can be modules to support
    different kinds of requests and different kinds
    of network equipment and multiple layers of the
    network
  • Sites can easily provide their own policy for
    releasing resources (timeouts, allocation
    mechanisms, flow monitoring)
  • Simple domains can be tied together to manage
    complex domains
  • Application interface is simple, requiring little
    detailed network knowledge from app developers
  • Encapsulates network resource discovery for
    applications
  • Service requests are explicit, out of band
  • Allows for greater abstraction of network
    resources moves logic out of network hardware,
    therefore - more flexibility

iCAIR
12
Provisioning Application Traffic to Lightpaths
  • Q Can different applications share a lightpath?
    i.e. are their service profiles compatible?
  • Q What protections must be put in L2/L3
    equipment to enforce provisioning? e.g.
    classification/labeling, policing, class-based
    queueing
  • The Comprehensive Vision
  • - ODIN includes dynamic resource discovery of
    new network resources
  • - ODIN uses real-time monitoring of network
    hardware or traffic flows to make decisions
  • - ODIN relies on manager-controlled policy
    engine
  • - ODIN configures access devices to do full
    classification and admission control
  • - ODIN configures core/distribution devices to
    provide appropriate QoS to classes
  • - ODIN is supported at the physical layer by
    physical process monitoring and automatic
    impairment detection and adjustment

iCAIR
13
Current Implementation
  • Prototype architecture defined, prototype
    libraries developed
  • Implementations tested/demonstrated, eg,
    iGRID2002 et al
  • "TeraAPI" is a C interface implementing frontend
  • Discovery Domain topology is known in advance
  • Frontend Custom stateless TCP-based request
    protocol
  • Policy Each service request receives its own
    lambda
  • Backends
  • 1. Optical backend THOR (Terascale High
    Performance Optical Resource-Regulator)
  • 2. Ethernet backend DEITI (Dynamic Ethernet
    Intelligent Transport Interface
  • Higher layers are configured to move traffic to
    new LAN segment transported over the assigned
    lambda
  • Dynamic light path provisioning supported by MEMS
  • Supported by wavelength routing protocols and
    wavelength information distribution protocols
    (eg, to propagate state information across nodes).

iCAIR
14
DEITI
  • DEITI Dynamic Ethernet Intelligent Transport
    Interface
  • One goal in this dynamic provisioning of vLANs is
    to extend the transport path beyond the lightpath
  • Another is to to segment traffic to protect other
    traffic from disruptive, intensive flows
    (encapsulation and transport over lightpaths).
  • DEITI can be an MPLS substitute/proxy
  • DEITI and UoA vLAN implementations are seed
    examples of the extensions that could be
    implemented to use other methods, eg, enforcing
    QoS, and establishing full AAA that could protect
    these methods.

iCAIR
15
PTS (CGI)
odin_cli
Simple Lightpath Control Protocol
Specification (SLCP) Architectural Overview
TeraAPI
ODIN
THOR
OMNInet UNI API
DEITI
SR Static Routes or 802.1q vLANs
GMPLS/ DWDM
iCAIR
16
OMNInet Technology Trial
Evanston
West Taylor
GE
GE
Optical Switching Platform
Optical Switching Platform
Passport 8600
Passport 8600
Application Cluster
Application Cluster
OPTera Metro 5200
OPTera Metro 5200
S. Federal
Lakeshore
To CaNet4 (future)
10GbE WAN
Loop Back
GE
GE
Optical Switching Platform
Passport 8600
Application Cluster
Optical Switching Platform
Application Cluster
Passport 8600
OPTera Metro 5200
  • A four site network in Chicago -- the first 10GE
    service trial!
  • A test bed for all-optical switching, advanced
    high-speed services, and and new applications
    including high-performance streaming media and
    collaborative applications for health-care,
    financial, and commercial services.
  • Partners SBC, Nortel, International Center for
    Advanced Internet Research (iCAIR) at
    Northwestern, Electronic Visualization Lab at
    Univ of Illinois, Argonne National Lab, CANARIE

iCAIR
17
Testbed Configuration
iCAIR
EVL UIC
8 l AWG
NWUEN-1
OFA
OFA
NWUEN-5
NWUEN-2
NWUEN-3
NWUEN-6
l1
l2
l1
l2
l3
l3

SW
Up to 8 l Per fiber
OFA
10/100/GE
10/100/GE
SW
StarLight
ADM
OC-12 to MREN
10/100/GE
NWUEN-8
NWUEN-9
To Optical MREN
Fiber
NWUEN-4
NWUEN-7
To CANet4, SURFnet and Other International Nets
  • Scalable photonic switch
  • Trunk side 10 G WDM
  • Lambda specific interface

SW
10 GbE WAN
10/100/GE
Canet4
iCAIR
18
Overlay Management Network (Current)
To Management Network ATM switch port
10/100 BT
BayStack 350
Photonic Switch
OPTera 5200 OLA
10/100 BT
Local Management Station
  • MREN

Passport 8600
  • Uses ATM PVC with 2 Mb/s CIR from existing
    network (MREN OC12)
  • Hub and spoke network from 710 Lakeshore Dr.

iCAIR
19
iCAIR
Chicago
O1
O2
GigE
GigE
SX
GigE
StarLight
GigE
?
259M
270M/540M
?
GigE
OMNINET
NTSC/SDI
Omninet
GigE
?
GigE
?
GigE
240M/480M
IPS Linux
Netherlight
10 Gpbs
?
2.5 Gbps
?
?
?
OMNINET
380M
GigE
GigE
SurfNet
SURFnet
Linux
O3
O4
UIC/EVL/ LAC NCDM
400M/900M
Linux Traffic Generator
100M
GigE
DV
NU Leverone
Evanston, IL
iGrid 2002
240M/480M
Linux/IPS
Laptop
GigE TX
100M TX
GigE TX
SARAnet
400M/900M
Window DV/Linux
100M TX
Linux Traffic Gen
30M/60M
GigE SX
270M540M
Photonic TeraStream Photonic Data Services
Display
100M TX
Amsterdam
Nelle Bacon iCAIR August 21, 2002
259M
iCAIR
20
Selected Related Activities
  • OptIPuter General Architecture
  • OptIPuter Network Architecture, with Oliver Yu et
    al, EVL, UIC
  • Data Services Photonic Data Services, with
    Bob Grossman et al LAC, NCDM, UIC
  • Intelligent application signaling projects, with
    Tom DeFanti, Jason Leigh, Olivar Yu et al, EVL,
    UIC
  • IETF (I)AAA, with Cees DeLaat et al UoA
  • UoA goal in the dynamic control of vLANs is to
    demonstrate the principles of generic AAA in the
    provisioning of resources
  • Performance metrics, analysis, optimization,
    e.g., with Valerie Taylor
  • DOT, Consortium (OMNInet/I-WIRE)
  • DOT-DAS-2, Cees DeLaat, et al, UoA
  • Scheduling? (TBD)
  • Globus Considerations

iCAIR
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com